Islanders (video game)

A circus building being placed, showing potential point gains and losses within its scoring sphere. The heads-up display shows how many points until the next building pack, available buildings, and progress towards the next island.

At the start of each session, players are presented with a small procedurally generated island.[1] There are several styles of islands; some have terrain that restricts the placement of certain buildings.[2][3] The player is given a choice between two building packs to start with, each of which provides a limited number of buildings according to a theme, such as forestry, farming, or fishing.[2][4] When selected from the inventory, a building displays a translucent sphere around it, which indicates the distance at which it will earn points from existing buildings and natural features, such as trees.[2][5][6] The size of this scoring sphere varies between building types.[3]

Buildings gain points from being placed near relevant structures, but lose points for incompatible ones.[5] A circus, for example, gains points for being placed near houses, but loses points for being near mansions.[6] As potential points are shown in preview before placement, the player can move the building around the island to determine the best location before setting the building down permanently.[7][8] Buildings can be rotated to fit into position, but once placed, cannot be removed or built over, so careful placement and forward planning are important to maximize the score.[5][9][10]

As buildings are placed, they are removed from the inventory. When the player reaches a given threshold of points, they may choose from one of two new themes for their next building pack, which will include more copies of already-unlocked buildings as well as buildings from the newly-selected theme.[5][8] This process gradually unlocks more advanced building types such as gold mines and resorts, which may have more difficult placement criteria but higher scoring potential.[2][11] Scoring points fills up the island gauge at the bottom of the screen; when filled, the player can click on it to move to the next island.[2] The number of points required to restock the inventory and move to new islands increases with each unlock.[12] Players are free to remain on their current island and continue to build and increase their score until they decide to move on.[13][14] The session ends if the player runs out of buildings to place, or space to place buildings, before unlocking the next island.[4][5] The player's score is cumulative across all islands in a session, and the overall objective is to reach a high score for the entire session.[15]

The game intentionally omits many features common to city-builders, such as resource accumulation, traffic management, and technology research.[3][6][11] There are no sidequests or optional objectives, although there is a short list of achievements to earn.[5][16] The sole multiplayer element is the global high score board that ranks every player's highest-scoring game.[11][15][16]

Grizzly Games is composed of Paul Schnepf, Friedemann Allmenröder, and Jonas Tyroller, who met during the Bachelor of Arts in Game Design program at HTW Berlin. Schnepf and Allmenröder first worked together on a second-year project, a short experimental game called ROM.[17] Later in their second year, they worked with another student, Shahriar Shahrabi, to develop minimalist wingsuit flight simulator Superflight, founding Grizzly Games as a means to release it.[17] Shahrabi left after the release of Superflight. During their third year, Tyroller joined Grizzly Games and development began on Islanders.[18]

The development of Islanders began with a three-week process of researching, prototyping, and refining several concepts. The team was inspired by their mutual childhood interest in city-building games like Anno, The Settlers, and SimCity, which they enjoyed but found complicated.[19] Seeking to provide a streamlined experience focused solely on building, the team decided to move forward with the concept that became Islanders.[17][19][20] The game had a short development cycle of seven months: four months of major development time, and another three months of refinement and preparation before release.[17][20]

In an interview with Game World Observer, Allmenröder described the game as an evolution of ideas explored in the earlier Superflight, particularly the embrace of minimalism and procedural generation. Because there were only three team members, each had to fill multiple roles in the development process. Rather than struggling against the limits of working with a small team, they adopted simplicity as a design philosophy and decided to create a game that was simple enough to be played in short sessions, but engaging enough to be returned to from time to time.[17][20] Schnepf compared the process of building a city in Islanders to be "just like growing a garden."[21]

The game's use of procedural generation had its roots in the development of Superflight. In order to test game mechanics, the developers created a script that quickly assembled new levels from pre-generated blocks. They found that having new levels each time they played kept their experience entertaining without extending development time, so they decided to use the process for Islanders.[17] When developing the mechanics of the game, Allmenröder explained that his team constantly discussed simplifying the systems they were implementing: "Every time we made a decision, we asked ourselves: Can we make it simpler? Can the game still be fun if we cut this feature?"[17] The gameplay went through various iterations, including one with a day-night cycle, before the team settled on a simple proximity-based scoring system.[17] The visual design of the buildings is intended to be divorced from any specific time period or culture.[20]

