5-Methylcytosine

5-Methylcytosine is a methylated form of the DNA base cytosine (C) that regulates gene transcription and takes several other biological roles.[1] When cytosine is methylated, the DNA maintains the same sequence, but the expression of methylated genes can be altered (the study of this is part of the field of epigenetics). 5-Methylcytosine is incorporated in the nucleoside 5-methylcytidine.

5-Methylcytosine
Names
Preferred IUPAC name
4-Amino-5-methylpyrimidin-2(1H)-one
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
3DMet
120387
ChEBI
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.008.236
EC Number
  • 209-058-3
KEGG
MeSH 5-Methylcytosine
UNII
  • InChI=1S/C5H7N3O/c1-3-2-7-5(9)8-4(3)6/h2H,1H3,(H3,6,7,8,9) checkY
    Key: LRSASMSXMSNRBT-UHFFFAOYSA-N checkY
  • InChI=1/C5H7N3O/c1-3-2-7-5(9)8-4(3)6/h2H,1H3,(H3,6,7,8,9)
    Key: LRSASMSXMSNRBT-UHFFFAOYAO
  • O=C1/N=C\C(=C(\N)N1)C
  • Cc1cnc(=O)[nH]c1N
Properties
C5H7N3O
Molar mass 125.131 g·mol−1
Hazards
GHS labelling:
GHS07: Exclamation mark
Warning
H317, H319
P261, P264, P272, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P321, P333+P313, P337+P313, P363, P501
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
checkY verify (what is checkY☒N ?)
Infobox references

In 5-methylcytosine, a methyl group is attached to the 5th atom in the 6-atom ring, counting counterclockwise from the NH-bonded nitrogen at the six o'clock position. This methyl group distinguishes 5-methylcytosine from cytosine.

Discovery

While trying to isolate the bacterial toxin responsible for tuberculosis, W.G. Ruppel isolated a novel nucleic acid named tuberculinic acid in 1898 from Tubercle bacillus.[2] The nucleic acid was found to be unusual, in that it contained in addition to thymine, guanine and cytosine, a methylated nucleotide. In 1925, Johnson and Coghill successfully detected a minor amount of a methylated cytosine derivative as a product of hydrolysis of tuberculinic acid with sulfuric acid.[3][4] This report was severely criticized because their identification was based solely on the optical properties of the crystalline picrate, and other scientists failed to reproduce the same result.[5] But its existence was ultimately proven in 1948, when Hotchkiss separated the nucleic acids of DNA from calf thymus using paper chromatography, by which he detected a unique methylated cytosine, quite distinct from conventional cytosine and uracil.[6] After seven decades, it turned out that it is also a common feature in different RNA molecules, although the precise role is uncertain.[7]

In vivo

The function of this chemical varies significantly among species:[8]

  • In bacteria, 5-methylcytosine can be found at a variety of sites, and is often used as a marker to protect DNA from being cut by native methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes.
  • In plants, 5-methylcytosine occurs at CpG, CpHpG and CpHpH sequences (where H = A, C or T).
  • In fungi and animals, 5-methylcytosine predominantly occurs at CpG dinucleotides. Most eukaryotes methylate only a small percentage of these sites, but 70-80% of CpG cytosines are methylated in vertebrates. In mammalian cells, clusters of CpG at the 5' ends of genes are termed CpG islands.[9] 1% of all mammalian DNA is 5mC.[10]

While spontaneous deamination of cytosine forms uracil, which is recognized and removed by DNA repair enzymes, deamination of 5-methylcytosine forms thymine. This conversion of a DNA base from cytosine (C) to thymine (T) can result in a transition mutation.[11] In addition, active enzymatic deamination of cytosine or 5-methylcytosine by the APOBEC family of cytosine deaminases could have beneficial implications on various cellular processes as well as on organismal evolution.[12] The implications of deamination on 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, on the other hand, remains less understood.

In vitro

The NH2 group can be removed (deamination) from 5-methylcytosine to form thymine with use of reagents such as nitrous acid; cytosine deaminates to uracil (U) under similar conditions.

