Hyperspectral imaging

Hyperspectral imaging collects and processes information from across the electromagnetic spectrum.[1] The goal of hyperspectral imaging is to obtain the spectrum for each pixel in the image of a scene, with the purpose of finding objects, identifying materials, or detecting processes.[2][3] There are three general types of spectral imagers. There are push broom scanners and the related whisk broom scanners (spatial scanning), which read images over time, band sequential scanners (spectral scanning), which acquire images of an area at different wavelengths, and snapshot hyperspectral imagers, which uses a staring array to generate an image in an instant.

For broader coverage of this topic, see Spectral imaging.
Two-dimensional projection of a hyperspectral cube

Whereas the human eye sees color of visible light in mostly three bands (long wavelengths - perceived as red, medium wavelengths - perceived as green, and short wavelengths - perceived as blue), spectral imaging divides the spectrum into many more bands. This technique of dividing images into bands can be extended beyond the visible. In hyperspectral imaging, the recorded spectra have fine wavelength resolution and cover a wide range of wavelengths. Hyperspectral imaging measures continuous spectral bands, as opposed to multiband imaging which measures spaced spectral bands.[4]

Engineers build hyperspectral sensors and processing systems for applications in astronomy, agriculture, molecular biology, biomedical imaging, geosciences, physics, and surveillance. Hyperspectral sensors look at objects using a vast portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Certain objects leave unique 'fingerprints' in the electromagnetic spectrum. Known as spectral signatures, these 'fingerprints' enable identification of the materials that make up a scanned object. For example, a spectral signature for oil helps geologists find new oil fields.[5]

Sensors

Figuratively speaking, hyperspectral sensors collect information as a set of 'images'. Each image represents a narrow wavelength range of the electromagnetic spectrum, also known as a spectral band. These 'images' are combined to form a three-dimensional (x,y,λ) hyperspectral data cube for processing and analysis, where x and y represent two spatial dimensions of the scene, and λ represents the spectral dimension (comprising a range of wavelengths).[6]

Technically speaking, there are four ways for sensors to sample the hyperspectral cube: Spatial scanning, spectral scanning, snapshot imaging,[5][7] and spatio-spectral scanning.[8]

Hyperspectral cubes are generated from airborne sensors like NASA's Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS), or from satellites like NASA's EO-1 with its hyperspectral instrument Hyperion.[9][10] However, for many development and validation studies, handheld sensors are used.[11]

The precision of these sensors is typically measured in spectral resolution, which is the width of each band of the spectrum that is captured. If the scanner detects a large number of fairly narrow frequency bands, it is possible to identify objects even if they are only captured in a handful of pixels. However, spatial resolution is a factor in addition to spectral resolution. If the pixels are too large, then multiple objects are captured in the same pixel and become difficult to identify. If the pixels are too small, then the intensity captured by each sensor cell is low, and the decreased signal-to-noise ratio reduces the reliability of measured features.

The acquisition and processing of hyperspectral images is also referred to as imaging spectroscopy or, with reference to the hyperspectral cube, as 3D spectroscopy.

Scanning techniques
Photos illustrating individual sensor outputs for the four hyperspectral imaging techniques. From left to right: Slit spectrum; monochromatic spatial map; 'perspective projection' of hyperspectral cube; wavelength-coded spatial map.

There are four basic techniques for acquiring the three-dimensional (x, y, λ) dataset of a hyperspectral cube. The choice of technique depends on the specific application, seeing that each technique has context-dependent advantages and disadvantages.

Spatial scanning
Acquisition techniques for hyperspectral imaging, visualized as sections of the hyperspectral datacube with its two spatial dimensions (x,y) and one spectral dimension (lambda).

