IRL eligibility rules

The IRL eligibility rules outline that a player is eligible to represent:[1]

• the nation in which they were born;
• the nation in which either of their parents were born;
• the nation in which any of their grandparents were born;
• the nation which is their primary place of residence.

Primary place of residence is defined as the nation in which the player has resided for the preceding five years. This was increased from three years in October 2016.[2]

In 2006, Australian-born Nathan Fien represented New Zealand in two matches of the 2006 Tri-Nations, claiming to be eligible through his grandmother. It was subsequently discovered that his New Zealand-born ancestor was, in fact, his great-grandmother, which did not establish his eligibility. He was banned from competing in the rest of the tournament and New Zealand was stripped of the points gained for their win against Great Britain. The scandal was known as "Grannygate".[6][7] Fien played a further 20 Tests for New Zealand after completing his three-year residency period in October 2007 and becoming eligible.[8][9]

In 2008, the IRL (then known as the RLIF) ruled that Fuifui Moimoi and Taniela Tuiaki were not eligible to represent Tonga at the 2008 Rugby League World Cup as the rules at the time dictated that players were only permitted to change nations once every two years.[10] Both players had switched from Tonga to New Zealand in 2007,[11] but wanted to represent Tonga at the tournament after they were not selected by New Zealand. The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court of New South Wales,[12] with Justice Richard Weeks White ruling that Moimoi and Tuiaki were to be permitted to play for Tonga from 12 November 2008 onwards, exactly two years after their most recent match for Tonga.[13] Neither player appeared at the tournament as Tonga was eliminated prior to that date. Moimoi was subsequently reselected by New Zealand in 2009.[14]

In comparison to other international sports, the IRL's previous eligibility rules, which permitted players to change nations every two years, were described as "an outlier in terms of how little impediment there was to players representing more than one country."[15] The current rules have been described as a farce[16] that has cheapened international tournaments.[17]

IRL development officer Tas Baitieri stated in September 2016 that the current eligibility system was designed to produce higher quality and more balanced international tournaments.[17] Dual eligible players who are not selected by their tier 1 nation can represent tier 2 and 3 nations without affecting their chances of being reselected by their tier 1 nation, strengthening the tier 2 and 3 nations in the interim.[2][17] When the system was introduced, the most recent win by a tier 2 or 3 nation over a tier 1 nation was Wales's 18–16 win over England in 1995.[18] In the 3 years following, Tonga defeated New Zealand, Great Britain, and Australia, while Fiji and Papua New Guinea defeated New Zealand and Great Britain, respectively.

The current eligibility system has also been praised for allowing members of diaspora populations to represent their multiple national identities.[19] Under the previous system, many dual eligible players were conflicted between representing their cultural heritage and the financial benefits of representing tier 1 nations, particularly Australia and its domestic State of Origin series.[20][21] As the Australian Rugby League Commission's eligibility rules for State of Origin require players to be eligible for Australia, dual eligible players are now able to be selected for State of Origin while representing a tier 2 or 3 nation.[22]