Fairy circle (arid grass formation)

Fairy circles are circular patches of land barren of plants, varying between 2 and 12 metres (7 and 39 ft) in diameter, often encircled by a ring of stimulated growth of grass. They occur in the arid grasslands of the Namib desert in western parts of Southern Africa, and in a part of the Pilbara in Western Australia. Studies have posited various hypotheses about their origins, but none have conclusively proven how they are formed. Theories include the activities of various types of termites, or the consequence of vegetation patterns that arise naturally from competition between grasses.

A single fairy circle, Namibia
Fairy circles in the Marienflusstal area in Namibia

In the languages of the Aboriginal Australian peoples who inhabit the Pilbara, they are known as linyji (Manyjilyjarra language) or mingkirri (Warlpiri language).

Location

Aerial view of Fairy circles within Namib-Naukluft National Park (2017) 24°08′14.09″S 15°41′31.63″E

Until 2014, the phenomenon was only known to occur in the arid grasslands of the Namib desert in western parts of Southern Africa, being particularly common in Namibia. In that year, ecologists were alerted to similar rings of vegetation outside Africa, in a part of the Pilbara in Western Australia.[1][2]

In Africa, the circles occur in a band lying about 160 kilometres (100 mi) inland, and extending southward from Angola for some 2,400 kilometres (1,500 mi) down to the Northwestern Cape province of South Africa. It is largely a remote and inhospitable[3] region, much of it over a hundred kilometres from the nearest village.[4] The circles have been recognised and informally remarked on for many years, first being mentioned in technical literature in the 1920s[5] and intermittently thereafter[6] with the intensity of study increasing during the final quarter of the 20th century.[7]

In 2014, fairy circles were first discovered outside Africa, 15 km (9.3 mi) outside of the town Newman, in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Australian environmental engineer Bronwyn Bell, alongside Stephan Getzin from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, released a paper in 2016, providing new insight into possible cause of the fairy circle formations.[2][8]

Examples can be found at 24.95°S 15.93°E / -24.95; 15.93 (Namibia) and 23.45°S 119.85°E / -23.45; 119.85 (Western Australia)

Description

Fairy circles typically occur in essentially monospecific grassy vegetation, where conditions are particularly arid. Associated grasses commonly are species in the genus Stipagrostis. Studies show that these circles pass through a life cycle of some 30 to 60 years. They become noticeable at a diameter of about 2 metres (6 ft 7 in), achieving a peak diameter of perhaps 12 metres (39 ft),[9] after which they mature and "die" as they undergo invasion, mainly by grasses.[10]

In the languages of the Martu and Warlpiri peoples of Western Australia,[11] fairy circles are known as "linyji" in the Manyjilyjarra language and "mingkirri" in the Warlpiri language.[12]

Theories of formation

Fairy circles in Namibia's Marienfluss valley

Like heuweltjies in South Africa and Mima mounds in the U.S., the cause of fairy circles has long been a puzzle and the investigation has proved challenging. Fairy circles in Namibia may be created in a different way from those in Australia, because they formed on sand rather than clay.[13]

In 2004, University of Pretoria botanist Gretel van Rooyen rejected proposals of termite activity, radioactive soil, and of plant toxins.[3] In 2008, Angelique Joubert proposed that residual plant toxins remaining in the soil after the death of Euphorbia damarana plants might be the cause of the barren interiors of the circles.[7]

In 2012, Eugene Moll suggested the termite species Baucaliotermes hainsei and Psammotermes allocerus as the creator of these circles. All rings have been found to contain termite casts, and radar investigations suggest that a moist layer of soil is situated beneath the fairy circles.[10]

In 2013, this theory was supported by Norbert Juergens. Juergens found evidence that the sand termite, Psammotermes allocerus, generates a local ecosystem that profits from and promotes the creation of the fairy circle.[14][15] The sand termite was found in 80-100% of the circles, in 100% of newly formed circles,[14] and was the only insect to live across the range of the phenomenon. Sand termites create the fairy circle by consuming vegetation and burrowing in the soil to create the ring. The barren circle allows water to percolate down through sandy soil and accumulate underground, allowing the soil to remain moist even under the driest conditions. Grass growth around the circle is promoted by the accumulated soil water, and in turn the termites feed on the grasses, slowly increasing the diameter of the circle. This behaviour on the part of Psammotermes allocerus amounts to creation of a local ecosystem in a manner analogous to behaviour of the common beaver.[4]

Walter R. Tschinkel, a biologist at Florida State University, who also researched the fairy circles, remarked that Juergens, "has made the common scientific error of confusing correlation (even very strong correlation) with causation".[15] Previously, Tschinkel had searched for harvester termites without success.[15][16] Juergens responded that sand termites differ from harvester termites and live deep beneath the circle; they do not create mounds or nests above ground, and they leave no tracks in the sand.[15] In such respects the sand termite is unusually inconspicuous in its activities.