In spatial scanning, each two-dimensional (2-D) sensor output represents a full slit spectrum (x, λ). Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) devices for spatial scanning obtain slit spectra by projecting a strip of the scene onto a slit and dispersing the slit image with a prism or a grating. These systems have the drawback of having the image analyzed per lines (with a push broom scanner) and also having some mechanical parts integrated into the optical train. With these line-scan cameras, the spatial dimension is collected through platform movement or scanning. This requires stabilized mounts or accurate pointing information to 'reconstruct' the image. Nonetheless, line-scan systems are particularly common in remote sensing, where it is sensible to use mobile platforms. Line-scan systems are also used to scan materials moving by on a conveyor belt. A special case of line scanning is point scanning (with a whisk broom scanner), where a point-like aperture is used instead of a slit, and the sensor is essentially one-dimensional instead of 2-D.[7][12]

Spectral scanning

In spectral scanning, each 2-D sensor output represents a monochromatic ('single-colored'), spatial (x, y) map of the scene. HSI devices for spectral scanning are typically based on optical band-pass filters (either tunable or fixed). The scene is spectrally scanned by exchanging one filter after another while the platform remains stationary. In such 'staring', wavelength scanning systems, spectral smearing can occur if there is movement within the scene, invalidating spectral correlation/detection. Nonetheless, there is the advantage of being able to pick and choose spectral bands, and having a direct representation of the two spatial dimensions of the scene.[6][7][12] If the imaging system is used on a moving platform, such as an airplane, acquired images at different wavelengths corresponds to different areas of the scene. The spatial features on each of the images may be used to realign the pixels.

Non-scanning
Main article: Snapshot hyperspectral imaging

In non-scanning, a single 2-D sensor output contains all spatial (x, y) and spectral (λ) data. HSI devices for non-scanning yield the full datacube at once, without any scanning. Figuratively speaking, a single snapshot represents a perspective projection of the datacube, from which its three-dimensional structure can be reconstructed.[7][13] The most prominent benefits of these snapshot hyperspectral imaging systems are the snapshot advantage (higher light throughput) and shorter acquisition time. A number of systems have been designed, including computed tomographic imaging spectrometry (CTIS), fiber-reformatting imaging spectrometry (FRIS), integral field spectroscopy with lenslet arrays (IFS-L), multi-aperture integral field spectrometer (Hyperpixel Array), integral field spectroscopy with image slicing mirrors (IFS-S), image-replicating imaging spectrometry (IRIS), filter stack spectral decomposition (FSSD), coded aperture snapshot spectral imaging (CASSI), image mapping spectrometry (IMS), and multispectral Sagnac interferometry (MSI).[14] However, computational effort and manufacturing costs are high. In an effort to reduce the computational demands and potentially the high cost of non-scanning hyperspectral instrumentation, prototype devices based on Multivariate Optical Computing have been demonstrated. These devices have been based on the Multivariate Optical Element[15][16] spectral calculation engine or the Spatial Light Modulator[17] spectral calculation engine. In these platforms, chemical information is calculated in the optical domain prior to imaging such that the chemical image relies on conventional camera systems with no further computing. As a disadvantage of these systems, no spectral information is ever acquired, i.e. only the chemical information, such that post processing or reanalysis is not possible.

Spatiospectral scanning
Main article: Spatiospectral scanning

In spatiospectral scanning, each 2-D sensor output represents a wavelength-coded ('rainbow-colored', λ = λ(y)), spatial (x, y) map of the scene. A prototype for this technique, introduced in 2014, consists of a camera at some non-zero distance behind a basic slit spectroscope (slit + dispersive element).[8][18] Advanced spatiospectral scanning systems can be obtained by placing a dispersive element before a spatial scanning system. Scanning can be achieved by moving the whole system relative to the scene, by moving the camera alone, or by moving the slit alone. Spatiospectral scanning unites some advantages of spatial and spectral scanning, thereby alleviating some of their disadvantages.[8]

Distinguishing hyperspectral from multispectral imaging
Multispectral and hyperspectral differences

Hyperspectral imaging is part of a class of techniques commonly referred to as spectral imaging or spectral analysis. The term “hyperspectral imaging” derives from the development of NASA's Airborne Imaging Spectrometer (AIS) and AVIRIS in the mid-1980s. Although NASA prefers the earlier term “imaging spectroscopy” over “hyperspectral imaging,” use of the latter term has become more prevalent in scientific and non-scientific language. In a peer reviewed letter, experts recommend using the terms “imaging spectroscopy” or “spectral imaging” and avoiding exaggerated prefixes such as “hyper-,” “super-” and "ultra-,” to prevent misnomers in discussion.[19]

