Grunt (board wargame)

Grunt is a 2-player wargame that simulates non-urban squad- or platoon-level combat between American forces and Viet Cong (VC) guerrilla forces during the period of American involvement in the Vietnam War. The American player must deploy forces to search the map for caches of equipment and food. The VC player tries to cause unacceptable American casualties.[1] The game comes with three scenarios, all only 10 turns long.

Searching

When American units move on top of a VC counter, it is turned over and revealed. If it is a Viet Cong, militia or sniper unit, the American unit is bounced back into its previous hex and combat results. If the counter is a cache, the American must spend one turn on top of the cache without moving or firing. At the end of that turn, the American player can either capture or destroy the cache. Capturing the cache is worth more Victory Points, but if the unit is subsequently pinned down during combat, the cache is dropped, and an American unit will have to spend a non-firing turn picking it up again.

Strategy & Tactics #26 that contained the pull-out wargame Grunt

In March 1971, Issue 26 of SPI's house magazine Strategy & Tactics included a free pull-out game designed by John Young titled Grunt, the then widely used term for an army private. It was not only SPI's first contemporary game, set in what was at the time the still on-going Vietnam War, but also the first squad-level combat wargame ever published,[3] just the second wargame to focus on the Vietnam War,[3] and also SPI's first magazine-published game that included a sheet of die-cut counters.[1] Grunt was later published as a boxed set.

By 1974, after several rival game companies published tactical-level games with better rules, SPI revised, updated and republished several of their older games. One of these was a new edition of Grunt, retitled Search & Destroy, published by SPI in 1975.[1]

In Issue 31 of Albion (July 1971), Don Turnbull noted some issues with the supplied counters, specifically not enough Vietcong counters and too many American counters. He also was not pleased with the lack of clarity in the rulebook, commenting, "the poor construction of the text makes it quite an onerous task to get to grips with the game, and makes the play itself frustrating in constant reference to that section of the rules which you have seen somewhere but just can't find at the moment." Turnbull also mentioned the lack of rules about VC snipers. "Unless you invent a rule to cover the omission, all they can do is sit around in trees watching the US go by." He concluded by giving the game a poor rating, saying, "the shortcomings in the game are too great a handicap to allow me the enjoy the play [...] there is no excuse for poor layout of the rules, since that betokens poor play-testing, which is itself inexcusable."[2]

In Issue 23 of Moves (October–November 1975), Phil Kosnett thought Grunt did not compare favorably to its descendant, Search & Destroy. Kosnett found Grunt's black and tan map "ugly". He also found the rules dis-organized, saying of the "sloppy work" done with the rule book, "Most (not all) of the rules are in there someplace, but in such disorder that it can take half an hour to dig them out." He also had issues with some of the rules, including unit stacking, and especially extended field-of-fire. He concluded that Search & Destroy was a far superior product, commenting "Search & Destroy is well worth buying, even if you own Grunt."[1]

In Issue 18 of Fire & Movement, Rodger B. MacGowan commented that "Grunt does an excellent job of capturing the period 'feel' and flavor of the war in Vietnam in the mid-1960s." MacGowan noted that "there are rules covering U.S. air strikes, Medevac evacuation by helicopter of U.S. casualties, 'body count' victory points, NLF ambushes and booby traps. In short, the bitter realities of the tragic conflict."[4]

Over a decade later, another review appeared in Fire & Movement. Nick Stasnopolis noted the unique leadership rules for both sides that accurately reflected reality. For the VC player, he noted that "To use their full capabilities the NLF [National Leadership Front, or Viet Cong] units must be within eight hexes of their cadre. This reflects their lack of modern communications equipment, which produced a reliance on written messages and sound signals, thus limiting operational radius." Stasnolopis noted that the myriad radios used by the Americans allowed them to operate as far away from their leader as desired, but "Unfortunately, this also produced a dependence on contact with higher headquarters [...] U.S. squads can be paralyzed for up to three turns if the squad radioman is hit or their headquarters takes casualties."[5]

• Panzerfaust Magazine #69
• Pursue & Destroy Vol.1, #6

• Grunt at BoardGameGeek
• Grunt at tacticalwargamer.com