Deamination of 5-methylcytosine to thymine

5-methylcytosine is resistant to deamination by bisulfite treatment, which deaminates cytosine residues. This property is often exploited to analyze DNA cytosine methylation patterns with bisulfite sequencing.[13]

Addition and regulation with DNMTs (Eukaryotes)

5mC marks are placed on genomic DNA via DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). There are 5 DNMTs in humans: DNMT1, DNMT2, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, and DNMT3L, and in algae and fungi 3 more are present (DNMT4, DNMT5, and DNMT6).[14] DNMT1 contains the replication foci targeting sequence (RFTS) and the CXXC domain which catalyze the addition of 5mC marks. RFTS directs DNMT1 to loci of DNA replication to assist in the maintenance of 5mC on daughter strands during DNA replication, whereas CXXC contains a zinc finger domain for de novo addition of methylation to the DNA.[15] DNMT1 was found to be the predominant DNA methyltransferase in all human tissue.[16] Primarily, DNMT3A and DNMT3B are responsible for de novo methylation, and DNMT1 maintains the 5mC mark after replication.[1] DNMTs can interact with each other to increase methylating capability. For example, 2 DNMT3L can form a complex with 2 DNMT3A to improve interactions with the DNA, facilitating the methylation.[17] Changes in the expression of DNMT results in aberrant methylation. Overexpression produces increased methylation, whereas disruption of the enzyme decreased levels of methylation.[16]

DNMT reaction mechanism
Addition of methyl group to cytosine

The mechanism of the addition is as follows: first a cysteine residue on the DNMT's PCQ motif creates a nucleophillic attack at carbon 6 on the cytosine nucleotide that is to be methylated. S-Adenosylmethionine then donates a methyl group to carbon 5. A base in the DNMT enzyme deprotonates the residual hydrogen on carbon 5 restoring the double bond between carbon 5 and 6 in the ring, producing the 5-methylcytosine base pair.[15]

Demethylation

After a cytosine is methylated to 5mC, it can be reversed back to its initial state via multiple mechanisms. Passive DNA demethylation by dilution eliminates the mark gradually through replication by a lack of maintenance by DNMT. In active DNA demethylation, a series of oxidations converts it to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC), and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC), and the latter two are eventually excised by thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), followed by base excision repair (BER) to restore the cytosine.[1] TDG knockout produced a 2-fold increase of 5fC without any statistically significant change to levels of 5hmC, indicating 5mC must be iteratively oxidized at least twice before its full demethylation.[18] The oxidation occurs through the TET (Ten-eleven translocation) family dioxygenases (TET enzymes) which can convert 5mC, 5hmC, and 5fC to their oxidized forms. However, the enzyme has the greatest preference for 5mC and the initial reaction rate for 5hmC and 5fC conversions with TET2 are 4.9-7.6 fold slower.[19] TET requires Fe(II) as cofactor, and oxygen and α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) as substrates, and the latter substrate is generated from isocitrate by the enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH).[20] Cancer however can produce 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) which competes with α-KG, reducing TET activity, and in turn reducing conversion of 5mC to 5hmC.[21]

Role in humans

In cancer

In cancer, DNA can become both overly methylated, termed hypermethylation, and under-methylated, termed hypomethylation.[22] CpG islands overlapping gene promoters are de novo methylated resulting in aberrant inactivation of genes normally associated with growth inhibition of tumors (an example of hypermethylation).[23] Comparing tumor and normal tissue, the former had elevated levels of the methyltransferases DNMT1, DNMT3A, and mostly DNMT3B, all of which are associated with the abnormal levels of 5mC in cancer.[16] Repeat sequences in the genome, including satellite DNA, Alu, and long interspersed elements (LINE), are often seen hypomethylated in cancer, resulting in expression of these normally silenced genes, and levels are often significant markers of tumor progression.[22] It has been hypothesized that there a connection between the hypermethylation and hypomethylation; over activity of DNA methyltransferases that produce the abnormal de novo 5mC methylation may be compensated by the removal of methylation, a type of epigenetic repair. However, the removal of methylation is inefficient resulting in an overshoot of genome-wide hypomethylation. The contrary may also be possible; over expression of hypomethylation may be silenced by genome-wide hypermethylation.[22] Cancer hallmark capabilities are likely acquired through epigenetic changes that alter the 5mC in both the cancer cells and in surrounding tumor-associated stroma within the tumor microenvironment.[24] The anticancer drug Cisplatin has been reported to react with 5mC.[25]

As a biomarker of aging

"Epigenetic age" refers to the connection between chronological age and levels of DNA methylation in the genome.[26] Coupling the levels of DNA methylation, in specific sets of CpGs called "clock CpGs", with algorithms that regress the typical levels of collective genome-wide methylation at a given chronological age, allow for epigenetic age prediction. During youth (0–20 years old), changes in DNA methylation occur at a faster rate as development and growth progresses, and the changes begin to slow down at older ages. Multiple epigenetic age estimators exist. Horvath's clock measures a multi-tissue set of 353 CpGs, half of which positively correlate with age, and the other half negatively, to estimate the epigenetic age.[27] Hannum's clock utilizes adult blood samples to calculate age based on an orthogonal basis of 71 CpGs.[28] Levine's clock, known as DNAm PhenoAge, depends on 513 CpGs and surpasses the other age estimators in predicting mortality and lifespan, yet displays bias with non-blood tissues.[29] There are reports of age estimators with the methylation state of only one CpG in the gene ELOVL2.[30] Estimation of age allows for prediction lifespan through expectations of age related conditions that individuals may be subject to based on their 5mC methylation markers.

