Ax–Kochen theorem

The proof of the theorem makes extensive use of methods from mathematical logic, such as model theory.

One first proves Serge Lang's theorem, stating that the analogous theorem is true for the field F_p((t)) of formal Laurent series over a finite field F_p with ${\displaystyle Y_{d}=\varnothing }$. In other words, every homogeneous polynomial of degree d with more than d² variables has a non-trivial zero (so F_p((t)) is a C₂ field).

Then one shows that if two Henselian valued fields have equivalent valuation groups and residue fields, and the residue fields have characteristic 0, then they are elementarily equivalent (which means that a first order sentence is true for one if and only if it is true for the other).

Next one applies this to two fields, one given by an ultraproduct over all primes of the fields F_p((t)) and the other given by an ultraproduct over all primes of the p-adic fields Q_p. Both residue fields are given by an ultraproduct over the fields F_p, so are isomorphic and have characteristic 0, and both value groups are the same, so the ultraproducts are elementarily equivalent. (Taking ultraproducts is used to force the residue field to have characteristic 0; the residue fields of F_p((t)) and Q_p both have non-zero characteristic p.)

The elementary equivalence of these ultraproducts implies that for any sentence in the language of valued fields, there is a finite set Y of exceptional primes, such that for any p not in this set the sentence is true for F_p((t)) if and only if it is true for the field of p-adic numbers. Applying this to the sentence stating that every non-constant homogeneous polynomial of degree d in at least d²+1 variables represents 0, and using Lang's theorem, one gets the Ax–Kochen theorem.

Jan Denef found a purely geometric proof for a conjecture of Jean-Louis Colliot-Thélène which generalizes the Ax–Kochen theorem.[2][3]

Emil Artin conjectured this theorem with the finite exceptional set Y_d being empty (that is, that all p-adic fields are C₂), but Guy Terjanian[4] found the following 2-adic counterexample for d = 4. Define

${\displaystyle G(x)=G(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})=\sum x_{i}^{4}-\sum _{i\,<\,j}x_{i}^{2}x_{j}^{2}-x_{1}x_{2}x_{3}(x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3}).}$

Then G has the property that it is 1 mod 4 if some x is odd, and 0 mod 16 otherwise. It follows easily from this that the homogeneous form

G(x) + G(y) + G(z) + 4G(u) + 4G(v) + 4G(w)

of degree d = 4 in 18 > d² variables has no non-trivial zeros over the 2-adic integers.

Later Terjanian[5] showed that for each prime p and multiple d > 2 of p(p − 1), there is a form over the p-adic numbers of degree d with more than d² variables but no nontrivial zeros. In other words, for all d > 2, Y_d contains all primes p such that p(p − 1) divides d.

Brown (1978) gave an explicit but very large bound for the exceptional set of primes p. If the degree d is 1, 2, or 3 the exceptional set is empty. Heath-Brown (2010) showed that if d = 5 the exceptional set is bounded by 13, and Wooley (2008) showed that for d = 7 the exceptional set is bounded by 883 and for d = 11 it is bounded by 8053.

• Brauer's theorem on forms
• Quasi-algebraic closure

• Brown, Scott Shorey (1978), "Bounds on transfer principles for algebraically closed and complete discretely valued fields", Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 15 (204), doi:10.1090/memo/0204, ISBN 978-0-8218-2204-3, ISSN 0065-9266, MR 0494980
• Chang, C.C.; Keisler, H. Jerome (1989). Model Theory (third ed.). Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-7204-0692-4. (Corollary 5.4.19)
• Heath-Brown, D. R. (2010), "Zeros of p-adic forms", Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Third Series, 100 (2): 560–584, arXiv:0805.0534, doi:10.1112/plms/pdp043, ISSN 0024-6115, MR 2595750, S2CID 6594042
• Wooley, Trevor D. (2008), "Artin's conjecture for septic and unidecic forms", Acta Arithmetica, 133 (1): 25–35, Bibcode:2008AcAri.133...25W, doi:10.4064/aa133-1-2, ISSN 0065-1036, MR 2413363