Carleton S. Coon

Carleton Stevens Coon (June 23, 1904 – June 3, 1981) was an American anthropologist. A professor of anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania, lecturer and professor at Harvard University, he was president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists.[1] Coon's theories on race were widely disputed in his lifetime[2] and are considered pseudoscientific in modern anthropology.[3][4][5][6][7]

Carleton S. Coon
Born(1904-06-23)June 23, 1904
Wakefield, Massachusetts, U.S.
DiedJune 3, 1981(1981-06-03) (aged 76)
Gloucester, Massachusetts, U.S.
NationalityAmerican
Board member ofPresident of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists
Spouses
  • Mary Goodale (m. 1926; div 1944)
  • Lisa Dougherty Geddes (m. 1945)
Children
Parents
  • John Lewis Coon
  • Bessie Coon
Awards
Academic background
Education
ThesisA Study of the Fundamental Racial and Cultural Characteristics of the Berbers of North Africa as Exemplified by the Riffians (1928)
Doctoral advisorEarnest Hooton
Academic work
DisciplineAnthropology
Sub-discipline
Institutions
Notable students
Notable works
  • The Races of Europe (1939)
  • The Origins of Races (1962)

Early life and education

Carleton Stevens Coon was born in Wakefield, Massachusetts on June 23, 1904.[8] His parents were John Lewis Coon, a cotton factor, and Bessie Carleton.[9] His family had Cornish American roots and two of his ancestors fought in the American Civil War. As a child, he listened to his grandfather's stories of the war and of traveling in the Middle East, and accompanied his father on business trips to Egypt, inspiring an early interest in Egyptology. He initially attended Wakefield High School, but was expelled after breaking a water pipe and flooding the school's basement, after which he went to Phillips Academy. Coon was a precocious student, learning to read Egyptian hieroglyphs at an early age and excelling at Ancient Greek.[8]

Wakefield was an affluent and almost exclusively white town.[10] Coon's biographer, William W. Howells, noted that his "only apparent awareness of ethnicity" was in childhood fights with his Irish American neighbours.[8] Coon himself claimed that "both anti-Semitism and racism were unknown to me before I left home at the age of fifteen, and zero to fifteen are formative years."[11][10]

Intending to study Egyptology, Coon enrolled at Harvard University and was able to obtain a place on a graduate course with George Andrew Reisner based on his knowledge of hieroglyphic. He also studied Arabic and English composition under Charles Townsend Copeland. However he changed his focus to anthropology after taking a course with Earnest Hooton, inspired by his lectures on the Berbers of the Moroccan Rif. Coon obtained his bachelor's degree from Harvard in 1925 and immediately embarked on graduate studies in anthropology.[8] He conducted his dissertation fieldwork in the Rif in 1925, which was politically unsettled after a rebellion of the local populace against the Spanish, and was awarded his PhD in 1928.[12]

Coon was motivated to study the Rif by the puzzle of the "light-skinned" Riffians' presence in Africa. Throughout much of his fieldwork, he relied on his local informant Mohammed Limnibhy, and even arranged for Limnibhy to live with him in Cambridge from 1928 to 1929.[13]

Academic career

After obtaining his PhD, Coon returned to Harvard as a lecturer and later a professor. In 1931 he published his dissertation as the "definitive monograph" of the Rif Berber;[14] studied Albanians from 1920 to 1930; traveled to Ethiopia in 1933; and in worked in Arabia, North Africa and the Balkans from 1925 to 1939.

Coon left Harvard to take up a position at the University of Pennsylvania in 1948. Throughout the 1950s he produced academic papers, as well as many popular books for the general reader, the most notable being The Story of Man (1954). During his years at Penn in the 1950s, he sometimes appeared on the television program called What in the World?, a game-show produced by the Penn Museum, and hosted by its director, Froelich Rainey, in which a panel of experts tried to identify an object in the museum's collection.

