Ideal theory

Ideals in a finitely generated algebra over a field (that is, a quotient of a polynomial ring over a field) behave somehow nicer than those in a general commutative ring. First, in contrast to the general case, if ${\displaystyle A}$ is a finitely generated algebra over a field, then the radical of an ideal in ${\displaystyle A}$ is the intersection of all maximal ideals containing the ideal (because ${\displaystyle A}$ is a Jacobson ring). This may be thought of as an extension of Hilbert's Nullstellensatz, which concerns the case when ${\displaystyle A}$ is a polynomial ring.

If I is an ideal in a ring A, then it determines the topology on A where a subset U of A is open if, for each x in U,

${\displaystyle x+I^{n}\subset U.}$

for some integer ${\displaystyle n>0}$. This topology is called the I-adic topology. It is also called an a-adic topology if ${\displaystyle I=aA}$ is generated by an element ${\displaystyle a}$.

For example, take ${\displaystyle A=\mathbb {Z} }$, the ring of integers and ${\displaystyle I=pA}$ an ideal generated by a prime number p. For each integer ${\displaystyle x}$, define ${\displaystyle |x|_{p}=p^{-n}}$ when ${\displaystyle x=p^{n}y}$, ${\displaystyle y}$ prime to ${\displaystyle p}$. Then, clearly,

${\displaystyle x+p^{n}A=B(x,p^{-(n-1)})}$

where ${\displaystyle B(x,r)=\{z\in \mathbb {Z} \mid |z-x|_{p}<r\}}$ denotes an open ball of radius ${\displaystyle r}$ with center ${\displaystyle x}$. Hence, the ${\displaystyle p}$-adic topology on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$ is the same as the metric space topology given by ${\displaystyle d(x,y)=|x-y|_{p}}$. As a metric space, ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$ can be completed. The resulting complete metric space has a structure of a ring that extended the ring structure of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$; this ring is denoted as ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} _{p}}$ and is called the ring of p-adic integers.

In a Dedekind domain A (e.g., a ring of integers in a number field or the coordinate ring of a smooth affine curve) with the field of fractions ${\displaystyle K}$, an ideal ${\displaystyle I}$ is invertible in the sense: there exists a fractional ideal ${\displaystyle I^{-1}}$ (that is, an A-submodule of ${\displaystyle K}$) such that ${\displaystyle I\,I^{-1}=A}$, where the product on the left is a product of submodules of K. In other words, fractional ideals form a group under a product. The quotient of the group of fractional ideals by the subgroup of principal ideals is then the ideal class group of A.

In a general ring, an ideal may not be invertible (in fact, already the definition of a fractional ideal is not clear). However, over a Noetherian integral domain, it is still possible to develop some theory generalizing the situation in Dedekind domains. For example, Ch. VII of Bourbaki's Algèbre commutative gives such a theory.

The ideal class group of A, when it can be defined, is closely related to the Picard group of the spectrum of A (often the two are the same; e.g., for Dedekind domains).

In algebraic number theory, especially in class field theory, it is more convenient to use a generalization of an ideal class group called an idele class group.

There are several operations on ideals that play roles of closures. The most basic one is the radical of an ideal. Another is the Integral closure of an ideal. Given an irredundant primary decomposition ${\displaystyle I=\cap Q_{i}}$, the intersection of ${\displaystyle Q_{i}}$'s whose radicals are minimal (don’t contain any of the radicals of other ${\displaystyle Q_{j}}$'s) is uniquely determined by ${\displaystyle I}$; this intersection is then called the unmixed part of ${\displaystyle I}$. It is also a closure operation.

Given ideals ${\displaystyle I,J}$ in a ring ${\displaystyle A}$, the ideal

${\displaystyle (I:J^{\infty })=\{f\in A\mid fJ^{n}\subset I,n\gg 0\}=\bigcup _{n>0}\operatorname {Ann} _{A}((J^{n}+I)/I)}$

is called the saturation of ${\displaystyle I}$ with respect to ${\displaystyle J}$ and is a closure operation (this notion is closely related to the study of local cohomology).

See also tight closure.

Local cohomology can sometimes be used to obtain information on an ideal. This section assumes some familiarity with sheaf theory and scheme theory.

Let ${\displaystyle M}$ be a module over a ring ${\displaystyle R}$ and ${\displaystyle I}$ an ideal. Then ${\displaystyle M}$ determines the sheaf ${\displaystyle {\widetilde {M}}}$ on ${\displaystyle Y=\operatorname {Spec} (R)-V(I)}$ (the restriction to Y of the sheaf associated to M). Unwinding the definition, one sees:

${\displaystyle \Gamma _{I}(M):=\Gamma (Y,{\widetilde {M}})=\varinjlim \operatorname {Hom} (I^{n},M)}$.

Here, ${\displaystyle \Gamma _{I}(M)}$ is called the ideal transform of ${\displaystyle M}$ with respect to ${\displaystyle I}$.

• System of parameters

• Atiyah, Michael Francis; Macdonald, I.G. (1969), Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Westview Press, ISBN 978-0-201-40751-8
• Eisenbud, David, Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150, Springer-Verlag, 1995, ISBN 0-387-94268-8.
• Huneke, Craig; Swanson, Irena (2006), Integral closure of ideals, rings, and modules, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 336, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-68860-4, MR 2266432, archived from the original on 2019-11-15, retrieved 2019-11-15