Siegel domain

A Siegel domain of the first kind (or first type, or genus 1) is the open subset of C^m of elements z such that

${\displaystyle \Im (z)\in V\,}$

where V is an open convex cone in R^m. These are special cases of tube domains. An example is the Siegel upper half plane, where V⊂R^k(k + 1)/2 is the cone of positive definite quadratic forms in R^k and m = k(k + 1)/2.

A Siegel domain of the second kind (or second type, or genus 2), also called a Piatetski-Shapiro domain, is the open subset of C^m×Cⁿ of elements (z,w) such that

${\displaystyle \Im (z)-F(w,w)\in V\,}$

where V is an open convex cone in R^m and F is a V-valued Hermitian form on Cⁿ. If n = 0 this is a Siegel domain of the first kind.

A Siegel domain of the third kind (or third type, or genus 3) is the open subset of C^m×Cⁿ×C^k of elements (z,w,t) such that

${\displaystyle \Im (z)-\Re L_{t}(w,w)\in V\,}$ and t lies in some bounded region

where V is an open convex cone in R^m and L_t is a V-valued semi-Hermitian form on Cⁿ.

A bounded domain is an open connected bounded subset of a complex affine space. It is called homogeneous if its group of automorphisms acts transitively, and is called symmetric if for every point there is an automorphism acting as –1 on the tangent space. Bounded symmetric domains are homogeneous.

Élie Cartan classified the homogeneous bounded domains in dimension at most 3 (up to isomorphism), showing that they are all Hermitian symmetric spaces. There is 1 in dimension 1 (the unit ball), two in dimension 2 (the product of two 1-dimensional complex balls or a 2-dimensional complex ball). He asked whether all bounded homogeneous domains are symmetric. Piatetski-Shapiro (1959, 1959b) answered Cartan's question by finding a Siegel domain of type 2 in 4 dimensions that is homogeneous and biholomorphic to a bounded domain but not symmetric. In dimensions at least 7 there are infinite families of homogeneous bounded domains that are not symmetric.

È. B. Vinberg, S. G. Gindikin, and I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro (1963) showed that every bounded homogeneous domain is biholomorphic to a Siegel domain of type 1 or 2.

Wilhelm Kaup, Yozô Matsushima, and Takushiro Ochiai (1970) described the isomorphisms of Siegel domains of types 1 and 2 and the Lie algebra of automorphisms of a Siegel domain. In particular two Siegel domains are isomorphic if and only if they are isomorphic by an affine transformation.

Suppose that G is the Lie algebra of a transitive connected group of analytic automorphisms of a bounded homogeneous domain X, and let K be the subalgebra fixing a point x. Then the almost complex structure j on X induces a vector space endomorphism j of G such that

• j²=–1 on G/K
• [x,y] + j[jx,y] + j[x,jy] – [jx,jy] = 0 in G/K; this follows from the fact that the almost complex structure of X is integrable
• There is a linear form ω on G such that ω[jx,jy]=ω[x,y] and ω[jx,x]>0 if x∉K
• if L is a compact subalgebra of G with jL⊆K+L then L⊆K

A j-algebra is a Lie algebra G with a subalgebra K and a linear map j satisfying the properties above.

The Lie algebra of a connected Lie group acting transitively on a homogeneous bounded domain is a j-algebra, which is not surprising as j-algebras are defined to have the obvious properties of such a Lie algebra. The converse is also true: any j-algebra is the Lie algebra of some transitive group of automorphisms of a homogeneous bounded domain. This does not give a 1:1 correspondence between homogeneous bounded domains and j-algebras, because a homogeneous bounded domain can have several different Lie groups acting transitively on it.

• Chu, Cho-Ho (2021), "Siegel domains over Finsler symmetric cones", J. reine angew. Math., 778: 145–169
• Kaup, Wilhelm; Matsushima, Yozô; Ochiai, Takushiro (1970), "On the automorphisms and equivalences of generalized Siegel domains", American Journal of Mathematics, 92 (2): 475–498, doi:10.2307/2373335, ISSN 0002-9327, JSTOR 2373335, MR 0267127
• Murakami, Shingo (1972), On automorphisms of Siegel domains, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 286, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/BFb0058567, ISBN 978-3-540-05985-1, MR 0364690
• Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. (1959), "On a problem proposed by E. Cartan", Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 124: 272–273, ISSN 0002-3264, MR 0101922
• Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. (1959b), "Geometry of homogeneous domains and the theory of automorphic functions. The solution of a problem of E. Cartan", Uspekhi Mat. Nauk (in Russian), 14 (3): 190–192
• Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. (1963), "Domains of upper half-plane type in the theory of several complex variables", Proc. Internat. Congr. Mathematicians (Stockholm, 1962) (in Russian), Djursholm: Inst. Mittag-Leffler, pp. 389–396, MR 0176105, archived from the original on 2011-07-17
• Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. (1969) [1961], Automorphic functions and the geometry of classical domains, Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 8, New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, ISBN 9780677203102, MR 0136770
• Siegel, Carl Ludwig (1939), "Einführung in die Theorie der Modulfunktionen n-ten Grades", Mathematische Annalen, 116: 617–657, doi:10.1007/BF01597381, ISSN 0025-5831, MR 0001251, S2CID 124337559
• Vinberg, E.B. (2001) [1994], "Siegel domain", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
• Vinberg, È. B.; Gindikin, S. G.; Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. (1963), "Classification and canonical realization of complex homogeneous bounded domains", Trudy Moskovskogo Matematičeskogo Obščestva, 12: 359–388, ISSN 0134-8663, MR 0158415 There is an English translation in the appendix of (Piatetski-Shapiro 1969).
• Xu, Yichao (2005), Theory of complex homogeneous bounded domains, Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 569, Beijing: Science Press, ISBN 978-1-4020-2132-9, MR 2217650