Driven grouse shooting

Driven grouse shooting is the shooting of the red grouse and a field sport in the United Kingdom. The grouse-shooting season begins on 12 August, often called the "Glorious Twelfth", ending on 10 December each year.

Gamekeeper (left) with a shooter on a driven grouse shoot in the Scottish Highlands (1922)

Driven grouse shooting entails grouse being driven (i.e. encouraged and corralled by beaters) to fly over people with shotguns. The sport first appeared around 1850 and became popular in the later Victorian era as a fashionable sport for the wealthy. The expanding rail network allowed relatively easy access into the remote upland areas of Britain for the first time and driven grouse shooting developed in tandem with this by providing shooting in a convenient and reliable form. Large numbers of birds are driven over a fixed position providing a regular supply of fast moving targets without the need to seek out the birds. The development of the breech-loading shotgun was also an essential ingredient in the development of the practice as it allowed more rapid reloading in the field matching the availability of target birds.

The alternative to a driven shoot is a walked-up shoot. In this form of shooting the participants walk forward in a line and flush the birds as they go, either themselves or with the assistance of specially trained dogs. The typical terrain and vegetation found on grouse moors means that walked-up shooting is more physically demanding than a driven shoot and requires some physical fitness.

Shooting takes place on grouse moors: areas of moorland in Scotland, northern England, and Wales. These areas, some 16,763 square kilometres (6,472 sq mi) in extent (about 8% of the combined area of England and Scotland) are managed to provide a beneficial habitat for red grouse.[1] In the period from 1870–1965 the sheep population of Scotland dropped by around 500,000 animals (because of commmercial competition from Australia and New Zealand). In consequence, areas of former pastureland were made into deer forests or grouse moors.[2]

Management techniques for grouse moors include heather burning (known as "muirburn" in Scotland), to ensure a supply of both young and old heather, and predator control – principally foxes and predatory birds such as corvids (including crows and magpies). Some people oppose these practices because of the killing of certain species for the benefit of others, although proponents of managed moorland argue that the species targeted are abundant, whilst those that benefit are of greater conservation importance, including ground-nesting birds such as lapwing, curlew, meadow pipit, golden plover, redshank and woodcock.[3]

There has been controversy over alleged persecution of raptors on grouse moors. Raptors are protected species in the United Kingdom. Opponents also argue that managed moorland prevents wildness, natural landscapes, forest and bog regeneration, and ecotourism.[4]: 167 

Description
Shooting butts on Scottish grouse moor

The red grouse is a medium-sized bird of the grouse family or subfamily which is found in heather moorland in Great Britain and Ireland. It is usually classified as a subspecies of the willow grouse, but is sometimes considered to be a separate species Lagopus scoticus, found only in the British Isles. It is also known as the moorfowl or moorbird. Grouse can fly at up to 130 km/h (81 mph),[5] making them difficult targets. The name "driven grouse shooting" refers to the way in which the grouse are driven by beaters towards the shooters (otherwise known as 'guns').[6] A shooting party usually includes 8–10 guns who stand in a line in the butts—hides for shooting spaced some 20–30 m (66–98 ft) apart, screened by a turf or stone wall and usually sunken into the ground to minimise their profile—to shoot the grouse in flight.[7] A code of conduct governs behaviour on the grouse moor for both safety and etiquette.

Red grouse

Grouse moors have been described as "the ultimate trophy asset... one of the ultimate playthings, for which people will pay well over the asset value."[8]

Grouse shooting can also be undertaken by 'walking up' grouse over pointers, or by flushing the birds with other dogs.[9]

In southern Sweden, this form of hunting is called fjälljakt; the corresponding biome is not managed by burning, but consists of a wooded mosaic, with heather, trees, lakes and bogland.[10] Its management by, in particular, large wild herbivores such as moose maintains this mosaic as a stable condition, with modest populations of grouse (often hidden from predators in willow thickets) and a rich variety of other species.[4]: 171–173 

Moorland management

Draining

Large areas of grouse moor were previously blanket bogs, where sphagnum moss is the dominant vegetation, and drainage is required to allow heather to flourish.[11] Drainage can damage these bogs.

