Dental cement
Dental cements have a wide range of dental and orthodontic applications. Common uses include temporary restoration of teeth, cavity linings to provide pulpal protection, sedation or insulation and cementing fixed prosthodontic appliances.[1] Recent uses of dental cement also include two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal activity in brains of animal models in basic experimental neuroscience.[2]
Traditionally cements have separate powder and liquid components which are manually mixed. Thus working time, amount and consistency can be individually adapted to the task at hand. Some cements, such as GIC, can come in capsules and are mechanically mixed using rotating or oscillating mixing machines.[3] Resin cements are no cements in a narrower sense, but rather polymer based composite materials. ISO 4049: 2019[4] classifies these polymer based luting materials according to curing mode as class 1 (self-cured), class 2 (light-cured), or class 3 (dual-cured). Most of the commercially available products are class 3 materials, combining chemical- and light-activation mechanisms.
Ideal cement properties
- High biocompatibility - zinc phosphate cement is considered the most biocompatible material with a low allergy potential despite the occasional initial acid pain (as a consequence of inadequate powder/liquid ratio)
- Non irritant. Polycarboxylate cement is considered the most sensitive type due to the properties of PAA.
- Antibacteria properties to prevent secondary caries
- Provide a good marginal (bacteria-tight) seal to prevent marginal leakage.
- Resistant to dissolution in saliva, or other oral fluid – a primary cause of decementation is dissolution of the cement at the margins of a restoration.
- High strength in tension, shear and compression to resist stress at the restoration-tooth interface.
- High Compressive strength (minimum 50 microns acc. to ISO 9917-1)
- Adequate working and setting time.
- Good aesthetics.
- Good thermal insulation properties as a liner under metal restorations
- Opacity – for diagnostic purposes on radiographs.
- Low film thickness (maximum 25 microns acc. to ISO 9917-1).
- Low allergy potential
- Low shrinkage
- Retention – if an adhesive bond occurs between the cement and the restorative material, retention is greatly enhanced. Otherwise, the retention depends on the geometry of the tooth preparation.[5]
| Cement type | Brands (Manufacturer) |
Indications | Contra-indications | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc phosphate | DeTrey Zinc (Dentsply)
Hoffmann's (Hoffmann Dental Manufaktur) Hy-Bond Zinc (Shofu Dental) Modern Tenacin (L.D. Caulk) Zinc Cement Improved (Mission White Dental) |
• Lining for all filling materials (amalgam, composites)
• Cementation of inlays, onlays, crowns and bridges made of precious metal, non-precious metal as well as metal ceramic and all-ceramic (zirconium oxide, aluminium oxide and lithium disilicate ceramic) • Cementation of implant-supported crowns and bridges • Cementation of orthodontic bands • Cementation of retention pins and screws • Core build-ups • Long-term temporary fillings • Fillings in deciduous teeth |
|
|
possible initial acid pain
no chemical adhesion Low tensile strength exothermic during mixing High solubility (in oral fluids) |
| Zinc polycarboxylate | Aqua CC (Hoffmann Dental Manufaktur)
Durelon (3M Espe) Hy-Bond (Shofu Dental) Tylok Plus (L.D. Caulk) |
Porcelain restorations
Orthodontic bands Cavity liner Metal crowns Metal-ceramic crowns |
Titanium based restorations (cement discolouration occurs) | Low irritation/ post-op sensitivity
Adhesive to tooth structure Sufficient compressive strength Higher tensile strength than Zinc Phosphate expands minimally can thus compensate for polymerisation shrinkage under composite fillings |
Low pH initially
Low resistance to erosion in acidic environment No acid pain Short working time |
| Glass ionomer (GI) | Fuji I (GC America)
Ketac-Cem (3M/Espe) |
Metal and Metal-Ceramic Restorations
Porcelain restorations All Ceramic Crowns with high strength cores such as alumina or zirconia Orthodontic bands Cavity liners Restoring erosion lesions |
Allergy (rare)
Dentine close to pulp (place suitable liner first) |
