Jie people

The Jié (Chinese: 羯; Wade–Giles: Chieh; Middle Chinese: [ki̯at][1]: 246 ) were members of a tribe of northern China in the fourth century. During the period of the Sixteen Kingdoms, they were regarded by the Han people as one of the Five Barbarians. Under Shi Le, they established the Later Zhao dynasty. The Jie were defeated by Ran Min in the Wei–Jie war in 350 following the fall of the Later Zhao. Chinese historians continued to document the Jie people and their activities after the Wei–Jie war.

For the Jie/Jiye people in Eastern Equatoria state, South Sudan, see Jiye people.
For the Jie people of northern Uganda, see Jie (Uganda).

Name and origins

There are widely differing accounts of the exact ethnic origins of the Jie, with one theory uncertainly suggesting that they spoke a Yeniseian language,[2] while other authors have proposed a Turkic language.[3] According to Sinologist Mark Edward Lewis, the Jie were of Indo-European origin(probably Iranian).[lower-alpha 1][5]

According to the Book of Wei (6th century AD), the name Jie was derived from the Jiéshì area (羯室, modern Yushe County in Shanxi province), where the Jie resided.[6][7]: 6, 149 

According to the Book of Jin, the ancestors of Shi Le were a part of the multi-ethnic Xiongnu tribe known as Qiāngqú (羌渠).[8] Edwin Pulleyblank believes the Qiangqu represent the Kangju state of Sogdia.[1]: 247  Although Pulleyblank suggested that they might have been Tocharian in origin, most scholars believe that Kangju was constituted by an Eastern Iranian people. Some have linked the names Shi (石) and Jie (羯) to a Sogdian statelet known as 石國 Shíguó (literally, "Stone Country", at Chach Zhěshí 赭時, now Tashkent, also meaning "Stone City" in Common Turkic). Also, An Lushan, a Tang rebel general, had a Sogdian stepfather and was called a Jiehu.

The name of the parent house of Turko-Mongol Barlas and Borjigin clans (house of Genghis Khan and Timur) was Kiyat, almost identical to the Middle Chinese pronunciation of the name Jie, /ki̯at/.[1]

Others claim that the Jie were an ancient Yeniseian-speaking tribe related to the Ket people, who today live between the Ob and Yenisey rivers—the character 羯 (jié) is pronounced /kiɛt̚/ in Hokkien, /kʰiːt̚/ or /kiːt̚/ in Cantonese, /ciat̚/ in Hakka and ketsu in Japanese, implying that the ancient pronunciation might have been fairly close to Ket (kʰet).[lower-alpha 2] The root 羯 may be transliterated as Jié- or Tsze2- and an older form, < kiat, may also be reconstructed. This ethnonym might be cognate with the ethnonyms of Yeniseian-speaking peoples, such as the Ket and the Kott (who spoke the extinct Kott language). Pulleyblank (1962) connected the ethnonym to Proto-Yeniseian *qeˀt/s "stone". Vovin et al. (2016) also pointed to *keˀt "person, human being" as another possible source.[11] Alexander Vovin also suggests that the Xiongnu spoke a Yeniseian language, further connecting them with the Jie people.[12]

Western Washington University historical linguist Edward Vajda spent a year in Siberia studying the Ket people and their language and his findings helped substantiate such conjecture into the origins of the Ket people from Eurasia.[13] He further proposes a relationship of the Ket language to the Na-Dene languages indigenous to Canada and western United States, and even suggests the tonal system of the Ket language is closer to that of Vietnamese than any of the native Siberian languages.

Among the Yeniseian languages, Jie is hypothesized to be Pumpokolic. Vovin, Vajda, and de la Vaissière have suggested that Jie shares the same idiosyncrasies with the Pumpokol language, and the two are therefore closely related. This argument is strengthened by the fact that in northern Mongolia, Yeniseian-derived hydronyms have been demonstrated to be exclusively Pumpokolic, while influence from other Yeniseian languages is only found further north.[11] This therefore lends credence to the theory that the Jie are a Pumpokolic-speaking tribe, and confirms that the Pumpokolic-speaking Yeniseians existed in the core territory of the Xiongnu state.