He was awarded the Legion of Merit for his wartime services and the Viking Medal in Physical Anthropology in 1952. He was also named a Membre D'Honneur of the Association de la Libération française du 8 novembre 1942.[14] From 1948 to the early 1960s, he was the Curator of Ethnology at the University Museum of Philadelphia.[8]

Military career

Coon wrote widely for a general audience like his mentor Earnest Hooton. Coon published The Riffians, Flesh of the Wild Ox, Measuring Ethiopia, and A North Africa Story: The Anthropologist as OSS Agent. A North Africa Story was an account of his work in North Africa during World War II, which involved espionage and the smuggling of arms to French resistance groups in German-occupied Morocco under the guise of anthropological fieldwork. During that time, Coon was affiliated with the United States Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner to the Central Intelligence Agency.

Coon served as a mentor to another Harvard-educated OSS agent and anthropologist who embraced anthropometry (measuring features of the human body, such as crania and nose sizes) as a means asserting racial types and categories. This was Lloyd Cabot Briggs, author of Living Races of the Sahara Desert (1958) and later of No More for Ever: A Saharan Jewish Town (1962) about the Jews of the Mzab region of the Algerian Sahara, which he wrote with Norina Lami Guède (née Maria Esterina Giovanni). The historian Sarah Abreyava Stein (who argued that Guede had done most of the research) noted that Briggs and Coon corresponded during the writing of No More for Ever, joking, for example, about the genital depilation customs of Jewish women in Ghardaïa.[15]

After the war, Coon returned to Harvard, but retained ties to the OSS and its successor the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). He was a scientific consultant to the CIA from 1948 to 1950, and in 1945 wrote an influential paper that argued that the United States should continue the use of wartime intelligence agencies to maintain an "Invisible Empire" in the postwar period.[16][17] In 1956–57, he worked for the Air Force as a photographer.[16]

Racial theories
Photographs of men from northern Albania taken by Coon in 1929 and published in The Mountains of Giants (1950). This "descriptive" approach was typical of Coon's work in physical anthropology before World War II.[18]

Before World War II, Coon's work on race "fit comfortably into the old physical anthropology",[18] describing the racial types supposedly present in human populations based on visible physical characteristics. He explicitly rejected any specific definition of race and used the concept to describe both highly specific groupings of people and continent-spanning racial types. In The Races of Europe (1939), for example, an update of William Z. Ripley's 1899 book of the same title, he distinguished between at least four racial types and sub-types of Jewish people, but also maintained that there existed a single, primordial Jewish race, characterised by a Jewish nose and other physical features that together form "a quality of looking Jewish".[19] In these early works Coon alluded to essential, "pure" racial types that produced the specific races he observed through hybridization, but did not attempt to explain how or where these types arose.[20]

The immediate post-war period marked a decisive break in Coon's work on race as the conventional, typological approach was challenged by the "new physical anthropology". Led by Coon's former classmate Sherwood Washburn, this was a movement to shift the field away from description and classification and towards an understanding of human variability grounded in the modern synthesis of biological evolution and population genetics. For some anthropologists, including Ashley Montagu and later Washburn himself, the new physical anthropology necessitated the wholesale rejection of race as a scientific category. In contrast, in Races: A Study in the Problem of Race Formation in Man (1950), Coon, together with his former student Stanley Garn and Joseph Birdsell, attempted to reconcile the race concept with the new physical anthropology's emphasis on genetics and adaptation.[21] This was followed by Coon's magnum opus, The Origin of Races (1962), which put forward a theory of the origins of essential racial types, however distinct from what is described by the model of multiregional evolution (MRE) as it drastically understates the role played by gene flow (whereas MRE requires it).[21]

Coon concluded that sometimes different racial types annihilated other types, while in other instances warfare and/or settlement led to the partial displacement of racial types. He asserted that Europe was the refined product of a long history of racial progression. He also posited that historically "different strains in one population have showed differential survival values and often one has reemerged at the expense of others (in Europeans)", in The Races of Europe, The White Race and the New World (1939).[22] Coon suggested that the "maximum survival" of the European racial type was increased by the replacement of the indigenous peoples of the New World.[22] He stated the history of the White race to have involved "racial survivals" of White subraces.[23]

