Bite angle

Diamines form a wide range of coordination complexes. They typically form 5- and 6-membered chelate rings. Examples of the former include ethylenediamine and 2,2′-bipyridine. Six-membered chelate rings are formed by 1,3-diaminopropane. The bite angle in such complexes is usually near 90°. Longer chain diamines, which are "floppy", tend not to form chelate rings.[4]

Figure 1. Dicylohexylphosphinomethane, dcpm, which forms a four-membered chelate ring.

Figure 2. DPEphos, which forms an eight-membered chelate ring.

Diphosphines are a class of chelating ligands that contain two phosphine groups connected by a bridge (also referred to as a backbone). The bridge, for instance, might consist of one or more methylene groups or multiple aromatic rings with heteroatoms attached. Examples of common diphosphines are dppe, dcpm (Figure 1), and DPEphos (Figure 2). The structure of the backbone and the substituents attached to the phosphorus atoms influence the chemical reactivity of the diphosphine ligand in metal complexes through steric and electronic effects.[5]

The natural bite angle (β_n) of diphosphines, obtained using molecular mechanics calculations, is defined as the preferred chelation angle determined only by ligand backbone and not by metal valence angles (Figure 3).[1]

Figure 3. Bite angle of a diphosphine ligand bound to rhodium.

Both steric bite angle effect and the electronic bite angle effects are recognized.[7] The steric bite angle effect involves the steric interactions between ligands or between a ligand and a substrate. The electronic bite angle effect, on the other hand, relates to the electronic changes that occur when the bite angle is modified. This effect is sensitive to the hybridization of metal orbitals.[8] This flexibility range accounts for the diverse conformations of the ligand with energies slightly above the strain energy of the natural bite angle.

The bite angle of a diphosphine ligand also indicates the distortion from the ideal geometry of a complex based on VSEPR models. Octahedral and square planar complexes prefer angles near 90° while tetrahedral complexes prefer angles near 110°. Since catalysts often interconvert between various geometries, the rigidity of the chelate ring can be decisive.[8] A bidentate phosphine with a natural bite angle of 120° may preferentially occupy two equatorial sites in a trigonal bipyramidal complex whereas a bidentate phosphine with a natural bite angle of 90° may preferentially occupy apical-equatorial positions.[9] Diphosphine ligands with bite angles of over 120° are obtained using a bulky, stiff diphosphine backbones.[8] Diphosphines of wide bite angles are used in some industrial processes.

The hydroformylation of alkenes to give aldehydes is an important industrial process. Almost 6 million tons of aldehydes are produced by this method annually.[9] Rhodium complexes containing diphosphine ligands are active hydroformylation catalysts. The ratio of linear to branched aldehyde product depends on the structure of the catalyst.[9][10]

One intermediate, [Rh(H)(alkene)(CO)L], exists in two different isomers, depending on the position of phosphine ligands (Figure 4).[9]

Figure 4. EA and EE isomers of Rh(H)(alkene)(CO)L.

Diphosphine ligands such as dppe, which has a bite angle of about 90°, span the equatorial and apical positions (AE isomer). Diphosphines with larger bite angles (above 120°) preferentially occupy a pair of equatorial positions (EE isomer). It is believed that the EE isomer favors formation of linear aldehydes, the desired product. In an effort to create rhodium complexes in which the phosphine ligands preferentially occupy the equatorial positions, the use of diphosphine ligands with wide bite angles such as BISBI (Figure 5) has been investigated.

Figure 5. BISBI, a diphosphine with a bite angle of 113°.

With a bite angle of approximately 113°, BISBI spans sites on equatorial plane of the trigonal bipyramidal intermediate complex (Figure 6).[8]

Figure 6. BISBI occupies sites on the equatorial plane.

The structure of the intermediate [Rh(H)(diphosphine)(CO)₂] does not however determine the regioselectivity of the hydroformylation. Instead, the formation of the linear vs. branched aldehydes is determined upon formation of [Rh(H)(diphosphine)CO(alkene)] and the subsequent hydride migration step. The bite angle affect the steric crowding at the Rh atom that results from the interactions of the bulky backbone of the ligand with substrate. The wide bite angle that results from the backbone allows the five-coordinate [Rh(H)(diphosphine)CO(alkene)] intermediate to adopt a structure that relieves steric hindrance. Thus, BISBI occupies the equatorial positions, where it has the most space. This preference of a transition state that relieves steric hindrance favors the formation of the linear aldehyde. The regioselectivity is also controlled by the hydride migration, which is usually irreversible in the formation of linear aldehydes.[8]

Furthermore, studies using Xantphos ligands (ligands with bulky backbones) in hydroformylation have indicated an increase in the rate of catalysis in metal complexes that contain diphosphine ligands with larger bite angles.[8] The electronic effect of this increase in reaction rate is uncertain since it mainly depends on the bonding between the alkene and rhodium.[9] Large bite angles promote alkene to rhodium electron donation, which results in an accumulation of electron density on the rhodium atom. This increased electron density would be available for π-donation into the anti-bonding orbitals of other ligands, which could weaken other M-L bonds within the catalyst, leading to higher rates.

The application of diphosphine ligands to catalysts is not limited to the process of hydroformylation. Hydrocyanation and hydrogenation reactions also implement phosphine-mediated catalysts.

• Constrained geometry complex
• Josiphos ligands

• Klinger, R.; Chen, M.; Rathke, J.; Kramarz, K. (2007). "Effect of Phosphines on the Thermodynamics of the Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydroformylation System". Organometallics. 26 (2): 352. doi:10.1021/om060768d.