Unresolved questions remain about the soil from the centre of the circle inhibiting plant growth and the interactions of other species in the fairy circle as they relate to the local ecosystem.[4] The received wisdom from about a century ago remarked on the "heuweltjies" being anomalously rich in plant nutrients, raising the question of how many effectively different types or circumstances of circles or heuweltjies there might be.[5][6]

Later in 2013, Michael Cramer and Nichole Barger suggested that the circles were the consequence of vegetation patterns that arose naturally from competition between grasses.[17] They examined the conditions under which fairy circles arise and found that fairy circles are negatively correlated with precipitation and soil nutrition. This observation is consistent with resource competition being a cause of the circles. Grassy landscapes with a mixture of grasses can result in barren spots as a consequence of under-ground competition between different types of grasses. The patches are maintained because they form a reservoir of nutrients for the taller grasses at the periphery and possibly because of the activity of termites, as in the theory above. Using rainfall, biomass and temperature seasonality, they can predict with high accuracy the presence or absence of fairy circles in a region. According to Walter Tschinkel, this theory accounts for all the characteristics of fairy circles, including the presence of tall grass species.[18] Other recent work has considered interacting combinations of both animal- and vegetation-induced patterning effects as a potential unifying theoretical explanation for the fairy circle phenomenon.[19]

A 2015 theory about the Australian fairy circles suggested that the distinct vegetation patterns are a population-level consequence of competition for scarce water, as the plants "organise" themselves to maximise access to scarce resources. The circular barren patches capture water which then flows to the outer edges of the ring. More water available increases biomass and roots which leads to the soil becoming looser. The less dense soil allows more water to penetrate and feed the vegetation, creating a feedback loop supporting the plants at the edge of the circle.[20] Field observations by Sujith Ravi, Lixin Wang and colleagues using soil moisture, soil particle size, and soil water infiltration measurements in Namibia in 2015 and 2016 support this.[21]

In 2021 an explanation using hydrological feedbacks and the Turing mechanism was proposed as the cause of the patterns in Australia.[22][13]

In February 2023, weak seeps of hydrogen through faults, fractures, and diffused through rocks, were identified as a possible cause of the depressions. One researcher suggested that "hydrogen-loving microbes" may consume all other nutrients in the soil.[23]

An Australian cross-cultural study published in April 2023, involving local Martu peoples and using their traditional knowledge of the phenomenon, are pavement nests occupied by Drepanotermes (Australian harvester termites). The research showed that the circles may have been created in the Pleistocene (over 12,000 years ago), and that termites lived in them and were continuing to build them. Aboriginal peoples have lived on the Australian continent for up to 65,000 years and have deep knowledge passed down through their oral traditions.[11][12]

Myths

In the oral myths of the Himba people of the Kunene Region of northern Namibia, these barren patches are said to have been caused by the gods, spirits and/or natural divinities.[10] The region's bushmen have traditionally ascribed spiritual and magical powers to them.[3] Of specific beliefs, the Himba people note that their original ancestor, Mukuru, was responsible for the creation of the fairy circles, or that they were the footprints of gods.[15]

Another myth put forth, promoted by some tour guides in Namibia, is that the circles are formed by a dragon in the earth and that its poisonous breath kills the vegetation.[15]

Use

The Himba people use the fairy circles in their agriculture. Because fairy circles support grasses in otherwise barren land, they provide grazing.[15] Sometimes they erect temporary wooden fences around the circles to corral young cattle for overnight protection against predators.[15]

