Charles Hamilton (female husband)

Charles Hamilton (born Mary Hamilton) was an English 18th-century female husband. In 1746, Hamilton – while living as a man – married Mary Price.[1][2] After Price reported she was suspicious of Hamilton's manhood to local authorities, Hamilton was prosecuted for vagrancy, and sentenced in 1746 to a public whipping in four towns and to six months imprisonment with hard labour.[1]

Charles Hamilton
An 1813 fanciful illustration of Hamilton being whipped, wearing male boots and breeches, but naked from the waist up
Born
Mary Hamilton

c.1721–24
Somerset, England
Diedunknown
NationalityBritish
OccupationQuack doctor
Years active1746

While the surviving records of the case indicate that Hamilton was actually prosecuted for vagrancy, the fact that she had penetrative sex and sexual intimacy with Mary Price prompted public opinion to ask for a severe punishment of what was considered as deceitful sexuality.[3]

Newspaper reports at the time claimed that there had been 14 marriages in all. A 1746 account in the Newgate calendar gives other details.[4]

In the same year, Henry Fielding published a fictionalised account[5] of the case under the title The Female Husband. The term Female Husband became common in the US and British press to document behaviour which would later be stigmatised by sexologists.[3][6]

Hamilton was not the first documented female husband, but it was the first use of the term to describe a woman who had married another woman whilst purporting to be male.

Biography

Hamilton was born in Somerset and grew up in Scotland, the child of William and Mary Hamilton. At the age of 14, Hamilton began wearing male clothes borrowed from her brother. Hamilton studied with two doctors during her apprenticeship. One of them was Dr. Edward Green, who presented as an "operator and occulist" but was known as a mountebank. Hamilton helped Green to produce the medical compounds, collect the needed supplies and sell the cures for various illnesses ranging from cancer, leprosy, fistulas and scurvy. At this time, quack itinerant doctors were sometimes well considered, and Dr Green even offered his services as poor relief to cure various illnesses and disorders, including fistula, being paid two guineas.[3]

After serving Dr Edward Green two to three years, Hamilton was employed by Dr Finley Green for the last year of apprenticeship.[3] Hamilton then worked independently as a quack doctor, travelling and selling medicine and medical advice in southwest England, dressed in "man's apparel": ruffles, breeches, and a periwig. During this period, the Jacobite rising of 1745 against the House of Hanover had occurred. In response, Parliament passed the Dress Act 1746, which forbade the wearing of highland dress in Scotland. Hamilton's clothes were viewed as European in contrast to highland styles, which could also be seen as a cultural conscious choice.[3] Travelling meant that Hamilton could easily change location in case of suspicion, and the work provided a decent living.[3]

At one point, Hamilton rented a room to a widow named Mary Creed. Hamilton became involved with her niece Mary Price. On 16 July 1746 Charles Hamilton married Mary Price in Wells, Somerset.[3] The couple travelled together for two months, before Mary Price decided she had been cheated upon into believing Hamilton was a man, and she reported her husband to the authorities in Glastonbury.[7] Hamilton was arrested and tried for fraud.[3] Before that, the couple are reported to have had sexual intercourse several times involving penetration,[3] and historians have questioned how that could be possible. Explanations range from stating that Price was a virgin ignorant of sexual matters, and that Hamilton may have used dildos or their hands during the intercourse to penetrate her, the practice leaving Price satisfied for months before she began questioning her husband's manhood.[3]

The court case

In 1746, Hamilton was brought before the summer Quarter Sessions in Taunton, Somerset.[8][9] According to the local newspaper report, "There was a great Debate for some Time in Court about the Nature of her Crime, and what to call it, but at last it was agreed that she should be charged with fraud."[5] At the time of the trial, there was no clear legal procedure to prosecute such cases. The records show that it was not so much the fact that Hamilton dressed and worked as a man that was a problem, but rather the fact of having deceitfully contrived penetrative sex.

