European interwar economy

The European interwar economy (the period between the First and Second World War, also known as the interbellum) began when the countries in Western Europe were struggling to recover from the devastation caused by the First World War, while also dealing with economic depression and the rise of fascism. Economic prosperity in the United States during the first half of the period was brought to an end with the onset of the Great Depression in 1929.[1]

In 1919 the Weimar Republic was founded after the fall of the German Empire. This new government was thought to be doomed from the start and after the hyperinflation of 1923, “money became so worthless that children could play with stacks of it.”[2] Despite civil unrest in Germany and elsewhere in Western Europe, there was still hope that world peace could be maintained. This hope was dimmed after Adolf Hitler came to power in January 1933.[3]

The years following consisted of a string of international crises, including: Hitler's disregard of the Treaty of Versailles by reintroducing compulsory military service in Germany and sending troops to demilitarized zones in Rhineland, Italy’s invasion of Abyssinia in October, 1935, the Spanish Civil War in the summer of 1936, and Japan’s invasion of northern China in 1936. These events climaxed with the German invasion of Poland in September 1939, as Britain and France declared war on Germany two days later effectively ending the interwar period.[4]

Opportunities for Economic Growth

Most European countries experienced a similar trend of brief economic growth followed by varying degrees of economic devastation during the twenty years of relative peace after 1918. Many countries sought to overhaul their industrial manufacturing facilities to help with economic reconstruction following World War 1. Newly formed Eastern European states started a transition towards industrialization, and experienced mixed results.[5] Czechoslovakia provides an example of a successful transition, as they gained most of Austria’s industry following the break-up of the Austria-Hungary Empire. They became one of the most industrialized nations during the interwar period until the Nazi invasion and occupation in 1938.[6]

New industrial technologies introduced before and during the war also contributed to the brief economic growth. It took until the early 1920s for these innovations to spread across countries and from one industry to another. Important innovations of the time include the combustion engine and complete overhaul of the mechanics powering machines in industry, agriculture, and transportation. The rise in enrollment rates of primary schools shows a continued accumulation of human capital in European countries, which began in the 19th century.[7]

Along with technological innovations, the large stock of human capital across Europe led to increases in total-factor productivity (TFP). As the relative peace in Europe dissipated in the 1930s, countries failed to coordinate economic policies and could not exploit the aforementioned growth factors. Investment slowed as resources were put towards preparing for another armed conflict due to friction over the redistribution of economic and political power after World War 1. A rise in protectionism and fragmentation of markets is proof of the failure to establish transnational economic policies necessary to capitalize on the opportunities for economic growth.[8]

Inwards economic policies and isolated markets ended the diffusion of technology within Europe. It also prevented technological diffusion between Europe and the United States, the leading country in technology at the time. Too many political obstacles were present during the latter half of the interwar period for Europe to experience continued economic growth.[9]

Economics and Politics after 1929

The onset of the great depression in 1929 undoubtedly had an astronomical effect on the global economy during the latter years of the interwar period. American credit disappeared with the United States stock market crash in October 1929, severely hurting European businesses and causing a drastic rise in unemployment. As the economies in Austria and Germany appeared to be in danger of collapsing, the United States suspended war reparations, which had a chain reaction across Europe. Policies implemented by European countries also compounded the effects of the great depression.[10]

This section examines the economic situation in Germany and the United Kingdom, in relation to the smaller Nordic states. The United Kingdom was the leading economic power at the time, and Germany was rapidly gaining strength under Hitler and the Nazi Party. It also shows how different economic factors and policies lessened the effects of the great depression on the Nordic States.

Germany

The aftermath of Germany's loss in World War 1 saw the country experience severe hyperinflation, with the Weimar Republic finally tackling the issue by 1923. A period of known as the Golden Twenties then saw major economic stabilization and growth fuelled largely by foreign investments and loans. However, the Great Depression resulted in the recalling of these loans and severe economic troubles and social unrest. By 1932, close to six million people were unemployed. The situation in Germany became so precarious that Hitler and the Nazi party started to gain the support of the people.[11]

United Kingdom

Estimated to have lost ¼ of its wealth during World War 1, Britain turned to welfare to spark an economic recovery. Reliant on receiving payments of war debts from Germany to stimulate economic growth after the onset of the great depression, the British economy suffered when the United States nullified these reparation payments. Britain, along with France, demanded that Germany pay these debts, despite the country being on the verge of a financial collapse. After much debate, the sum of the payment was set at 32 billion gold-backed US dollars over the course of 62 years. Economists such as John Maynard Keynes have compared this to imposing slavery on Germany and its defeated allies.