References
  1. Wu, Xiaoji; Zhang, Yi (2017-05-30). "TET-mediated active DNA demethylation: mechanism, function and beyond". Nature Reviews Genetics. 18 (9): 517–534. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.33. ISSN 1471-0056. PMID 28555658. S2CID 3393814.
  2. Matthews AP (2012). Physiological Chemistry. Williams & Wilkins Company/. p. 167. ISBN 978-1130145373.
  3. Johnson TB, Coghill RD (1925). "The discovery of 5-methyl-cytosine in tuberculinic acid, the nucleic acid of the Tubercle bacillus". J Am Chem Soc. 47 (11): 2838–2844. doi:10.1021/ja01688a030.
  4. Grosjean H (2009). Nucleic Acids Are Not Boring Long Polymers of Only Four Types of Nucleotides: A Guided Tour. Landes Bioscience.
  5. Vischer E, Zamenhof S, Chargaff E (1949). "Microbial nucleic acids: the desoxypentose nucleic acids of avian tubercle bacilli and yeast". J Biol Chem. 177 (1): 429–438. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)57100-3. PMID 18107446.
  6. Hotchkiss RD (1948). "The quantitative separation of purines, pyrimidines and nucleosides by paper chromatography". J Biol Chem. 175 (1): 315–332. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)57261-6. PMID 18873306.
  7. Squires JE, Patel HR, Nousch M, Sibbritt T, Humphreys DT, Parker BJ, Suter CM, Preiss T (2012). "Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA". Nucleic Acids Res. 40 (11): 5023–5033. doi:10.1093/nar/gks144. PMC 3367185. PMID 22344696.
  8. Colot V, Rossignol JL (1999). "Eukaryotic DNA methylation as an evolutionary device". BioEssays. 21 (5): 402–411. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199905)21:5<402::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-B. PMID 10376011. S2CID 10784130.
  9. Bird, Adrian P. (May 1986). "CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation". Nature. 321 (6067): 209–213. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..209B. doi:10.1038/321209a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 2423876. S2CID 4236677.
  10. Ehrlich, M.; Wang, R. Y. (1981-06-19). "5-Methylcytosine in eukaryotic DNA". Science. 212 (4501): 1350–1357. Bibcode:1981Sci...212.1350E. doi:10.1126/science.6262918. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 6262918.
  11. Sassa A, Kanemaru Y, Kamoshita N, Honma M, Yasui M (2016). "Mutagenic consequences of cytosine alterations site-specifically embedded in the human genome". Genes and Environment. 38 (1): 17. doi:10.1186/s41021-016-0045-9. PMC 5007816. PMID 27588157.
  12. Chahwan R, Wontakal SN, Roa S (2010). "Crosstalk between genetic and epigenetic information through cytosine deamination". Trends in Genetics. 26 (10): 443–448. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2010.07.005. PMID 20800313.
  13. Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL, Frommer M (1994). "High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines". Nucleic Acids Res. 22 (15): 2990–2997. doi:10.1093/nar/22.15.2990. PMC 310266. PMID 8065911.
  14. Ponger, Loïc; Li, Wen-Hsiung (2005-04-01). "Evolutionary Diversification of DNA Methyltransferases in Eukaryotic Genomes". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 22 (4): 1119–1128. doi:10.1093/molbev/msi098. ISSN 0737-4038. PMID 15689527.
  15. Lyko, Frank (February 2018). "The DNA methyltransferase family: a versatile toolkit for epigenetic regulation". Nature Reviews Genetics. 19 (2): 81–92. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.80. ISSN 1471-0064. PMID 29033456. S2CID 23370418.
  16. Robertson, K D; Uzvolgyi, E; Liang, G; Talmadge, C; Sumegi, J; Gonzales, F A; Jones, P A (1999-06-01). "The human DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) 1, 3a and 3b: coordinate mRNA expression in normal tissues and overexpression in tumors". Nucleic Acids Research. 27 (11): 2291–2298. doi:10.1093/nar/27.11.2291. ISSN 0305-1048. PMC 148793. PMID 10325416.
  17. Jia, Da; Jurkowska, Renata Z.; Zhang, Xing; Jeltsch, Albert; Cheng, Xiaodong (September 2007). "Structure of Dnmt3a bound to Dnmt3L suggests a model for de novo DNA methylation". Nature. 449 (7159): 248–251. Bibcode:2007Natur.449..248J. doi:10.1038/nature06146. ISSN 1476-4687. PMC 2712830. PMID 17713477.
