Brent Mishler

Brent D. Mishler (born 1953) is an American botanist who is director of the University and Jepson Herbaria at the University of California, Berkeley as well as Distinguished Professor in the Department of Integrative Biology, where he teaches phylogenetics, plant diversity, and island biology.

Brent Mishler
Born1953 (age 69–70)
Pasadena, California, U.S.
NationalityAmerican
Alma materCalifornia State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Harvard University
Scientific career
FieldsBotany
Bryology
InstitutionsDuke University, University of California, Berkeley
Websitehttps://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/people/mishler.html

Early life and education

Mishler attended Bonita High School in La Verne, California, and worked as a Ranger-Naturalist for the Los Angeles County Nature Center Unit (Parks and Recreation Department). He received his B.S. and M.S. from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona in 1975 and 1978 respectively, then got his Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1984, working with Carroll E. Wood, Peter F. Stevens and Norton G. Miller He did his dissertation work on the systematics and evolution of the moss genus Syntrichia.[M 1]

Career

Research

Mishler was on the faculty of the Botany Department at Duke University from 1984. He moved to the Department of Integrative Biology at University of California, Berkeley in 1993.[M 1]

Mishler has studied the diverse moss genus Syntrichia in the Pottiaceae family, including the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis.[M 2]

More recently, Mishler has helped to develop spatial phylogenetic tools for studying biodiversity and endemism, using large-scale phylogenies and collection data in a geographic and statistical framework.[M 3]

Species concept

Mishler has had a particular interest in concepts of species over his 40-year career, in relation to theories of biological classification in general. He realized early on that the evolutionary processes operating in different branches of the tree of life are distinct enough that different criteria need to be applied to decide when lineages are diverged enough to be called species. He later recognized that deciding which among the many nested levels in the vast tree of life should be ranked as a species is arbitrary and misleading, and began to advocate a rankless approach as was already being advocated for higher taxonomic levels by advocates of phylogenetic nomenclature in the PhyloCode naming system. Mishler argues that the species rank can and should be done away with, to be replaced by a multi-level approach to systematics, ecology, evolution, and conservation.[M 4] His two recent books[M 5][M 6] explore this radical view of "species", and what it means for science and society to move to a rankless, phylogenetic view of biodiversity. Quentin Wheeler and Rudolf Meier note that the Mishler version of the phylogenetic species concept differs from that of Wheeler and Norman Platnick, and that biologists like Ernst Mayr disagree with both versions.[1]

Reception

Werner Kunz, noting that Charles Darwin "did not actually believe in the existence of species", describes Mishler as having an "extreme attitude ... related to denying any existence of biological species", shared with the botanist Konrad Bachmann, that the idea of a biological species is "worn out, hopelessly vague, or even evidently wrong".[2] The evolutionary biologist James Mallet writes that some taxonomists, including Mishler, "even argue that named Linnean ranks, including species, are no longer useful in taxonomy at all".[3]

The philosopher Marco Nathan distinguishes two kinds of pluralism, heterogeneity and theory-dependence. He defines heterogeneity as meaning that species are defined differently according to their attributes, e.g. Mayr's "interbreeding natural populations ... reproductively isolated" applies only to organisms that reproduce sexually, so asexual groups like bacteria need a different definition of species. Nathan defines theory-dependence as meaning that taxa are assigned according to the organisms being discussed and "the explanatory target at hand", so there is no unique or "natural" method for defining a species or taxa at any other level. Nathan calls the "common" labelling of heterogeneity as pluralism by biologists such as Mishler "dangerous" as it overlooks the distinction of the two kinds.[4]

References

Primary

These sources are used for basic information about the subject's life and work.

  1. "Brent Drennen Mishler (CV)" (PDF). University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 12 August 2022.
  2. Bowker, Matthew A.; Stark, Lloyd R.; McLetchie, D. Nicholas; Mishler, Brent D. (2000). "Sex expression, skewed sex ratios, and microhabitat distribution in the dioecious desert moss Syntrichia caninervis (Pottiaceae)". American Journal of Botany. 87 (4): 517–526. doi:10.2307/2656595. JSTOR 2656595. PMID 10766723.
  3. Thornhill, Andrew H.; Mishler, Brent D.; Knerr, Nunzio J.; González‐Orozco, Carlos E.; Costion, Craig M.; Crayn, Darren M.; Laffan, Shawn W.; Miller, Joseph T. (26 May 2016). "Continental‐scale spatial phylogenetics of Australian angiosperms provides insights into ecology, evolution and conservation". Journal of Biogeography. 43 (11): 2085–2098. doi:10.1111/jbi.12797. S2CID 89129946.
  4. Mishler, Brent D. (2022), "Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics in a Post-Species World", Species Problems and Beyond, pp. 177–190, doi:10.1201/9780367855604-12, ISBN 978-0-367-85560-4, retrieved 2022-08-24
  5. Mishler, Brent D. (2021). What, if Anything, are Species?. doi:10.1201/9781315119687. ISBN 978-1-315-11968-7. S2CID 233525644.
  6. Swartz, B. and B.D. Mishler (eds.). 2022 Speciesism in Biology and Culture: How Human Exceptionalism is Pushing Planetary Boundaries. Springer Nature. ISBN 9783030990299

Secondary
  1. Wheeler, Quentin D.; Meier, Rudolf (2000). Species concepts and phylogenetic theory : a debate. New York: Columbia University Press. p. x, and relevant chapters in the book. ISBN 0-231-10142-2. OCLC 42291078.
  2. Kunz, Werner (2013). Do Species Exist? Principles of Taxonomic Classification. Wiley. 2.5 The Reality of Species: Ernst Mayr vs. Charles Darwin. ISBN 978-3-527-66426-9.
  3. Mallet, James (2001). "Species, Concepts of". Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (PDF). Vol. 5. Tarjomefa. pp. 427–440.
  4. Nathan, Marco J. (10 July 2019). "Pluralism is the Answer! What is the Question?". Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology. 11 (20220112). doi:10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.015. S2CID 210712334.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.