Fargo-Moorhead Area Diversion Project

The Red River Valley Alliance, a private, international consortium of builders consisting of ACCIONA, Shikun & Binui USA, and North American Construction Group, serves as the P3 developer,[12] and its design and construction arm is ASN Constructors.[13]

Under the P3 model adopted by the MFDA, the RRVA has taken responsibility for pre-financing the entire portion of its construction work until it is completed and turned over for operation. The agreement provides for milestone payments throughout construction as well as for RRVA taking on the project’s operation and maintenance for 30 years after its completion.[14]

Flooding in Fargo in 2009.

The Red River has flooded the Fargo-Moorhead area numerous times, with the most recent significant flood events taking place in 1997, 2009 and 2011 (1997 Red River flood, 2009 Red River flood, 2011 Red River flood).

Several tributaries along the Red River also flood and cause damage in the Fargo-Moorhead area, including the Wild Rice River, Sheyenne River, Maple River, Rush River and Lower Rush River.

The Red River routinely exceeds the National Weather Service flood stage of 18 feet at the United States Geological Survey (USGS) gauge in Fargo (Fargo gauge). As of 2023, the Red River had reached this stage in 60 of the previous 124 years (1902 through 2023), and in every year except 2012, 2016 and 2021 from 1993 through 2013.[15]

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conducted a feasibility study for flood protection in the Fargo-Moorhead area in September 2008, with the initial Draft Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement published in 2010.[16] The goals of the study were to find a plan that reduced flood risk and damages to the Fargo-Moorhead area, restored or improved habitat along the rivers in the area, provided additional wetland habitat and recreational opportunities with flood risk management features.

The initial study looked at multiple alternatives that could reduce flooding, including no action (continuing to use emergency measures and sand bags), nonstructural measures, construction of flood barriers and levees, diversion channels and flood storage.[17]

Attendees at a public meeting about the FM Area Diversion Project look at a posterboard about projected project expenses.

Two diversion concepts were carried forward at the end of the study, including a diversion channel in Minnesota and a diversion channel in North Dakota. However, in 2016, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources denied a permit for the project.[18]

In October 2017, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum and then-Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton created a joint task force to develop engineering options to address the Minnesota DNR’s concerns about the project's impacts. The Metro Flood Diversion Authority submitted its Plan B proposal following the work of the Governors’ Task Force, which changed the alignment of the embankment and also allowed more water to flow through the Fargo-Moorhead area during project operation.[19]

The FM Area Diversion project is intended to protect the FM-area economy, which generated a Gross Regional Product of $16.8 billion in 2021.[20] It is being funded and financed through federal, state and local sources.

The project received $750 million from the federal government, which includes $437 million from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.[21] North Dakota allocated $850 million to the project, and Minnesota contributed $135 million. Local sales taxes approved by voters in Fargo and Cass County, N.D., will generate an anticipated $1.2 billion to pay long-term debt service.[22]

The project also locked in low-interest loans, including a federally subsidized $569 million loan for 2.08% interest from the United States Environmental Protection Agency,[23] $55 million in State Revolving Fund loans from the North Dakota Public Finance Agency,[24] and $280 million in U.S. Department of Transportation Private Activity Bonds.[25]

A rendering of what the channel portion of the FM Area Diversion Project may look like.

The FM Area Diversion project includes multiple components in four key areas that, together, will protect the community from flooding by 2027. It’s designed to withstand a 100-year flood and provide fightable protection for a 500-year flood.

Stormwater Diversion Channel and Associated Infrastructure

The Stormwater Diversion Channel and Associated Infrastructure section of the FM Area Diversion project includes a 30-mile stormwater diversion channel that will route water around the metro area, a diversion outlet, aqueducts on the Maple and Sheyenne rivers, fourteen drainage inlets tied to the channel, three railroad crossings, two interstate highway crossings, and 12 county road crossings. It is being built by ASN Constructors.[26]

This inlet and control structure controls the amount of water entering the stormwater diversion channel.

Southern Embankment and Associated Infrastructure

The Southern Embankment and Associated Infrastructure portion of the FM Area Diversion project includes a 22-mile earthen embankment, road raises, bridge crossings and three gated structures. The structures have large, radial-arm Tainter gates that will open or close to control floodwater levels during times of extreme flooding.[27] The gates tie into the southern embankment, behind which floodwaters will be held in an upstream staging area of nearly 30,000 acres. Once collected in the staging area, floodwaters would then be routed through the Diversion Inlet Structure into the stormwater diversion channel and away from the metro area.[28] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contractors are building these portions.

Mitigation Features & Associated Infrastructure

As part of the overall project, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Metro Flood Diversion Authority are implementing a number of mitigation projects. Among these are funding and/or constructing levees in nearby communities, completing wetland restoration projects, and acquiring flowage easements for properties that will be impacted when the FM Area Diversion project operates.[29]

Local Entity Flood Protection and Associated Infrastructure

City and county governments are working on in-town protection measures that include levees, floodwalls, stormwater lift stations, road improvements and grade raises.[30]

• The city of Winnipeg built to the Red River Floodway in the 1960s to protect the city from the Red River. The project includes a diversion channel around the east of Winnipeg and cost an estimated $63 Million (CAD), approximately $360 million today. To date, the Floodway has been used more than 20 times and prevented more than $100 billion (CAD) in cumulative flood damages.
• The Shellmouth Reservoir is on the Assiniboine River in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, Canada. The Dam was built in the late 1960s and the outflow is controlled by a gated structure. The project protects the city of Winnipeg from flooding from the Assiniboine River.
• 

  Contractors working at the Wild Rice River Control Structure south of Fargo, ND.
  The Portage Diversion project, also known as the Assiniboine River Floodway, is near Portage la Prairie Manitoba. It includes a 29 km long diversion channel that drains directly into Lake Manitoba and prevents flooding downriver in Winnipeg. The project was built at a cost of $20.5 million in 1970.
• The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers built the Worcester Diversion Project in 1957 to protect the towns of Auburn and Millbury.[31] The project was completed in 1960 at a cost of $5.2 million. The 11,300 foot open diversion channel allows potential floodwaters to go around Worcester and flow into the Blackstone River. The project also includes a control dam.[32]
• The W. Darcy McKeough Floodway is meant to reduce the threat of flooding for Wallaceburg, Ontario. The project includes a dam embankment, and a concrete control structure with two gates. The diversion channel is seven kilometers long and divers water into the St. Clair River.[33][34]

• FM Diversion Website