Other sources link the Jie to the Lesser Yuezhi (Xiao Yuezhi 小月氏), who remained in China as vassals of the Xiongnu and then the Han dynasty.[14]

Jie language
Jie
Native toLater Zhao dynasty
RegionNorthern China
EthnicityJie people
Eraaround 4th century
Probably Yeniseian or Turkic
  • (If Yeniseian) Southern Yeniseian, related to Pumpokol
    • Jie
Language codes
ISO 639-3–

Only one phrase in the native language of the Jie is known. The source for this phrase was a Kuchean Buddhist monk and missionary Fotudeng. It was recorded in the Book of Jin as 秀支 替戾剛 僕谷 劬禿當 and said to have a connection to Shi Le's fight against Liu Yao in 328.[15] The phrase was glossed with a Chinese translation:

Text Middle Chinese[lower-alpha 3] Gloss
秀支[si̯u-ci̯e]軍 'army'
替戾剛[tʰei-let/lei-kɑŋ]出 'go out'
僕谷[bok/buk-kuk/yok]劉曜胡位 'Liu Yao's barbarian title'
劬禿當[ɡi̯u̯o-tʰuk-tɑŋ]捉 'capture'

This phrase has been analyzed in a number of publications. Shiratori (1900),[16] Ramstedt (1922),[17] Bazin (1948),[18] von Gabain (1950),[19] Shervashidze (1986),[20] and Shimunek (2015)[21] recognized Turkic lexicon, and gave their versions of the transcription and translation:

RamstedtBazinvon GabainShervashidzeShimunek
Sükä talıqın
bügüg tutun!		 Süg tägti ıdqaŋ
boquγıγ tutqaŋ!		 Särig tılıtqan
buγuγ kötürkän		 Sükâ tol'iqtin
buγuγ qodigo(d)tin		 su-Ø kete-r erkan
boklug-gu tukta-ŋ
Go with a war
[and] capture bügü!		 Send the army to attack,
capture the commander!		 You'd put forth the army,
you'd take the deer		 You came to the army
Deposed buγuγ		 When/as the army goes out,
capture the Boklug!

Edwin G. Pulleyblank (1963) argued that the Turkic interpretations cannot be considered very successful because they conflict with the phonetic values of the Chinese text and with the Chinese translation. Instead, he suggested a connection with the Yeniseian languages.[1]: 264 

Alexander Vovin (2000) gave the following translation based on Yeniseian.[12] Vovin (2000) suggests a connection with the Southern Yeniseian branch.

suke

armies

t-i-r-ek-ang

PV-CM-PERF-go out-3P

bok-kok

bok-kok

k-o-t-o-kt-ang

PV-?-OBJ-CM-catch-3P

suke t-i-r-ek-ang bok-kok k-o-t-o-kt-ang

armies {PV-CM-PERF-go out-3P} bok-kok PV-?-OBJ-CM-catch-3P

Armies have gone out. [They] will catch Bokkok.

The verbal ending -ŋ can be seen in Jie, which is a common verb ending in Yeniseian languages. The cognate form of the Jie words "kot-o-kt-aŋ" 'they will catch' in Ket is "d-kas-a-qos-n", showing the characteristic of Pumpokol where the sound /t/ corresponds the Ket sound /s/, thus Jie is thought to be closely related to Pumpokol. The Arin word 'kel' 'fight' partly coincides in the second syllable of suke 'army', however the connection is dubious and Vovin suggested it to be a loanword, because if Pumpokolic speakers became part of Xiongnu, the word for army would have likely been loaned.[22]

History

In 319, Jie general Shi Le established the state of Later Zhao in North China, which supplanted the Xiongnu-led Han-Zhao (304-329) state. However, the Later Zhao state collapsed in 351. In the period between 350 and 352, during the Wei–Jie war, General Ran Min ordered the complete extermination of the Jie, who were easily identified by high noses and full beards, leading to large numbers being killed.[23] According to some sources more than 200,000 of them were slain.[24] Despite this, the Jie continue to appear occasionally in history over the next 200 years. Both Erzhu Rong and Hou Jing, two famous warlords of the Northern Dynasties, were identified as Qihu and Jiehu respectively and modern scholars have suggested that they could have been be related to the Jie.[25]

Cultural influences

Fang Xuanling recorded in the Book of Jin chronicle that at around 340 a Jie state Later Zhao's which ruled part of North China had a Chinese scholar Xie Fei (together with Wei Mengbian) serving as a Head of Healing (Medicinal) Department in the Later Zhao State Chancellery, was a mechanical engineer who built a south-pointing chariot (also called south-pointing carriage), a directional compass vehicle that apparently did not use magnetic principle, but was operated by use of differential gears (which apply an equal amount of torque to driving wheels rotating at different speeds), or a similar angular differential principle.[26]

For the great ingenuity shown in the construction of the device, the Later Zhao Emperor Shi Hu granted Jie Fei the noble title of hou without land possessions and rewarded him generously.[7]: 99 [27]