Hamilton was charged under the vagrancy act of 1744. This act was meant to prosecute lack of employment or deceitful attitudes, mostly related to deceitful ways of acquiring money. However, the charges retained against people prosecuted for vagrancy were vague and diverse, they were seen as a way to maintain order by restricting mobility and consolidating gender and sexual norms that were not precisely named.[10][11][3] In fact Hamilton was detained with men charged with crimes of bastardy or concerning settlement under the custody of William Hodges. The authorities were concerned about ruling over the mobility and sexual lives of strangers to the community, concerned about them taking their responsibilities with the women and children that these men had. Hamilton's case was the only one not involving paternity, money or bastardy.[3] During the trial, members of Hamilton's community wrote a letter to the clerk asking for severe punishment. They wanted public humiliation and to ensure that Hamilton would never again be able to live as a man.[12]

Charles Hamilton's deposition

According to Hamilton's own deposition, she was born in Somerset, the daughter of Mary and William Hamilton. Her family later moved to Scotland. When she was fourteen, she used her brother's clothes to pose as a boy, travelled to Northumberland and entered the service of a Dr. Edward Green (described in the deposition as a "mountebank") and later of a Dr. Finey Green. She studied to become a "quack doctor" as an apprentice of the two unlicensed practitioners. In 1746, she moved to Wells, and set up a medical practice of her own under the name Charles Hamilton. She met Mary Price, a relative of her landlady, whom she married in July 1746. The marriage lasted for two months before Hamilton's so called «true sex» was discovered, and Hamilton was arrested.[13]

Mary Price's deposition

A deposition from Mary Price says that after the marriage she and Hamilton travelled selling medicines. During the marriage Hamilton "entered her body several times, which made this examinant believe, at first, that the said Hamilton was a real man, but soon had reason to judge that the said Hamilton was not a man, but a woman." When they were in Glastonbury, Price confronted her. Hamilton admitted the truth to Price, at which point she reported the matter and Hamilton was arrested.[13]

Conviction

The justices delivered their verdict that "The he or she prisoner at the bar is an uncommon, notorious cheat, and we, the Court, do sentence her, or him, whichever he or she may be, to be imprisoned six months, and during that time to be whipped in the towns of Taunton, Glastonbury, Wells, and Shepton Mallet ..."[4][3]

The report in the Newgate Calendar concludes "And Mary, the monopoliser of her own sex, was imprisoned and whipped accordingly, in the severity of the winter of the year 1746."[4]

According to Jen Manion, the court case is representative of the pressure exercised by community to trigger a legal response by the courts to punish sexual intimacy outside of marriage and to stabilize sexual differences in a context where there were no clear legal offences defined by existing laws for cases of female husbands. Hamilton became the first known case of woman imposter cheating a woman in a fraudulent marriage.[3]

Newspaper reports

In addition to Hamilton's and Price's own depositions, there are several reports of the case in the local newspaper, the Bath Journal. The first of these says that after news of the arrest got out many people visited the prison to get a look at Hamilton, who was very "bold and impudent". It added that "it is publickly talk'd that she has deceived several of the Fair Sex by marrying them."[13] The author promises to "make a further Enquiry" into these allegations for a later report.[13] A subsequent report states that Hamilton was born in Yeovil. Another report says that at the trial the prosecuting attorney, Mr. Gold, had alleged in his opening statement that Hamilton had been married fourteen times.[13]

The final report was repeated in the Daily Advertiser on 12 November, where it was probably seen by Henry Fielding.[13]

A few months later the affair was picked up by the US press.The Boston Weekly Post published the story in February 1747 stating the court's difficulty in naming and defining the crime:

Mary Hamilton was try'd for pretending herself a man, and marrying 14 wives, the last of which, Mary Price, deposed in court that she was married to the prisoner and bedded and lived as man and wife for a quarter of a year, during which time she thought the prisoner a man, owing to the prisoner's vile and deceitful practices. After a debate of the nature of the crime and what to call it, it was agreed that she was an uncommon notorious cheat, and sentenced to be publicly whipt

Hamilton's story became a sensation with the stated fact of having 14 wives, which made the story very visible. Readers were left to imagine what the "vile and deceitful practices" could be, as they were not defined precisely.

Fielding's version: The Female Husband

In 1746, Fielding anonymously published[14] a sensational pamphlet, The Female Husband, that gives a different account of Hamilton's life.[15] Fielding was himself the son of a judge and had trained and worked in law, contributing to the establishment of the London police force.[3] The author claims that he had his information "from the mouth" of Hamilton herself. However, it is likely that he never met the woman he satirized in his work.[16] He says that she was born in 1721 on the Isle of Man, the daughter of a former army sergeant who had married a woman of property on the island. She had been brought up in the strictest principles of virtue and religion, but was seduced into "vile amours" by her friend Anne Johnson, an enthusiastic Methodist, and "transactions not fit to be mention'd passed between them". When Anne leaves her for a man, Hamilton seeks another female lover. She dresses as a man and pretends to be a Methodist preacher. She meets Mrs. Rushford, a wealthy 68-year-old widow who takes her to be a lad of about 18. Tempted by the money she will get as a "husband", Hamilton marries Mrs. Rushford. According to Fielding, she was able to deceive her bride by means "which decency forbids me even to mention". However, the bride eventually discovers Hamilton's sex, and Hamilton is forced to flee.