Racial origins

Coon first modified Franz Weidenreich's polycentric (or multiregional) theory of the origin of races. The Weidenreich Theory states that human races have evolved independently in the Old World from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens sapiens, while at the same time there was gene flow between the various populations. Coon held a similar belief that modern humans, Homo sapiens, arose separately in five different places from Homo erectus, "as each subspecies, living in its own territory, passed a critical threshold from a more brutal to a more sapient state", but unlike Weidenreich stressed gene flow far less.[24][25] Coon's modified form of the Weidenreich Theory is sometimes referred to as the Candelabra Hypothesis. A misunderstanding however has led some to believe that Coon supported parallel evolution or polygenism; this is not true since Coon's evolution model still allows for gene-flow, although he did not stress it.[26]

In his 1962 book, The Origin of Races, Coon theorized that some races reached the Homo sapiens stage in evolution before others, resulting in the higher degree of civilization among some races.[27] He had continued his theory of five races. He considered both what he called the Mongoloid race and the Caucasoid race had individuals who had adapted to crowding through evolution of the endocrine system, which made them more successful in the modern world of civilization. This can be found after page 370, in the illustrative serie of number XXXII of The Origin of Races. Coon contrasted a picture of an Indigenous Australian with one of a Chinese professor. His caption "The Alpha and the Omega" was used to demonstrate his research that brain size was positively correlated with intelligence.

Wherever Homo arose, and Africa is at present the most likely continent, he soon dispersed, in a very primitive form, throughout the warm regions of the Old World....If Africa was the cradle of mankind, it was only an indifferent kindergarten. Europe and Asia were our principal schools.

By this he meant that the Caucasoid and Mongoloid races had evolved more in their separate areas after they had left Africa in a primitive form. He also believed, "The earliest Homo sapiens known, as represented by several examples from Europe and Africa, was an ancestral long-headed white man of short stature and moderately great brain size."

Races in the Indian sub-continent

Coon's understanding of racial typology and diversity within the Indian sub-continent changed over time. In The Races of Europe, he regarded the so-called "Veddoids" of India ("tribal" Indians, or "Adivasi") as closely related to other peoples in the South-Pacific ("Australoids"), and he also believed that this supposed human lineage (the "Australoids") was an important genetic substratum in Southern India. As for the north of the sub-continent, it was an extension of the Caucasoid range.[22] By the time Coon coauthored The Living Races of Man, he thought that India's Adivasis were an ancient Caucasoid-Australoid mix who tended to be more Caucasoid than Australoid (with great variability), that the Dravidian peoples of Southern India were simply Caucasoid, and that the north of the sub-continent was also Caucasoid. In short, the Indian sub-continent (North and South) is "the easternmost outpost of the Caucasoid racial region".[28] Underlying all of this was Coon's typological view of human history and biological variation, a way of thinking that is not taken seriously today by most anthropologists/biologists.[29][30][31][32]

Debate on race
Carleton Putnam (1901–1998). Coon corresponded with Putnam about his book Race and Reason (1961), a defence of racial segregation and white supremacy, and resigned from the American Association of Physical Anthropologists when it passed a motion condemning it.

The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s and changing social attitudes challenged racial theories like Coon's that had been used by segregationists to justify discrimination and depriving people of civil rights. In 1961, Coon's cousin[33] Carleton Putnam, wrote Race and Reason: A Yankee View, arguing a scientific basis for white supremacy and the continuation of racial segregation in the United States. After the book was made required reading for high school students in Louisiana, the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (AAPA) passed a resolution condemning it. Coon, who had corresponded with Putnam about the book as he was writing it, and chaired the meeting of the AAPA in which the resolution was passed,[2] resigned in protest, criticizing the resolution as scientifically irresponsible[34] and a violation of free speech.[35] Later, he claimed to have asked how many of those present at the meeting had read the book, and that only one hand was raised.[2]

Coon published The Origin of Races in 1962. In its "Introduction", he described the book as part of the outcome of his project he conceived (in light of his work on The Races of Europe) around the end of 1956, for a work to be titled along the lines of Races of the World. He said that since 1959 he had proceeded with the intention to follow The Origin of Races with a sequel, so the two would jointly fulfill the goals of the original project.[36] (He indeed published The Living Races of Man in 1965.) The book asserted that the human species divided into five races before it had evolved into Homo sapiens. Further, he suggested that the races evolved into Homo sapiens at different times. It was not well received.[14] The field of anthropology was moving rapidly from theories of race typology, and The Origin of Races was widely castigated by his peers in anthropology as supporting racist ideas with outmoded theory and notions which had long since been repudiated by modern science. One of his harshest critics, Theodore Dobzhansky, scorned it as providing "grist for racist mills".[37]

Geneticist Dobzhansky's shot
His bolt and really gone to pot.
Things which now pass above his pate
Cause him to fume and fulminate
In ways unacademical
And anything but oecumenical.
Querulous cracks with venom spattered
Tell of an ethos sadly shattered.