Burning

To ensure a mosaic of heather of varying ages, gamekeepers burn patches of heather (between 1 October and 15 April).[12] A burned patch of heather allows fresh shoots to grow, which are ideal nutrition for grouse and prevents the build up of dry plant matter. Burning is done in patches so that there is a variety of heather heights, on a rotation of between 8 and 12 years. While the short new shoots provide food, the taller, older heather provides cover and shelter for the grouse. Heather moorland is an unusual habitat worldwide, the result of management by burning for grouse.[13][14] (The claim that 75% of the world's heather moorland is found in the UK is contested and has been shown to be unsubstantiated.[15]) 60% of all England's upland Sites of Special Scientific Interest are managed for grouse shooting. UK moorlands and blanket bogs are a carbon sink and opponents to burning heather argue that it can release this carbon.[16] However, proponents argue that it is the heather alone that is burnt and demonstrated this by burning heather with a Mars Bar underneath; the Mars Bar remains unburnt at the end of the process. A video of this was uploaded to YouTube.[17] Moreover, the charcoal from burned heather is stored in the soil.[18]

Heather burning when improperly carried out can have negative impacts on peat hydrology, peat chemistry and physical properties, river water chemistry and river ecology.[19] Moor burning reduces Sphagnum moss growth and the density of macroinvertebrates which play a vital role in aquatic food webs by feeding on algae, microbes and detritus at the base of food chains before they themselves are consumed by birds, fish and amphibians. Burning also reduces the water content of the upper layers of peat, so the peat is less able to retain minerals which are important for plant growth and resist acid rain.[20]

To minimize the damage, some moorland estates managed for grouse shooting have agreed not to burn over protected blanket bogs, where fires dry and burn the peat. However, some burning of these areas continues.[21] If a moorland is not burned over for several years, large stands of rank and woody heather build up, posing a risk of major fires due to the large fuel loads. Larger wildfires burn with greater intensity and may be more likely to burn the peat beneath.[16] This risk is limited to long-established, unnatural heather moorland that is actively burned; wildfires are very rare in the corresponding mosaic biome of southern Sweden.[4]: 165 

A significant advantage of heather burning is its prevention of wildfires. Annual, managed burns of small patches of heather prevent the existence of large swathes of flammable areas.

Mowing

Trials of mechanical mowing have been made to achieve the same objective of regeneration of heather. Mowing produces only one-seventieth as much overall carbon dioxide emissions as burning but costs approximately six times more.[22]

Killing predators

Grouse moors have a near-200 year history of killing large numbers of predators, including many species that are now protected.[23] Burning and predator control correlate with higher densities of red grouse, and also of a few other species that are able to thrive on open heather moors; golden plover, curlew, lapwing, common redshank and ring ouzel.[24][13][25] The RSPB's Investigations Team reports that in 2017, despite vast swathes of suitable habitat, not a single hen harrier chick was produced on a privately owned grouse moor. Illegal killing of raptors on grouse moors is widespread.[26]

A 2017 study commissioned by Scottish Natural Heritage into the fate of satellite-tracked golden eagles concluded that "Corroborative information points to the perpetrators of the persecution of tagged eagles being associated with some grouse moors in the central and eastern Highlands of Scotland," and that "[t]his illegal killing has such a marked effect on the survival rates of the young birds that the potential capacity for the breeding golden eagle population continues to be suppressed around where this persecution largely occurs."[27]

The Langholm Moor Demonstration Project prevented the persecution of raptors, especially hen harriers, and found that grouse would survive in the presence of a more natural number of predators. However, raptor predation at Langholm reduced autumn grouse abundance by 50%, making organized driven grouse shooting unprofitable.[28] A community land project now hopes to purchase much of the land in question.[29] The Langholm experiment suggests that, to be profitable, intensive grouse moors require predators to be persecuted.[4]: 166  The RSPB reports that there seems to be a "background of illegal persecution" of raptors on British grouse moors.[30]

