HEATH

Tan Lin presents a massive accumulation of language and graphics from several sources, most of which are from the Internet. These sources include commercial ads, programs from the Museum of Modern Art, blogs, RSS feeds, and social media sites such as Facebook. He includes corporate logos, pictures of the drug Ecstasy, reactions towards the death of actor Heath Ledger in 2008, and bits of academic articles.[4]

The text presents somewhat of a "confession" to plagiarism, as Lin quotes "numerous works were plagiarized while writing this text, in terms of ideas or turns of phrase, which the author attempted to imitate."[4][5] He complicates authorship even further by plagiarizing himself with text from his lectures, notes, and other poems, as well as other outside sources such as Google’s Project Gutenberg. Lin plays around with notions of appropriation, copyright, and censorship, which are all seen as major issues in the age of digital language.[1]

Notes Towards the Definition of Culture prompts various questions on the subject of writing through technology. HEATH reviewer Laurie Macfee asks, "Is an RSS feed a manifestation of collective intellectual achievement, a form of art, or is it more related to the scientific notion of culture and an artificial medium that promotes or cultivates replication?"[1] This passage has been extensively linked to the development of a culture study concerning the ‘whole way of life,’ intriguing Lin due to its composition of predominately non-humans.[6]

The title of this passage is "plagiarized" from author T.S. Eliot's own Notes Towards the Definition of Culture, written in 1948.[6]

This section of the text involves the death of actor Heath Ledger in 2008. Lin created a compilation of web searches and interviews surrounding the event, along with its relation to the media and how celebrities are portrayed through a screen.

Readers and critics of HEATH point out the fact that upon initial reading, the brain automatically corrects the word "untilted" to "untitled", prompting different analytical suggestions for why Lin decided to title the section as such. Some may see it as a humorous typo and reference to the fact that most readers overlook the spelling of the word, while others can argue the reasoning for the typo using the opposite definition of the word "tilt" (i.e. if tilt means unsteady or slanted, "untilted" would mean steady or firm in agreement).[1] Additionally, "Untitled Heath Ledger Project" was the title of Christ Norris's New York Times article following Ledger’s death, which coincidentally is another newspaper story that Lin plagiarizes in HEATH.[6]

Lin presents a short history of the search engine and modern-day web browsing, from Archie in 1990 to Google in 1996 to Bing in 2009. The ability to immediately search for information on any topic has started to be considered an art form. Concurrently, in the 23 years that search engines have been around, other web-related forms of searching and storing information have risen, such as news feeds, open directories, and online indexes full of endless information.[1]

Writer Danny Snelson comments on the fact that Lin uses "a history" rather than "the history", indicating that Lin's a history of the search engine is a collected singular history of the web, and that there could be many other versions or details that were left out. Going along with the repetition of plagiarizing from other works, Lin notes that "no solely paper bound or cloth bound books were used for this work ... articles, quotes, and ideas have been annotated extensively, re-written, and removed from the following online platforms."[5] Snelson also relates HEATH to Ambience is a Novel with a Logo, written by Lin in 2007, which features a subtitle system consisting of citations in the format of Google search entries which correspond to passages from the body of the text.[6]

Similar to the intentional mistake of "untilted", disco OS creatively misrenders Disk Operation System, translating the computational interface between users, applications, and hardware into the "post-medium" networks of disco.[6] Once again Lin plagiarized himself from an essay he wrote in 2008 called Disco as Operating System, which linked the generic cultural dance phenomenon to the digital age of programmed language and shed light on the production of the book.[1]