Critical reception of Islanders was largely positive; it received an aggregate score of 82/100 on Metacritic, which uses a weighted average system.[28] Reviewers praised the game's intentionally simple mechanics, as well as its minimalist, low-poly visual aesthetic and relaxing soundtrack.[11][12][13] The game was commercially successful as well: in April 2019, it was one of the top twenty highest-selling new releases on Steam.[31] In July 2019, Hayden Dingman of PC World called it one of their favorite indie games of the year to that point.[32] That month, the staff at Rock, Paper, Shotgun also placed it on their list of the year's best games so far.[33] Luke Plunkett of Kotaku placed the game on his list of the top 10 games of 2019.[34] Paul Tamayo, also of Kotaku, named it one of the most relaxing games of 2019.[35]

Many critics highlighted the game's simplicity as a positive, calling the game relaxing or meditative.[2][6][10][12] In his full review, Luke Plunkett called Islanders "pure city-building. No fuss, no distractions."[13] Reviewers found that the simple gameplay encouraged variable session length.[3][36] Many enjoyed the ability to play in short sessions.[19][29][30] Both the reviewer from video game magazine Edge and Cass Marshall of Polygon described using the game as a "palate cleanser" to wind down between sessions of more complicated games.[5][12] Others felt the game was suitable for long sessions in and of itself.[3][4][13] Several reviewers found that the process of strategically placing buildings reminded them of carefully directing falling blocks in the puzzle game Tetris.[5][11][36]

Visual style was a draw that affected the way some reviewers played the game. French gaming site Millenium appreciated the way the color palettes and shapes suited the gameplay.[16] Samuel Guglielmo of TechRaptor found that the art style prompted him to place buildings "in locations that looked pretty" even if it meant scoring fewer points.[30] The reviewer from Edge described going through a similar "battle between efficiency and beauty," but found that the "crisp geometric style" of the graphics meant that the islands still looked attractive even when they focused on scoring over aesthetics.[5] Benja Hiller of German indie magazine Welcome to Last Week enjoyed the lack of human characters: "there are no annoying people. Nobody who wags his finger maliciously in front of you and says: Now take care of the road damage."[8]

Some reviewers felt that the game reflected or encouraged philosophical thinking. Michael Moore at The Verge wrote that the way each island visually progressed from a pristine natural setting to being densely packed with buildings felt like an honest reflection of "humanity's exploitative relationship with nature."[14] At Eurogamer, Christian Donlan had similar thoughts, asking "Is it nice to see one of the game's gorgeous low-poly islands filled with buildings, or is it a crime against nature?" He appreciated that the game allowed the player to decide that for themselves rather than forcing a perspective on them.[7] Reviewing the console version in 2021 for Nintendo Life, Roland Ingram wrote "Islanders is an elucidation of how games build meaning from abstract systems."[36] Ryan Young of The Indie Games Website discussed Islanders in relation to the "lusory attitude", a psychological state of willingness to play and abide by a game's arbitrary rules. He found that the game's slow pace combined with the possibility of entropy spiraling from a poor building placement affected his ability to adopt the lusory attitude towards the game.[37]

The game's studied minimalism attracted criticism from reviewers who wanted more depth from the experience. Both Nicoló Paschetto of Italian gaming site The Games Machine and Alice Liguori of Rock, Paper, Shotgun were disappointed that the game did not have animated inhabitants to give the islands a sense of life.[3][38] Some critics cited the single-song soundtrack as a negative.[16][30] Other reviewers had concerns with game mechanics. The reviewer from Millenium wished there were more objectives aside from simply earning points.[16] Reviewing the console edition, Joe Findlay of Comics Gaming Magazine found the lack of in-game consequences for placement of buildings made the game feel pointless to him.[39] The reviewer from Edge magazine noted that the game can be "a little persnickety about placement" of buildings, and Alessandro Barbosa of Critical Hit disliked the lack of an undo button at launch.[4][5] Several reviewers found it frustrating to start again on the earlier, simpler islands after a game over.[4] Young wrote that the prospect of restarting a failed session felt stressful enough to him that he quit playing entirely instead.[37] Rahul Shirke of IND13 wished for an option to choose the size or type of island when starting a new game, and Alec Meer suggested that players should be able to reset existing islands.[11][40]

Some critics have drawn comparisons between Islanders and later minimalist building games.[21] Following the console release of Islanders, many compared it to Dorfromantik, a tile-based city-building game released in 2021.[9][21][45] Several reviews for Townscaper, a low poly city-builder released in 2021, explicitly compared it to Islanders.[21][46]

Writing in 2022, Geoffrey Bunting of Eurogamer linked the rising popularity of games like Islanders with the COVID-19 pandemic. During the early stages of the pandemic, many countries initiated lockdowns as a pandemic control measure. Bunting argues that during these periods, people had increased free time and needed distraction from stress, and turned to relaxing minimalist games as a solution.[19]

• List of city-building video games

• Official website for Islanders: Console Edition