Court of public opinion

Trying cases in the court of public opinion refers to using the media to influence public support for one side or the other in a court case. This can result in persons outside the justice system (i.e. people other than the judge or jury) taking action for or against a party. For instance, the reputation of a party may be greatly damaged even if they win the case.[1][2] Lawyer Robert S. Bennett noted that when he represents high-profile clients, he sometimes finds them in a (figurative) Bermuda triangle of cross-currents generated by a criminal investigation, the news media, and the U.S. Congress.[3] It has been noted that there is no Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in the court of public opinion.[4]

For the book titled: "In the Court of Public Opinion", see Alger Hiss.

It is said that high-profile cases have important implications for balancing the right of the public to scrutinize the judicial process and the right of the participants to a fair trial.[5] An argument against U.S. ratification of the Statute of the International Criminal Court was that a politically motivated prosecutor might attempt to convict the United States in the court of public opinion of a violation of international law, by charging one of its military or civilian officials with war crimes.[6] The court of public opinion has been described as the most important informal court.[7]

Instances

It could be argued that the prosecutor in the Duke lacrosse case attempted to try the case in the court of public opinion by making unsupported allegations to the media.[5] In the Kobe Bryant sexual assault case, it was alleged that parties were using court pleadings as press releases.[8]

See also

References
  1. JM Moses (1995), "Legal Spin Control: Ethics and Advocacy in the Court of Public Opinion", Columbia Law Review, 95 (7): 1811–1856, doi:10.2307/1123196, JSTOR 1123196
  2. Haggerty, James (2003), In the court of public opinion : winning your case with public relations
  3. Bennett, Robert S. (1996–1997), Press Advocacy and the High-Profile Client, vol. 30, Loy. L. A. L. Rev., p. 13
  4. J Marquis (2005), The Myth of Innocence, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
  5. The Court of Public Opinion, Duke University School Of Law, September 28–29, 2007
  6. Leigh, Monroe (2001), United States and the Statute of Rome, The, vol. 95, Am. J. Int'l L., p. 124
  7. JM Bryson; BC Crosby (1993), Policy planning and the design and use of forums, arenas, and courts (PDF)
  8. SA Terilli; SL Splichal; PJ Driscol (2007), Lowering the Bar: Privileged Court Filings as Substitutes for Press Releases in the Court of Public Opinion (PDF), Communication Law
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.