Holomorphic function

The function f(z) = z̅ is not complex differentiable at zero, because as shown above, the value of (f(z) − f(0)) / (z − 0) varies depending on the direction from which zero is approached. Along the real axis, f equals the function g(z) = z and the limit is 1, while along the imaginary axis, f equals h(z) = −z and the limit is −1. Other directions yield yet other limits.

Given a complex-valued function f of a single complex variable, the derivative of f at a point z₀ in its domain is defined as the limit[3]

${\displaystyle f'(z_{0})=\lim _{z\to z_{0}}{f(z)-f(z_{0}) \over z-z_{0}}.}$

This is the same definition as for the derivative of a real function, except that all quantities are complex. In particular, the limit is taken as the complex number z tends to z₀, and this means that the same value is obtained for any sequence of complex values for z that tends to z₀. If the limit exists, f is said to be complex differentiable at z₀. This concept of complex differentiability shares several properties with real differentiability: it is linear and obeys the product rule, quotient rule, and chain rule.[4]

A function is holomorphic on an open set U if it is complex differentiable at every point of U. A function f is holomorphic at a point z₀ if it is holomorphic on some neighbourhood of z₀.[5] A function is holomorphic on some non-open set A if it is holomorphic at every point of A.

A function may be complex differentiable at a point but not holomorphic at this point. For example, the function ${\displaystyle f(z)=|z|^{2}=z{\overline {z}}}$ is complex differentiable at 0, but not complex differentiable elsewhere (see the Cauchy–Riemann equations, below). So, it is not holomorphic at 0.

The relationship between real differentiability and complex differentiability is the following: If a complex function f(x + i y) = u(x, y) + i v(x, y) is holomorphic, then u and v have first partial derivatives with respect to x and y, and satisfy the Cauchy–Riemann equations:[6]

${\displaystyle {\frac {\partial u}{\partial x}}={\frac {\partial v}{\partial y}}\qquad {\mbox{and}}\qquad {\frac {\partial u}{\partial y}}=-{\frac {\partial v}{\partial x}}\,}$

or, equivalently, the Wirtinger derivative of f with respect to ${\displaystyle {\bar {z}},}$ the complex conjugate of ${\displaystyle z,}$ is zero:[7]

${\displaystyle {\frac {\partial f}{\partial {\overline {z}}}}=0,}$

which is to say that, roughly, f is functionally independent from ${\displaystyle {\bar {z}},}$ the complex conjugate of z.

If continuity is not given, the converse is not necessarily true. A simple converse is that if u and v have continuous first partial derivatives and satisfy the Cauchy–Riemann equations, then f is holomorphic. A more satisfying converse, which is much harder to prove, is the Looman–Menchoff theorem: if f is continuous, u and v have first partial derivatives (but not necessarily continuous), and they satisfy the Cauchy–Riemann equations, then f is holomorphic.[8]

The term holomorphic was introduced in 1875 by Charles Briot and Jean-Claude Bouquet, two of Augustin-Louis Cauchy's students, and derives from the Greek ὅλος (hólos) meaning "whole", and μορφή (morphḗ) meaning "form" or "appearance" or "type", in contrast to the term meromorphic derived from μέρος (méros) meaning "part". A holomorphic function resembles an entire function ("whole") in a domain of the complex plane while a meromorphic function (defined to mean holomorphic except at certain isolated poles), resembles a rational fraction ("part") of entire functions in a domain of the complex plane.[9] Cauchy had instead used the term synectic.[10]

Today, the term "holomorphic function" is sometimes preferred to "analytic function". An important result in complex analysis is that every holomorphic function is complex analytic, a fact that does not follow obviously from the definitions. The term "analytic" is however also in wide use.

Because complex differentiation is linear and obeys the product, quotient, and chain rules, the sums, products and compositions of holomorphic functions are holomorphic, and the quotient of two holomorphic functions is holomorphic wherever the denominator is not zero.[11] That is, if functions f and g are holomorphic in a domain U, then so are f + g, f − g, f g, and f ∘ g. Furthermore, f / g is holomorphic if g has no zeros in U, or is meromorphic otherwise.

If one identifies C with the real plane R², then the holomorphic functions coincide with those functions of two real variables with continuous first derivatives which solve the Cauchy–Riemann equations, a set of two partial differential equations.[6]

Every holomorphic function can be separated into its real and imaginary parts f(x + i y) = u(x, y) + i v(x, y), and each of these is a harmonic function on R² (each satisfies Laplace's equation ∇² u = ∇² v = 0), with v the harmonic conjugate of u.[12] Conversely, every harmonic function u(x, y) on a simply connected domain Ω ⊂ R² is the real part of a holomorphic function: If v is the harmonic conjugate of u, unique up to a constant, then f(x + i y) = u(x, y) + i v(x, y) is holomorphic.

Cauchy's integral theorem implies that the contour integral of every holomorphic function along a loop vanishes:[13]

${\displaystyle \oint _{\gamma }f(z)\,dz=0.}$

Here γ is a rectifiable path in a simply connected complex domain U ⊂ C whose start point is equal to its end point, and f : U → C is a holomorphic function.

Cauchy's integral formula states that every function holomorphic inside a disk is completely determined by its values on the disk's boundary.[13] Furthermore: Suppose U ⊂ C is a complex domain, f : U → C is a holomorphic function and the closed disk D = {z : |z − z₀| ≤ r} is completely contained in U. Let γ be the circle forming the boundary of D. Then for every a in the interior of D:

${\displaystyle f(a)={\frac {1}{2\pi i}}\oint _{\gamma }{\frac {f(z)}{z-a}}\,dz}$

where the contour integral is taken counter-clockwise.