Hyperspectral imaging is related to multispectral imaging. The distinction between hyper- and multi-band is sometimes based incorrectly on an arbitrary "number of bands" or on the type of measurement. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) uses continuous and contiguous ranges of wavelengths (e.g. 400 - 1100 nm in steps of 1 nm) whilst multiband imaging (MSI) uses a subset of targeted wavelengths at chosen locations (e.g. 400 - 1100 nm in steps of 20 nm).[20]

Multiband imaging deals with several images at discrete and somewhat narrow bands. Being "discrete and somewhat narrow" is what distinguishes multispectral imaging in the visible wavelength from color photography. A multispectral sensor may have many bands covering the spectrum from the visible to the longwave infrared. Multispectral images do not produce the "spectrum" of an object. Landsat is an excellent example of multispectral imaging.

Hyperspectral deals with imaging narrow spectral bands over a continuous spectral range, producing the spectra of all pixels in the scene. A sensor with only 20 bands can also be hyperspectral when it covers the range from 500 to 700 nm with 20 bands each 10 nm wide. (While a sensor with 20 discrete bands covering the visible, near, short wave, medium wave and long wave infrared would be considered multispectral.)

Ultraspectral could be reserved for interferometer type imaging sensors with a very fine spectral resolution. These sensors often have (but not necessarily) a low spatial resolution of several pixels only, a restriction imposed by the high data rate.

Applications

Hyperspectral remote sensing is used in a wide array of applications. Although originally developed for mining and geology (the ability of hyperspectral imaging to identify various minerals makes it ideal for the mining and oil industries, where it can be used to look for ore and oil),[11][21] it has now spread into fields as widespread as ecology and surveillance, as well as historical manuscript research, such as the imaging of the Archimedes Palimpsest. This technology is continually becoming more available to the public. Organizations such as NASA and the USGS have catalogues of various minerals and their spectral signatures, and have posted them online to make them readily available for researchers. On a smaller scale, NIR hyperspectral imaging can be used to rapidly monitor the application of pesticides to individual seeds for quality control of the optimum dose and homogeneous coverage.

Agriculture
Hyperspectral camera embedded on OnyxStar HYDRA-12 UAV from AltiGator

Although the cost of acquiring hyperspectral images is typically high, for specific crops and in specific climates, hyperspectral remote sensing use is increasing for monitoring the development and health of crops. In Australia, work is under way to use imaging spectrometers to detect grape variety and develop an early warning system for disease outbreaks.[22] Furthermore, work is underway to use hyperspectral data to detect the chemical composition of plants,[23] which can be used to detect the nutrient and water status of wheat in irrigated systems.[24] On a smaller scale, NIR hyperspectral imaging can be used to rapidly monitor the application of pesticides to individual seeds for quality control of the optimum dose and homogeneous coverage.[25]

Another application in agriculture is the detection of animal proteins in compound feeds to avoid bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), also known as mad-cow disease. Different studies have been done to propose alternative tools to the reference method of detection, (classical microscopy). One of the first alternatives is near infrared microscopy (NIR), which combines the advantages of microscopy and NIR. In 2004, the first study relating this problem with hyperspectral imaging was published.[26] Hyperspectral libraries that are representative of the diversity of ingredients usually present in the preparation of compound feeds were constructed. These libraries can be used together with chemometric tools to investigate the limit of detection, specificity and reproducibility of the NIR hyperspectral imaging method for the detection and quantification of animal ingredients in feed.

