Economy monetization

The Economy monetization is a metric of the national economy, reflecting its saturation with liquid assets.[1] The level of monetization is determined both by the development of the national financial system and by the whole economy. The monetization of economy also determines the freedom of capital movement. Long time ago scientists recognized the important role played by the money supply. Nevertheless, only approximately 50 years ago did Milton Friedman convincingly prove that change in the money quantity might have a very serious effect on the GDP.[2] The monetization is especially important in low- to middle-income countries in which it is substantially correlated with the per-capita GDP and real interest rates. This fact suggests that supporting an upward monetization trend can be an important policy objective for governments.[3][4]

The reverse concept is called economy demonetization.

Monetization coefficient

The monetization coefficient (or ratio) of the economy is an indicator that is equal to the ratio of the money supply aggregate M2 to the gross domestic product (GDP)—both nominated in current prices.[5] The coefficient reflects the proportion of the total of goods and services of an economy that is monetized—being actually paid for in money by the purchaser—to substitute bartering.[6] This is one of the most important characteristics of the level and course of economic development.[7] The ratio can be as low as 10–20% for the emerging economies and as high as 100%+ for the developed countries.

Formula

[8][9][10]

The ratio is, in fact, based on the money demand function of Milton Friedman.[11]

This coefficient gives an idea of the degree of financial security of the economy. Many scientific publications calculate not only the indicator of M2/GDP but also M3/GDP and M1/GDP.[12] The higher the M3/GDP compared to M1/GDP, the more developed and elaborated the system of non-cash payments and the financial potential of the economy.[13] A small difference indicates that in this country a significant proportion of monetary transactions are carried out in cash, and the banking system is poorly developed. It is impossible to artificially increase the monetization coefficient; its growth is based on the high level of savings within the national financial system and on the strengthened confidence in the national economic policy and economic growth. The ability of the state to borrow money in the domestic market and implement social programs depends on the value of the coefficient.

The monetization ratio is positively related to the expected wealth and negatively related to the opportunity costs of holding money.[11] A high level of economy monetization is typical for developed countries with a well-functioning financial sector. A low level of monetization creates an artificial shortage of capital and, consequently, investments. This fact limits any economic growth. At the same time, the saturation of the economy with money in an undeveloped financial system will only lead to an increase in inflation and, accordingly, an even greater decrease in the economy monetization. This is so due to the fact that the additional money supply enters the consumer market, increasing the aggregate demand, but does not proportionally affect the level of supply.

Criticism
  • There is a certain paradox associated with the difference between the nominal and real money supply. The uncontrolled monetary emission does not lead to an increase in the economy monetization—but to its decrease. The rapid increase of the nominal money supply during the period of high inflation leads to an increase in prices and, accordingly, in the nominal GDP, which outstrips the increase in the amount of money, which accordingly leads to a decrease in the monetization coefficient. In contrast, a decrease in the growth rate of the nominal money supply coupled with a growing GDP increases confidence in the national currency, leading to an increase in the economy monetization.[14]
  • The GDP tends to change in a linear manner whereas the money supply may change exponentially. This fact may distort the real situation.[2]
  • For developed countries the relationship between growth in the money supply and the economic performance may become weak.[15]
  • Methods to calculate both GDP and M2 may vary from country to country, sometimes making a direct comparison between ratios troublesome.
  • The money supply is measured on a specific date whereas the GDP is calculated for a specific period of time (year).

Economy demonetization

There are two primary nonmonetized sectors in the economy: subsistence and barter.[16][7] Modern economic publications define the economy demonetization as an increase in the share of barter in the economic life and its displacement of money as a medium of exchange. Demonetization, as a transition from monetary to barter exchange, oftentimes occurs during the periods of military operations and hyperinflation, that is, when money loses its natural role in the economy as a measure of value, means of circulation, accumulation, payment. Counterintuitively, the demonetization can also be observed in the peacetime, in the absence of the hyperinflation.[17]

The microeconomic explanation of demonetization is the hypothesis of so-called "liquidity constraints". When entrepreneurs simply do not have enough money to carry out the necessary transactions, they have to resort to the commodity-for-commodity form of exchange. It is noted that in the context of financial crises the demonetization is associated with a strict state monetary policy. The monetary tightening (higher taxes, lower government spending, a reduction in the money supply to prevent inflation, etc.) leads to a relative stabilization of the financial sector, which, due to a decrease in liquidity, leads to the demonetization of the economy and exacerbates the production crisis. The monetary easing, in turn, exacerbates the financial crisis. Alternative explanations suggest that the demonetization can be a form of tax evasion.[18]

