Court Appointed Special Advocates

In 1977, Seattle Superior Court Judge David Soukup was faced with making decisions on behalf of abused and neglected children with only the information provided by the state Child Protective Services. Soukup formulated the idea that volunteers could be dedicated to a case and speak for children's best interests.[4] Fifty volunteers responded to his idea, which started a movement to provide better representation for abused and neglected children throughout the United States.[5] By 2007, the National CASA Association had served 2 million children nationwide.[6]

Since its founding, CASA programming has grown to cover 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.[3] Each state's program is responsible for developing and funding a budget.[7] Some state and local agencies receive government funding, while others do not. The National CASA agency relies on pass thru grants from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention as well as partnerships with non-profit organizations, philanthropic corporations, and community action groups.[8]

CASA are generally appointed at the first hearing for the welfare of a child.[9] In some states, a child will be assigned a lawyer as guardian ad litem (GAL) to represent the child in court. The GAL can double as a CASA, and in some situations, a child will be assigned both a CASA and a GAL.[1]

There are over 400,000 children aged 0–21 in foster care in the US.[6]

CASA are volunteers from the community who complete training that has been provided by the state or local CASA office.[10] The training consists of a minimum of 30 hours classroom instruction, court observation, and continued training each year.[11] CASA must also pass a criminal background check.[12] Each state develops its own program, implementing the national training and program standards. There are no educational requirements that CASA volunteers must meet, other than completing the training.[1]

A 2019 study commissioned by Texas CASA looking at the outcomes of 31,754 children found that children assigned a CASA were less likely to be reunified with parents, less likely to find permanence, and more likely to "age out" of foster care, and these outcomes were not the result of selection bias whereby CASAs were appointed to the toughest cases.[13] A 2004 study found CASA prolonged the time children were in foster care and made it less likely children would be placed with relatives than strangers.[14] The study also found CASAs spent very little time with children.[15] One law review article has found "structural racism" in CASA programs whereby volunteers overwhelmingly come from white and middle class backgrounds but are sent to investigate families that are disproportionately nonwhite and poor.[16]

• Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act