HSI cameras can also be used to detect stress from heavy metals in plants and become an earlier and faster alternative to post-harvest wet chemical methods.[27][28]

Waste sorting and recycling

Hyperspectral imaging can provide information about the chemical constituents of materials which makes it useful for waste sorting and recycling.[29] It has been applied to distinguish between substances with different fabrics and to identify natural, animal and synthetic fibers.[30] HSI cameras can be integrated with machine vision systems and, via simplifying platforms, allow end-customers to create new waste sorting applications and other sorting/identification applications.[31] A system of machine learning and hyperspectral camera can distinguish between 12 different types of plastics such as PET and PP for automated separation of waste of, as of 2020, highly unstandardized[32] plastics products and packaging.[33][34]

Eye care

Researchers at the Université de Montréal are working with Photon etc. and Optina Diagnostics[35] to test the use of hyperspectral photography in the diagnosis of retinopathy and macular edema before damage to the eye occurs. The metabolic hyperspectral camera will detect a drop in oxygen consumption in the retina, which indicates potential disease. An ophthalmologist will then be able to treat the retina with injections to prevent any potential damage.[36]

Food processing
A line scan push-broom system was used to scan the cheeses and images were acquired using a Hg-Cd-Te array (386x288) equipped linescan camera with halogen light as a radiation source.

In the food processing industry, hyperspectral imaging, combined with intelligent software, enables digital sorters (also called optical sorters) to identify and remove defects and foreign material (FM) that are invisible to traditional camera and laser sorters.[37][38] By improving the accuracy of defect and FM removal, the food processor’s objective is to enhance product quality and increase yields.

Adopting hyperspectral imaging on digital sorters achieves non-destructive, 100 percent inspection in-line at full production volumes. The sorter’s software compares the hyperspectral images collected to user-defined accept/reject thresholds, and the ejection system automatically removes defects and foreign material.

Hyperspectral image of "sugar end" potato strips shows invisible defects

The recent commercial adoption of hyperspectral sensor-based food sorters is most advanced in the nut industry where installed systems maximize the removal of stones, shells and other foreign material (FM) and extraneous vegetable matter (EVM) from walnuts, pecans, almonds, pistachios, peanuts and other nuts. Here, improved product quality, low false reject rates and the ability to handle high incoming defect loads often justify the cost of the technology.

Commercial adoption of hyperspectral sorters is also advancing at a fast pace in the potato processing industry where the technology promises to solve a number of outstanding product quality problems. Work is underway to use hyperspectral imaging to detect “sugar ends,”[39] “hollow heart”[40] and “common scab,”[41] conditions that plague potato processors.

Mineralogy
A set of stones is scanned with a Specim LWIR-C imager in the thermal infrared range from 7.7 μm to 12.4 μm. The quartz and feldspar spectra are clearly recognizable.[42]

Geological samples, such as drill cores, can be rapidly mapped for nearly all minerals of commercial interest with hyperspectral imaging. Fusion of SWIR and LWIR spectral imaging is standard for the detection of minerals in the feldspar, silica, calcite, garnet, and olivine groups, as these minerals have their most distinctive and strongest spectral signature in the LWIR regions.[42]

Hyperspectral remote sensing of minerals is well developed. Many minerals can be identified from airborne images, and their relation to the presence of valuable minerals, such as gold and diamonds, is well understood. Currently, progress is towards understanding the relationship between oil and gas leakages from pipelines and natural wells, and their effects on the vegetation and the spectral signatures. Recent work includes the PhD dissertations of Werff[43] and Noomen.[44]

Surveillance
Hyperspectral thermal infrared emission measurement, an outdoor scan in winter conditions, ambient temperature -15°C—relative radiance spectra from various targets in the image are shown with arrows. The infrared spectra of the different objects such as the watch glass have clearly distinctive characteristics. The contrast level indicates the temperature of the object. This image was produced with a Specim LWIR hyperspectral imager.[42]

Hyperspectral surveillance is the implementation of hyperspectral scanning technology for surveillance purposes. Hyperspectral imaging is particularly useful in military surveillance because of countermeasures that military entities now take to avoid airborne surveillance. The idea that drives hyperspectral surveillance is that hyperspectral scanning draws information from such a large portion of the light spectrum that any given object should have a unique spectral signature in at least a few of the many bands that are scanned. Hyperspectral imaging has also shown potential to be used in facial recognition purposes. Facial recognition algorithms using hyperspectral imaging have been shown to perform better than algorithms using traditional imaging.[45]

