Floriano Vaz

A case study was done a year later after Vaz's death in 1987, by Lionel Messias which was published in Gomantak Times Weekender on 24 December 2006. As per his investigation, the death of Vaz was a "cold blooded murder" and attempts were made to close the case. Messias states that the day Vaz was murdered, around noon, Jose Francisco Gomes a local of the Gogol neighborhood heard a single gunshot and ran towards the three houses owned by the Vaz clan. Gomes witnessed Vaz fallen on the ground injured with a stomach wound, he also noticed a fiat car, possibly the Premier Padmini driven by Naique, parked besides the SRP van.[9]

Hours later after Vaz's death, the Margao police station issued two official versions describing the incident. The first instance said that Vaz along with his three accomplices had restrained sub-inspector, Narayan K Yetale of the Goa Police and made attempts to seize his service revolver, then the accompanying SRP took Vaz down. The second version claimed that a violent rabble of around 400-500 had attacked the police who in self defence shot Vaz.[9]

Messias further states that the "whitewash" was unmethodical to an extent that Vaz along with the 400-500 violent mob were charged under Cr. No. 444/86 u/s 341, 143, 147, 148, 323, 353, 332, 307 of the IPC r/w 149 IPC for assaulting the police, setting up the blockade and grabbing service weapons. As per the scrutiny of the panchanama conducted at the hospital around 4:00–4:30 pm IST, stated that no external injuries were found. Further they mentioned, "Vaz's body was turned and except the bandaged area where he was shot, no other injuries were visible".[9]

A source later revealed that no panchanama was done, instead the deputy collector and station police inspector were called by the inspector to witness Vaz's injuries. The inspection began before and after the post mortem. Messias discovered that Vaz's body bore 15 marks caused by a dull weapon, probably a police lathi. The longest mark was 23.5×3 cms which was underneath the right antebrachium which explains the defensive posture of Vaz while shielding himself, there were also red swellings on both forearms which were 3–21cms long, showing signs that Vaz was brutally beaten.[9]

The police refused to disclose the post mortem reports, Vaz's family vowed that prior to the latter's death, Naique had promised to return with the police and teach Vaz a lesson. Naique had driven to the station and returned with 22 police personnel which was later confirmed by police. It is also believed that an ASI along with two policemen had arrived at the road blockade in Naique's car.[9]

The Vaz family had adamantly stated that the police arrived on the scene and questioned about Vaz at the first two houses owned by the clan. Upon discovering him in the third house, they dragged him out from the outhouse and assaulted him. His younger sister had pleaded with the ASI to arrest him instead but she was dragged away from Vaz. He was then shot at point blank range while defending himself, possibly with a melee (a protective helmet) which had fallen on the ground.[9][16]

The accompanying ASI then faked an injury but refused x-ray when he was admitted at a local government hospital. He later yielded once the medical officer insisted. The prevailing night of Vaz's death, a fishing net factory owned by the Naique family was set on fire. The next day, Bhagvanta Naique offered MLAs, Uday Bhembre and Luizinho Faleiro a sum of amount ₹20,000 (equivalent to ₹270,000 or US$3,400 in 2023) as compensation to the Vaz family. The same evening another fishing net factory the family owned was destroyed which forced the Naique's to stay at home.[9]