Hamilton uses various other aliases to marry other women, but is repeatedly forced to flee when the ruse is discovered. In at least three instances she lived for some time unnoticed by her married spouse. Finally, posing as a doctor, she marries Mary Price, a beautiful 18-year-old girl. The marriage is apparently happy until, while Hamilton is visiting Glastonbury, she is recognised by someone from a previous "marriage". Mary cannot believe it, but her mother ensures that Hamilton is arrested and prosecuted. She is sentenced to imprisonment and to four public whippings in the market towns of Somerset. Fielding claims that "on the very evening she had suffered the first whipping, she offered the gaoler money, to procure her a young girl to satisfy her most monstrous and unnatural desires."[17]

Fielding's text was re-published with alterations in 1813, again anonymously, as The surprising adventures of a female husband! Containing the whimsical amours, curious incidents, and diabolical tricks of Miss M. Hamilton, alias Mr. G. Hamilton, alias Minister Bentley, Mr. O'Keefe, alias Mrs. Knight, the Midwife, &c ...[18] This lesser-known version has many alterations including a more sensationalized title and changes to the historical and cultural context.[15] The pamphlet was inexpensive and more than likely purchased by both men and women of different social statuses. Fielding exaggerated and fictionalized parts of the story in order to keep the audience interested and to entice people to read who might not be interested in erotic fiction.[15]

Something interesting about Fielding's version of The Female Husband was his use of pronouns. When Hamilton is passing as a male, Fielding uses 'he/him', a tactic which might seem to cast the author as complicit in the deception.[19] In Fielding's version the reader can be confused by the use of gender: "She had not been long in this city, before she became acquainted with one Mary Price, a girl of about eighteen years of age, and of extraordinary beauty. With this girl, hath this wicked woman since her confinement declared, she was really as much in love, as it was possible for a man ever to be with one of her own sex."[20] Fielding's use grammar here confuses the gender issue; both 'man' and 'her' refer back to Hamilton, or the 'wicked woman' speaking to Fielding from her jail cell. However, in the pamphlet published in the 19th century, the author makes a point of correcting this ambiguity, often adding italics to emphasize the pronoun choice.[19] Not only does the nineteenth-century pamphlet consistently refer to Hamilton with a female pronoun, the author draws attention to the choice by using italics which are only used when a masculine pronoun would be indicated by Hamilton's masculine persona.[19] While in earlier text Fielding does play with the idea that women might find Hamilton attractive because of her femininity, whenever her 'sex' is discovered in his pamphlet, the relationship abruptly ends and unlike the 19th century author, Fielding more subtly exploits the possibilities of suggestion, and manages at the same time to maintain a tone of moral reprimand.[19] It has been argued that Fielding merged the conventions of the criminal biographies that were so popular in his time, with those of the comic marriage plot (a staple of drama that was slowly gaining ground in fiction as well).[21]

Authenticity of the accounts

Historian Louis Crompton describes Fielding's account as probably "one part fact to ten parts fiction".[5] Sheridan Baker says of the 23 page booklet, "I think it fairly safe to put down the first twenty pages of The Female Husband to pure fiction by Fielding. And in the last three pages, as the record indicates, fiction is not altogether lacking." He dismisses Fielding's claim to have interviewed Hamilton herself, saying that "it seems certain" no such interview took place, and that he was not present at the trial.[13] He notes that many elements of the 'life' of Hamilton as described by Fielding seem to parallel the plots of his novels, and that even the details of the court case, which can be checked against the record, contain elements that are demonstrably false, and probably follow from a misinterpretation of phrases in the newspaper reports.[13] It is possible that Fielding got some details from the prosecuting council Henry Gould (misspelled as 'Mr. Gold' in the newspapers), who was his cousin, but Baker thinks this unlikely, especially as Fielding himself copies the newspapers in misspelling the name 'Gold'. Since details of Hamilton's life as reported by Fielding contradict her sworn deposition, the evidence suggests that Fielding simply elaborated on the newspaper reports, perhaps supplemented by rumours that were circulating about the case.[13]

According to Louis Crompton, Hamilton was only prosecuted for fraudulently marrying Price: there is no record of any other prosecution. Whether any previous marriages ever occurred, or if they were merely a product of local gossip and rumour remains unknown.[5]

Broadcast media

Fielding's version of the story was adapted into a BBC Radio 4 play of the same name, starring comedian Sandi Toksvig. The play was written by Sheila Hannon and was first broadcast in June 2006.[22]

The 1813 publication by Henry Fielding[18] was the subject of an appraisal in a 2010 episode of PBS' Antiques Roadshow entitled "Naughty or Nice." The publication includes a colour etching attributed, possibly falsely, to George Cruikshank which depicts Hamilton being publicly whipped for her crimes.