Traditionally, commercially available thermal infrared hyperspectral imaging systems have needed liquid nitrogen or helium cooling, which has made them impractical for most surveillance applications. In 2010, Specim introduced a thermal infrared hyperspectral camera that can be used for outdoor surveillance and UAV applications without an external light source such as the sun or the moon.[46][47]

Astronomy

In astronomy, hyperspectral imaging is used to determine a spatially-resolved spectral image. Since a spectrum is an important diagnostic, having a spectrum for each pixel allows more science cases to be addressed. In astronomy, this technique is commonly referred to as integral field spectroscopy, and examples of this technique include FLAMES[48] and SINFONI[49] on the Very Large Telescope, but also the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer on Chandra X-ray Observatory uses this technique.

Remote chemical imaging of a simultaneous release of SF6 and NH3 at 1.5 km using the Telops Hyper-Cam imaging spectrometer[50]

Chemical imaging
Main article: Chemical imaging

Soldiers can be exposed to a wide variety of chemical hazards. These threats are mostly invisible but detectable by hyperspectral imaging technology. The Telops Hyper-Cam, introduced in 2005, has demonstrated this at distances up to 5 km.[51]

Environment
Top panel: Contour map of the time-averaged spectral radiance at 2078 cm−1 corresponding to a CO2 emission line. Bottom panel: Contour map of the spectral radiance at 2580 cm−1 corresponding to continuum emission from particulates in the plume. The translucent gray rectangle indicates the position of the stack. The horizontal line at row 12 between columns 64-128 indicate the pixels used to estimate the background spectrum. Measurements made with the Telops Hyper-Cam.[52]

Most countries require continuous monitoring of emissions produced by coal and oil-fired power plants, municipal and hazardous waste incinerators, cement plants, as well as many other types of industrial sources. This monitoring is usually performed using extractive sampling systems coupled with infrared spectroscopy techniques. Some recent standoff measurements performed allowed the evaluation of the air quality but not many remote independent methods allow for low uncertainty measurements.

Civil engineering

Recent research indicates that hyperspectral imaging may be useful to detect the development of cracks in pavements[53] which are hard to detect from images taken with visible spectrum cameras.[53]

Biomedical imaging

Hyperspectral imaging has also been used to detect cancer, identify nerves and analyze bruises.[54]

Data compression

In February 2019, an organization founded by the world's major space industries, the Consultative Committee for Space Data Standards (CCSDS), approved a standard for both lossless and near-lossless compression of multispectral and hyperspectral images (CCSDS 123). Based on NASA's fast-lossless algorithm, it requires very low memory and computational resources compared to alternatives, such as JPEG 2000.

Commercial implementations of CCSDS 123 include:

Advantages and disadvantages

The primary advantage to hyperspectral imaging is that, because an entire spectrum is acquired at each point, the operator needs no prior knowledge of the sample, and postprocessing allows all available information from the dataset to be mined. Hyperspectral imaging can also take advantage of the spatial relationships among the different spectra in a neighbourhood, allowing more elaborate spectral-spatial models for a more accurate segmentation and classification of the image.[57][58]

The primary disadvantages are cost and complexity. Fast computers, sensitive detectors, and large data storage capacities are needed for analyzing hyperspectral data. Significant data storage capacity is necessary since uncompressed hyperspectral cubes are large, multidimensional datasets, potentially exceeding hundreds of megabytes. All of these factors greatly increase the cost of acquiring and processing hyperspectral data. Also, one of the hurdles researchers have had to face is finding ways to program hyperspectral satellites to sort through data on their own and transmit only the most important images, as both transmission and storage of that much data could prove difficult and costly.[9] As a relatively new analytical technique, the full potential of hyperspectral imaging has not yet been realized.

