Habermas–Rawls debate

The Habermas–Rawls debate is the exchange which took place between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas in The Journal of Philosophy in 1995. One major point of misunderstanding was Rawls' emphasis on social primary goods in a debate that included Habermasian notions of the public and common good.[1][2]

See also

References
  1. Pedersen, J. (2012). "Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls-Habermas Debate". Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 42 (3): 399–432. doi:10.1177/0048393111414723.
  2. Finlayson, James Gordon (1 April 2007). "The Habermas-Rawls Dispute Redivivus". Politics and Ethics Review. 3 (1): 144–162. doi:10.1177/1743453X0700300111.

Further reading

Finlayson, Gordon (2019). The Habermas-Rawls Debate. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231549011.

Finlayson, James Gordon (2016). "Where the Right Gets in: On Rawls's Criticism of Habermas's Conception of Legitimacy" (PDF). Kantian Review. 21 (2): 161–183. doi:10.1017/S1369415416000017. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/the-habermas-rawls-debate/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41296-020-00418-0 https://academic.oup.com/pq/article-abstract/72/1/249/6128792 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1368431020985416


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.