See also

References

  1. Manion, Jen (1 February 2021). "'Female husbands': the secret lives of 18th-century transgender pioneers". HistoryExtra. Retrieved 12 September 2021. ['Female husband'] was used to describe someone who was assigned female at birth, transed genders, lived as a man and married a woman. The phrase was used first in the UK in 1746, circulating throughout the UK and the US during the 19th century, then fading from prominent usage in the early years of the 20th century.
  2. Baker, Sheridan, 'Henry Fielding's the Female Husband: Fact and Fiction', Proceedings of the Modern Language Association, Vol. 74, No. 3 (Jun., 1959), pp. 213-224
  3. Jen, Manion (2020). Female Husbands: A Trans History. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 17–43. ISBN 9781108483803.
  4. Newgate Calendar A Woman who was imprisoned and whipped for marrying Fourteen Women, 1746
  5. Louis Crompton, Homosexuality and Civilization, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA., 2003, p.476.
  6. Emily, Skidmore (2017). True Sex. New York University Press. ISBN 978-1-4798-7063-9.
  7. Elliott, Sarah K. (20 December 2021). "Who Was the Real Person Behind Fielding's "Female Husband"?". PBS. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
  8. Elizabeth Susan Wahl, Invisible Relations: Representations of Female Intimacy in the Age of Enlightenment, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1999, p.263
  9. Lavery, Grace (10 July 2020). "Female Husbands by Jen Manion review – a trans history". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
  10. Audrey Eccles (2016). "Offences within the 1744 Vagrant Act". Vagrancy in Law and Practice under the Old Poor Law. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.4324/9781315548531. ISBN 9781317002925.
  11. "Background - Vagrancy - London Lives". www.londonlives.org. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
  12. Letter to the clerk of peace, October 9, 1746, Q/SR/314/170a, Quarter sessions, Somerset archives, England
  13. Sheridan Baker, "Henry Fielding's the Female Husband: Fact and Fiction", PMLA, Vol. 74, No. 3 (Jun., 1959), pp. 213-224
  14. Eastwood, A. L. (2007). "Surprising histories: a comparison of two pamphlets". Notes and Queries. 54 (4): 490–496. doi:10.1093/notesj/gjm191.
  15. Eeastwood, Adrienne (2007). "Surprising Histories: A Comparison of Two Pamphlets". Notes and Queries. 54 (4): 490–96. doi:10.1093/notesj/gjm191 via MLA International Bibliography.
  16. Castle, Terry (1982). "Matters Not Fit to Be Mentioned: Fielding's The Female Husband". ELH. 49 (3): 602–622. doi:10.2307/2872757. JSTOR 2872757.
  17. "The Female Husband: or, the Surprising History of Mrs. Mary, alias Mr. George Hamilton, who was Convicted of having Married a young Woman of Wells and Lived with her as her Husband. Taken from her own Mouth since her Confinement.". Archived from the original on 19 July 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
  18. The surprising adventures of a female husband! : containing the whimsical amours, curious incidents, and diabolical tricks, of Miss M. Hamilton, alias Mr. G. Hamilton, alias Minister Bentley, Mr. O'Keefe, alias Mrs. Knight, the midwife, &c. who married three wives, and lived with each some time undiscovered: for which acts she was tried at the summer sessions, in the county of Somerset, in the year 1752, found guilty, and whipped four several times, in four market towns, and afterwards imprisoned six months ..., Henry Fielding, 1813. p.1
  19. Eastwood, Adrienne L. (1 December 2007). "Surprising Histories: A Comparison of Two Pamphlets". Notes and Queries. 54 (4): 490–496. doi:10.1093/notesj/gjm191. ISSN 0029-3970.
  20. Fielding, Henry (27 February 2014). The Female Husband. The University of Adelaide Library. p. 15. Archived from the original on 19 July 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
  21. Castro-Santana, Anaclara. Errors and Reconciliations: Marriage in the Plays and Novels of Henry Fielding (Routledge, 2018) pp. 145-50.
  22. "The Female Husband" Radio Listings
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.