Beclabito Formation

The formation is composed mostly of thinly bedded sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone which is reddish-orange to reddish-brown in color. The sandstone is very fine to medium grained and displays ripple crossbedding, trough crossbedding, and horizontal laminations. The siltstones are reddish-brown and show wavy laminations. The formation is 108 feet (33 m) thick.[1] The formation conformably overlies the Todilto Formation and conformably underlies the Bluff Formation.[2]

The formation is interpreted as having been deposited in a marginal marine or coastal sabkha environment.[1]

The formation was first named by S.M. Condon and H.C. Huffman, Jr., as the Beclabito Member of the Wanakah Formation. The beds making up the formation were previously assigned to the Summerville Formation on the basis of similar lithology and stratigraphic position, and on the similarity of the Curtis Formation that underlies the Summerville Formation to the Todilto Formation that underlies the Beclabito beds, but the correlation is questionable.[1] Steven M. Cather concurred with reassigning the beds from the Summerville to the Beclabito, which he also proposed raising to formation rank. Cather pointed out that the Curtis appears to be younger than the Todilto, calling into question the correlation between the overlying Summerville and Beclabito beds, and that there are significant lithological differences between the Summerville and the Beclabito.[2]