Nordic Countries

The Nordic countries discussed include Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Sweden, as Iceland is not mentioned. While most countries adopted inwards economic policies after 1929, Nordic states continued their cooperation and reliance on international trade. With extreme fluctuations in the international economy, these countries were forced to specialize in areas in which they had a competitive advantage. One example of this is Finland identifying the increasing demand for wood across Europe, and using their abundance of natural resources to give rise to a major timber industry. This allowed Finland to experience tremendous growth during the latter half of the 1930s.[12]

Norway also grew after a strong recovery in 1934 from stagnant foreign trade and rising unemployment caused by the great depression. Denmark's neutrality during World War 1 allowed it to supply both sides and profit from this war. It used this profit to lessen the effects of the great depression and stimulate a quick economic recovery. Sweden did not feel the effects of the great depression until the early 1930s, but recovered quickly and stabilized its economy by supplying goods to most of Europe. While these countries experienced relative economic growth, there was fear that their trade conditions would deteriorate due to the imposition of quotas and the control on trade of larger states.[13]

Each Nordic state specialized in commodities that were high in demand in both Britain and Germany, the two largest and most important countries. Sweden specialized in iron ore, Finland in paper, Denmark in agrarian products, and Norway in nickel and aluminum. Germany's expansion created a tense political climate, and the Nordic states relied on political cooperation while other countries turned inwards in an attempt to become more self-sufficient. Representatives from Norway, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden met numerous times throughout the interwar period to establish strategies, which protected industries such as timber and agriculture that were exposed to international competition. The most important meeting proved to be The Oslo Convention in 1930, which included the four Nordic countries (Finland joined late), Belgium and the Netherlands.[14]

The states agreed to reduce obstacles to foreign trade, which in turn allowed them to form an economic bloc comprising 8.64 per cent of world trade in 1931. With the refusal of Britain and Germany to participate, The Oslo Convention did not achieve its intended goal of a global revival of free trade; however, it further strengthened exchange between the Nordic states. Imports and exports between the four countries grew, helping with their continued economic growth during the 1930s. Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden are proof of the importance of cross-border policies in relation to economic growth. Countries with inwards policies, such as Germany and Britain, would be stuck in the great depression for much longer as a result. The political and economic landscape in Germany following the great depression paved the way for the radicalization of its people.[15]

Germany's Fascist Economy

Upon bringing fascism to Germany in 1933, Adolf Hitler proclaimed, "the State should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property."[16] This laid the foundation for Germany's new fascist economy and the radical economic policies that would follow. One of the Nazi Party's first steps was to eliminate small corporations, which Hitler classified as any corporation with capital under $40,000. The establishment of new corporations with capital less than $20,000 dollars was also forbidden.[17]

Hitler completely reorganized the economic landscape in Nazi Germany. The Reichswirtschaftskammer ("Reich Economic Chamber") consisted of over two hundred organizations and national councils involved in industry, commercial, and craft lines. Large public works programs, such as the construction of the Autobahn, stimulated the economy and reduced unemployment. These programs also prevented the recurrence of inflation, which plagued the German economy immediately following World War 1 and led to widespread civil unrest. As the economy slowly recovered under the Nazi Party, Hitler adapted the economy to cater towards war preparations.[18]

The Four-year Plan

In 1936, Hitler and Nazi Party implemented their second four-year plan of the period, and put it in the hands of Hermann Göring. The goal of the plan was to continue to economic transition towards fascism while making Germany self-sufficient in preparation of another war. Four priorities of the plan were to increase agricultural production, retrain key sectors of the work force, implement governmental policies to regulate imports and exports, and to achieve self-sufficiency in the production of raw materials.[19]

Several high-ranking members of Nazi Germany believed Göring was not the right man for the job, but Hitler expressed full confidence in him. Several business leaders also did not support this plan, and believed a wholesale rearmament would come at the expense of economic improvement. Despite numerous concerns over Göring and the plan itself, it was carried out and extended into the start of World War II. The success of the plan in preparing Germany for war is attributed to the Göring's use of slave labor, which he defended as necessary of the very existence of Germany.[20]

Lasting Impacts of the Interwar Period

Many social, political, and economic changes started taking place during the brief period of relative peace between the two World Wars. In their book British Tourism: The Remarkable Story of Growth, Victor Middleton and Leonard Lickorish describe the period as, "A transition away from the Victorian Age toward the new world of greater individuality, mobility and innovation in most spheres of daily life, and especially in leisure and travel. Against what one might suppose, it was also a period of remarkable growth in travel and tourism and of developing social ideas that are still easily traceable today,".[21]

Holiday travel and leisure excursions became a huge source of revenue in the 1930s as rail travel was at the peak of its popularity. Many of the changes that started during the interwar years could not fully manifest until the political and economic climate of Europe was settled following World War II. Travel and tourism became a huge part of life for people in Britain as soon as it was affordable after the war. The role of the media began to transform through cinema and radio communications in the 1930s, and this extended dramatically following the end of World War II. The growth of tourism during the interwar period provided a basis for future development when post-war conditions would allow.[22]

