Database caching

Database caching improves scalability by distributing query workload from backend to multiple cheap front-end systems. It allows flexibility in the processing of data; for example, the data of Platinum customers can be cached while that of ordinary customers are not. Caching can improve availability of data, by providing continued service for applications that depend only on cached tables even if the backend server is unavailable. Another benefit is improved data access speeds brought about by locality of data and smoothing out load peaks by avoiding round-trips between middle-tier and data-tier.[3]

• Updateable cache tables: Many cache systems are read-only which limits their usage to small segment of the applications, non-real time applications.
• Bi-Directional updates: For updateable caches, updates, which happen in cache, should be propagated to the target database and any updates that happen directly on the target database should come to cache automatically.
• Synchronous and asynchronous update propagation: The updates on cache table shall be propagated to target database in two modes. Synchronous mode makes sure that after the database operation completes the updates are applied at the target database as well. In case of Asynchronous mode the updates are delayed to the target database. Synchronous mode gives high cache consistency and is suited for real time applications. Asynchronous mode gives high throughput and is suited for near real time applications.
• Multiple cache granularity - Database level, Table level and Result-set caching: Major portions of corporate databases are historical and infrequently accessed. But, there is some information that should be instantly accessible like premium customer's data, etc.
• Recovery for cached tables: In case of system or power failure, during the restart of caching platform all the committed transactions on the cached tables should be recovered.
• Tools to validate the coherence of cache: In case of asynchronous mode of update propagation, cache at different cache nodes and target database may diverge. This needs to be resolved manually, with mismatches identified and corrective measures taken if required.
• Horizontally scalable: Cluster computing may increase availability and achieve load balancing. Caching in a clustered environment spans multiple nodes, keeping the cached data coherent across nodes.
• Transparent access to non-cached tables reside in target database: Database cache should keep track of queries and should be able to intelligently route to the database cache or to the origin database based on the data locality without any application code modification.
• Transparent Fail over: There should not be any service outages in case of caching platform failure. Client connections should be routed to the target database.
• No or very few changes to application: Support for standard interfaces JDBC, ODBC etc. that will make the application to work seamlessly without any application code changes. It should route all stored procedure calls to target database so that they don't need to be migrated.

• Cache walking on deletes or invalidation events: Cache designs that leverage external cache engines such as Redis or Hazelcast will often trigger invalidation by issuing deletions against the invalidated objects. This could result in a single write operation triggering thousands of deletes, impacting performance.
• Lack of key tracking: Again, if using an external cache engine, any request will often trigger a key lookup at the cache layer. If this is a miss, it can trigger an extra RTT, adding to the overall latency of requests. Engines such as Redis and Hazelcast provide for key change notification support however, allowing local cache layers to be updated when keys are changed in a remote cache layer. By tracking these keys locally, remote lookups on a cache miss can be avoided, preventing a cache hit penalty.
• Invalidation as an instant event, not a time range: When a table is to be changed as part of a transaction, the SQL mode can impact if a query on another connection should see the changes or not. As such, while a transaction hasn't yet been committed or rolled back, any change against a table during the transaction should trigger the table to be considered volatile until the transaction is completed. Often, cache engines will only invalidate a result before or after the query is executed.
• Distributed caches w/ lack of communication: If a cache design is using an underlying storage layer, when used as a distributed cache, invalidations are done locally, based on what tables are written to at a given time. Unfortunately, other nodes may have written cache objects for the same table, and these objects won't be invalidated. When used for local session data with upstream client persistence, this may be acceptable, but for shared data that needs to maintain consistency across sessions, this can cause data consistency problems.

• Middle-Tier Database Caching for e-Business