Poem written by Coon around 1963[38]

The dispute that followed the publication of The Origin of Races was personal as well as academic. Coon had known Ashley Montagu and Dobzhansky for decades and the three men often corresponded and wrote positive reviews of each other's work before 1962. Their vociferous criticism of Origins severed their friendship and affected Coon on a personal and emotional level.[3] In a letter to Dobzhansky shortly after its publication, Coon advised him that he considered his critiques defamatory and had consulted a lawyer, writing: "Why have you done this? When are you going to stop?"[3] Washburn was a fellow student of Earnest Hooton at Harvard, and Coon saw his subsequent repudiation of biological race as an "oedipal" betrayal of their mentor. Garn, Coon's former student and coauthor of Races, helped draft the AAPA motion condemning Putnam, which also disappointed Coon.[3] Coon stopped referencing Montagu and then Washburn in his work after they each publicly rejected the concept of race.[21] Nevertheless, historian Peter Sachs Collopy has noted that Coon was able to maintain cordial relationships with many of those he had disagreements with, rooted in his belief in the importance of academic collegiality.[3]

Although some of these interpersonal conflicts faded over time—Coon wrote that he had "buried the now‐rusty hatchet" with Dobzhansky in a letter to him in 1975—the animosity between Coon and Montagu was severe and lasting. Before 1962, the two were on friendly terms, but represented rival schools of anthropology (Coon studied under Hooton at Harvard; Montagu under Boas at Columbia), and Coon privately disdained his work.[3] After the publication of Origins, they engaged in a lengthy correspondence, published in Current Anthropology, that "consisted almost entirely of bickering over minutiae, name calling, and sarcasm".[3] Privately, Coon suspected Montagu (a target of McCarthyism) of communist sympathies and of turning Dobzhansky and others against him.[3] As late as 1977, he was quoted as saying to a colleague, "You had Ashley Montagu in your office? And you didn't shoot him?"[39] The enmity was reciprocated; in a 1974 letter to Stephen Jay Gould, Montagu wrote, "Coon… is a racist and an antisemite, as I know well, so when you describe Coon's letter to the editor of Natural History as 'amusing' I understand exactly what you mean—but it is so in exactly the same sense as Mein Kampf was 'amusing'."[3]

Coon continued to write and defend his work until his death, publishing two volumes of memoirs in 1980 and 1981.[40]

Other work

Archaeology

After taking up his position at Pennsylvania in 1948, Coon embarked on a series of archaeological expeditions to Iran, Afghanistan and Syria.[41] His 1949 excavations at four cave sites in Iran (Bisitun, Tamtama, Khunik and Belt) were the first systematic investigations of Palaeolithic archaeology in Iran.[41][42] The most significant of these was Bisitun, which Coon called "Hunter's Cave", where he discovered evidence of the Mousterian industry[41] and several human fossils that were later confirmed to belong to Neanderthals.[43] Coon published the results of these excavations in a 1951 monograph, Cave Explorations in Iran, 1949,[44][45] and subsequently wrote a popular book about the expeditions, The Seven Caves: Archaeological Explorations in the Middle East (1957).[46] Bisitun remained the only fully-published Palaeolithic site from Iran for several decades.[41][42]

Coon followed up his 1949 expedition with excavations at Hotu Cave in 1951.[47] He interpreted the site, together with Belt Cave, as the first traces of a "Mesolithic" in Iran and claimed that they showed evidence of early agriculture.[48][47][49] Other archaeologists questioned the basis for these claims[47][49] and subsequent excavations at sites such as Ganj Dareh clarified that Coon had probably conflated separate Epipalaeolithic hunter-gatherer and Neolithic farmer occupations at the sites.[41]

