Bombus dahlbomii

B. dahlbomii queens initiate colonies. Queens forage for nectar and pollen that are used to feed the initial brood of a new colony nest site.[8] The foraging activity of queens usually stops once the first brood develops into fully mature workers that can forage to feed immature siblings and alleviate the queen's need to perform such duties.[8] After this happens, the queen assumes her main role of laying and incubating the brood eggs to further propagate the colony and produce new workers. Once workers begin foraging activities, B. dahlbomii queens seem to venture out of nests less frequently, but are still found in the outside of nests quite often.[8]

Scientific research indicates that most bees cannot see the color red, as their photoreceptors are more sensitive to short (UV, blue, green) rather than long wavelengths of light.[2] As a result, bees generally avoid red colored flowers, which are typically pollinated by birds. Although B. dahlbomii distinguishes colors in much the same way as other bees, it frequently visits certain species of red flowers, such as C. hookerianum, L. rosea, A. ovata and E. coccineum, that are common in South American temperate forests.[2] Such behavior sets B. dahlbomii apart from most other bee species that do not visit red colored flowers as frequently.[2] This somewhat peculiar behavior can be attributed to B. dahlbomii's ability to rely on a specific receptor system, the L-receptor system, to perform achromatic contrast and detect and distinguish the color red.[2] Research on the B. dahlbomii L-receptor receptor system has forced experts to partially change the ways they think about bumblebee light/color sensitivity.[2]

B. dahlbomii forages both nectar and pollen from a wide variety of plants, including Lapageria rosea, Alstroemeria aurea, Eucryphia cordifolia, Crinodendron hookerianum and Embothrium coccineum.[6][13] B. dahlbomii individuals show both short and relatively long distance foraging patterns.[5] Short distance foraging patterns arise in continuous, resource rich situations where workers can gather the necessary nectar from plants that exist close to the nest site.[5] Long distance foraging patterns develop in resource poor environments such as fragmented forests; long distance foragers usually have to deal with harsher environmental/temporal conditions as well, including faster wind gusts.[5] In general, B. dahlbomii spends more time foraging on each flower than other related species of bumblebees.[14] Researchers attribute this slower foraging behavior to B. dahlbomii's bigger size and heavier body, which partially precludes it from fast movements. B. dahlbomii's relatively short tongue may also prevent it from performing rapid foraging patterns.[5]

In regions of South America (Chile, Patagonia), B. dahlbomii coexists and competes with two other species, Bombus terrestris and Bombus ruderatus, that are congeneric with B. dahlbomii.[8] B. terrestris and B. ruderatus were introduced into Patagonia for commercial purposes 30 years ago in order to increase the seed and fruit yields of cultivated crops in orchards and farms.[6] At the time of introduction, the invasive potential of B. terrestris and B. ruderatus was severely underestimated and large populations were released without much regulation.[8] Over the past three decades, B. terrestris and B. ruderatus have had a negative effect on the propagation and survival of the native B. dahlbomii. The southward spread of these alien species at rates of up to 200 kilometers per year mirrors the simultaneous retraction and decline of B. dahlbomii populations.[4][8]

Although the population decline can be linked to the introduction of alien species, B. terrestris and B. ruderatus, the exact mechanisms that account for the decline in B. dahlbomii population are not completely understood. Research indicates that exploitative/competitive advantage and pathogen introduction account for some part of the population decline in Patagonia.[8] The aliens’ competitive advantage results from their relatively high migration ability, foraging ranges, polylectic foraging strategies and gyne production rate when compared to B. dahlbomii.[8] Moreover, B. dahlbomii queens emerge and colonize nests later in the season than their B. terrestris counterparts, which provides B. terrestris a colony-cycle advantage over B. dahlbomii and accounts for further decline.[8]

Populations of B. dahlbomii have been greatly affected by the highly pathogenic Apicystis bombi protozoan.[10] A. bombi was co-introduced with the release of B. terrestris in certain South American regions. Research indicates that A. bombi did not exist in any South American regions prior to the introduction of commercial B. terrestris populations in Chile in the early 1980s.[10] While A. bombi has little effect on the commercial B. terrestris that were introduced into South America, it does have a debilitating effect on B. dahlbomii.[10] Upon introduction, A. bombi began infecting B. dahlbomii populations through pathogen spillover, which was facilitated by A. bombi’s lack of specificity (ability to infect a wide range of hosts- it affects over 20 bumblebee species in its native European habitats).[10]

B. dahlbomii individuals, both workers and queens, initially are infected by A. bombi when they ingest oocysts. Once ingested, the oocysts develop into sporozoites in B. dahlbomii intestines and eventually move to fat cells.[15] The A. bombi life cycle negatively impacts B. dahlbomii populations through a couple of mechanisms. It starts by inhibiting colony formation by preventing worker/brood propagation.[15] If active workers or queens exist, A. bombi leads to a plethora of physiological and behavioral effects that prevent essential actions such as foraging.[16] Unfortunately, B. dahlbomii has very little ability to curtail the progression of this pathogenesis.[4]

Syrphid flies in Patagonia and the Southern parts of Chile (Aneriophora aureorufa) seem to use B. dahlbomii as a Batesian mimicry template. A. aureorufa thus, resembles/mimics certain aspects of B. dahlbomii morphology and behavior.[13] In particular, B. dahlbomii and A. aureorufa have similar color and size, and are sometimes difficult to distinguish when observed in the wild because of similar flight motion patterns.[13] The fact that such marked similarities exists illustrates how A. aureorufa morphology must have evolved rapidly, as B. dahlbomii speciation only occurred approximately 7.5 million years ago.[13] The mimicry demonstrates how B. dahlmbomii has a competitive advantage in avoiding predation that A. aureorufa lacks (A. auerorufa mimics B. dahlbomii to falsely “steal” this competitive advantage and increase fitness).[13]

B. dahlbomii is an important pollinator to a number of plant species such as Lapageria rosea and Alstroemeria aurea in Chile and Patagonia.[5][6] In certain ecosystems, specifically the Maulino forest area of Chile, B. dahlbomii plays an extremely important role in ensuring that fragmented plant populations get pollinated.[5] Research indicates that individuals in such fragmented environments have longer wings relative to body size than those individuals that reside in continuous forest environments because they have a greater need for long range flights in such fragmented environments (long-winged individuals are favored).[5] In general, B. dahlbomii has been shown to be a much more efficient pollinator than species of other tribes (Apis; Apini), families (Chalepogenus; Anthoporidea) and orders.[14] Although B. dahlbomii has also been shown to be a more efficient pollinator than the invasive B. ruderatus, B. dahlbomii visits plants less frequently than its invasive counterpart.[14]