James A. D. W. Anderson

James A. D. W. Anderson
James A. D. W. Anderson
Born	1958 (age 64–65)
Alma mater	University of Reading
Known for	Computer algebra; Division by zero; Transreal arithmetic
	Scientific career
Institutions	University of Reading
Doctoral advisor	Geoffrey Daniel Sullivan

James Arthur Dean Wallace Anderson, known as James Anderson, is a retired member of academic staff in the School of Systems Engineering at the University of Reading, England, where he used to teach compilers, algorithms, fundamentals of computer science and computer algebra, programming and computer graphics.[1]

Anderson quickly gained publicity in December 2006 in the United Kingdom when the regional BBC South Today reported his claim of "having solved a 1200 year old problem", namely that of division by zero. However, commentators quickly responded that his ideas are just a variation of the standard IEEE 754 concept of NaN (Not a Number), which has been commonly employed on computers in floating point arithmetic for many years.[2]

Dr Anderson defended against the criticism of his claims on BBC Berkshire on 12 December 2006, saying, "If anyone doubts me I can hit them over the head with a computer that does it."[3]

Research and background

Anderson was a member of the British Computer Society, the British Machine Vision Association, Eurographics, and the British Society for the Philosophy of Science.[4] He was also a teacher in the Computer Science department (School of Systems Engineering) at the University of Reading.[1] He was a psychology graduate who worked in the Electrical and Electronic Engineering departments at the University of Sussex and Plymouth Polytechnic (now the University of Plymouth). His doctorate is from the University of Reading for (in Anderson's words) "developing a canonical description of the perspective transformations in whole numbered dimensions".

He has written multiple papers on division by zero[5][6] and has invented what he calls the "Perspex machine".

Anderson claims that "mathematical arithmetic is sociologically invalid" and that IEEE floating-point arithmetic, with NaN, is also faulty.[7]

Transreal arithmetic

Zero divided by zero
In mathematical analysis, the following limits can be found: $\lim _{x\to 0}{\frac {0}{x}}=0$ $\lim _{x\to 0^{+}}{\frac {1}{x}}=+\infty$ $\lim _{x\to 0^{-}}{\frac {1}{x}}=-\infty$ $\lim _{x\to 0}{\frac {\sin x}{x}}=1$ $\lim _{x\to 0}{\frac {1-\cos x}{x}}=0$ $0^{0}$ is also an indeterminate form. See exponentiation.
In IEEE floating-point arithmetic: ${\frac {0}{0}}\Rightarrow NaN_{i}$ by definition In several computer programming languages, including C's `pow` function, $0^{0}$ is defined to be $1$ , as that is the most convenient value for numerical analysis programs, since it makes $f(x)=x^{0}$ (and many other functions) continuous at zero, with the notable exception of $f(x)=0^{x}$ .[8]
In transreal arithmetic: ${\frac {0}{0}}=\Phi$ by definition $0^{0}=\Phi \,$ by Anderson's proof, reported on by the BBC, that: $0^{0}={\frac {0}{0}}$

Anderson's transreal numbers were first mentioned in a 1997 publication,[9] and made well known on the Internet in 2006, but not accepted as useful by the mathematics community. These numbers are used in his concept of transreal arithmetic and the Perspex machine. According to Anderson, transreal numbers include all of the real numbers, plus three others: infinity ( $\infty$ ), negative infinity ( $-\infty$ ) and "nullity" ( $\Phi$ ), a number that lies outside the affinely extended real number line. (Nullity, confusingly, has an existing mathematical meaning.)

Anderson intends the axioms of transreal arithmetic to complement the axioms of standard arithmetic; they are supposed to produce the same result as standard arithmetic for all calculations where standard arithmetic defines a result. In addition, they are intended to define a consistent numeric result for the calculations which are undefined in standard arithmetic, such as division by zero.[10]

Transreal arithmetic and other arithmetics

"Transreal arithmetic" is derived from projective geometry[9] but produces results similar to IEEE floating point arithmetic, a floating point arithmetic commonly used on computers. IEEE floating point arithmetic, like transreal arithmetic, uses affine infinity (two separate infinities, one positive and one negative) rather than projective infinity (a single unsigned infinity, turning the number line into a loop).