Shooting and poisoning are not the only methods of killing predators. Snares placed to trap foxes have injured humans.[31][32] Illegal snares have been used to kill predators on grouse moors.[33] Spring and rail traps are widely used and can kill a variety of protected species.[34]

In November 2020, the Scottish government announced that self-regulation and attempts at suppression of undesirable practices had failed. The government intends to start drafting new legislation that will impose a strict licensing regime on Scottish grouse moors, controlling raptor persecution, the burning of moorland, and mass medication with medicated grit. A joint industry statement said that Scotland already had the UK’s strictest anti-persecution measures and incidents were declining, and further regulation risked closing down grouse moors, with economic loss to gamekeepers and vulnerable rural businesses.[35]

Killing mountain hares

Mountain hares may be hosts for ticks and for louping ill virus, both of which they can share with red grouse (and with deer). In order to control tick-borne disease, some game managers have recommended killing mountain hares.[36] The only study that has been used to support this policy had no meaningful control group, used potentially confounding treatments, and there were no deer in the study area.[37] A recent study found no effects of mountain hare abundance on number of ticks on grouse, and actually found better grouse chick survival in areas with greater numbers of mountain hares.[38] The Scottish Parliament voted in June 2020 to protect mountain hares; it will be an offence under the Wildlife and Countryside Act to intentionally or recklessly kill or injure a hare without a licence.[39]

Economics and employment
Grouse shooting scene in Yorkshire – 1836 painting by John Fearnley

Grouse shooting supports the equivalent of 2,592 full-time jobs in England, Wales and Scotland, some 1,772 actually managing moors.[4]: 161  The Moorland Association estimates the total economic value of the grouse-shooting industry at some £67 million per year.[40] However, this is supported by millions of pounds in subsidies.[41][4]: 162 [42] The small village of Blanchland, Northumberland (population 140) is a centre for grouse shooting in England; 55 per cent of its inhabitants are either directly or indirectly involved in grouse shooting.[43][44]

Grouse shooting is not directly eligible for government subsidy; however, the land over which it takes place is considered to be agricultural grazing land and therefore eligible for the Basic Farm Payment. The total government funding paid to grouse moor owners is therefore hard to estimate accurately. Estimates have circulated in the press as high as £85 million but a more realistic assessment is around £11 million in 2018.[45]

The profitability of grouse shooting is under threat from both climate and disease. There has been a long-term decline in red grouse numbers.[46] Weather conditions in recent years have resulted in shortages of grouse, to the extent that grouse shooting has had to be cancelled in some locations.[47][48] This has led landowners in upland areas to substitute pheasant and partridge shooting for grouse shooting, with an increased risk of disease spreading from rear-and-release pheasants and partridge to nearby red grouse.

Opposition to driven grouse shooting

The practices associated with driven grouse shooting have been criticised by many conservation bodies for harming moorland habitats and for illegally persecuting predators, particularly the hen harrier, which preys on grouse chicks. The RSPB has called for shoots to be licensed,[49] and former RSPB Conservation Director Dr Mark Avery raised a petition calling for a ban on the practice.[50] By its closure on 21 September 2016 the petition had attracted 123,077 signatures,[51] triggering a parliamentary debate on the practice, held in Westminster Hall on 31 October 2016.[52] "Because most of our birds evolved in wooded mosaic habitats, grouse moors, being burned and treeless, with just a fraction of native food plants, stifle most wildlife – most of the time."[4]: 167 

Alternative land uses

The main alternatives proposed are:

Rewilding, with ecotourism

The Revive coalition describes Scotland's grouse moors as "impoverished" and suggests that an increase in woodland and scrub cover and reinstatement of functioning bogs could result in an upland landscape composed of a mosaic of different woodland, scrub and open habitats. This would support a greater abundance and diversity of wildlife, supply improved ecosystem services, be more resilient to environmental change, pests and diseases, and provide diverse resources and sources of income for local people.[53]

