Edwin Smith Papyrus

The Edwin Smith Papyrus is an ancient Egyptian medical text, named after Edwin Smith who bought it in 1862, and the oldest known surgical treatise[2] on trauma. From a cited quotation in another text, it may have been known to ancient surgeons as the "Secret Book of the Physician".[3]

Plates vi & vii of the Edwin Smith Papyrus at the Rare Book Room, New York Academy of Medicine[1]

This document, which may have been a manual of military surgery, describes 48 cases of injuries, fractures, wounds, dislocations and tumors.[4] It dates to Dynasties 16–17 of the Second Intermediate Period in ancient Egypt, c. 1600 BCE.[5]: 70  The papyrus is unique among the four principal medical papyri in existence[6] that survive today. While other papyri, such as the Ebers Papyrus and London Medical Papyrus, are medical texts based in magic, the Edwin Smith Papyrus presents a rational and scientific approach to medicine in ancient Egypt,[7]: 58  in which medicine and magic do not conflict. Magic would be more prevalent had the cases of illness been mysterious, such as internal disease.[8]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Edwin Smith Papyrus.

The Edwin Smith papyrus is a scroll 4.68 meters or 15.3 feet in length. The recto (front side) has 377 lines in 17 columns, while the verso (backside) has 92 lines in five columns. Aside from the fragmentary outer column of the scroll, the remainder of the papyrus is intact, although it was cut into one-column pages some time in the 20th century.[5]: 70  It is written right-to-left in hieratic, the Egyptian cursive form of hieroglyphs, in black ink with explanatory glosses in red ink. The vast majority of the papyrus is concerned with trauma and surgery, with short sections on gynaecology and cosmetics on the verso.[9] On the recto side, there are 48 cases of injury. Each case details the type of the injury, examination of the patient, diagnosis and prognosis, and treatment.[10]: 26–28  The verso side consists of eight magic spells and five prescriptions. The spells of the verso side and two incidents in Case 8 and Case 9 are the exceptions to the practical nature of this medical text.[5]: 70  Generic spells and incantations may have been used as a last resort in terminal cases.[8]

Authorship

Authorship of the Edwin Smith Papyrus is debated. The majority of the papyrus was written by one scribe, with only small sections copied by a second scribe.[8] The papyrus ends abruptly in the middle of a line, without any inclusion of an author.[5]: 71  It is believed that the papyrus is an incomplete copy of an older reference manuscript from the Old Kingdom, evidenced by archaic grammar, terminology,[9] form and commentary. James Henry Breasted speculates - but emphasises that this is pure conjecture based on no evidence - that the original author might be Imhotep, an architect, high priest, and physician of the Old Kingdom, 3000–2500 BCE.[11]: 9 

Procedure

The rational and practical nature of the papyrus is illustrated in 48 case histories, which are listed according to each organ.[6] Presented cases are typical, not individual.[2] The papyrus begins by addressing injuries to the head, and continues with treatments for injuries to neck, arms and torso,[10]: 29  detailing injuries in descending anatomical order[9] like a modern anatomical exposition.[2] The title of each case details the nature of trauma, such as "Practices for a gaping wound in his head, which has penetrated to the bone and split the skull".[5]: 74  The objective examination process[12] included visual and olfactory clues, palpation and taking of the pulse.[9] Following the examination are the diagnosis and prognosis, where the physician judges the patient’s chances of survival and makes one of three diagnoses: "An ailment which I will treat," "An ailment with which I will contend," or "An ailment not to be treated".[9] Last, treatment options are offered. In many of the cases, explanations of trauma are included to provide further clarity.[5]: 70 

Hieroglyph designating the brain or skull

Among the treatments are closing wounds with sutures (for wounds of the lip, throat, and shoulder),[13] bandaging, splints, poultices,[9] preventing and curing infection with honey, and stopping bleeding with raw meat.[5]: 72  Immobilization is advised for head and spinal cord injuries, as well as other lower body fractures. The papyrus also describes realistic anatomical, physiological and pathological observations.[12] It contains the first known descriptions of the cranial structures, the meninges, the external surface of the brain, the cerebrospinal fluid, and the intracranial pulsations.[2]: 1  The procedures of this papyrus demonstrate an Egyptian level of knowledge of medicines that surpassed that of Hippocrates, who lived 1000 years later,[7]: 59  and the documented rationale for diagnosis and treatment of spinal injuries can still be regarded as the state-of-the-art reasoning for modern clinical practice.[14] The influence of brain injuries on parts of the body is recognized, such as paralysis. The relationship between the location of a cranial injury and the side of the body affected is also recorded, while crushing injuries of vertebrae were noted to impair motor and sensory functions.[12] Due to its practical nature and the types of trauma investigated, it is believed that the papyrus served as a textbook for the trauma that resulted from military battles.[5]: 11 

History

The Edwin Smith Papyrus dates to Dynasties 16–17 of the Second Intermediate Period. Egypt was ruled from Thebes during this time and the papyrus is likely to have originated from there.[5]: 70–71  Edwin Smith, an American Egyptologist,[6] was born in Connecticut in 1822 – the same year Egyptian hieroglyphic writing was decoded.[2] Smith purchased it in Luxor, Egypt in 1862, from an Egyptian dealer named Mustafa Agha.[10]: 25 