Cryptozoology

Coon was, up to his death, a proponent of the existence of bipedal cryptids, including Sasquatch and Yeti. His 1954 book The Story of Man included a chapter on "Giant Apes and Snowmen" and a figure showing the purported footprints of an "Abominable Snowman" alongside those of extinct hominids,[50] and near the end of his life he wrote a paper on "Why There Has to Be a Sasquatch".[51][52] In the late 1950s, he was approached by Life magazine about either joining Tom Slick and Peter Byrne's expedition to the Himalayas to search for evidence of Yeti, or organising his own expedition.[53] Although Coon spent some time planning the logistics, in the end neither materialised.[53] Coon believed that cryptid "Wild Men" were relict populations of Pleistocene apes and that, if their existence could be proved scientifically, they would lend support to his theory of the separate origins of human races.[53]

Cultural historian Colin Dickey has argued that the search for Sasquatch and Yeti are inextricably linked to racism: "For an anthropologist like Coon, invested in finding some sort of scientific basis to justify his racism, Wild Men lore offered a compelling narrative, a chance to prove a scientific basis for his white supremacy."[33] It has also been speculated that the Yeti expeditions that Coon was involved with were cover for American espionage in Nepal and Tibet, since both he and Slick had links to US intelligence agencies,[53] and Byrne was allegedly involved in the extraction of the 14th Dalai Lama from Tibet by the CIA in 1959.[52]

Coon's views on cryptids were a major influence on Grover Krantz, and the two were close friends in his later life.[54]

Reception and legacy

Coon's published magnum opus, The Origin of Races (1962), received mixed reactions from scientists of the era. Ernst Mayr praised the work for its synthesis as having an "invigorating freshness that will reinforce the current revitalization of physical anthropology".[55] A book review by Stanley Marion Garn criticised Coon's parallel view of the origin of the races with little gene flow but praised the work for its racial taxonomy and concluded: "an overall favorable report on the now famous Origin of Races".[56] Sherwood Washburn and Ashley Montagu were heavily influenced by the modern synthesis in biology and population genetics. In addition, they were influenced by Franz Boas, who had moved away from typological racial thinking. Rather than supporting Coon's theories, they and other contemporary researchers viewed the human species as a continuous serial progression of populations and heavily criticized Coon's Origin of Races.

In a New York Times' obituary he was hailed for "important contributions to most of the major subdivisions of modern anthropology", "pioneering contributions to the study of human transition from the hunter-gatherer culture to the first agricultural communities." and "important early work in studying the physical adaptations of humans in such extreme environments as deserts, the Arctic and high altitudes."[14] William W. Howells, writing in a 1989 article, noted that Coon's research was "still regarded as a valuable source of data".[57] In 2001, John P. Jackson, Jr. researched Coon's papers to review the controversy around the reception of The Origin of Races, stating in the article abstract:

Segregationists in the United States used Coon's work as proof that African Americans were "junior" to white Americans, and thus unfit for full participation in American society. The paper examines the interactions among Coon, segregationist Carleton Putnam, geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky, and anthropologist Sherwood Washburn. The paper concludes that Coon actively aided the segregationist cause in violation of his own standards for scientific objectivity.[2]

Jackson found in the archived Coon papers records of repeated efforts by Coon to aid Putnam's efforts to provide intellectual support to the ongoing resistance to racial integration, but cautioned Putnam against statements that could identify Coon as an active ally (Jackson also noted that both men had become aware that they had General Israel Putnam as a common ancestor, making them (at least distant) cousins, but Jackson indicated neither when either learned of the family relationship nor whether they had a more recent common ancestor).[2] Alan H. Goodman (2000) has said that Coon's main legacy was not his "separate evolution of races (Coon 1962)," but his "molding of race into the new physical anthropology of adaptive and evolutionary processes (Coon et al. 1950)," since he attempted to "unify a typological model of human variation with an evolutionary perspective and explained racial differences with adaptivist arguments."[58]

Personal life
Mary Coon (née Goodale, left) was married to Coon between 1926 and 1944.