chemical adhesion to tooth and metal restoration
fluoride release Ease of Mixing Good flow Aesthetic Thermal compatible with enamel Low shrinkage Good resistance to acid dissolution Translucency ?? |
Soluble in water
Rapid set – time limitation especially in cementation of several units. Moisture sensitivity at set fluoride release Inherent opacity Low fracture toughness Poor wear resistance Radiolucency Possible pulpal sensitivity |
| Resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) | Fuji Plus (GC America)
Vitremer Luting (3M/Espe) Advance (L.D. Caulk) Rely X Luting |
Cavity liners
Core buildups Luting cements Crowns Orthodontic appliances |
All-ceramic crowns – due to uptake of water causing swelling and pressure on the crown
Veneer – not retentive enough |
Dual cure
Fluoride release Higher flexural strength than GI Capable of bonding to composite materials |
Setting expansion may lead to cracking of all-ceramic crowns
Moisture sensitive |
| Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) | Temp-Bond
Fynal (L.D. Caulk) Super EBA (Bosworth) |
Temporary crowns, bridges
Provisional cementation of fixed partial dentures Provisional restoration of teeth Cavity liner |
When resin cement to be used for permanent cementation | Neutral pH
Good sealing ability Resistance to marginal penetration Obtundent effect on pulpal tissues |
Weakest of the cements
Low strength Low abrasion resistance Soluble (in oral fluids) Little anticariogenic action |
| Copper cements | Doc's Best (Temrex)
READY2PROTECT Copperioncement (Hoffmann Dental Manufaktur) |
|
bactericidal effect
bacteria-tight seal |
||
| Resin cements | Panavia 21 (Kurarary)
Multilink Automix SG(Vivadent) RelyX Unicem 2 (3M/ESPE) Maxcem Elite (Kerr) TheraCEM (BISCO) |
All crown types
Bonding fixed partial dentures Inlays Veneers Indirect resin restorations Resin-fiber posts |
If a ZOE cement has been used for the previous temporary.
Light cured under a metal crown since it would not cure through the metal. |
Strongest of the cement – highest tensile strength.
Least soluble (in oral fluids) High micromechanical bonding to prepared enamel, dentin, alloys, and ceramic surfaces Neutral pH |
Setting shrinkage – contributing to marginal leakage
Difficult sealing Requires a meticulous and critical technique Possible pulpal sensitivity Difficult to remove excess cement |
Cements Based on Phosphoric Acid
| Types | Composition | Setting reaction |
|---|---|---|
| Zinc phosphate cements |
|
3ZnO + 2H3PO4 +H2O →Zn3(PO4)2 = 4H2O |
| Silicophosphate cements (obsolete) | Supplied as a powder (zinc oxide and aluminosilicate glass mixture) and liquid (aqueous solution of phosphoric acid with buffers) | forms unconsumed cores of zinc oxide and glass particles enclosed by matrix of zinc and aluminium phosphates. |
| Copper cements | Supplied as a powder (zinc oxide and copperions) and liquid (aqueous solution of phosphoric acid) | Same as zinc phosphate |
Dental Cements Based on Organometallic Chelate Compounds
| Types | Composition | Setting reaction | Advantages | Disadvantages | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc oxide/eugenol cements | Supplied as two pastes or as a powder (zinc oxide) and liquid (zinc acetate, eugenol, olive oil) | A slow chelation reaction of two eugenol molecules and one zinc ion to form zinc eugenolate without moisture. However, setting can be completed fast when water is present. | bactericidal effect due to free eugenol
|
|
Mainly used for lining under amalgam restorations |
| Ortho-ethoxybenzoic acid (EBA) cements | Supplied as a powder (mainly zinc oxide and reinforcing agents: Quartz and hydrogenated rosin and liquid o-ethoxybenzoic acid and eugenol) | Similar to zinc oxide/eugenol materials |
|
less retention than zinc phosphate cements | Luting cements primarily |
| Calcium hydroxide cements |
|
Chelate compounds are formed and chelation is largely due to zinc ions
|
|
|
Used as lining material under silicate and resin-based filling materials |
Dental applications
Dental cements can be utilised in a variety of ways depending on the composition and mixture of the material. The following categories outline the main uses of cements in dental procedures.