However, rewilding has been opposed by shooting organizations.[54] The chief executive of Scottish Land and Estates, which represents many grouse moor owners, said: “It is recommending a complete change in the landscape of Scotland. The bonnie purple heather will give way to an unmanaged vista of scrub and scarce wildlife.”[55]

In recent years a few large estates including grouse moors have been managed for the re-establishment of a more natural mosaic of habitats. Ecotourism is often a component, and ongoing shooting, especially of deer which prevent tree regrowth and in modern Britain have no natural predators, is often essential. The Mar Lodge Estate aims to regenerate woodland including Caledonian forest. Cairngorms Connect has a 200-year vision, to restore woodland to its natural limit, including high altitude montane woodlands; restore blanket bog and forest bogs, and restore natural processes to river floodplains. These restoration projects are intended to deliver benefits to people: reducing flood-risk, storing carbon, and providing homes for wildlife, as well as great places for people to visit.[56] Anders Holch Povlsen's "Wildland" plans for his Scottish estate, some 390 square kilometres in 2019, include restoring their parts of the Highlands "to their former magnificent natural state and repair the harm that man has inflicted on them". This vision includes not just the land itself, but also its many vulnerable buildings and communities. The Rothiemurchus Forest has not been managed for grouse and presents a patchwork of woods, bogs, and heather with rich wildlife.[4]: 130–132  Alladale Wilderness Reserve, Creag Meagaidh, and Glen Affric are further examples of successful management of Scottish wildlife.[4]: 132–134  Scottish Natural Heritage estimates that nature-based tourism in Scotland was worth £1.4 billion and supported 39,000 jobs in 2018.[57]

Intensive production of timber

Plantations of Sitka spruce are almost the only form of intensive forestry that are economically practical in much of upland Britain – though not on all of it. They support only very limited wildlife.

Minimal management, sheep grazing

A former grouse moor in Berwyn, Wales, was allowed to fall out of management in the 1990s. As the area was not managed to restore its natural rich mosaic of habitats, heather was replaced by rank, ungrazed grass, few species replaced the grouse, and predators (especially crows and foxes) flourished.[4]: 169–170  The species specifically favoured by grouse moor management did particularly badly: within 20 years, lapwing became extinct at the site, golden plover declined by 90 per cent, and curlew declined by 79 per cent.[58]

