Firefight: Modern U.S. and Soviet Small Unit Tactics

Firefight is a two-man wargame in which Soviet ground forces have invaded West Germany and are opposed by American units. The game uses American and Soviet small unit tactics and weapons that were current in the mid-1970s. The rules are complex, and the game uses three graduated levels of modular rules and scenarios (Firefight I, Firefight II, and Firefight III) so that players can gradually learn how to play.

The combat is on a very small scale, with each hex scaled to 50 m (54 yd), while counters represent a 2– to 4-person fire team or a vehicle.

In the mid-1970s, SPI was commissioned by the U.S. Army to develop small-unit training materials for soldiers assigned to Europe during the Cold War.[2]

That material was then converted to a commercial product, designed by Jim Dunnigan with cover and interior art by Redmond Simonsen, and was published by SPI in 1976 as Firefight.[1] A number of errors and ambiguous rules were discovered after publication, and an errata sheet was added to the game after August 1976. Even before it was published, pre-orders lifted Firefight to the top of SPI's sales list in the summer of 1976. Once released, it stayed in SPI's Top 10 sales list for eight months.[3]

When TSR took over SPI in 1983, it sought to get an immediate return on its money by both immediately releasing several SPI titles that had been almost ready for publication such as Battle Over Britain and A Gleam of Bayonets: The Battle of Antietam, and by re-printing a number of popular SPI titles, including Blue & Gray: Four American Civil War Battles and Firefight.

In the 1990s, Decision Games acquired the license for Firefight and published a revised edition.

In his 1977 book The Comprehensive Guide to Board Wargaming, Nicholas Palmer noted the "unusually detailed rules, with particular care taken to see that beginners can follow them." He concluded that the game was "Relatively elementary for a tactical game, with such questions as morale and intelligence omitted and a limited range of vehicles, but most impressive within its scope and particularly suitable for beginners interested in modern tactical warfare but anxious to avoid excessive complication."[4]

In Issue 15 of Imagine, Roger Musson pointed out that the rules were actually relatively simple, and the graduated approach to rules complexity aided in learning how to play. He noted that "The main premise of the game is, 'if you can see it, you can hit it, and if you can hit it, you can kill it' — the casualty rate is very high." He concluded with a strong recommendation, saying, "To sum up, this is an enjoyable game, playable in an evening [...] for the less experienced gamer with an interest in this [...] subject of US/ Soviet conflict, Firefight can be strongly recommended."[5]

In Issue 11 of Phoenix, Mike Doe compared the board wargame Firefight to general miniatures wargaming. He noted that "The indirect fire system in Firefight is highly detailed and is quite the best system for off table fire I have seen." However, Doe didn't like the complete absence of morale (panic) rules, which he thought were a necessary part of wargaming.[6]

In The Complete Book of Wargames, Jon Freeman was considerably less enthusiastic about the game. He allowed that it was "an extremely professional, accurate, and well-laid-out piece of work." But due to its first purpose as a simulation developed for Army trainees, he felt that it was "a learning device – not a game [...] the aim of the system was realism, not playability." He found the scenarios "rather wooden and one-dimensional." He concluded, "FireFight is possibly the most tedious game on the market [...] If enjoyment is a consideration in your game playing, pass this by."[7]

In The Guide to Simulations/Games for Education and Training, Martin Campion noted that despite the game's complexity, "Well-developed combat charts make combat easier to figure out than is normal in games at this scale." However, Campion, a history professor writing about how this game could be adapted to the history classroom, concluded that the game's very contemporary nature worked against it for this purpose, saying, "Since it is not a historical game, my interest in it is slight."[8]

• At the 1977 Origins Awards, Firefight was a finalist for a Charles S. Roberts Award in the category "Best Tactical Game of 1976".[1]

• Fire & Movement #5 and #15
• The Wargamer Vol.1 #9, and Vol.1 #32
• Campaign #92 and #95
• JagdPanther #15
• Journal of Twentieth Century Wargaming #13
• Ann Arbor Wargamer #12
• Games & Puzzles #58[9]