Coon married Mary Goodale in 1926. They had two sons, one of whom, Carleton S. Coon Jr. went on to become Ambassador to Nepal. Coon and Goodale divorced and in 1945 he married Lisa Dougherty Geddes. He was a member of the Congregational Church.[14]

Coon retired from Pennsylvania in 1963, but retained an affiliation with the Peabody Museum and continued to write until the end of his life. He appeared on several episodes of television quiz show What in the World? between 1952 and 1957.[9]

Coon died in Gloucester, Massachusetts on June 3, 1981.[14]

Selected publications

Science:

Fiction and memoir:

See also

Notes
  1. "Race" Relations: Montagu, Dobzhansky, Coon, and the Divergence of Race Concepts Archived July 23, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  2. Jackson 2001.
  3. Sachs Collopy, Peter (2015). "Race Relationships: Collegiality and Demarcation in Physical Anthropology". Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 51 (3): 237–260. doi:10.1002/jhbs.21728. PMID 25950769.
  4. Spickard 2016, p. 157, "For more than four decades beginning in the late 1930s, the Harvard anthropologist Carleton Coon wrote a series of big books for an ever shrinking audience in which he pushed a pseudoscientific racial angle of analysis."
  5. Selcer 2012, p. S180, "Most disturbingly for liberal anthropologists, the new generation of racist "pseudoscience" threatened to return to mainstream respectability in 1962 with the publication of Carleton Coon's The Origin of Races (Coon 1962)."
  6. Loewen 2005, p. 462, "Carleton Coon, whose The Origin of Races [...] claimed that Homo sapiens evolved five different times, blacks last. Its poor reception by anthropologists, followed by evidence from archaeology and paleontology that mankind evolved once, and in Africa, finally put an end to such pseudoscience."
  7. Regal 2011, pp. 93–94, "Carleton Coon fully embraced typology as a way to determine the basis of racial and ethnic difference .... Unfortunately for him, American anthropology increasingly equated typology with pseudoscience."
  8. Howells, H. W. (1989). Carleton Stevens Coon 1904—1981: A Biographical Memoir (PDF). Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
  9. Goodrum, Matthew R. (2020). "Coon, Carleton Stevens". Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Encyclopedia.com.
  10. Goodman & Hammonds 2000, p. 29.
  11. Coon 1981, p. 6.
  12. The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2005.
  13. "Harvard in the Rif, 1926-1928 | Peabody Museum". www.peabody.harvard.edu. Retrieved October 29, 2020.
  14. Harold M. Schmeck Jr. (June 6, 1981). "Carleton S. Coon Is Dead at 76: Pioneer in Social Anthropology". New York Times.
  15. Stein, Sarah Abreyava (2014). Saharan Jews and the Fate of French Algeria. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 22–28. ISBN 9780226123745.
  16. Kohlstedt 2015, pp. 218–221.
  17. Price 2008, pp. 255–259.
  18. Goodman & Hammonds 2000, p. 30.
  19. Coon 1939, p. 441.
  20. Goodman & Hammonds 2000, p. 29–30.
  21. Goodman & Hammonds 2000, p. 31.
  22. Coon 1939.
  23. Coon 1939, Chapter 2, Section 12.
  24. The Origin of Races: Weidenreich's Opinion, S. L. Washburn, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 66, No. 5 (Oct. 1964) (pp. 1165-1167).
  25. An Attempted Revival of the Race Concept, Leonard Lieberman, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 97, No. 3 (Sep. 1995), pp. 590-592.
  26. Coon's Theory on "The Origin of Races", Bruce G. Trigger, Anthropologica, New Series, Vol. 7, No. 2 (1965), pp. 179-187.
  27. Coon, Carleton S. (1962) . The Origins of Races. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  28. The Living Races of Man, 'On Greater India
  29. Weiss, Kenneth M.; Long, Jeffrey C. (May 1, 2009). "Non-Darwinian estimation: My ancestors, my genes' ancestors". Genome Research. 19 (5): 703–710. doi:10.1101/gr.076539.108. PMC 3647532. PMID 19411595.
  30. http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/current/readings/templeton.pdf