References
  1. Defra (21 June 2017). "UK natural capital: developing UK mountain, moorland and heathland ecosystem accounts". Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  2. The Changing Distribution of Breeds of Sheep in Scotland, 1795–1965 W. J. Carlyle THE AGRICULTURAL HISTORY R£VIEW Vol 27 page 19 https://www.bahs.org.uk/AGHR/ARTICLES/27n1a3.pdfRetrieved 6 September 2023 from website of the British Agricultural History Society
  3. "New study shows grouse moor management is helping to slow curlew decline". Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust. 8 August 2023. Retrieved 14 August 2023.
  4. Macdonald, Benedict (2019). Rebirding: Rewilding Britain and its birds. Pelagic Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78427-187-9.
  5. "UK: Driven and Walked up Grouse Shooting". WhereWiseMenShoot Limited. 2008. Archived from the original on 27 February 2012. Retrieved 19 June 2015.
  6. Roll Pickering, John. "New to Pheasant Shooting – Learn Driven Shooting Etiquette". GunsOnPegs. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
  7. Blakeley, Peter F (2012). Wingshooting. Stackpole Books. pp. 116, 125. ISBN 978-0-8117-0566-0.
  8. Prince, Dominic (12 March 2008). "The ultimate trophy asset for the new-money elite". The Spectator. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  9. "Grouse Shooting". British Association for Shooting and Conservation. Retrieved 19 June 2015.
  10. "Ptarmigan hunting in the mountains". Exclusive Adventure. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  11. BD5104 'Restoration of blanket bog vegetation for biodiversity, carbon sequestration and water regulation'. Final Report Defra Project BD5104, final version March (2019). Dr Andreas Heinemeyer, Dr Harry W. Vallack, Dr Phoebe A. Morton, Dr Rachel Pateman, Dr Calvin Dytham, Prof. Phil Ineson, Dr Colin McClean, Prof. Charles Bristow and Dr James W. Pearce-Higgins, with an Appendix by Richard A. Lindsay. Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, YO10 5NG http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=14717_DefraBD5104FinalReport.pdf p.2
  12. "Heather and grass burning: rules and applying for a licence". Natural England. Retrieved 20 June 2022.
  13. Aebischer, N., Ewald, J. & Tapper, S., 2010. Driven grouse shooting in Britain: A form of upland management with wider conservation benefits. In: Proceedings of the World Symposium on Hunting Activities: Ecologic and Economic Benefits of Hunting. The World Forum on the Future of Sport Shooting Activities.
  14. Robertson, P.; Park, K.; Barton, A. (March 2001). "Loss of heather moorland in the Scottish uplands: The role of red grouse management" (PDF). Wildlife Biology. 7 (1): 11–16. doi:10.2981/wlb.2001.004. S2CID 18361104. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  15. "Is 75% of the world's heather moorland in the UK?". What the Science Says. 10 November 2020. Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  16. Allen, Katherine A.; Harris, Michael P. K.; Marrs, Rob H. (9 April 2013). Kardol, P. (ed.). "Matrix modelling of prescribed burning in Calluna vulgaris-dominated moorland: short burning rotations minimize carbon loss at increased wildfire frequencies". Journal of Applied Ecology. 50 (3): 614–624. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12075.
  17. Will it Muirburn? MARS BAR VS HEATHER BURNING! on YouTube
  18. "A burning issue: no blanket approach for blanket bogs". University of York. n.d. Retrieved 20 June 2022.
  19. "Grouse moor burning causes widespread environmental changes". University of Leeds. 1 October 2014. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  20. The Ember Project. "Effects of Moorland Burning on the Ecohydrology of River Basins" (PDF). Leeds University.
  21. Shrubsole, Guy; Cameron, Alasdair (24 February 2019). "Friends of the Earth sparks moorland burning investigation". Friends of the Earth. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  22. BD5104 'Restoration of blanket bog vegetation for biodiversity, carbon sequestration and water regulation'. Final Report Defra Project BD5104, final version March (2019). Dr Andreas Heinemeyer, Dr Harry W. Vallack, Dr Phoebe A. Morton, Dr Rachel Pateman, Dr Calvin Dytham, Prof. Phil Ineson, Dr Colin McClean, Prof. Charles Bristow and Dr James W. Pearce-Higgins, with an Appendix by Richard A. Lindsay. Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, YO10 5NG http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=14717_DefraBD5104FinalReport.pdf pp.5–6
  23. Avery, Mark (2015). Inglorious. London: Bloomsbury. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-4729-1741-6.
  24. "Evidence Review (NEER004), The Effects of Managed Burning on Upland Peatland Biodiversity, Carbon and Water". Natural England. 30 May 2013. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  25. Baines, David; Richardson, Michael (19 July 2013). "Hen harriers on a Scottish grouse moor: multiple factors predict breeding density and productivity". Journal of Applied Ecology. 50 (6): 1397–1405. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12154.
