Access to Medicine Index

The Access to Medicine Index is a ranking system published biennially since 2008 by the Access to Medicine Foundation in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, an international not-for-profit organisation, funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Axa Investment Managers.[1][2] It ranks the world's 20 largest pharmaceutical companies according to their ability to make their pharmaceutical drugs more available, affordable, accessible and acceptable in 106 low- to middle-income countries.[3] The biennial index aims to stimulate industry to improve access in developing countries, to show the activities of their peers,[4][5] and allow them, governments, investors, civil society, patient organisations and academia to gather and form a common view of how pharmaceutical companies can make further progress.

Ranking

The latest Access to Medicine Index, published in January 2021, ranked the top 20 pharmaceutical companies as follows:[6][2]

Company name (2022 score) 2022 ranking 2021 ranking2018 ranking2016 ranking
GSK plc (4.06) 1 111
Johnson & Johnson (4.03) 2 323
AstraZeneca plc. (3.93) 3 732
Novartis AG (3.87) 4 2 11 14
Merck KGaA (3.72) 5 8 7 6
Pfizer Inc (3.62) 6 4 5 15
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd (3.51) 7 6 9 7
Sanofi (3.47) 8 544
Bayer AG (3.36) 9 131019
Roche Holding AG (3.23) 10 9610
Novo Nordisk A/S (2.97) 11 10811
Eisai Co. Ltd (2.95) 12 111416
Boehringer Ingelheim (2.93) 13 121612
Gilead Sciences (2.84) 14 141920
Bristol Myers Squibb (2.60) 15 19138
Astellas Pharma Inc (2.46) 16 14125
Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd (2.20) 17 161818
Merck & Co. Inc (2.15) 18 15179
AbbVie Inc (1.84) 19 172017
Eli Lilly & Co (1.79) 20 181513

History

The Access to Medicine Index was developed starting in 2004 on the initiative of Dutch entrepreneur Wim Leereveld.[7] After years of working with the pharmaceutical industry, he concluded that simply "naming and shaming" the industry did not do enough to encourage pharmaceutical companies to play their part in improving access to medicine in the developing world. Leereveld noticed that there were many different (and sometimes conflicting) opinions about what the pharmaceutical industry should be doing with regard to access to medicine, but that there was no tool to recognise good practice within the pharmaceutical industry and no framework for collective dialogue surrounding this issue. He set out to develop a ranking system that would show which pharmaceutical companies do the most to improve access to medicine and how, and also help stakeholders to collectively define companies' role in increasing access to medicine.[7]

The first Access to Medicine Index was published in 2008, followed by a new index every two years.[8]

Methodology

The 2017 methodology for the 2018 Access to Medicine Index was published in October 2017.[3]

The Access to Medicine Index uses a weighted analysis to capture and compare data which the companies provide. The framework is constructed along seven areas of focus called "Technical Areas", which cover the range of company business activities considered relevant to access to medicine. Within each area, the index assesses four aspects of company action called "Strategic Pillars": commitments, transparency, performance and innovation.[3]

Scope

Company scope The Access to Medicine Index ranks 20 of the world's largest originator (research-based) pharmaceutical companies, based on market capitalisation and the relevance of their product portfolios to diseases in the developing world. One unlisted company, Boehringer Ingelheim, is also included since it meets the size and portfolio relevance criteria.

In 2008 and 2010, the Access to Medicine Index also measured companies engaged exclusively in the production of generic drugs. Based on feedback from the 2011 stakeholder consultations, these companies were excluded from the 2012 Index and subsequent iterations. The Access to Medicine Foundation stated that it recognised that these companies play a significant role in access to medicine, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.[3][9][10][11][12]

Geographic scope

The Access to Medicine Index focuses on low and middle income countries, based on World Bank and United Nations classifications measuring economic advancement, human development, and relative levels of inequality.[13][14] The 2018 Index measured developments in a total of 106 countries, including countries considered to be low income and lower-middle income countries by the World Bank, and Least Developed Countries as defined by the United Nations Economic and Social Council.[15] In addition, countries classified as low human development countries and medium human development countries by the UN Human Development Index are included. Finally, based on the UN Inequality-Adjusted Human Development Index, the index includes countries which, while they may have higher measures of development, have comparatively high levels of socio-economic inequality.[3]

Disease scope

The Access to Medicine Index covers a range of diseases based on their aggregate global disease burden and their relevance to pharmaceutical interventions, in accordance with non-age-weighted WHO Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY)[16] data. Those diseases for which pharmaceutical interventions were irrelevant (such as violent death, trauma and snakebites) are excluded. In the 2018 Index, the disease scope consisted of a combination of the following:[3]

  • The top 11 communicable diseases based on DALYs from the WHO Global Health Observatory 2015 DALY Estimates[17]
  • The top 10 non-communicable diseases based on DALYs from the WHO Global Health Observatory 2015 DALY Estimates[17]
  • 20 of the WHO Neglected Tropical Diseases[18]
  • 10 maternal and neonatal health conditions identified by Every Woman Every Child.[19] In addition, the index captures activity on contraceptives.
  • 12 priority pathogens from the 2017 WHO priority pathogens list.[20]
  • 17 cancers with high disease burdens based on data from the WHO Global Cancer Observatory.[21] 19 cancers with relevant products on the 2017 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines are in scope for technical areas relating to pricing, patenting and donations.[22] Nine cancers are in both sets.

