Friend of the World

The script was formulated in 2016.[3] Butler said the film is "about solitude, growth, and the corruption accompanying that growth within the enlightened, sometimes fractured psyches of our mentors."[4]

Pre-production started around August 2016. Diane was originally written as a young man, but scheduling conflicts and delays led to rewrites and ultimately Alexandra Slade was cast in the role. Kerry Rossall contributed to the production by funding the project directly.[3]

Principal photography began on May 13, 2017, in San Diego County and lasted for ten days. The majority of filming took place at Gray Area Multimedia, a key location Butler had intended to use for the production. Outside scenes were at Sunset Cliffs and the Tierrasanta entrance bridge to Mission Trails Regional Park near Camp Elliott. The cinematography was handled by Ray Gallardo[3] and the special make-up effects by C.J. Martinez.[5]

Butler had a rough cut of the film ready within months of wrapping but the final stages were not complete until 2019. Daniel N. Butler managed the visual effects and sound departments.[3] In an interview with Voyage LA, upon completing the film, Butler stated:

It is roughly an hour-long dark comedy sci-fi with a “Twilight Zone” feel and elements of body horror, absurd humor and satire.[6]

Corin Totin of Sick Flix mentioned the film has "a background score of an almost unrecognizably discordant version of Ode to Joy."[7] Celia Payne of Let's Talk Terror said "a surprisingly gleeful string arrangement accompanies scenes where humans-turned-monstrosities melt into themselves, shape-shift, and eat rats, bringing the audience into their world of insanity."[8]

Melissa Hannon at Horror Geek Life said "although it technically falls within the post-apocalyptic category, Friend of the World defies any specific genre."[9] Mark Harris at Black Horror Movies mentioned it mixes horror and sci-fi with heady drama.[10] Several critics pointed out that it is a body horror film.[11][12][13][14] Others conclude that it is a strange avant-garde art film[15][16][17] filled with subtext.[7][18] Lisa Marie Bowman at Through the Shattered Lens said it comes with "a hint of Kubrickian satire" with scenes reminiscent of Alien, concluding that surviving the end of the world does not mean you'll have a choice on who remains with you.[19] Joseph Perry at Horror Fuel mentioned it's like The Twilight Zone if Rod Serling and Charles Beaumont ate psychedelic material, or if ideas from Dr. Strangelove, Night of the Living Dead and Apocalypse Now were merged.[20] Albert Valentin of World Film Geek claims it is a zombie apocalypse film in the realm of "Romero meets Muschietti meets Cronenberg."[21] Redmond Bacon at Tilt Magazine said it blends the zombie film genre with the existential film drama, acknowledging Butler, as if he had a "Raging Bull-like" David Lynch version of 10 Cloverfield Lane.[12] Sean Parker of Horror Obsessive mentioned it has similarities to The Divine Comedy, with political satire and doomsday conspiracies.[22] Paul Klein at Filmhounds Magazine said the "weird mix of horror and comedy" felt like a "companion piece" to The Lighthouse.[23]

Themes and style drew comparisons to the 1968 zombie film Night of the Living Dead.

Butler chose to have the film mostly in black-and-white to accentuate the perspective of Gore's world.[3] Alain Elliott at Nerdly said shooting in black and white helped its style and low-budget film constraints.[14] Milana Vujkov at Lola on Film claims it has "a terrifyingly delightful string of corruptive catalysts, explosive apparitions of post-humanity, taken straight out of Burroughs" and that the "unsustainability of the human condition in a genetically modified apocalypse is a mix of home movie and Brechtian theatre play."[24] Dennis Schwartz Movie Reviews said that the fifty minute film is split up into chapters which allows for viewers to ponder at the nonlinear narrative.[25] Jeremie Sabourin at Cinema Smack mentions that some filmmakers will extend a narrative out to ninety minutes even if they don’t have enough story to tell. "With Friend of the World though, it sometimes feels like there’s ninety minutes of content compacted into its fifty minute runtime."[13] Celia Payne at Let's Talk Terror appreciated its shorter runtime, stating that "it shows the filmmakers know when their story is done and don’t try to extend when not necessary."[8] Butler claims he structured the film to be around fifty minutes, like an episode of Twilight Zone or Black Mirror.[3] Butler said:

In this day and age I think it would fit nicely within a streaming service – whether self-contained, part of an anthology series, or expanded into multiple episodes of a larger story.[3]

Karla Peterson at The San Diego Union Tribune said that Butler did not anticipate his feature-film debut to happen virtually during an actual pandemic, although "the surreal environment is a perfect match for an unsettling film where the source of chaos might just be a contagion." Being made available around a global conflict, during a pandemic and controversial election year, it was received by critics as a prophetic experience.[26][7]

When we look back on the quarantine days it will be films like this and Host that will stand as an artistic representation of the anxieties of the time.

