Infection in childcare

A sick person who does not cover his nose when he sneezes may spread infection, especially in a childcare environment.

The presumption behind the idea of a "childcare infection" is that a place in which many children come into contact with each other can be a focus of infection, which is a place where infections are able to spread from person to person.

Flu and respiratory tract infection are lessened in groups which use frequent hand washing, but the actual pathway through which the diseases spread is unclear except for the fact that hand washing disrupts disease transmission.[1]

Diseases related to the human gastrointestinal tract, like diarrhea or other enteric illness, often spread through the fecal-oral route and are especially common in places where children have not completed toilet training.[2] Diapers, confined spaces for changing diapers, and the unhygienic habits of children contribute to the spread of these infections.[2] Bacterial infections most often spread through person to person contact, while eating food, or through the presence of animals.[2] It is difficult to determine how viral agents causing enteric illness spread.[2] Reviews of Helicobacter pylori have been unable to determine how it spreads during childcare, but have confirmed that it does easily spread in childcare environments, and that it is difficult to make recommendations for preventing it.[3]

Childcare infection is a public health concern because it harms the health of individual children and the infections which children get during childcare also may be spread within their homes and communities away from the childcare.[4] Generally, children who attend childcare are 2-3 times more likely to acquire an infection than children who do not receive such services.[4]

Infection happens because of individuals bringing infections into a childcare environment and spreading infectious agents within that environment, which children then contact and become at risk for infection. Increased risk of infection is related to practices of those in the childcare environment, and infection risk can be reduced by taking precautions.[4] Practices which reduce the likelihood of spreading infection include encouraging hand washing in all present, providing facial tissue to cover sneezes, doing food preparation in a place separate from other activity, cleaning and using a disinfectant on surfaces people touch, and among groups using diapers, having good practices to change and dispose of diapers while cleaning children and the changing area.[4]

There are some alternetives to prevent diseases through physical contact with objects. Most of the objects in child center like toys, chairs, tables, and everything that can be touch by anyone can be what causes infections or a disease. There is some disinfectant that has studies report of their effectiveness against "Salmonella Typhimurium" and "Staphylococcus aureus" on a chair and a toy. They can be used to prevent these infections. First, we have Clorox Anywhere (CA) that has achieved the greatest results of reducing "Staphylococcus aureus" and "Salmonella Typhimurium". Clorox Green Works (GCW) is the second to show reduction but not more than Clorox Anywhere. The one that has shown less reduction but still shows effectiveness is CITRUS Farm Edition (CFE).[5]

Health advocacy messages such as this one encourage using antibiotics only after discussion with a health care provider.

Childcare infections can be treated just as infections acquired outside of childcare, however, there are pressures on sick children to begin taking unnecessary health care even against the advice of health care providers. Antibiotics are commonly given to children for whom the drugs would serve no benefit, due to the child not having a medical condition which antibiotics can treat.[6] This is especially common in children with respiratory infections which antibiotics cannot treat, and in younger children, and in children who have privately purchased health insurance covering their medical expenses.[6]

Children who attend childcare are twice as likely to take an antibiotic when sick as children who do not attend childcare.[7] This is because child care providers wish to host children who are not sick, and consequently pressure parents to seek antibiotics or other treatment even when it is against the advice of health care providers.[7] In turn, parents feel compelled to seek this treatment for their children to please the care providers even if it is against the advice of their health care provider.[7] Overuse of antibiotics in child care has led to an increase of antibiotic resistance in bacteria in childcare settings.[8] While the increase of antibiotic resistance is worrisome, the current implications of this are uncertain, although it is expected that this will become more of a public health problem in the future.[8]

Families in which parents take time off work to care for their sick children instead of sending them to childcare services may be harmed by missing the loss of work hours and pay.[9] Some research has suggested that when parents have paid leave from work to tend to sick children then they are less likely to give their children antibiotics unless they are sure that it is recommended by a health care provider.[10]

Childcare providers often refuse to care for sick children, and ask that parents make alternate arrangements.[11] For various reasons including an inability of childcare providers to know which illnesses are infectious, childcare providers often refuse to care even for children who have acute illnesses which are unlikely to spread to others.[11]

• Day care health risks at MedLine Plus
• Respiratory Tract Infections in Children, a Merck Manual guide for patients and caregivers