FONOPs during the Obama administration

During the administration of President Barack Obama, there were six instances of the United States Navy performing a freedom of navigation operation (FONOP) in the South China Sea (SCS). During the same period the USN also performed multiple other FONOPs in other parts of the world. The SCS operations involved Arleigh-Burke class guided missile destroyers assigned to United States Seventh Fleet. The U.S. FONOP program began in 1979[1] and the Department of Defense (DoD) keeps public records of FONOPs since 1991 on its website.[2] The Department of State (DoS) provided guidance to the DoD on conducting FONOPs, with a particular focus on the South China Sea and East China Sea, while pushing back on the People's Republic of China and their "excessive territorial claims", specifically with the Spratly Islands, Paracel Islands, and Senkaku Islands.[3]

Timeline of FONOPs during the Obama administration

Background

Although the South China Sea disputes have brought the most media attention between 2012 and 2017, China has many excessive claims in contrast to international law.

The Chinese People's Liberation Army (Navy) had established a significant presence in vicinity of the Paracel (Xisha) Islands through their own FONOPs prior to their confrontation with Vietnam during the Battle of the Paracel Islands in 1974. According to Chinese Law, specifically the 1992 Territorial Sea/Contiguous Zone (1992 TS/CZ) Law, China has full ownership of the Paracel Islands, which has created tension with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Republic of China (Taiwan).[11]

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan declared that the U.S. would not ratify the 1982 Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III). China signed and ratified UNCLOS III in 1996.[12] Nevertheless, the U.S. Navy- under the Obama administration- has operated in accordance with UNCLOS III with the use of innocent passage, proper communications, and respect for nations' territorial waters.[13]

Throughout Obama's presidency, the US Navy's Seventh Fleet routinely patrolled the Indo-Asia-Pacific to maintain the freedom of seas

United States Pacific Fleet vessels spent a combined total of 700 days in the South China Sea during 2015 alone.[14] This includes vessels assigned to Carrier Strike Group 5, which included the USS George Washington (CVN-73) until the summer of 2015, at which point the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) took its place in the homeport of Yokosuka, Japan after a hull swap in San Diego, CA.[15][16]

The Hague – International Tribunal's 2016 ruling

On July 12, 2016, the Hague's International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea ruled in the Permanent Court of Arbitration that the People's Republic of China's claims were excessive and violated the Republic of Philippines' sovereignty when they.[17]

The Philippines filed the case on 22 January 2013[18] with a strong backing from President Benigno Aquino.[19] Although the Obama administration did not overtly back the Philippines in the case, President Obama and Secretary John Kerry did publicly express support for the right of sovereign nations to follow international law and norms and to dispute disagreements in the legal and appropriate forums, although emphasizing that since the US is not a claimant they are a neutral party.[20] China declared that it did not recognize the jurisdiction of the tribunal prior to proceedings,[21] and requested the Philippines to do the same. Meanwhile, the Obama administration continued to urge all nations to follow international law and abide by the ruling for the remainder of Obama's presidency.

Military exercises with SCS island claimants and the United States

Claimants to the South China Sea island disputes include Brunei, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam. Although the US is neutral in the disputes, the American military participates in training exercises with each claimant. During the 2016 Arbitration ruling, the Chinese Navy's CNS Changdao and divers participated in RIMPAC 16. Exercise CARAT and Balikatan are among several annual exercises involving these same nations.

See also

References

  1. "U.S. Destroyer Passes Near Chinese Artificial Island in South China Sea Freedom of Navigation Operation – USNI News". USNI News. 2016-05-10. Archived from the original on 2017-05-19. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  2. "Under Secretary of Defense for Policy > OUSDP Offices > FON". policy.defense.gov. Archived from the original on 2017-05-10. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  3. O'Rourke, Ronald (2016). "Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. 7–5700: 92. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-15. Retrieved 2017-04-03 via fas.org.
  4. Hilkowski, Ellen. "USS Curtis Wilbur Departs Yokosuka for Routine Patrol". Archived from the original on 2017-09-20. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  5. "Obama says will ensure freedom of navigation in South China Sea". Reuters. 2017-05-24. Archived from the original on 2017-05-19. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  6. "US launches FoNOPS in the South China Sea: Better late than never? | Lowy Institute". www.lowyinstitute.org. Archived from the original on 2017-09-20. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  7. "We should think carefully about an Australian FONOP in the South China Sea | Lowy Institute". www.lowyinstitute.org. Archived from the original on 2017-09-20. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  8. "US Navy carries out third FONOP in South China Sea | Lowy Institute". www.lowyinstitute.org. Archived from the original on 2017-05-18. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  9. "U.S. Warship Conducts South China Sea Freedom of Navigation Operation – USNI News". USNI News. 2016-10-21. Archived from the original on 2017-05-18. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  10. U.S. Department of State, Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (December 5, 2014). "China- Maritime Claims in the South China Sea" (PDF). Limits in the Seas. No. 143: 26. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 20, 2020. Retrieved May 27, 2019 via U.S. Department of State.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. Xue, Guifang. "China and the Law of the Sea: An Update". International Law Studies- International Law and Military Operations. 84: 97–110. Archived from the original on 2013-06-27. Retrieved 2017-04-03 via US Naval War College.
  12. Kuok, Lynn (2016). "The U.S. FON Program in the South China Sea- A lawful and necessary response to China's strategic ambiguity" (PDF). Brookings- East Asia Policy Center. Paper 9: 1–38. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-09-05. Retrieved 2017-04-03 via Brookings.
  13. Sulmasy, Glenn; Tribolet, Chris (2012). "The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas". National Security Law in the News: 1–12.
  14. "U.S. Show of Force in the South China Sea". Foreign Policy Blogs. 2016-03-08. Archived from the original on 2017-01-29. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  15. Bayas, Paolo. "Hull Swap Begins: George Washington Arrives in San Diego". Archived from the original on 2017-05-30. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  16. "Carrier Hull Swap Ends with Return of Last of 'The Three President's Crew' – USNI News". USNI News. 2016-01-16. Archived from the original on 2017-09-20. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
  17. Perlez, Jane (2016-07-12). "Tribunal Rejects Beijing's Claims in South China Sea". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2016-07-13. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
  18. "PCA :: Case view". pcacases.com. Archived from the original on 2016-07-11. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
  19. "Aquino on arbitration tribunal ruling: It is a victory for all nations". cnn. Archived from the original on 2016-07-18. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
  20. "Kerry to urge ASEAN to find diplomatic ways to ease South China Sea tensions". Reuters. 2017-07-23. Archived from the original on 2016-08-23. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
  21. "Philippines asked to 'disregard' tribunal ruling on South China Sea, foreign minister says". BBC News. 2016-07-19. Archived from the original on 2017-03-15. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.