Temporary restorations
Unlike composite and amalgam restorations, cements are usually used as a temporary restorative material. This is generally due to their reduced mechanical properties which may not withstand long-term occlusal load.[3]
- GIC – Glass Ionomer cement
- Zinc Polycarboxylate cement
- Zinc Oxide Eugenol cement
- RMGIC
Bonded amalgam restorations
Amalgam does not bond to tooth tissue and therefore requires mechanical retention in the form of undercuts, slots and grooves. However, if insufficient tooth tissue remains after cavity preparation to provide such retentive features, a cement can be utilised to help retain the amalgam in the cavity.
Historically, zinc phosphate and polycarboxylate cements were used for this technique, however since the mid-1980s composite resins have been the material of choice due to their adhesive properties. Common resin cements utilised for bonded amalgams are RMGIC and dual-cure resin based composite.[3]
Liners and pulp protection
When a cavity reaches close proximity to the pulp chamber, it is advisable to protect the pulp from further insult by placing a base or liner as a means of insulation from the definitive restoration. Cements indicated for liners and bases include:
- Zinc oxide eugenol
- Zinc polycaroxylate
- RMGIC
Pulp capping is a method to protect the pulp chamber if the clinician suspects it may have been exposed by caries or cavity preparation. Indirect pulp caps are indicated for suspected micro-exposures whereas direct pulp caps are place on a visibly exposed pulp. In order to encourage pulpal recovery, it is important to use a sedative, non-cytotoxic material such as Setting Calcium Hydroxide cement.
Luting cements
Luting materials are used to cement fixed prosthodontics such as crowns and bridges. Luting cements are often of similar composition to restorative cements, however they usually have less filler meaning the cement is less viscous.
- RMGIC
- GIC
- Zinc Polycarboxylate cement
- Zinc oxide eugenol luting cement
Summary of clinical applications
| Clinical application | Type of cement used |
|---|---|
| Crowns | |
| Metal | Zinc phosphate, GI, RMGI, self or dual cured resin * |
| Metal ceramic | Zinc phosphate, GI, RMGI, self or dual cured resin * |
| All ceramic | Resin cement |
| Temporary crown | Zinc oxide eugenol cement |
| 3/4 crown | Zinc phosphate, GI, RMGI, self or dual cured resin * |
| Bridges | |
| Conventional | Zinc phosphate, GI, RMGI, self or dual cured resin * |
| Resin bonded | Resin cement |
| Temporary bridge | Zinc oxide eugenol cement |
| Veneers | Resin cement |
| Inlay | Zinc phosphate, GI, RMGI, self or dual cured resin * |
| Onlay | Zinc phosphate, GI, RMGI, self or dual cured resin * |
| Post and core | |
| Metal post | Any cement which is non-adhesive (NOT resin cements) |
| Fibre post | Resin cement |
| Orthodontic brackets | Resin cement |
| Orthodontic molar bands | GI, zinc polycarboxylate, composite |
Composition and classification
ISO classification Cements are classified on the basis of their components. Generally, they can be classified into categories:
- Water-based acid-base cements: zinc phosphate (Zn3(PO4)2), Zinc Polyacrylate (Polycarboxylate), glass ionomer (GIC). These contain metal oxide or silicate fillers embedded in a salt matrix.
- Non-aqueous/ oil bases acid-base cements: Zinc oxide eugenol and Non-eugenol zinc oxide. These contain metal oxide fillers embedded in a metal salt matrix.
- Resin-based: Acrylate or methacrylate resin cements, including the latest generation of self-adhesive resin cements that contain silicate or other types of fillers in an organic resin matrix.
Cements can be classified based on the type of their matrix:
- Phosphate (zinc phosphate, silico phosphate)
- Polycarboxylate (zinc polycarboxylate, glass ionomer)
- Phenolate (Zinc oxide–eugenol and EBA)
- Resin (polymeric)[4]
Based on time of use:
- Conventional (Zinc phosphate, Zinc polycarboxylate, Zinc oxide eugenol, glass ionomer cement)
- Contemporary (resin cements, resin modified glass ionomers).