See also

References
  1. Chilton, Alexander (2013-10-07). "The Working Principle and Key Applications of Infrared Sensors". AZoSensors. Retrieved 2020-07-11.
  2. Chein-I Chang (31 July 2003). Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-306-47483-5.
  3. Hans Grahn; Paul Geladi (27 September 2007). Techniques and Applications of Hyperspectral Image Analysis. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-01087-7.
  4. Hagen, Nathan; Kudenov, Michael W. (2013). "Review of snapshot spectral imaging technologies" (PDF). Optical Engineering. 52 (9): 090901. Bibcode:2013OptEn..52i0901H. doi:10.1117/1.OE.52.9.090901. S2CID 215807781.
  5. Lu, G; Fei, B (January 2014). "Medical Hyperspectral Imaging: a review". Journal of Biomedical Optics. 19 (1): 10901. Bibcode:2014JBO....19a0901L. doi:10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.010901. PMC 3895860. PMID 24441941.
  6. "Spectral Imaging and Linear Unmixing". Nikon’s MicroscopyU.
  7. http://www.bodkindesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Hyperspectral-1011.pdf
  8. Grusche, Sascha (2014). "OSA – Basic slit spectroscope reveals three-dimensional scenes through diagonal slices of hyperspectral cubes". Applied Optics. 53 (20): 4594–5103. Bibcode:2014ApOpt..53.4594G. doi:10.1364/AO.53.004594. PMID 25090082.
  9. Schurmer, J.H., (Dec 2003), Air Force Research Laboratories Technology Horizons
  10. "Earth Observing 1 (EO-1)". earthobservatory.nasa.gov. 2000-11-15. Retrieved 2020-07-17.
  11. Ellis, J., (Jan 2001) Searching for oil seeps and oil-impacted soil with hyperspectral imagery Archived 2008-03-05 at the Wayback Machine, Earth Observation Magazine.
  12. Lu, Guolan; Fei, Baowei (2014). "SPIE – Journal of Biomedical Optics – Medical hyperspectral imaging: a review". Journal of Biomedical Optics. 19 (1): 010901. Bibcode:2014JBO....19a0901L. doi:10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.010901. PMC 3895860. PMID 24441941.
  13. "StackPath". www.laserfocusworld.com.
  14. Hagen, Nathan; Kester, Robert T.; Gao, Liang; Tkaczyk, Tomasz S. (2012). "SPIE – Optical Engineering – Snapshot advantage: a review of the light collection improvement for parallel high-dimensional measurement systems". Optical Engineering. 51 (11): 111702. Bibcode:2012OptEn..51k1702H. doi:10.1117/1.OE.51.11.111702. PMC 3393130. PMID 22791926.
  15. Myrick, Michael L.; Soyemi, Olusola O.; Haibach, Fred; Zhang, Lixia; Greer, Ashley; Li, Hongli; Priore, Ryan; Schiza, Maria V.; Farr, J. R. (2002-02-22). Christesen, Steven D; Sedlacek Iii, Arthur J (eds.). "Application of multivariate optical computing to near-infrared imaging". Vibrational Spectroscopy-Based Sensor Systems. 4577: 148–158. Bibcode:2002SPIE.4577..148M. doi:10.1117/12.455732. S2CID 109007082.
  16. J Priore, Ryan; Haibach, Frederick; V Schiza, Maria; E Greer, Ashley; L Perkins, David; Myrick, M.L. (2004-08-01). "Miniature Stereo Spectral Imaging System for Multivariate Optical Computing". Applied Spectroscopy. 58 (7): 870–3. Bibcode:2004ApSpe..58..870P. doi:10.1366/0003702041389418. PMID 15282055. S2CID 39015203.
  17. Davis, Brandon M.; Hemphill, Amanda J.; Cebeci Maltaş, Derya; Zipper, Michael A.; Wang, Ping; Ben-Amotz, Dor (2011-07-01). "Multivariate Hyperspectral Raman Imaging Using Compressive Detection". Analytical Chemistry. 83 (13): 5086–5092. doi:10.1021/ac103259v. ISSN 0003-2700. PMID 21604741.
  18. Hyperspectral imaging with spatiospectral images from a simple spectroscope. 12 July 2014. Archived from the original on 2021-12-19 – via YouTube.
  19. Polder, Gerrit; Gowen, Aoife (27 February 2020). "The hype in spectral imaging". Journal of Spectral Imaging. 9: a4. doi:10.1255/jsi.2020.a4. S2CID 213347436. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
  20. CM Veys; et al. (2017). "An Ultra-Low-Cost Active Multispectral Crop Diagnostics Device" (PDF). IEEE Sensors Journal. 113: 1005–1007.
  21. Smith, R.B. (July 14, 2006), Introduction to hyperspectral imaging with TMIPS Archived 2008-05-09 at the Wayback Machine, MicroImages Tutorial Web site