Monetization coefficients for countries (2015–2018, %)

The table includes data for both developed and emerging economies.[19]

Country2015201620172018
US68.5271.3771.8870.77
UK48.3663.8369.4064.31
Germany85.6987.9688.5189.06
Japan173.04177.77181.29184.87
Brazil33.1741.8437.9739.35
India18.0413.5117.8918.00
China194.18199.30212.16198.04
Russia39.4142.3643.5543.22

See also

References
  1. Smirnov, V.V.; Kadysheva, O.N.; Semenov, V.L.; Anufrieva, O.M.; Voskresenskaya, N.V. (2020). "Possibilities of Russian Economy Monetization". Proceedings of the Russian Conference on Digital Economy and Knowledge Management (RuDEcK 2020). doi:10.2991/aebmr.k.200730.116. ISBN 978-94-6252-997-7. S2CID 226764772.
  2. Blinov, Sergey (27 October 2015). "Real Money and Economic Growth" (PDF). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  3. Kinoshita, Noriaki; McLoughlin, Cameron (1 June 2012). "Monetization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries". International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  4. Ghosh, Santikumar (1964). Monetization of an Economy. World Press. p. 34. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  5. Khmurych, Volodymyr (May 1998). "Explaining Monetization with Reference to Transitional Economies" (PDF). Kyiv School of Economics. p. 3. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  6. Wang, Lei (2019-12-01). "A Farewell to Monetization". Man and the Economy. De Gruyter. 6 (2). doi:10.1515/me-2019-0007. S2CID 208868678. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  7. Chandavarkar, Anand G. (1977-01-01). "Monetization of Developing Economies". IMF Staff Papers. doi:10.5089/9781451969450.024 (inactive 1 August 2023). Retrieved 24 May 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of August 2023 (link)
  8. Ramady, Mohamed A. (5 December 2005). The Saudi Arabian Economy: Policies, Achievements, and Challenges. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-387-24935-3. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
  9. Myant, Martin; Cox, Terry (3 March 2008). Reinventing Poland: Economic and Political Transformation and Evolving National Identity. Routledge. p. 50. ISBN 978-1-134-05695-8. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
  10. Seck, Diery (18 November 2013). Regional Economic Integration in West Africa. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 156. ISBN 978-3-319-01282-7. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
  11. Wang, Lei; Zhu, Taihui (2018-06-25). "The myth of China's monetization". Applied Economics Letters. 25 (11): 772–775. doi:10.1080/13504851.2017.1366633. S2CID 158867722. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  12. Chen, Baizhu (17 September 2019). Financial Market Reform In China: Progress, Problems, And Prospects. Routledge. p. 173. ISBN 978-0-429-72143-4. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  13. Kanglin, Zeng; Peiwen, Xu; Jing, Luo (April 23, 2021). "Innovative thinking on the excess growth of money supply in China". China Finance and Economic Review. De Gruyter. 4 (2): 115–128. doi:10.1515/cfer-2015-040208 (inactive 1 August 2023). Retrieved 24 May 2021.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of August 2023 (link)
  14. "МОНЕТИЗАЦИЯ ЭКОНОМИКИ" (in Russian). abc.informbureau.com.
  15. Ross, Sean (May 3, 2020). "What Is the Relationship Between Money Supply and GDP?". Investopedia. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  16. Gaĭdar, Egor Timurovich; Gaidar, Yegor; Gaidar, Yegor Timurovich (2003). The Economics of Transition. MIT Press. p. 364. ISBN 978-0-262-07219-9. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  17. Гуриев, Сергей; Попов, Владимир (2001). "Трехглавая гидра безденежья" (PDF) (9). Эксперт. Retrieved 25 May 2021. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  18. Зоидов, К. Х. "Кризисная цикличность и методология антикризисного регулирования переходной экономики России" (PDF) (in Russian). Higher School of Economics. Retrieved 25 May 2021.
  19. "Коэффициент монетизации экономики в России и разных странах" (in Russian). prognostica.info. 2019-06-05. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  20. Ponciano, Jonathan. "Is The Stock Market About To Crash?". Forbes. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.