Resin-based cements
These cements are resin based composites. They are commonly used to definitively cement indirect restorations, especially resin bonded bridges and ceramic or indirect composite restorations, to the tooth tissue. They are usually used in conjunction with a bonding agent as they have no ability to bond to the tooth, although there are some products that can be applied directly to the tooth (self-etching products). Panavia was created in Tamil Nadu, India. The name panavia in Hindi Sanskrit means "stick to a tooth". It is described to be one of the toughest cements in the world.
There are 3 main resin based cements;
- Light-cured – required a curing lamp to complete set
- Dual-cured – can be light cured at the restoration margins but chemically cure in areas that the curing lamp cannot penetrate
- Self-etch – these etch the tooth surface and do not require an intermediate bonding agent
Resin cements come in a range of shades to improve aesthetics.[8]
Mechanical properties
- Fracture toughness
- Thermocycling significantly reduces the fracture toughness of all resin-based cements except RelyX Unicem 2 AND G-CEM LinkAce.
- Compressive strength
- All automixed resin-based cements have greater compressive strength than hand-mixed counterpart, except for Variolink II.[9]
Zinc polycarboxylate cements
Zinc polycarboxylate was invented in 1968 and was revolutionary as it was the first cement to exhibit the ability to chemically bond to the tooth surface. Very little pulpal irritation is seen with its use due to the large size of the polyacrylic acid molecule. This cement is commonly used for the installation of crowns, bridges, inlays, onlays, and orthodontic appliances.
Composition:
- Powder + liquid reaction
- Zinc oxide (powder) + poly(acrylic) acid (liquid) = Zinc polycarboxylate
- Zinc polycarboxylate is also sometimes referred to as zinc polyacrylate or zinc polyalkenoate
- Components of the powder include zinc oxide, Stannous fluoride, magnesium oxide, silica and also alumina
- Components of the liquid include poly(acrylic) acid, itaconic acid and maleic acid.
Adhesion:
- Zinc polycarboxylate cements adhere to enamel and dentine by means of chelation reaction.
Indications for use:
- Temporary restorations
- Inflamed pulp
- Bases
- Cementation of crowns[8]
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Bonds to tooth tissue or restorative material | Difficult to mix |
| Long term durability | Opaque |
| Acceptable mechanical properties | Soluble in mouth particularly where stannous fluoride is incorporated in the powder |
| Relatively inexpensive | Difficult to manipulate |
| Long and successful track record | ill-defined set |
Zinc Phosphate Cements
Zinc phosphate was the very first dental cement to appear on the dental marketplace and is seen as the “standard” for other dental cements to be compared to. The many uses of this cement include permanent cementation of crowns, orthodontic appliances, intraoral splints, inlays, post systems, and fixed partial dentures. Zinc phosphate exhibits a very high compressive strength, average tensile strength and appropriate film thickness when applies according to manufacture guidelines. However the issues with the clinical use of zinc phosphate is its initially low PH when applied in an oral environment (this linked to pulpal irritation) and the cements inability to chemically bond to the tooth surface although this hasn't affected the successful long term use of the material.[10]
Composition:
- Phosphoric acid liquid
- Zinc Oxide powder
Formerly known as the most commonly used luting agent. Zinc Phosphate Cement works successfully for permanent cementation, it does not possess anticariogenic effect, not adherent to tooth structure, acquires a moderate degree of intraoral solubility. However, Zinc Phosphate cement can irritate nerve pulp hence pulp protection is required but the use of polycarboxylate cement (Zinc polycarboxylate, glass ionomer) is highly recommended since it is a more biologically compatible cement.[11]
Known contraindications of dental cements
Dental materials such as filling and orthodontic instruments must satisfy biocompatibility requirements as they will be in the oral cavity for a long period of time. Some dental cements can contain chemicals that may induce allergic reactions on various tissues in the oral cavity. Common allergic reactions include stomatitis/dermatitis, urticaria, swelling, rash and rhinorrhea. These may predispose to life-threatening conditions such as anaphylaxis, oedema and cardiac arrhythmias.
