Injection locking

Injection pulling and injection locking can be observed in numerous physical systems where pairs of oscillators are coupled together. Perhaps the first to document these effects was Christiaan Huygens, the inventor of the pendulum clock, who was surprised to note that two pendulum clocks which normally would keep slightly different time nonetheless became perfectly synchronized when hung from a common beam. Modern researchers have confirmed his suspicion that the pendulums were coupled by tiny back-and-forth vibrations in the wooden beam.[1] The two clocks became injection locked to a common frequency.

Cross coupled LC oscillator with output on top

In a modern-day voltage-controlled oscillator an injection-locking signal may override its low-frequency control voltage, resulting in loss of control. When intentionally employed, injection locking provides a means to significantly reduce power consumption and possibly reduce phase noise in comparison to other frequency synthesizer and PLL design techniques. In similar fashion, the frequency output of large lasers can be purified by injection locking them with high accuracy reference lasers (see injection seeder).

An injection-locked oscillator (ILO) is usually based on cross-coupled LC oscillator. It has been employed for frequency division[2] or jitter reduction in PLL, with the input of pure sinusoidal waveform. It was employed in continuous mode clock and data recovery (CDR) or clock recovery to perform clock restoration from the aid of either preceding pulse generation circuit to convert non-return-to-zero (NRZ) data to pseudo-return-to-zero (PRZ) format[3] or nonideal retiming circuit residing at the transmitter side to couple the clock signal into the data.[4] In the late 2000s, the ILO was employed for a burst-mode clock-recovery scheme.[5]

The ability to injection-lock is an inherent property of all oscillators (electronic or otherwise). This capability can be fundamentally understood as the combined effect of the oscillator's periodicity with its autonomy. Specifically, consider a periodic injection (i.e., external disturbance) that advances or lags the oscillator's phase by some phase shift every oscillation cycle. Due to the oscillator's periodicity, this phase shift will be the same from cycle to cycle if the oscillator is injection-locked. Moreover, due to the oscillator's autonomy, each phase shift persists indefinitely. Combining these two effects produces a fixed phase shift per oscillation cycle, which results in a constant frequency shift over time. If the resultant, shifted oscillation frequency matches the injection frequency, the oscillator is said to be injection-locked. However, if the maximum frequency shift that the oscillator can experience due to the injection is not enough to cause the oscillation and injection frequencies to coincide (i.e., the injection frequency lies outside the lock range), the oscillator can only be injection pulled (see Injection pulling).[6]

High-speed logic signals and their harmonics are potential threats to an oscillator. The leakage of these and other high frequency signals into an oscillator through a substrate concomitant with an unintended lock is unwanted injection locking.

Injection locking can also provide a means of gain at a low power cost in certain applications.

Injection (aka frequency) pulling occurs when an interfering frequency source disturbs an oscillator but is unable to injection lock it. The frequency of the oscillator is pulled towards the frequency source as can be seen in the spectrogram. The failure to lock may be due to insufficient coupling, or because the injection source frequency lies outside the locking window (also known as the lock range) of the oscillator. Injection pulling fundamentally corrupts the inherent periodicity of an oscillator.

Spectrogram of the above audio

Entrainment has been used to refer to the process of mode locking of coupled driven oscillators, which is the process whereby two interacting oscillating systems, which have different periods when they function independently, assume a common period. The two oscillators may fall into synchrony, but other phase relationships are also possible. The system with the greater frequency slows down, and the other speeds up.

Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens, the inventor of the pendulum clock, introduced the concept after he noticed, in 1666, that the pendulums of two clocks mounted on a common board had synchronized, and subsequent experiments duplicated this phenomenon. He described this effect as "odd sympathy". The two pendulum clocks synchronized with their pendulums swinging in opposite directions, 180° out of phase, but in-phase states can also result. Entrainment occurs because small amounts of energy are transferred between the two systems when they are out of phase in such a way as to produce negative feedback. As they assume a more stable phase relationship, the amount of energy gradually reduces to zero. In the realm of physics, Huygens' observations are related to resonance and the resonant coupling of harmonic oscillators, which also gives rise to sympathetic vibrations.

A 2002 study of Huygens' observations show that an antiphase stable oscillation was somewhat fortuitous, and that there are other possible stable solutions, including a "death state" where a clock stops running, depending on the strength of the coupling between the clocks.[7]

Mode locking between driven oscillators can be easily demonstrated using mechanical metronomes on a common, easily movable surface.[8][9][10] Such mode locking is important for many biological systems including the proper operation of pacemakers.[11]

The use of the word entrainment in the modern physics literature most often refers to the movement of one fluid, or collection of particulates, by another (see Entrainment (hydrodynamics)). The use of the word to refer to mode locking of non-linear coupled oscillators appears mostly after about 1980, and remains relatively rare in comparison.

A similar coupling phenomenon was characterized in hearing aids when the adaptive feedback cancellation is used. This chaotic artifact (entrainment) is observed when correlated input signals are presented to an adaptive feedback canceller.

In recent years, aperiodic entrainment has been identified as an alternative form of entrainment that is of interest in biological rhythms.[12][13][14]

• Injection-locked frequency divider
• Phase-locked loop
• LC oscillator
• Electronic oscillator
• Burst mode clock and data recovery
• Entrainment (hydrodynamics)
• Brainwave synchronization
• Synchronization of chaos
• Phase-locked loop range
• Tidal locking

• Filter Entrainment Avoidance with a Frequency Domain Transform Algorithm
• Entrainment Avoidance with Pole Stabilization
• Entrainment Avoidance with a Transform Domain Algorithm
• Entrainment Avoidance with an Auto Regressive Filter

* Wolaver, Dan H. 1991. Phase-Locked Loop Circuit Design, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-662743-9, pages 95–105

• Adler, Robert (June 1946). "A Study of Locking Phenomena in Oscillators". Proceedings of the IRE. 34 (6): 351–357. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1946.229930. S2CID 51638781.
• Kurokawa, K. (October 1973). "Injection locking of microwave solid-state oscillators". Proceedings of the IEEE. 61 (10): 1386–1410. doi:10.1109/PROC.1973.9293.

* Lee, Thomas H. 2004. The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits, Cambridge, ISBN 0-521-83539-9, pages 563–566

• Demonstration of injection locking.
• Injection locking of 100 metronomes