See also

Notes
  1. Medieval Sinologist David A. Graff suggests Central Asian or Iranian origins.[4]
  2. Western Washington University historical linguist Edward Vajda spent a year in Siberia studying the Ket people and their language and his findings helped substantiate such conjecture into the origins of the Ket people, where DNA claims show genetic affinities with people of China and Myanmar, suggesting a Sino-Tibetan origin.[9] He further proposes a relationship of the Ket language to the Na-Dene languages indigenous to Canada and western United States, and even suggests the tonal system of the Ket language is closer to that of Vietnamese than any of the native Siberian languages.[10]
  3. Middle Chinese pronunciation follows Pulleyblank.[1]: 264 

References

Citations
  1. Pulleyblank, Edwin George (1963). "The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Part II" (PDF). Asia Major. 9: 206–265. Retrieved 2011-02-06.
  2. Kim, Hyun Jin (18 April 2013). The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe. Cambridge University Press. p. 176. ISBN 978-1-107-06722-6.
  3. Shimunek et al. 2015, p. 149.
  4. Graff 2002, p. 74.
  5. Lewis 2009, p. 82-83.
  6. Wei, Shou (554). 魏書 [Book of Wei]., Vol. 95.
  7. Taskin, V. S. (1990). Цзе [Jie]. Материалы по истории кочевых народов в Китае III-V вв. [Materials on the history of nomadic peoples in China. 3rd–5th cc. AD] (in Russian). Vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka. ISBN 5-02-016543-3.
  8. Fang, Xuanling (1958). 晉書 [Book of Jin] (in Chinese). Beijing: Commercial Press. Vol. 104
  9. "East Asian Studies 210 Notes: The Ket". Archived from the original on 2019-04-06. Retrieved 2009-10-09.
  10. "The Ket People - Google Video". Archived from the original on 2007-03-03. Retrieved 2009-10-09.
  11. Vovin et al. "Who were the *Kjet" (羯) and what language did they speak?" Journal Asiatique 304.1 (2016): 125-144. p. 126–127
  12. Vovin, Alexander. "Did the Xiongnu speak a Yeniseian language?". Central Asiatic Journal 44/1 (2000), pp. 87-104.
  13. Vajda, Edward. "The Ket and Other Yeniseian Peoples". Archived from the original on 2019-02-03.
  14. Haw 2006, p. 201
  15. Fang Xuanling, Book of Jin, ibid., Vol. 95, pp. 12b-13a
  16. Shiratori, Kurakichi, Uber die Sprache des Hiung-nu Stammes und der Tung-hu-Stdmme, Tokyo, 1900
  17. Ramstedt G.J., "Zur Frage nach der Stellung des Tschuwassischen" (On the question of the position of the Chuvash), Journal de la Société finno-ougrienne 38, 1922, pp. 1–34
  18. Bazin, Louis (1948). "Un texte proto-turc du IVe siècle: le distique hiong-nou du "Tsin-chou"". Oriens. 1 (2): 208–219. doi:10.2307/1578997. JSTOR 1578997.
  19. von Gabain, Annemarie (1950). "Louis Bazin: Un texte proto-turc du IVe siècle: le distique hiong-nou du "Tsin-chou" (Besprechung)". Der Islam. 29: 244–246.
  20. Shervashidze I.N. "Verb forms in the language of the Turkic runiform inscriptions", Tbilisi, 1986, pp. 3–9
  21. Shimunek A. "The earliest attested Turkic language: The Chieh 羯 (*Kɨr) language of the fourth century A.D.", Journal Asiatique, 2015
  22. Vovin, Alexander; Vajda, Edward J.; Vaissière, Etienne de la. "WHO WERE THE *KJET (羯) AND WHAT LANGUAGE DID THEY SPEAK?". Academia.edu. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
  23. Maenchen-Helfen, Otto J. (1973). The World of the Huns: Studies in Their History and Culture. University of California Press. p. 372. ISBN 0520015967. Retrieved January 16, 2015.
  24. The Buddhist Conquest of China, Erik Zürcher, page 111
  25. Graff, David (2 September 2003). Medieval Chinese Warfare 300-900. Routledge. ISBN 9781134553525. Retrieved 10 December 2021 – via Google Books.
  26. J. Needham (1986), "Science and Civilization in China", Taipei, Caves Books, Ltd, Volume 4, Part 2, Part 2, pp. 40 and 287, ISBN 978-0-521-05803-2
  27. Fang Xuanling, Book of Jin, supra, Vol. 106

Sources
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.