Enoch Marvin Banks

Enoch Marvin Banks (November 28, 1877 – November 21, 1911) was an American historian and professor at the University of Florida. In 1911, after the publication of an article attributing the cause of the American Civil War to slavery and criticizing the role of the Confederacy, he was forced to resign.

Enoch Marvin Banks
A black-and-white headshot photo of a bespectacled, mustached man wearing a suit and tie
Banks in 1911
Born(1877-11-28)November 28, 1877
DiedNovember 21, 1911(1911-11-21) (aged 33)
Newnan, Georgia, U.S.
OccupationHistorian
Known forRefuting the Lost Cause of the Confederacy
TitleProfessor of History and Political Economy
Academic background
ThesisThe economics of land tenure in Georgia (1905)

Enoch died shortly after his resignation.

Early life and education

Banks was born on November 28, 1877. He completed his undergraduate studies at Emory College, graduating in 1897, and earned a master's degree from the same school in 1900. He received a Ph.D. from Columbia University in 1905.[1] He wrote his dissertation on the economics of land tenure in Georgia.[2]

Career

Banks held various teaching positions after earning his Ph.D., teaching at Columbia University and the University of Pennsylvania, along with a short stint in Germany. In 1907 he became a professor of history and economics at the University of Florida.[1]

On February 9, 1911, The Independent published an article by Banks titled "A Semi-Centennial View of the Civil War". In the article, he made the case that "the fundamental cause of secession and the Civil War" was the South's refusal to end the institution of slavery.[3] This claim was in direct opposition to the Lost Cause of the Confederacy, a commonly-held racist belief in the South, and quickly sparked outrage, both in Florida and across the region.[4] After the article's publication, Banks was warned about potential ramifications by Andrew Sledd, the University of Florida's former president who had been forced out of a job at Emory University because of his protests against lynching.[5]:8

A coalition of confederate organizations quickly joined together to call for Banks' resignation, including the United Daughters of the Confederacy, the Sons of Confederate Veterans, and the United Confederate Veterans.[5]:9 Powerful figures in state government such as the Florida Board of Control, Governor Albert W. Gilchrist, and former legislator John Beard viewed Banks' removal as the only way to resolve the conflict.[5]:11–13 Banks submitted his resignation on March 9, one month after the article's publication. Albert Murphree, the University's president, initially refused to accept it, fearing more outrage.[5]:14 In April, the state Board of Control directed Murphree to process the resignation and Banks stepped down from his professorship.[5]:16

The editorial board of The Independent defended Banks after his resignation and sharply criticized his detractors, writing that "not yet is it allowed for a man to express opinions of his own" in the South.[6] Other public defenders of Banks included prominent Southern economist James W. Garner and Andrew Sledd.[7][8]

Later life and legacy

After resigning, Banks moved to Newnan, Georgia.[9] Only a few months later, on November 21, 1911, he died from an unknown illness.[1] Some of his contemporaries suspected that the stress placed on him as a result of his article's controversy contributed to his death.[4] Later analyses of Banks' article and the episode as a whole have noted that Banks was not a progressive on issues of race and that even within the article, he explicitly opposed granting Black citizens the right to vote.[10][11] Banks' papers are held by Emory University.[9]

References

  1. "Enoch M. Banks". The Palm of Alpha Tau Omega. 32: 140–144. 1912 via Internet Archive.
  2. Miller, Alice L. (1910). List of Theses submitted by Candidates for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Columbia University 1872-1910. Columbia University. Bulletin of information. July 10, 1910; 10 ser.,no. 26. New York: Columbia University. p. 22.
  3. Banks, Enoch Marvin (February 9, 1911). "A Semi-Centennial View of Secession". The Independent. 70 (3245): 299–303.
  4. Leccese, Stephen (August 4, 2019). "The Professor Who Was Ostracized for Claiming the Civil War Was About Slavery – In 1911". History News Network. Retrieved November 15, 2022.
  5. Bailey, Fred Arthur (1992). "Free Speech at the University of Florida: The Enoch Marvin Banks Case". The Florida Historical Quarterly. 71 (1): 1–17. JSTOR 30148184 via JSTOR.
  6. "Free Speech Supprest". The Independent. 70 (3254): 807–808. April 13, 1911 via Internet Archive.
  7. Garner, James W. (April 27, 1911). "The Dismissal of Professor Banks". The Independent. 70 (3256): 900 via Internet Archive.
  8. Sledd, Andrew (May 25, 1911). "The Dismissal of Professor Banks". The Independent. 70 (3260): 1113–1114 via Internet Archive.
  9. "Enoch Marvin Banks papers, 1903-1911". Emory University. Retrieved November 15, 2022.
  10. Gold, David (2010). "Students Writing Race at Southern Public Women's Colleges, 1884-1945". History of Education Quarterly. 50 (2): 186–187. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5959.2010.00259.x. JSTOR 40648058. S2CID 143006455 via JSTOR.
  11. Weitz, Seth (2009). "Defending the Old South: The Myth of the Lost Cause and Political Immorality in Florida, 1865–1968". The Historian. 71 (1): 90. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.2008.00232.x. JSTOR 24454162. S2CID 144989248 via JSTOR.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.