Directed percolation

Realization of permeable (solid line) or closed bonds (no line) on a tilted square lattice. The cluster of sites connected by a directed path (following the arrows) to the source (circled point) is indicated in red.

One of the simplest realizations of DP is bond directed percolation. This model is a directed variant of ordinary (isotropic) percolation and can be introduced as follows. The figure shows a tilted square lattice with bonds connecting neighboring sites. The bonds are permeable (open) with probability ${\displaystyle p\,}$ and impermeable (closed) otherwise. The sites and bonds may be interpreted as holes and randomly distributed channels of a porous medium.

The difference between ordinary and directed percolation is illustrated to the right. In isotropic percolation a spreading agent (e.g. water) introduced at a particular site percolates along open bonds, generating a cluster of wet sites. Contrarily, in directed percolation the spreading agent can pass open bonds only along a preferred direction in space, as indicated by the arrow. The resulting red cluster is directed in space.

Interpreting the preferred direction as a temporal degree of freedom, directed percolation can be regarded as a stochastic process that evolves in time. In the case of bond DP the time parameter ${\displaystyle t}$ is discrete and all sites are updated in parallel. Activating a certain site (called initial seed) at time ${\displaystyle t=0}$ the resulting cluster can be constructed row by row. The corresponding number of active sites ${\displaystyle N(t)}$ varies as time evolves.

The DP universality class is characterized by a certain set of critical exponents. These exponents depend on the spatial dimension ${\displaystyle d\,}$. Above the so-called upper critical dimension ${\displaystyle d\geq d_{c}=4\,}$ they are given by their mean-field values while in ${\displaystyle d<4\,}$ dimensions they have been estimated numerically. Current estimates are summarized in the following table:

Critical exponents of directed percolation in ${\displaystyle d}$ dimensions (September 2006)[1]

exponent	${\displaystyle d=1\,}$	${\displaystyle d=2\,}$	${\displaystyle d=3\,}$	${\displaystyle d\geq 4\,}$
${\displaystyle \beta \,}$	${\displaystyle 0.276486\pm 0.000008}$	${\displaystyle 0.583\pm 0.003}$	${\displaystyle 0.813\pm 0.009}$	${\displaystyle 1\,}$
${\displaystyle \nu _{\perp }}$	${\displaystyle 1.096854\pm 0.000004}$	${\displaystyle 0.733\pm 0.008}$	${\displaystyle 0.584\pm 0.005}$	${\displaystyle 1/2\,}$
${\displaystyle \nu _{||}\,}$	${\displaystyle 1.733847\pm 0.000006}$	${\displaystyle 1.295\pm 0.006}$	${\displaystyle 1.11\pm 0.01}$	${\displaystyle 1\,}$

In two dimensions, the percolation of water through a thin tissue (such as toilet paper) has the same mathematical underpinnings as the flow of electricity through two-dimensional random networks of resistors. In chemistry, chromatography can be understood with similar models.

The propagation of a tear or rip in a sheet of paper, in a sheet of metal, or even the formation of a crack in ceramic bears broad mathematical resemblance to the flow of electricity through a random network of electrical fuses. Above a certain critical point, the electrical flow will cause a fuse to pop, possibly leading to a cascade of failures, resembling the propagation of a crack or tear. The study of percolation helps indicate how the flow of electricity will redistribute itself in the fuse network, thus modeling which fuses are most likely to pop next, and how fast they will pop, and what direction the crack may curve in.

Examples can be found not only in physical phenomena, but also in biology, neuroscience, ecology (e.g. evolution), and economics (e.g. diffusion of innovation).

Percolation can be considered to be a branch of the study of dynamical systems or statistical mechanics. In particular, percolation networks exhibit a phase change around a critical threshold.

In spite of vast success in the theoretical and numerical studies of DP, obtaining convincing experimental evidence has proved challenging. However, in 2007, critical behavior of DP was finally found in the electrohydrodynamic convection of liquid crystal, where a complete set of static and dynamic critical exponents and universal scaling functions of DP were measured in the transition to spatiotemporal intermittency between two turbulent states.[2][3]

• Percolation threshold
• Ziff–Gulari–Barshad model