  18. Song, Chun-Xiao; Szulwach, Keith E.; Dai, Qing; Fu, Ye; Mao, Shi-Qing; Lin, Li; Street, Craig; Li, Yujing; Poidevin, Mickael; Wu, Hao; Gao, Juan (2013-04-25). "Genome-wide profiling of 5-formylcytosine reveals its roles in epigenetic priming". Cell. 153 (3): 678–691. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.001. ISSN 1097-4172. PMC 3657391. PMID 23602153.
  19. Ito, Shinsuke; Shen, Li; Dai, Qing; Wu, Susan C.; Collins, Leonard B.; Swenberg, James A.; He, Chuan; Zhang, Yi (2011-09-02). "Tet Proteins Can Convert 5-Methylcytosine to 5-Formylcytosine and 5-Carboxylcytosine". Science. 333 (6047): 1300–1303. Bibcode:2011Sci...333.1300I. doi:10.1126/science.1210597. ISSN 0036-8075. PMC 3495246. PMID 21778364.
  20. Lu, Xingyu; Zhao, Boxuan Simen; He, Chuan (2015-02-12). "TET Family Proteins: Oxidation Activity, Interacting Molecules, and Functions in Diseases". Chemical Reviews. 115 (6): 2225–2239. doi:10.1021/cr500470n. ISSN 0009-2665. PMC 4784441. PMID 25675246.
  21. Xu, Wei; Yang, Hui; Liu, Ying; Yang, Ying; Wang, Ping; Kim, Se-Hee; Ito, Shinsuke; Yang, Chen; Wang, Pu; Xiao, Meng-Tao; Liu, Li-xia (2011-01-18). "Oncometabolite 2-Hydroxyglutarate Is a Competitive Inhibitor of α-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenases". Cancer Cell. 19 (1): 17–30. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.014. ISSN 1535-6108. PMC 3229304. PMID 21251613.
  22. Ehrlich, Melanie (2009-12-01). "DNA hypomethylation in cancer cells". Epigenomics. 1 (2): 239–259. doi:10.2217/epi.09.33. ISSN 1750-1911. PMC 2873040. PMID 20495664.
  23. Jones, Peter A. (1996-06-01). "DNA Methylation Errors and Cancer". Cancer Research. 56 (11): 2463–2467. ISSN 0008-5472. PMID 8653676.
  24. Hanahan, Douglas; Weinberg, Robert A. (2011-03-04). "Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation". Cell. 144 (5): 646–674. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. ISSN 0092-8674. PMID 21376230.
  25. Menke, Annika; Dubini, Romeo C.A.; Mayer, Peter; Rovó, Petra; Daumann, Lena (2020-10-23). "Formation of Cisplatin Adducts with the Epigenetically-relevant Nucleobase 5-Methylcytosine". European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2021: 30–36. doi:10.1002/ejic.202000898. ISSN 1434-1948.
  26. Horvath, Steve; Raj, Kenneth (June 2018). "DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing". Nature Reviews Genetics. 19 (6): 371–384. doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3. ISSN 1471-0064. PMID 29643443. S2CID 4709691.
  27. Horvath, Steve (2013-12-10). "DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types". Genome Biology. 14 (10): 3156. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. ISSN 1474-760X. PMC 4015143. PMID 24138928.
  28. Hannum, Gregory; Guinney, Justin; Zhao, Ling; Zhang, Li; Hughes, Guy; Sadda, SriniVas; Klotzle, Brandy; Bibikova, Marina; Fan, Jian-Bing; Gao, Yuan; Deconde, Rob (2013-01-24). "Genome-wide Methylation Profiles Reveal Quantitative Views of Human Aging Rates". Molecular Cell. 49 (2): 359–367. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016. ISSN 1097-2765. PMC 3780611. PMID 23177740.
  29. Levine, Morgan E.; Lu, Ake T.; Quach, Austin; Chen, Brian H.; Assimes, Themistocles L.; Bandinelli, Stefania; Hou, Lifang; Baccarelli, Andrea A.; Stewart, James D.; Li, Yun; Whitsel, Eric A. (2018-04-17). "An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan". Aging (Albany NY). 10 (4): 573–591. doi:10.18632/aging.101414. ISSN 1945-4589. PMC 5940111. PMID 29676998.
  30. Garagnani, Paolo; Bacalini, Maria G.; Pirazzini, Chiara; Gori, Davide; Giuliani, Cristina; Mari, Daniela; Blasio, Anna M. Di; Gentilini, Davide; Vitale, Giovanni; Collino, Sebastiano; Rezzi, Serge (2012). "Methylation of ELOVL2 gene as a new epigenetic marker of age". Aging Cell. 11 (6): 1132–1134. doi:10.1111/acel.12005. hdl:11585/128353. ISSN 1474-9726. PMID 23061750. S2CID 8775590.

Literature
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.