The derivative f′(a) can be written as a contour integral[13] using Cauchy's differentiation formula:

${\displaystyle f'(a)={1 \over 2\pi i}\oint _{\gamma }{f(z) \over (z-a)^{2}}\,dz,}$

for any simple loop positively winding once around a, and

${\displaystyle f'(a)=\lim \limits _{\gamma \to a}{\frac {i}{2{\mathcal {A}}(\gamma )}}\oint _{\gamma }f(z)\,d{\bar {z}},}$

for infinitesimal positive loops γ around a.

In regions where the first derivative is not zero, holomorphic functions are conformal: they preserve angles and the shape (but not size) of small figures.[14]

Every holomorphic function is analytic. That is, a holomorphic function f has derivatives of every order at each point a in its domain, and it coincides with its own Taylor series at a in a neighbourhood of a. In fact, f coincides with its Taylor series at a in any disk centred at that point and lying within the domain of the function.

From an algebraic point of view, the set of holomorphic functions on an open set is a commutative ring and a complex vector space. Additionally, the set of holomorphic functions in an open set U is an integral domain if and only if the open set U is connected. [7] In fact, it is a locally convex topological vector space, with the seminorms being the suprema on compact subsets.

From a geometric perspective, a function f is holomorphic at z₀ if and only if its exterior derivative df in a neighbourhood U of z₀ is equal to f′(z) dz for some continuous function f′. It follows from

${\displaystyle \textstyle 0=d^{2}f=d(f^{\prime }dz)=df^{\prime }\wedge dz}$

that df′ is also proportional to dz, implying that the derivative f′ is itself holomorphic and thus that f is infinitely differentiable. Similarly, d(f dz) = f′ dz ∧ dz = 0 implies that any function f that is holomorphic on the simply connected region U is also integrable on U.

(For a path γ from z₀ to z lying entirely in U, define ${\textstyle F_{\gamma }(z)=F_{0}+\int _{\gamma }f\,dz;}$ in light of the Jordan curve theorem and the generalized Stokes' theorem, F_γ(z) is independent of the particular choice of path γ, and thus F(z) is a well-defined function on U having F(z₀) = F₀ and dF = f dz.)

All polynomial functions in z with complex coefficients are entire functions (holomorphic in the whole complex plane C), and so are the exponential function exp z and the trigonometric functions ${\textstyle \cos {z}={\tfrac {1}{2}}{\bigl (}\exp(iz)+\exp(-iz){\bigr )}}$ and ${\textstyle \sin {z}=-{\tfrac {1}{2}}i{\bigl (}\exp(iz)-\exp(-iz){\bigr )}}$ (cf. Euler's formula). The principal branch of the complex logarithm function log z is holomorphic on the domain C ∖ {z ∈ R : z ≤ 0}. The square root function can be defined as ${\textstyle {\sqrt {z}}=\exp {\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\log z{\bigr )}}$ and is therefore holomorphic wherever the logarithm log z is. The reciprocal function 1 / z is holomorphic on C ∖ {0}. (The reciprocal function, and any other rational function, is meromorphic on C.)

As a consequence of the Cauchy–Riemann equations, any real-valued holomorphic function must be constant. Therefore, the absolute value |z |, the argument arg (z), the real part Re (z) and the imaginary part Im (z) are not holomorphic. Another typical example of a continuous function which is not holomorphic is the complex conjugate ${\displaystyle {\bar {z}}.}$ (The complex conjugate is antiholomorphic.)

The definition of a holomorphic function generalizes to several complex variables in a straightforward way. A function ${\displaystyle f:(z_{1},z_{2},\ldots ,z_{n})\mapsto f(z_{1},z_{2},\ldots ,z_{n})}$ in n complex variables is analytic at a point p if there exists a neighbourhood of p in which f is equal to a convergent power series in n complex variables;[15] the function f is holomorphic in an open subset U of Cⁿ if it is analytic at each point in U. Osgood's lemma shows (using the multivariate Cauchy integral formula) that, for a continuous function f, this is equivalent to f being holomorphic in each variable separately (meaning that if any n − 1 coordinates are fixed, then the restriction of f is a holomorphic function of the remaining coordinate). The much deeper Hartogs' theorem proves that the continuity assumption is unnecessary: f is holomorphic if and only if it is holomorphic in each variable separately.

More generally, a function of several complex variables that is square integrable over every compact subset of its domain is analytic if and only if it satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations in the sense of distributions.

Functions of several complex variables are in some basic ways more complicated than functions of a single complex variable. For example, the region of convergence of a power series is not necessarily an open ball; these regions are logarithmically-convex Reinhardt domains, the simplest example of which is a polydisk. However, they also come with some fundamental restrictions. Unlike functions of a single complex variable, the possible domains on which there are holomorphic functions that cannot be extended to larger domains are highly limited. Such a set is called a domain of holomorphy.

A complex differential (p, 0)-form α is holomorphic if and only if its antiholomorphic Dolbeault derivative is zero: ∂α = 0.

The concept of a holomorphic function can be extended to the infinite-dimensional spaces of functional analysis. For instance, the Fréchet or Gateaux derivative can be used to define a notion of a holomorphic function on a Banach space over the field of complex numbers.

• Antiderivative (complex analysis)
• Antiholomorphic function
• Biholomorphy
• Holomorphic separability
• Meromorphic function
• Quadrature domains
• Harmonic maps
• Harmonic morphisms
• Wirtinger derivatives

• Blakey, Joseph (1958). University Mathematics (2nd ed.). London: Blackie and Sons. OCLC 2370110.

• "Analytic function", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]