  26. Murgatroyd, M.; Redpath, S.M.; Murphy, S.G.; et al. (2019). "Patterns of satellite tagged hen harrier disappearances suggest widespread illegal killing on British grouse moors". Nature Communications. 10 (1094): 1094. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.1094M. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09044-w. PMC 6424969. PMID 30890695.
  27. Whitfield, D.P.; Fielding, A.H. (2017). "Analyses of the fates of satellite tracked golden eagles in Scotland". Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 982. Scottish Natural Heritage. Retrieved 20 April 2018.
  28. "The Langholm Moor Demonstration Project". Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  29. "Langholm grouse moor scheme 'successes and challenges' outlined". BBC. 7 October 2019. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  30. Elliot, Bob (8 August 2018). "Peregrine persecution filmed in Bowland". RSPB Investigations Team. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  31. "Dark Peak Fell Runners News". Dark Peak Fell Runners. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  32. Marshall, Claire (29 April 2015). "Runners injured in animal snares". BBC News. Retrieved 21 September 2015.
  33. Jones, Howard (1 June 2016). "Proceed with caution?". RSPB. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  34. Shorrock, Guy (17 August 2018). "Spring traps and grouse moors – a bridge too far?". RSPB. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  35. Carrell, Severin (26 November 2020). "Grouse shooting to require licence in Scotland". Guardian. Retrieved 26 November 2020.
  36. Smith, Adam; Fletcher, Kathy (January 2014). "Mountain hare management". Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  37. Grouse Moor Management Group: report (Report to the Scottish Government from the independent Grouse Moor Management Group which looks at the environmental impact of grouse moor management practices and advises on the option of licensing grouse shooting businesses). Scottish Government. 19 December 2019. ISBN 9781839604348. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  38. Watson, Adam; Wilson, Jeremy D. (13 August 2018). "Seven decades of mountain hare counts show severe declines where high‐yield recreational game bird hunting is practised". Journal of Applied Ecology. 55 (6): 2663–2672. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13235. S2CID 92382362.
  39. Carrell, Severin (18 June 2020). "Scotland to ban mass culling of mountain hares". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  40. "Grouse moor management linchpin of upland economics and wildlife". The Moorland Association. 6 August 2011. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  41. Carrington, Damian (28 October 2016). "Grouse shooting estates shored up by millions in subsidies". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  42. "An economic study of Scottish grouse moors: an update (2010)" (PDF). Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust. July 2010.
  43. "Grouse Shooting Benefits Rural Communities". The Herald.
  44. Middleton, Christopher (6 August 2009). "How Grouse Shooting Helps Rural Economies". Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 9 August 2009. Retrieved 19 June 2015.
  45. "Who owns England?". 12 August 2019.
  46. Ratcliffe, Roger (9 August 2017). "Country & Coast: Lack of reverence for our only entirely native bird". Yorkshire Post. Retrieved 14 October 2018.
  47. Keane, Kevin (11 August 2017). "Grouse shooting braced for poor season". BBC News. Retrieved 14 October 2018.
  48. Elliott, Coran (9 August 2018). "Not so Glorious Twelfth: Grouse shoots cancelled across Britain after stocks hit by extreme weather". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 14 October 2018.
  49. Harper, Martin (24 June 2014). "Why it's time to license driven grouse shooting". RSPB. Retrieved 2 September 2014.
  50. "Grouse Shooting & Hen Harriers Guide". Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
  51. "e-petition: Ban driven grouse shooting". UK Government and Parliament. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  52. "Business Today: Chamber for Monday 31 October 2016". House of Commons. 31 October 2016. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
  53. Armstrong, Helen (November 2019). "Revive: A Better Way. How an alternative to grouse moors could help tackle climate change, increase biodiversity and benefit Scotland's people". Edinburgh: The Revive Coalition. Retrieved 9 December 2019.
  54. Gilruth, Andrew (13 May 2019). "Rewilding grouse moors not the answer: our letter to The Spectator". Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  55. Carrell, Severin (9 December 2019). "Close Scottish grouse moors to help climate, report urges". The Guardian.
  56. "Frequently Asked Questions". Cairngorm Connect. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  57. Yeomans, Emma (16 May 2019). "Grouse moors ruin countryside, expert claims". The Times.
  58. Warren, P.; Baines, D. (2014). "Changes in the abundance and distribution of upland breeding birds in the Berwyn Special Protection Area, North Wales 1983–2002". Birds in Wales. 11: 32–42.

Media related to Grouse shooting at Wikimedia Commons

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.