Charles Graham (Western Australian politician)

Charles Montague Graham was the eldest son of Patrick Graham, a horse trainer.[2]

Graham received his education in New Zealand. There, he trained to be a tailor but left New Zealand to reside in Australia. After arriving in Australia, he met his wife, Katie; they married on 17 March 1891.[2] He then lived on Pell Street, Broken Hill, New South Wales, starting in 1892. The couple moved from Broken Hill to Western Australia a few years after their marriage.[2]

In Western Australia, Graham set up a business in Piesse Street, Boulder and was elected to Boulder's Municipal Council.[2]

Graham died in Melbourne on 27 March 1938 after a short illness. He and his wife had one daughter, Wilmot Jane.[2]

States Map of Australia

After mention was given of the death of Charles Montague Graham. It is written that Graham served as a member of the senate for 6 years and was elected as a senator of Western Australia through a general election in 1922.[4] He is also a part of several select committees (where one of them is the Joint Select Committee on Commonwealth Electoral Law and Procedure of 1926 to 1927) as a member. With his passing, he left his wife and a daughter.[4]

Later in his political career, he declared that he was an Australian.[2]

He fought against and defended numerous beliefs and opinions during his political period. These include: Some level of profit received by Commonwealth bank should be delivered to the people, the trouble of low pensions for the aged, appeal for compassion towards those suffering from work-related illnesses, to create a minor change towards the Conciliation and Arbitration Act, fight against gold bounty, supported selective immigration, and kept an area relating to the concern of Australian Women's Commonwealth Organisations.[2]

Earlier in his political career, he enunciate his central mission, which drew attention to him. He commented and professed that the production of men's (soldier) caps should be protected as it is the 'true Australian sentiment'. This is one of his first objections to the Commonwealth. One of his first actions as a senate is to "Question: Invalid and Old-Age Pensions" on 5 July 1923, and his last actions in the political stance was to bring upon the government 2 questions, which were about "Wireless Advertisements" and "Retiring Senators" (Sherratt, T. as cited in Historic Hansard). It was also written about Charles Graham that who is known mainly as 'a party man in debate'; this statement emphasises the indication that his work will cover policy in regards to Australia, more specifically on Western Australia.[2]

After his continuous political movement after this event. Eventually, his political career ended with his loss in the 1928 election. Before it came to an end, in 1927, he made one of his last speeches, which is regarding expressing hope that the time when men needed to crawl like snakes to approach their masters to beg for work had ended.[2]

As his political career ended, he moved and found a job as a storeman and lastly became the committee of the Victorian Federated Storeman and Packers Union.[2]

A figure who is said to have worked closest with senator Charles Graham is Edward Needham. They both work as senators for Western Australia's government. They both share some common ground. The main opinions they share are the feeling of dissatisfaction towards the Commonwealth Parliament.[8] In the Biographical dictionary for Charles Montague Graham, it is then written how Edward Needham supported his career in terms of objecting to the Commonwealth.[2]

As in history, as a Western Australia Senator who tackles political policy. During the period when Charles Graham is an active senate representative, in different parts of Australia, such as the Northern Territory, it was brought into concern regarding some of the parliament. This can be related to the fact that Charles Graham was one of the figures who brought up the need for change in different rights acknowledgments during the time. Major bills and government changes were brought up in the territories.[2]

Some changes include a debate on the right to vote and house representation. The discussion about the house representation. In this matter, it is aforementioned to have a similar problem which what Charles Graham addressed. Where the word females or the expression of different ethnicity is lacking in the government of Northern Territory.[9]

Therefore, different proposals have been put forward regarding the circumstances of representation. Although up until 1920, the range of time in which Charles Graham was a senator, there was no action taken into account for the proposal given by the parliament. As has been mentioned in an online biographical dictionary that Charles Graham was a senate who sticks close to the matter of policy, precisely labour policy as the way how he worked on his political career.[2]

Members from different senators bring the policy topic to the table. Although other figures brought the topic differently, it is known that policy is a major topic in the different parts of Australia's government, where Charles Graham has taken part in one of the policy movements in one of Australia's territories, Western Australia. Even though Charles Graham is a political figure in Western Australia. He also talks about the Commonwealth Bank. The mainland Commonwealth Territory is mentioned to be both Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory.[9]

At the end of his career, it was seen that no further actions were taken toward the matter on which Charles Graham focused his political career on. Instead, further actions were taken after the passing of Senator Charles Graham in 1968. Where by the year 1975, the action/policy on the electoral senate between the Commonwealth and Australia is finally challenged across the different territories of Australia's various governments which includes: Western Australia, New South Wales, and Queensland.[9]

The work of Charles Graham and his belief in the need for change in the policy of Western Australia and the need for change in the Commonwealth impacted Australia's current government. His work is shown to have created a foundation for the changes which is brought upon the policies in the Australian government after his passing[9]