See also

References

  1. "Enigma of Namibia's 'fairy circles'". BBC NEWS. 31 March 2004. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
  2. Sullivan, Rachel (15 March 2016). "Rare 'fairy circles' discovered near Newman in Western Australia". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  3. Pinkstone, Joe (30 July 2020). "'Fairy circles' of Africa baffle scientists". The Telegraph. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
  4. "By building "fairy circles," termites engineer their own ecosystem". Ars Technica. 31 March 2013. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
  5. University of Stellenbosch (1928). Annale - Universiteit van Stellenbosch: Reeks A.
  6. C. R. Van der Merwe (1941). Soil Groups and Sub-groups of South Africa. Government Printer.
  7. Investigation on selected biotic and abiotic factors in the maintenance of "fairy circles" (barren patches) in Southern Africa
  8. Getzin, Stephan; Bell, Bronwyn (9 March 2016). "Discovery of fairy circles in Australia supports self-organization theory". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Highwire Press. 113 (13): 3551–3556. Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.3551G. doi:10.1073/pnas.1522130113. PMC 4822591. PMID 26976567.
  9. Nuwer, Rachel (28 June 2012). "Mysterious Fairy Circles Are 'Alive'". Wired. Retrieved 30 June 2012.
  10. Njuguna, Wanja (27 November 2012). "Fairy rings – enigmatic features of Namibia". The Namibian. Archived from the original on 21 February 2013.
  11. Angeloni, Alice (4 April 2023). "Indigenous knowledge leads scientists to reveal 'fairy circles', termites linked". ABC News (Australia). Retrieved 4 April 2023.
  12. Walsh, Fiona; Bidu, Gladys Karimarra; Bidu, Ngamaru Karimarra; Evans, Theodore A.; et al. (3 April 2023). "First Peoples' knowledge leads scientists to reveal 'fairy circles' and termite linyji are linked in Australia". Nature Ecology & Evolution. Nature Publishing Group: 1–13. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-01994-1. ISSN 2397-334X. PMC 10089917. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
  13. Machemer, Theresa. "The Magical Mathematics Behind 'Fairy Circles'". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 25 December 2021.
  14. Juergens, Norbert (29 March 2013). "The Biological Underpinnings of Namib Desert Fairy Circles". Science. 339 (6127): 1618–1621. doi:10.1126/science.1222999. PMID 23539605. S2CID 206541797.
  15. Wilford, John Noble (28 March 2013). "African Circle Mystery Solved? Maybe It's Chewing". The New York Times.
  16. Tschinkel, W.E. (2012). "The Life Cycle and Life Span of Namibian Fairy Circles". PLOS ONE. Plos.org. 7 (6): e38056. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...738056T. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038056. PMC 3384657. PMID 22761663.
  17. Cramer, Michael; Nicole Barger (15 August 2013). "Are Namibian "Fairy Circles" the Consequence of Self-Organizing Spatial Vegetation Patterning". PLOS ONE. 8. 8 (8): e70876. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...870876C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070876. PMC 3744476. PMID 23976962.
  18. Castro, Joseph (4 September 2013). "Mysterious "Fairy Circles" in African Desert Get New Explanation". livescience.
  19. Tarnita, Corina E.; et al. (2017). "A theoretical foundation for multi-scale regular vegetation patterns". Nature. 541 (7637): 398–401. Bibcode:2017Natur.541..398T. doi:10.1038/nature20801. PMID 28102267. S2CID 205252942.
  20. Palmer, Jane (14 March 2015). "Mysterious fairy circles now discovered in Australia's desert". New Scientist. Reed Business Information Ltd. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  21. Ravi, Sujith; Wang, Lixin; Kaseke, Kudzai; Ilya, Buynevich; Eugene, Marais (2017). "Ecohydrological interactions within "fairy circles" in the Namib Desert: Revisiting the self-organization hypothesis". Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 122 (2): 405–414. doi:10.1002/2016JG003604. hdl:20.500.12613/7147.
  22. Getzin, Stephan; Erickson, Todd E.; Yizhaq, Hezi; Muñoz‐Rojas, Miriam; Huth, Andreas; Wiegand, Kerstin (January 2021). Schwinning, Susan (ed.). "Bridging ecology and physics: Australian fairy circles regenerate following model assumptions on ecohydrological feedbacks". Journal of Ecology. 109 (1): 399–416. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13493. ISSN 0022-0477. S2CID 224978601.
  23. Hand, Eric (16 February 2023). "Hidden Hydrogen. Does Earth hold vast stores of a renewable, carbon-free fuel?". Science. 379 (6633). doi:10.1126/science.adh1460.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.