The Breasted edition (1930): left page photograph of the original papyrus, right page transcription of hieroglyphics. This is Plate XIII (column 13, case 38-41)

The papyrus was in the possession of Smith until his death, when his daughter donated the papyrus to New York Historical Society. There its importance was recognized by Caroline Ransom Williams, who wrote to James Henry Breasted in 1920 about "the medical papyrus of the Smith collection" in hopes that he could work on it.[15][16] He completed the first translation of the papyrus in 1930, with the medical advice of Dr. Arno B. Luckhardt.[10]: 26  Breasted’s translation changed the understanding of the history of medicine. It demonstrates that Egyptian medical care was not limited to the magical modes of healing demonstrated in other Egyptian medical sources. Rational, scientific practices were used, constructed through observation and examination.[11]: 12 

From 1938 through 1948, the papyrus was at the Brooklyn Museum. In 1948, the New York Historical Society and the Brooklyn Museum presented the papyrus to the New York Academy of Medicine, where it remains today.[5]: 70 

From 2005 through 2006, the Edwin Smith Papyrus was on exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. James P. Allen, curator of Egyptian Art at the museum, published a new translation of the work, coincident with the exhibition.[5] This was the first complete English translation since Breasted’s in 1930. This translation offers a more modern understanding of hieratic and medicine.

See also

References
  1. Martin, Andrew J. (2005-07-27). "Academy Papyrus to be Exhibited at the Metropolitan Museum of Art" (Press release). The New York Academy of Medicine. Archived from the original on November 27, 2010. Retrieved 2015-06-03.
  2. Wilkins, Robert H. (1992) [First published 1965]. Neurosurgical Classics (2nd ed.). Park Ridge, Illinois: American Association of Neurological Surgeons. ISBN 978-1-879284-09-8. LCCN 2011293270.
  3. The Edwin Smith surgical papyrus, published in facsimile and hieroglyphic transliteration with translation and commentary in two volumes (PDF). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago, Oriental Institute. 1930. ISBN 978-0-918986-73-3., fulltext of translation with commentary.
  4. Lawrence, Christopher (2008). "Surgery". In Lerner, K.Lee; Lerner, Brenda Wilmoth (eds.). Biomedicine And Health: Surgery. In Context. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale. ISBN 978-1-4144-0299-4. LCCN 2007051972. Archived from the original on 2018-08-09. Retrieved 2018-08-09.
  5. Allen, James P. (2005). The Art of Medicine in Ancient Egypt. New York/New Haven: The Metropolitan Museum of Art/Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10728-9. LCCN 2005016908.
  6. Lewkonia, Ray (2006) [First published 1986]. "education". In Lock, Stephen; Last, John M.; Dunea, George (eds.). The Oxford Companion to Medicine (Online ed.). Oxford Reference. ISBN 978-0-19-172745-0. LCCN 2001021799. Archived from the original on 2016-02-06. Retrieved 2016-01-04.
  7. Ghalioungui, Paul (1965) [First published 1963]. Magic and Medical Science in Ancient Egypt. New York: Barnes & Noble. LCCN 65029851.
  8. Ritner, Robert K. (2005) [First published 2001]. "Magic". In Redford, Donald B. (ed.). Archived copy. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt (Online ed.). Oxford Reference. ISBN 978-0-19-518765-6. LCCN 99054801. Archived from the original on 2016-03-22. Retrieved 2016-01-04.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  9. Ritner, Robert K. (2005) [First published 2001]. "Medicine". In Redford, Donald B. (ed.). Archived copy. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt (Online ed.). Oxford Reference. ISBN 978-0-19-518765-6. LCCN 99054801. Archived from the original on 2016-08-17. Retrieved 2016-01-04.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  10. Nunn, John F. (1996). Ancient Egyptian Medicine. pp. 57–68. ISBN 978-0-8061-2831-3. LCCN 95039770. PMID 10326089. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  11. Breasted, James Henry (1991) [First published 1930]. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus: published in facsimile and hieroglyphic transliteration with translation and commentary in two volumes. University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications, v. 3–4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-918986-73-3. LCCN 31007705.
  12. Zimmerman, Leo M.; Veith, Ilza (1993) [First published 1961]. Great Ideas in the History of Surgery. San Francisco: Jeremy Norman Publishing. ISBN 978-0-930405-53-3. LCCN 93013671.
  13. Sullivan, Richard (August 1996). "The Identity and Work of the Ancient Egyptian Surgeon". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. SAGE Publications. 89 (8): 467–73. doi:10.1177/014107689608900813. PMC 1295891. PMID 8795503.
  14. van Middendorp, Joost J.; Sanchez, Gonzalo M.; Burridge, Alwyn L. (2010). "The Edwin Smith papyrus: a clinical reappraisal of the oldest known document on spinal injuries". European Spine Journal. 19 (11): 1815–1823. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1523-6. PMC 2989268. PMID 20697750.
  15. Sheppard, Kathleen (December 16, 2016). "The Contributions of Caroline Ransom Williams (1872-1952) to Archaeology". Brewminate. Archived from the original on July 26, 2018. Retrieved February 25, 2017.
  16. Randolph, Louise F. (1921). "College Women and Research". Journal of the American Association of University Women. 15: 51. Archived from the original on 26 February 2017. Retrieved 25 February 2017.

Bibliography
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.