Product type scope

To reflect the range of available product types for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases, the index maintains a broad product type scope which draws closely from definitions provided by the G-Finder Report.[23]

Reception

Since its inception, the Access to Medicine Index has progressed to be a frequently cited and "authoritative" benchmark for pharmaceutical companies with regard to their access to medicine initiatives. In addition to global media outlets reporting on the Access to Medicine Index and its findings, significant coverage includes:

Criticism

The results of the Access to Medicine Index are largely based on company data provided by the pharmaceutical companies themselves. Self-reported data does carry with it an inherent risk, but the Access to Medicine Index also uses dependable external sources to verify data provided by the companies wherever possible. Additionally, it is in companies' best interest to be as forthcoming as possible, as they are a) rated by the index on their degree of transparency and b) rated on their performance every two years, so that failures to meet their commitments and/or inconsistencies over time are likely to be uncovered. Besides, as drug access is only one dimension of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) within the pharmaceutical industry, it would not be reasonable to evaluate the CSR practices of pharmaceutical companies only using this index.

References
  1. UK Department for International Development. "The Access to Medicine Index: Encouraging global access to health care". DFID News. DFID. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  2. The Access To Medicine Foundation (December 21, 2021). "The Access to Medicine Index 2021". Archived from the original on 2021-01-27. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
  3. Access to Medicine Foundation. "The 2017 Access to Medicine Index: Methodology 2018" (PDF). Access to Medicine Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  4. Access to Medicine Foundation. "What is the Index?". Archived from the original on 31 October 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  5. World Health Organization. "Medicines in Health Systems" (PDF). WHO. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  6. Access to Medicine Foundation. "2018 Access to Medicine Index" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  7. Levy, Gideon. "Patents or Patients". AVRO. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  8. "Access to Medicine Index 2016". apps.who.int. Archived from the original on January 2, 2017. Retrieved 2020-01-21.
  9. Access to Medicine Foundation. "Methodology Report 2013 for the 2014 Access to Medicine Index" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 February 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  10. Access to Medicine Foundation. "2012 Methodology Report - Stakeholder Review" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 July 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  11. Access to Medicine Foundation. "2010 Methodology Report - Stakeholder Review" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  12. Access to Medicine Foundation. "2008 Methodology Report - Stakeholder Review" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  13. "Least Developed Countries: UN Classification". The World Bank. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  14. "How we classify countries". World Bank. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  15. UN Capital Development Fund. "Least Developed Countries". Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  16. "Health statistics and health information systems: DALY". World Health Organization. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  17. World Health Organization. "World Health Organization. Global Health Estimates 2015: Disease burden by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2015". World Health Organization. Archived from the original on July 10, 2014. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  18. "The 20 neglected tropical diseases". World Health Organization. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  19. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. "The Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health (2016-2030)" (PDF). Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  20. World Health Organization. "Global Priority List of Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria to Guide, Discovery, and Development Of New Antibiotics" (PDF). Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  21. World Health Organization. "The Global Cancer Observatory (GCO)". Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  22. World Health Organization. "WHO Model Lists of Essential Medicines" (PDF). World Health Organization. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  23. "G-Finder 2017 - Neglected Disease Research and Development: Reflecting on a Decade of Global Investment". Policy Cures. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  24. Gates, Bill & Kiviat, Barbara (31 July 2008). "Making Capitalism More Creative". Time. Archived from the original on July 18, 2011. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  25. Hunt & Khosla, Paul, Rajat (28 September 2010). "Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? The Perspective of the Former United Nations Special Rapporteur (2002-2008)". PLOS Medicine. 7 (9): e1000330. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000330. PMC 2946950. PMID 20927413.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. "Global Pharma: Doing well by doing good?" (PDF). UBS Investment Research. Retrieved 18 June 2013.
  27. Yudkin, John S. (2012). "Post-marketing observational trials and catastrophic health expenditure". British Medical Journal. 344: e3987. doi:10.1136/bmj.e3987. PMID 22692653. S2CID 206895448. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  28. Gulland, Anne. "Top drug companies are making more accessible but are also guilty of corruption, report says". British Medical Journal. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  29. Ali & Narayan, Mohammed K., K.M. Venkat (2008). "The New Access to Medicine Index". The Lancet. 372 (9642): 891. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61396-3. PMID 18790309. S2CID 36253561. Retrieved 11 March 2013.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. Newsdesk (August 2010). "Bridging the gap in access to medicines" (PDF). The Lancet. 10 (8): 514–515. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70150-x. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  31. Connelly, Dawn. "Targeting disease in the developing world". The Pharmaceutical Journal. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  32. Edwards; et al. (2015). "Access to hepatitis C medicines". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 93 (11): 799–805. doi:10.2471/BLT.15.157784. PMC 4622162. PMID 26549908.
  33. Deutsch Bank. "F.I.T.T. for investors: Tropical diseases; social responsibility, neglected market" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.