  22. Lacar, F.M.; et al. (2001). "Use of hyperspectral imagery for mapping grape varieties in the Barossa Valley, South Australia". IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217). Vol. 6. pp. 2875–2877. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2001.978191. hdl:2440/39292. ISBN 0-7803-7031-7. S2CID 61008168.
  23. Ferwerda, J.G. (2005), Charting the quality of forage: measuring and mapping the variation of chemical components in foliage with hyperspectral remote sensing, Wageningen University, ITC Dissertation 126, 166p. ISBN 90-8504-209-7
  24. Tilling, A.K., et al., (2006) Remote sensing to detect nitrogen and water stress in wheat, The Australian Society of Agronomy
  25. Vermeulen, Ph.; et al. (2017). "Assessment of pesticide coating on cereal seeds by near infrared hyperspectral imaging". Journal of Spectral Imaging. 6: a1. doi:10.1255/jsi.2017.a1.
  26. Fernández Pierna, J.A., et al., 'Combination of Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Near Infrared (NIR) imaging spectroscopy for the detection of meat and bone meat (MBM) in compound feeds' Journal of Chemometrics 18 (2004) 341-349
  27. Gardner, Elizabeth K. "Study finds that heavy metal-contaminated leafy greens turn purple". Purdue University. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  28. Zea, Maria; Souza, Augusto; Yang, Yang; Lee, Linda; Nemali, Krishna; Hoagland, Lori (1 January 2022). "Leveraging high-throughput hyperspectral imaging technology to detect cadmium stress in two leafy green crops and accelerate soil remediation efforts". Environmental Pollution. 292 (Pt B): 118405. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118405. ISSN 0269-7491. PMID 34710518. S2CID 239975631.
  29. Karaca, Ali Can; Erturk, Alp; Gullu, M. Kemal; Elmas, M.; Erturk, Sarp (June 2013). "Automatic waste sorting using shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging system". 2013 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/WHISPERS.2013.8080744. ISBN 978-1-5090-1119-3. S2CID 37092593.
  30. Brunn, Michael (1 September 2020). "Hyperspectral imaging reducing textile waste". RECYCLING magazine. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  31. "Specim launches complete spectral imaging platform for the sorting industry". optics.org. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  32. Qureshi, Muhammad Saad; Oasmaa, Anja; Pihkola, Hanna; Deviatkin, Ivan; Tenhunen, Anna; Mannila, Juha; Minkkinen, Hannu; Pohjakallio, Maija; Laine-Ylijoki, Jutta (1 November 2020). "Pyrolysis of plastic waste: Opportunities and challenges". Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 152: 104804. doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104804. ISSN 0165-2370. S2CID 200068035.
  33. "Breakthrough in separating plastic waste: Machines can now distinguish 12 different types of plastic". Aarhus University. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
  34. Henriksen, Martin L.; Karlsen, Celine B.; Klarskov, Pernille; Hinge, Mogens (1 January 2022). "Plastic classification via in-line hyperspectral camera analysis and unsupervised machine learning". Vibrational Spectroscopy. 118: 103329. doi:10.1016/j.vibspec.2021.103329. ISSN 0924-2031. S2CID 244913832.
  35. "Home". Optina.
  36. AM Shahidi; et al. (2013). "Regional variation in human retinal vessel oxygen saturation". Experimental Eye Research. 113: 143–147. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2013.06.001. PMID 23791637.
  37. Higgins, Kevin. "Five New Technologies for Inspection". Food Processing. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
  38. "Hyperspectral Imaging Fights Food Waste". www.photonics.com. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  39. Burgstaller, Markus; et al. (February 2012). "Spotlight: Spectral Imaging Sorts 'Sugar-End' Defects". PennWell.