Here are some identities in transreal arithmetic with the IEEE equivalents:

Transreal arithmetic	IEEE standard floating point arithmetic
$0\div 0=\Phi$	$0\div 0\Rightarrow NaN_{i}$
$\infty \times 0=\Phi$	$\infty \times 0\Rightarrow NaN_{i}$
$\infty -\infty =\Phi$	$\infty -\infty \Rightarrow NaN_{i}$
$\Phi +a=\Phi \$	$NaN_{i}+a\Rightarrow NaN_{j}$ ( $NaN_{i},NaN_{j}$ may or may not be identical)
$\Phi \times a=\Phi$	$NaN_{i}\times a\Rightarrow NaN_{j}$ ( $NaN_{i},NaN_{j}$ may or may not be identical)
$-\Phi =\Phi \$	$-NaN_{i}\Rightarrow NaN_{i}$ (i.e. applying unary negation to a NaN yields the identical NaN)
$+1\div 0=+\infty$	$1\div +0=-1\div -0=+\infty$
$-1\div 0=-\infty$	$1\div -0=-1\div +0=-\infty$
$\Phi =\Phi \Rightarrow True\$	$NaN=NaN\Rightarrow False\ or\ Error$

The main difference is that IEEE arithmetic replaces the real (and transreal) number zero with positive and negative zero. (This is so that it can preserve the sign of a nonzero real number whose absolute value has been rounded down to zero. See also infinitesimal.) Division of any non-zero finite number by zero results in either positive or negative infinity.

Another difference between transreal and IEEE floating-point operations is that nullity compares equal to nullity, whereas NaN does not compare equal to NaN. This is due to nullity being a number, whereas NaN is an indeterminate value. It is easy to see that nullity is not an indeterminate value. For example, the numerator of nullity is zero, but the numerator of an indeterminate value is indeterminate. Thus nullity and indeterminant have different properties, which is to say they are not the same! In IEEE, the inequality is because two expressions which both fail to have a numerical value cannot be numerically equivalent.

Anderson's analysis of the properties of transreal algebra is given in his paper on "perspex machines".[11]

Due to the more expansive definition of numbers in transreal arithmetic, several identities and theorems which apply to all numbers in standard arithmetic are not universal in transreal arithmetic. For instance, in transreal arithmetic, $a-a=0$ is not true for all $a$ , since $\Phi -\Phi =\Phi$ . That problem is addressed in ref.[11] pg. 7. Similarly, it is not always the case in transreal arithmetic that a number can be cancelled with its reciprocal to yield $1$ . Cancelling zero with its reciprocal in fact yields nullity.

Examining the axioms provided by Anderson,[10] it is easy to see that any arithmetical term, being a sum, difference, product, or quotient, which contains an occurrence of the constant $\Phi$ is provably equivalent to $\Phi$ . This is to say that nullity is absorptive over these arithmetical operations. Formally, let $t$ be any arithmetical term with a sub-arithmetical-term $\Phi$ , then $t=\Phi$ is a theorem of the theory proposed by Anderson.

Media coverage

Anderson's transreal arithmetic, and concept of "nullity" in particular, were introduced to the public by the BBC with its report in December 2006[5] where Anderson was featured on a BBC television segment teaching schoolchildren about his concept of "nullity". The report implied that Anderson had discovered the solution to division by zero, rather than simply attempting to formalize it. The report also suggested that Anderson was the first to solve this problem, when in fact the result of zero divided by zero has been expressed formally in a number of different ways (for example, NaN).

The BBC was criticized for irresponsible journalism, but the producers of the segment defended the BBC, stating that the report was a light-hearted look at a mathematical problem aimed at a mainstream, regional audience for BBC South Today rather than at a global audience of mathematicians. The BBC later posted a follow-up giving Anderson's response to many claims that the theory is flawed.[3]

Applications

Anderson has been trying to market his ideas for transreal arithmetic and "Perspex machines" to investors. He claims that his work can produce computers which run "orders of magnitude faster than today's computers".[7][12] He has also claimed that it can help solve such problems as quantum gravity,[7] the mind-body connection,[13] consciousness[13] and free will.[13]

