Imperial Federation League

It was founded in London on 18 November, 1884, as an initiative of W. E. Forster who would be its first chairman. The following resolutions were passed:[1]

1. That a Society be now formed to be called “The Imperial Federation League.
2. That the object of the League be to secure by Federation the permanent Unity of the Empire.
3. That no scheme of Federation should interfere with the existing rights of local Parliaments as regards local affairs.
4. That any scheme of Imperial Federation should combine, on an equitable basis, the resources of the Empire for the maintenance of common interests and adequately provide for an organised defence of common rights.
5. That the League use every constitutional means to bring about the object for which it is formed and invite the support of men of all political parties.
6. That the membership of the League be open to any British subject who accepts the principles of the League, and pays a yearly registration fee of not less than one shilling.
7. That donations and subscriptions be invited for providing means for conducting the business of the League.
8. That British subjects throughout the Empire be invited to become members, and to form and organise Branches of the League which may place their representatives on the General Committee.

Branches were established in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Barbados and British Guiana. After Forster's death Lord Rosebery became President of the League; he was in turn succeeded by Edward Stanhope.

Francis Labilliere, William Westgarth and John Dennistoun Wood served on a committee of six to draft the prospectus of the Imperial Federation League.[2] It aimed to promote the Imperial Federation, to be formed in a similar way to the confederation of a majority of British North America into the Dominion of Canada in the mid-19th century. The United States and Canada were held up as concrete examples of how vast territories could be effectively managed while maintaining a central representative authority.

The League was cross-party and sought to avoid party politics. The Imperial Federation League combined politicians, journalists, and intellectuals, like Sir John Robert Seeley, James Bryce, Alfred Milner, Froude and Lord Tennyson.

Supporters of Imperial Federation presented the argument that the two choices for Britain were federation or disintegration. In their view, the future importance of Britain depended on it federating what is now called the "Old Commonwealth".[7]

The League promoted the closer union of the British Empire under an "Imperial Federal Government" however it did not settle on any particular scheme of what this would comprise, whether a Federal Parliament, a Council, or Conferences, other than that it would include representation from the parts of the empire to consider matters of foreign policy, defence, and trade. It was generally taken to mean some sort of Imperial Parliament.

The Imperial Parliament (Westminster, stripped of its local responsibilities) would handle foreign affairs, the army, the navy, and those colonies (including India) which had a population the bulk of which was "alien". The center would also have a final court of appeal. Local Parliaments would exercise control over Home Affairs, the police and education.[8]

The League was Unionist in outlook.

The League was divided between those who wanted to establish a clear pathway for Imperial Federation and those whose view was that the program could best be advanced by general discussion, aiming to move opinion in favor of federation with specifics to be worked out later (Parkin, in Canada, argued that that was the method used to bring about Canadian Confederation).[9]

Another point of division within the League was the question of free trade or tariff protection. The League while refraining from adopting a view point did not prevent advocates from either side commenting on the matter. A prominent activist in the League was the protectionist Howard Vincent MP.

A "want of homogeneity" in the League and recognition that it was composed of "three or four sections" would be given as the reason for the eventual dissolution of the League in 1893 [10]

The League's most notable opponents were Edward Augustus Freeman, Goldwin Smith, and Andrew Carnegie. In his Triumphant Democracy Carnegie would refer to the League as Rosebery's "amusing Imperial Federation fad (which, happily, is impossible)"[11]

The League brought the issue of imperial federation to the attention of the public throughout the empire.

It had a concrete accomplishment in the calling of the First Colonial Conference in 1887 at the time of Queen Victoria's golden jubilee.

The League sent deputations to two successive Prime Minister, Salisbury and Gladstone. While Salisbury agreed to the calling of the Colonial Conference he would later dismiss federation as nothing more than "a word spelt with ten letters". Gladstone, as a Little Englander, was predictably unresponsive and he "dismissed summarily the plan submitted for consideration by the IFL in April 1893"[12]

The League was effectively revived by some members in 1894 as the British Empire League.[13]

Milner would go on to unite South Africa and form the Round Table movement.

• Australian Dictionary of Biography – Entry of Henry d'Esterre Taylor
• Carnegie, Andrew; The Gospel of Wealth And Other Timely Essays
• Papers of Alfred Deakin, 1804-1973 (bulk 1880-1919) Collection number: MS 1540
• Commonwealth miscellanea
• Foster, L.; The Imperial Federation League in Victoria after Australian Federation (B.A. Hons thesis, Monash University, 1979)
• Morris, Edward E.; Imperial federation : a Lecture for the Victorian Branch of the Imperial Federation League 28 Aug 1885, Melbourne
• Review of Parkin, George A.; Imperial Federation: The Problem of National Unity, MacMillan & Co. London/New York 1892, e-book at The Anglosphere
• http://www.unitedcommonwealthsociety.org/