  40. Dacal-Nieto, Angel; et al. (2011). Non-Destructive Detection of Hollow Heart in Potatoes Using Hyperspectral Imaging (PDF). Springer. pp. 180–187. ISBN 978-3-642-23677-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-10.
  41. Dacal-Nieto, Angel; et al. (2011). "Common Scab Detection on Potatoes Using an Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging System". Image Analysis and Processing – ICIAP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6979. pp. 303–312. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24088-1_32. ISBN 978-3-642-24087-4.
  42. Holma, H., (May 2011), Thermische Hyperspektralbildgebung im langwelligen Infrarot Archived July 26, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Photonik
  43. Werff H. (2006), Knowledge based remote sensing of complex objects: recognition of spectral and spatial patterns resulting from natural hydrocarbon seepages, Utrecht University, ITC Dissertation 131, 138p. ISBN 90-6164-238-8
  44. Noomen, M.F. (2007), Hyperspectral reflectance of vegetation affected by underground hydrocarbon gas seepage, Enschede, ITC 151p. ISBN 978-90-8504-671-4.
  45. "Studies on Hyperspectral Face Recognition in Visible Spectrum With Feature Band Selection - IEEE Journals & Magazine". CiteSeerX 10.1.1.413.3801. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2052603. S2CID 18058981. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  46. Frost & Sullivan (Feb 2011). Technical Insights, Aerospace & Defence: World First Thermal Hyperspectral Camera for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
  47. Specim's Owl sees an invisible object and identifies its materials even in a pitch-dark night. Archived 2011-02-21 at the Wayback Machine.
  48. "FLAMES – Fibre Large Array Multi Element Spectrograph". ESO. Retrieved 30 November 2012.
  49. "SINFONI – Spectrograph for INtegral Field Observations in the Near Infrared". ESO. Retrieved 30 November 2012.
  50. M. Chamberland, V. Farley, A. Vallières, L. Belhumeur, A. Villemaire, J. Giroux et J. Legault, "High-Performance Field-Portable Imaging Radiometric Spectrometer Technology For Hyperspectral imaging Applications," Proc. SPIE 5994, 59940N, September 2005.
  51. Farley, V., Chamberland, M., Lagueux, P., et al., "Chemical agent detection and identification with a hyperspectral imaging infrared sensor," Archived 2012-07-13 at archive.today Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 6661, 66610L (2007).
  52. Gross, Kevin C.; Bradley, Kenneth C.; Perram, Glen P. (2010). "Remote Identification and Quantification of Industrial Smokestack Effluents via Imaging Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy". Environmental Science & Technology. 44 (24): 9390–9397. Bibcode:2010EnST...44.9390G. doi:10.1021/es101823z. PMID 21069951.
  53. Abdellatif, Mohamed; Peel, Harriet; Cohn, Anthony G.; Fuentes, Raul (2020). "Pavement Crack Detection from Hyperspectral Images Using a Novel Asphalt Crack Index". Remote Sensing. 12 (18): 3084. Bibcode:2020RemS...12.3084A. doi:10.3390/rs12183084.
  54. Lu, Guolan; Fei, Baowei (2014). "Medical hyperspectral imaging: a review". Journal of Biomedical Optics. 19 (1): 010901. Bibcode:2014JBO....19a0901L. doi:10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.010901. ISSN 1083-3668. PMC 3895860. PMID 24441941.
  55. "Data Reduction and Compression Session" (PDF).
  56. "Metaspectral - Multispectral and hyperspectral data management". February 24, 2021.
  57. A. Picon, O. Ghita, P.F. Whelan, P. Iriondo (2009), Spectral and Spatial Feature Integration for Classification of Non-ferrous Materials in Hyper-spectral Data, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 5, N° 4, November 2009.
  58. Ran, Lingyan; Zhang, Yanning; Wei, Wei; Zhang, Qilin (2017-10-23). "A Hyperspectral Image Classification Framework with Spatial Pixel Pair Features". Sensors. 17 (10): 2421. Bibcode:2017Senso..17.2421R. doi:10.3390/s17102421. PMC 5677443. PMID 29065535.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Hyperspectral imaging.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.