Gay Life (TV series)

Michael Atwell said programme could claim to be "the first time in the world that a major national TV company has given a whole series to gays". Three members of Gay Life's production team were gay, including Attwell, who said the staff felt that they were "in a sense trying to ride two horses – putting forward the gay viewpoint and relating to non-gay people".[1] This was encapsulated for the production team by the slogan "For and about gays". Gay Life was first broadcast, in the London region, on 10 February 1980 at 11:30 pm.[1] Notable contributors included comedian Graham Chapman, who spoke of his experience as a gay parent in the February 24 episode.[4]

The debut episode was reviewed by John Russell Taylor in the following week's issue of Gay News.[1][5] In his essay "Something for Everyone" included in the critical theory book Queer TV: Theories, Histories, Politics, edited by Glyn Davis and Gary Needham, Gregory Woods wrote Taylor's review had raised "basic but crucial questions that would keep cropping up in relation to gay television programmes for the next two decades". Taylor's questions concerned the visibility of men in drag and leather who because of their frequent appearances as representative of the gay community in news reports "led the straight media to treat gayness as extraordinary, and therefore had to seek out vivid representatives of it in order to confirm their own per-constructed idea of it" and also his belief that the programme may adopt divided aims in an attempt to appeal to both "uncomprehending straights" and its desire to "preach to the converted".[1]

Richard Ingrams negatively reviewed the 10 July 1981 episode of Gay Life as the television critic for The Spectator. In his column he wrote that "I at last managed to catch up with the lesbians on Sunday, and about time too is all that I can say". The episode discussed artificial insemination of which Ingrams wrote that it was a "far more satisfactory method in many lesbian eyes because one can ensure that the donor is a suitable person—presumably a Guardian-reading Gay. Various mournful specimens were wheeled on to hail this Brave New World." Ingrams further criticised Gay Life by saying:

Nothing was said by anyone about the dangers involved in all these experiments in eugenics, the deliberate breeding of children—who are almost bound to grow up as neurotic misfits—simply to gratify the selfish urges of a lot of perverts. There might be someone at London Weekend Television who would see that even in our wonderful new permissive society there were good grounds for not allowing this sort of propaganda to be made without giving some indication of the perils attached […]

and concluded by writing:

A few years ago lesbians were rightly regarded as subjects for humour or else sympathy. Now, if people like LWT have their way, we are expected to treat them as a quasi-political movement with 'rights'. Most of this is the fault of the so-called Women's Movement, of which the lesbian activists are the extreme wing.

• Gay Life at IMDb
• Gay Life at the British Film Institute