References

"Computer Science at Reading - Dr. James Anderson". University of Reading. Retrieved 28 February 2011.
Mark C. Chu-Carroll (7 December 2006). "Nullity: The Nonsense Number". Good Math, Bad Math. Archived from the original on 9 December 2006. Retrieved 7 December 2006.
"Nullity is a number, and that makes a difference". BBC News. 12 December 2006. Retrieved 12 December 2006.
"About the Ambient & Pervasive Intelligence Research Group". University of Reading. Retrieved 16 January 2007.
Ben Moore; Ollie Williams (7 December 2006). "1200-year-old problem "easy"". BBC News. Schoolchildren from Caversham have become the first to learn a brand new theory that dividing by zero is possible using a new number—"nullity". But the suggestion has left many mathematicians cold..
"Professor Comes Up With a Way to Divide by Zero". Slashdot. Retrieved 7 December 2006.
Dr James A.D.W. Anderson. "Transreal Computing Research and Portfolio – Company Showcase" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 January 2007. Retrieved 11 December 2006.
John Benito (April 2003). "Rationale for International Standard – Programming Languages – C" (PDF). Revision 5.10: 182. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Anderson, James A. D. W. (1997). "Representing Geometrical Knowledge". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 352 (1358): 1129–39. Bibcode:1997RSPTB.352.1129A. doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0096. PMC 1692011. PMID 9304680.
J. A. D. W. Anderson (2006). "Perspex Machine VIII: Axioms of Transreal Arithmetic" (PDF). In Longin Jan Latecki; David M. Mount; Angela Y. Wu (eds.). Vision Geometry XV: Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 6499.
J. A. D. W. Anderson (2006). "Perspex Machine IX: Transreal Analysis" (PDF). In Longin Jan Latecki; David M. Mount; Angela Y. Wu. (eds.). Vision Geometry XV: Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 6499.
"Transreal Computing Ltd". Archived from the original on 8 January 2007. Retrieved 12 December 2006.
"Home". bookofparagon.com.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[reading-1] "Computer Science at Reading - Dr. James Anderson". University of Reading. Retrieved 28 February 2011.

[Good_Math,_Bad_Math-2] Mark C. Chu-Carroll (7 December 2006). "Nullity: The Nonsense Number". Good Math, Bad Math. Archived from the original on 9 December 2006. Retrieved 7 December 2006.

[BBC2-3] "Nullity is a number, and that makes a difference". BBC News. 12 December 2006. Retrieved 12 December 2006.

[4] "About the Ambient & Pervasive Intelligence Research Group". University of Reading. Retrieved 16 January 2007.

[BBC1-5] Ben Moore; Ollie Williams (7 December 2006). "1200-year-old problem "easy"". BBC News. Schoolchildren from Caversham have become the first to learn a brand new theory that dividing by zero is possible using a new number—"nullity". But the suggestion has left many mathematicians cold..

[Slashdot-6] "Professor Comes Up With a Way to Divide by Zero". Slashdot. Retrieved 7 December 2006.

[investor_presentation-7] Dr James A.D.W. Anderson. "Transreal Computing Research and Portfolio – Company Showcase" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 January 2007. Retrieved 11 December 2006.

[8] John Benito (April 2003). "Rationale for International Standard – Programming Languages – C" (PDF). Revision 5.10: 182. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[Pub1-9] Anderson, James A. D. W. (1997). "Representing Geometrical Knowledge". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 352 (1358): 1129–39. Bibcode:1997RSPTB.352.1129A. doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0096. PMC 1692011. PMID 9304680.

[perplex8-10] J. A. D. W. Anderson (2006). "Perspex Machine VIII: Axioms of Transreal Arithmetic" (PDF). In Longin Jan Latecki; David M. Mount; Angela Y. Wu (eds.). Vision Geometry XV: Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 6499.

[perplex9-11] J. A. D. W. Anderson (2006). "Perspex Machine IX: Transreal Analysis" (PDF). In Longin Jan Latecki; David M. Mount; Angela Y. Wu. (eds.). Vision Geometry XV: Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 6499.

[company-12] "Transreal Computing Ltd". Archived from the original on 8 January 2007. Retrieved 12 December 2006.

[paragon-13] "Home". bookofparagon.com.