  31. "Welcome". raceandgenomics.ssrc.org. Retrieved April 8, 2018.
  32. Edgar, Heather J.H. (2009). "Race reconciled?: How biological anthropologists view human variation". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 139 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20995. PMID 19226646.
  33. Dickey, Colin (2020). The Unidentified: Mythical Monsters, Alien Encounters, and Our Obsession with the Unexplained. New York: Viking. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-525-55757-9.
  34. Shipman 1994, p. 200.
  35. Academic American Encyclopedia (vol. 5, p.271). Danbury, Connecticut: Grolier Incorporated (1995).
  36. Carleton S. Coon, The Origin of Races, Knopf, 1962, p. vii
  37. Shipman 1994, p. 207.
  38. Jackson 2001, p. 247.
  39. Shipman 1994, pp. 283–284.
  40. National Anthropological Archives, "Coon, Carleton Stevens (1904-1981), Papers" Archived April 1, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  41. "Coon, Carleton Stevens". Encyclopaedia Iranica. Retrieved October 5, 2020.
  42. Mortensen, Peder (1987). "Philip E.L. Smith, 1986. — Palaeolithic Archaeology in Iran. (Review)". Paléorient. 13 (1): 137–138.
  43. Trinkaus, Erik; Biglari, F. (2006). "Middle Paleolithic Human Remains from Bisitun Cave, Iran". Paléorient. 32 (2): 105–111. doi:10.3406/paleo.2006.5192.
  44. Garrod, Dorothy A. E. (1952). "CAVE EXPLORATIONS IN IRAN, 1949. By Carleton S. Coon. 10 3/4 by 8 1/4 pp. 124. 33 plates, map, plans, sections . University Museum, Pennsylvania. $1.50". Antiquity. 26 (104): 228–230. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00024261. ISSN 0003-598X.
  45. Adams, Robert M. (January 1, 1954). "Cave Explorations in Iran 1949. Carleton S. Coon". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 13 (1): 65–66. doi:10.1086/371182. ISSN 0022-2968.
  46. Howells, W. W. (1957). "The Seven Caves. Archaeological Explorations in the Middle East. Carleton S. Coon". American Anthropologist. 59 (5): 930–931. doi:10.1525/aa.1957.59.5.02a00500. ISSN 1548-1433.
  47. Howe, Bruce (1954). "ETHNOLOGY AND ETHNOGRAPHY: Excavations in Hotu Cave, Iran, 1951: A Preliminary Report. Carleton S. Coon. The Pleistocene Artifacts of Hotu Cave, Iran. Louis B. Dupree. The Human Skeletal Remains from Hotu Cave, Iran. J. Lawrence Angel". American Anthropologist. 56 (5): 922–923. doi:10.1525/aa.1954.56.5.02a00480. ISSN 1548-1433.
  48. C. S. Coon, "Excavations in Huto Cave, Iran, 1951: A Preliminary Report", Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society; 96, 1952, pp. 231–69.
  49. Braidwood, Robert J. (1952). "Review of Cave Explorations in Iran 1949". American Anthropologist. 54 (4): 551–553. doi:10.1525/aa.1952.54.4.02a00240. ISSN 0002-7294. JSTOR 664896.
  50. Coon, Carleton S. (1962). The Story of Man: From the First Human to Primitive Culture and Beyond (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Knopf. OCLC 489646.
  51. Coon, Carleton. "Why There Has to Be a Sasquatch". Bigfoot Encounters. Retrieved October 5, 2020.
  52. Liechty, Mark (2017). Far Out: Countercultural Seekers and the Tourist Encounter in Nepal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 55–59. ISBN 978-0-226-42913-7.
  53. Dickey, Colin (2020). The Unidentified: Mythical Monsters, Alien Encounters, and Our Obsession with the Unexplained. New York: Viking. pp. 102–105. ISBN 978-0-525-55757-9.
  54. Regal 2011.
  55. Origin of the Human Races, Ernst Mayr, Science, New Series, Vol. 138, No. 3538, (October 19, 1962), pp. 420-422.
  56. The Origin of Races. by Carleton S. Coon, Review by: Stanley M. Garn, American Sociological Review, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Aug. 1963), pp. 637-638/
  57. W. W. Howells. "Biographical Memoirs V.58". National Academy of Sciences, 1989.
  58. Goodman & Hammonds 2000.

References

Further reading
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Carleton S. Coon.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.