Eugenol is widely used in dentistry for different applications including impression pastes, periodontal dressings, cements, filling materials, endodontic sealers and dry socket dressings. Zinc oxide eugenol is a cement commonly used for provisional restorations and root canal obturation. Although classified as non-cariogenic by the Food and Drug Administration, eugenol is proven to be cytotoxic with the risk of anaphylactic reactions in certain patients.
Zinc oxide eugenol constituents a mixture of zinc oxide and eugenol to form a polymerised eugenol cement. The setting reaction produces an end product called zinc eugenolate which readily hydrolyses producing free eugenol that causes adverse effects on fibroblast and osteoclast-like cells. At high concentrations localised necrosis and reduced healing occurs whereas for low concentrations contact dermatitis is the common clinical manifestation.
Allergy contact dermatitis has been proven to be the highest clinical occurrence usually localised to soft tissues with buccal mucosa being the most prevalent. Normally a patch test done by dermatologists will be used to diagnose the condition. Glass Ionomer cements have been used to substitute zinc oxide eugenol cements (thus removing the allergen), with positive outcome from patients.[12]
References
- "dental cement". TheFreeDictionary.com. Retrieved 2017-11-21.
- Goldey, Glenn J.; Roumis, Demetris K.; Glickfeld, Lindsey L.; Kerlin, Aaron M.; Reid, R. Clay; Bonin, Vincent; Schafer, Dorothy P.; Andermann, Mark L. (November 2014). "Removable cranial windows for long-term imaging in awake mice". Nature Protocols. 9 (11): 2515–2538. doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.165. ISSN 1750-2799. PMC 4442707. PMID 25275789.
- J., Bonsor, Stephen (2013). A clinical guide to applied dental materials. Pearson, Gavin J. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 9780702031588. OCLC 824491168.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - International Organization for Standardization (12 February 2023). "ISO 4049: 2019 (en) Dentistry — Polymer-based restorative materials". www.iso.org.
- Jack L Ferracane, 2001. Materials in Dentistry Second Edition. Colombia
- Daugela, Povilas; Oziunas, Rimantas; Zekonis, Gediminas (2008). "Antibacterial potential of contemporary dental luting cements". Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal. 10 (1): 16–21. PMID 18493161.
- McCabe, J. F. (John F.) (2008). Applied dental materials. Walls, Angus. (9th ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub. ISBN 9781405139618. OCLC 180080871.
- Bonsor, Stephen; Pearson, Gavin (2013). A Clinical Guide to Applied Dental Materials. Elsevier. pp. 167, 168 and 169.
- Sulaiman, Taiseer A.; Abdulmajeed, Awab A.; Altitinchi, Ali; Ahmed, Sumitha N.; Donovan, Terence E. (June 2018). "Mechanical properties of resin-based cements with different dispensing and mixing methods". The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 119 (6): 1007–1013. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.010. ISSN 1097-6841. PMID 28967397. S2CID 7518684.
- MSEd, AEGIS Communications, By Mojdeh Dehghan, DDS, Ashanti D. Braxton, DDS, James F. Simon, DDS. "An Overview of Permanent Cements | ID | aegisdentalnetwork.com". www.aegisdentalnetwork.com. Retrieved 2019-01-23.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Dean, Jeffrey A. (2015-08-10). McDonald and Avery's dentistry for the child and adolescent. Dean, Jeffrey A. (Jeffrey Alan),, Jones, James E. (James Earl), 1950-, Vinson, LaQuia A. Walker,, Preceded by (work): McDonald, Ralph E., 1920- (Tenth ed.). St. Louis, Missouri. ISBN 9780323287463. OCLC 929870474.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Deshpande A N, Verma S, Macwan C. January 2014. Allergic Reaction Associated with the use of Eugenol Containing Dental Cement in a Young Child. Research Gate.
- Acid-base Cements (1993) A. D. Wilson and J.W. Nicholson