Elasticity of intertemporal substitution

Given a utility function ${\displaystyle u(c)}$, where ${\displaystyle c}$ denotes consumption level, the EIS is defined as

$${\displaystyle \sigma (c)=-{\frac {u'(c)}{cu''(c)}}}$$

Notice that this definition is the inverse of relative risk aversion. We can define a family of utility functions, which may be understood as inverse CRRA utility:

$${\displaystyle u_{\sigma }(c)={\begin{cases}{\frac {\sigma }{\sigma -1}}(c^{\frac {\sigma -1}{\sigma }}-1){\text{ if }}\sigma \neq 1\\\ln c\quad {\text{if }}\sigma =1\end{cases}}}$$

Constant EIS utility curves for ${\displaystyle \sigma \in \{-1,0.1,1,10\}}$.

For each ${\displaystyle \sigma \neq 0}$, the utility function ${\displaystyle u_{\sigma }}$ has constant EIS ${\displaystyle \sigma }$. In usual economic applications, there is restriction ${\displaystyle \sigma >0}$, since agents are assumed to not be risk-loving.

In the diagram, one can see that as ${\displaystyle \sigma \to \infty }$, the utility curve becomes more linear, indicating that the agent does not attempt to smooth consumption over time, similar to how a risk-neutral agent does not prefer gambles with smoother outcomes.

The derivation differs for discrete and continuous time. We will see that for CRRA utility, the two approaches yield the same answer. The below functional forms assume that utility from consumption is time additively separable.

Total lifetime utility is given by

${\displaystyle U=\sum _{t=0}^{T}\beta ^{t}u(c_{t})}$

In this setting, the gross real interest rate ${\displaystyle R}$ will be given by the following condition:

${\displaystyle Qu'(c_{t})=Q\beta Ru'(c_{t+1})}$

A quantity of money ${\displaystyle Q}$ invested today costs ${\displaystyle Qu'(c_{t})}$ units of utility, and so must yield exactly that number of units of utility in the future when saved at the prevailing gross interest rate ${\displaystyle R=1+r}$, where ${\displaystyle r}$ is the net interest rate (if it yielded more, then the agent could make himself better off by saving more).

Solving for the gross interest rate, we see that

${\displaystyle R={\frac {u'(c_{t})}{\beta u'(c_{t+1})}}}$

In logs, we have

${\displaystyle \ln(R)=\ln(1+r)=-\ln {\left[{\frac {u'(c_{t+1})}{u'(c_{t})}}\right]}-\ln {\beta }}$

Since ${\displaystyle \ln(1+r)\approx r}$ for small ${\displaystyle r}$ (logs are very close to percentage changes) we have

${\displaystyle r\approx -\ln {\left[{\frac {u'(c_{t+1})}{u'(c_{t})}}\right]}-\ln {\beta }}$

The elasticity of intertemporal substitution is defined as the percent change in consumption growth per percent increase in the net interest rate:

${\displaystyle {\frac {d\ln(c_{t+1}/c_{t})}{dr}}}$

By substituting in our log equation above, we can see that this definition is equivalent to the elasticity of consumption growth with respect to marginal utility growth:

${\displaystyle -{\frac {d\ln(c_{t+1}/c_{t})}{d\ln(u'(c_{t+1})/u'(c_{t}))}}}$

Either definition is correct, however, assuming that the agent is optimizing and has time separable utility.

Let utility of consumption in period ${\displaystyle t}$ be given by

${\displaystyle u(c_{t})={\frac {c_{t}^{1-\sigma }}{1-\sigma }}.}$

Since this utility function belongs to the family of CRRA utility functions we have ${\displaystyle u'(c_{t})=c_{t}^{-\sigma }.}$ Thus,

${\displaystyle \ln \left[{\frac {u'(c_{t+1})}{u'(c_{t})}}\right]=-\sigma \ln \left[{\frac {c_{t+1}}{c_{t}}}\right].}$

This can be rewritten as

${\displaystyle \ln \left[{\frac {c_{t+1}}{c_{t}}}\right]=-{\frac {1}{\sigma }}\ln \left[{\frac {u'(c_{t+1})}{u'(c_{t})}}\right]}$

Hence, applying the above derived formula

${\displaystyle -{\frac {\partial \ln(c_{t+1}/c_{t})}{\partial \ln(u'(c_{t+1})/u'(c_{t}))}}=-\left[-{\frac {1}{\sigma }}\right]={\frac {1}{\sigma }}.}$

Let total lifetime utility be given by

${\displaystyle U=\int _{0}^{T}e^{-\rho t}u(c_{t})dt}$

where ${\displaystyle c_{t}}$ is shorthand for ${\displaystyle c(t)}$, ${\displaystyle u(c(t))}$ is the utility of consumption in (instant) time t, and ${\displaystyle \rho }$ is the time discount rate. First define the measure of relative risk aversion (this is useful even if the model has no uncertainty or risk) as,

${\displaystyle RRA=-{\frac {d(u'(c_{t}))}{d(c_{t})}}{\frac {c_{t}}{u'(c_{t})}}=-u''(c_{t}){\frac {c_{t}}{u'(c_{t})}}}$

then the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is defined as

${\displaystyle EIS=-{\frac {\partial ({\dot {c}}_{t}/c_{t})}{\partial ({\dot {u}}'(c_{t})/u'(c_{t}))}}=-{\frac {\partial ({\dot {c}}_{t}/c_{t})}{\partial (u''(c_{t}){\dot {c}}_{t}/u'(c_{t}))}}={\frac {\partial ({\dot {c}}_{t}/c_{t})}{\partial (RRA\cdot ({\dot {c}}_{t}/c_{t}))}}={\frac {1}{RRA}}=-{\frac {u'(c_{t})}{u''(c_{t})\cdot c_{t}}}}$

If the utility function ${\displaystyle u(c)}$ is of the CRRA type:

${\displaystyle u(c)={\frac {c^{1-\theta }-1}{1-\theta }}}$ (with special case of ${\displaystyle \theta =1}$ being ${\displaystyle u(c)=\ln(c)}$)

then the intertemporal elasticity of substitution is given by ${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{\theta }}}$. In general, a low value of theta (high intertemporal elasticity) means that consumption growth is very sensitive to changes in the real interest rate. For theta equal to 1, the growth rate of consumption responds one for one to changes in the real interest rate. A high theta implies an insensitive consumption growth.