Tourism across all of Europe started to become a huge revenue generator. Entrepreneurs who pioneered new business models during the interwar years paved the way for the growth of holiday resorts and travel agencies in the latter half of the 20th century. Even during the depression years, inbound tourism expanded and prompted people to start concentrating more on foreign exchange earnings. Evidence shows that tourism was even more of an income generating factor during the interwar period than in the years following World War II when local governments were undergoing significant changes. Tourism in Europe would not reach the level of popularity it experienced during the interwar period until close to the 21st century.[23]

See also

References
  1. "Interwar Period." History Today. History Today Ltd., 2012. Web. 15 Nov. 2014.
  2. Rapten, Pema D. "Political Disorder: The Weimar Republic and Revolt 1918-23." Untitled Document. Mount Holyoke College, n.d. Web. 15 Nov. 2014.
  3. "Interwar Period." History Today. History Today Ltd., 2012. Web. 15 Nov. 2014.
  4. "Interwar Period." History Today. History Today Ltd., 2012. Web. 15 Nov. 2014.
  5. Rosés, Joan R., and Nikolaus Wolf. Prosperity and Depression in the European Economy during the Interwar Years (1913-1950): An Introduction. Working Papers in Economic History. Universidad Carlos III De Madrid, June 2008. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  6. "Inter-War Economy & Government for Each Country." Worldology. Worldology LLC, 2009. Web. 15 Nov. 2014
  7. Rosés, Joan R., and Nikolaus Wolf. Prosperity and Depression in the European Economy during the Interwar Years (1913-1950): An Introduction. Working Papers in Economic History. Universidad Carlos III De Madrid, June 2008. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  8. Rosés, Joan R., and Nikolaus Wolf. Prosperity and Depression in the European Economy during the Interwar Years (1913-1950): An Introduction. Working Papers in Economic History. Universidad Carlos III De Madrid, June 2008. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  9. Rosés, Joan R., and Nikolaus Wolf. Prosperity and Depression in the European Economy during the Interwar Years (1913-1950): An Introduction. Working Papers in Economic History. Universidad Carlos III De Madrid, June 2008. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  10. Saenz-Cambra, Concepcion, ed. "The European Economy in the Interwar Period." The Saylor Foundation (n.d.): 2-5. Saylor. Saylor Academy. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  11. Zermeno, Sebastain. "Germany During the Interwar Period." Prezi.com. Prezi Inc., 8 June 2011. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  12. Olsson, Sven-Olof. "What Can We Learn from Economic Crisis 1929-1933 When Discussing and Analyzing the Present Economic Crisis?" SNEE Conference (2010): n. pag. Snee.org. Gothenburg University, 18–21 May 2010. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  13. Olsson, Sven-Olof. "What Can We Learn from Economic Crisis 1929-1933 When Discussing and Analyzing the Present Economic Crisis?" SNEE Conference (2010): n. pag. Snee.org. Gothenburg University, 18–21 May 2010. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  14. Olsson, Sven-Olof. "What Can We Learn from Economic Crisis 1929-1933 When Discussing and Analyzing the Present Economic Crisis?" SNEE Conference (2010): n. pag. Snee.org. Gothenburg University, 18–21 May 2010. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  15. Olsson, Sven-Olof. "What Can We Learn from Economic Crisis 1929-1933 When Discussing and Analyzing the Present Economic Crisis?" SNEE Conference (2010): n. pag. Snee.org. Gothenburg University, 18–21 May 2010. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
  16. Barkai, Avraham. Nazi Economics: Ideology, Theory, and Policy. Trans. Ruth Hadass-Vashitz. Oxford: Berg Publishers Ltd., 1990.
  17. Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1960.
  18. Hans-Joachim Braun, "The German Economy in the Twentieth Century", Routledge, 1990, p. 83
  19. "The Four Year Plan." History Learning Site. N.p., May 2012. Web. 18 Nov. 2014.
  20. "The Four Year Plan." History Learning Site. N.p., May 2012. Web. 18 Nov. 2014.
  21. Middleton, Victor T.C. "Chapter 1." British Tourism: The Remarkable Story of Growth. By Leonard J. Lickorish. 2nd ed. N.p.: Routledge, n.d. 16. Print. page 2.
  22. Middleton, Victor T.C. "Chapter 1." British Tourism: The Remarkable Story of Growth. By Leonard J. Lickorish. 2nd ed. N.p.: Routledge, n.d. 16. Print.
  23. Middleton, Victor T.C. "Chapter 1." British Tourism: The Remarkable Story of Growth. By Leonard J. Lickorish. 2nd ed. N.p.: Routledge, n.d. 16. Print.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.