— Corin Totin, "Short Film Review: Friend of the World (2020) Duration 50 min 30 sec", Sick Flix (8/12/2020)[7]

Jeremie Sabourin at Cinema Smack claims "Friend of the World also feels like a natural continuation of our current world due to its characters."[13] Rebecca Cherry at Film Carnage said it makes a good attempt to identify "a more character driven apocalyptic story pulling elements from a modern America."[26] Jim Morazzini of Voices From The Balcony claimed the characters as being "archetypes at opposite ends of American society" and compared the uncertain reality of the film to "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge like flight of a mind approaching death."[17] Brian Robertson of The Vista Press said "its characters echo a disturbing truth that is currently plaguing our nation today."[27] Conor McShane at Morbidly Beautiful said it’s a film that brings up the ideological and racial divides in America.[28]

Diane is a young black woman, who's an artist and millennial filmmaker.[10][16] She is a grounded, level-headed individual with liberal views.[9][13] Joel Fisher of Battle Royale With Cheese points out that Diane being a filmmaker is Butler allowing the audience to "smile a little at the director mocking himself."[18]

General Gore is an old, heavily built military officer who seems increasingly unhinged.[10][29][5] S Dewhirst of Set The Tape said he is "wild-eyed and larger than life, a big man with a big voice, big gut and big ideals."[30] Critics have compared him to Sterling Hayden's Jack D. Ripper of Dr. Strangelove,[12][5] Powers Boothe's Senator Ethan Roark of Sin City,[13] Jack Nicholson's Jack Torrance of The Shining,[30] and his voice to Anthony Hopkins and Gerald Mohr.[31]

In an interview with Times of San Diego, Butler stated that Friend of the World's style was inspired by the works of Samuel Beckett, Jean-Paul Sartre, John Carpenter and David Cronenberg. He mentioned that political anxieties and absurdist theatre helped inspire him to write.[3] The film is said to draw inspiration from films and television such as The Twilight Zone, Dr. Strangelove, The Thing and La Jetée, as well as plays such as No Exit and Krapp's Last Tape.[2] It is a two-hander film with "comic absurdity and social satire"[2] that broadens the "body horror subgenre of science fiction and horror."[32]

Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God.[33]

When asked if the film's title had any biblical influence, Butler confirmed it did not.[3]

Friend of the World received mostly positive reviews from critics. It has a 90% approval rating on film review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes with an average score of 5.9/10 based on twenty reviews.[36]

Ally Ham at Video Librarian scored it 4.5 out of 5, stating that "Friend of the World is an evocative indie gem serving a little bit of science fiction, some dark comedy, and a healthy dose of body horror."[42] John Noonan at FilmInk said "in some ways, Friend of the World is a black comedic theatre piece translated to celluloid."[43] Rob Rector of Film Threat scored the film 6 out of 10 and said it "works more like a stage play than a film [...] but it does share a persistent dread and discomfort" comparing it to Possum by Matthew Holness.[11] Douglas Davidson at Elements of Madness said it "has something real to say regarding interpersonal strife powered by misinformation and the narrow view of only certain parts of humanity."[44] Melissa Hannon at Horror Geek Life awarded the film 3.7 out of 5 stars, writing "Friend of the World is truly an acid trip of a movie."[9] Jeremie Sabourin at Cinema Smack gave it 3.5 out of 5 and felt the tone matched Night of the Living Dead as if done by Terry Gilliam claiming that "its nightmarish and claustrophobic setting will have viewers on edge."[13] Corin Totin of Sick Flix rated the film 4.5 out of 5, comparing it to Tetsuo: The Iron Man, declaring "this is a piece of art that is very much of this moment and really taps into the surreal horror that we are experiencing in the world at large right now."[7]

This is how you take on a genre that has been done to death.

— Redmond Bacon, "Friend of the World is a Bracing Stocktake of a Crumbling World", Tilt Magazine (9/11/2020)[12]

Film critic Daniel M. Kimmel of the Boston Online Film Critics Association said "It makes for a disturbing 50-minute running time that is engaging but will likely leave you wondering what it was all about."[45] Cheryl Eddy at Io9 says "there are flickers of humor along the way, as well as a slight story twist that explains the film’s title."[40] Tim Brennan of About Boulder admitted arthouse films can be intimidating to watch, but called it a "strange little art film made with intelligence and wit."[15] Anton Bitel at Projected Figures said the film "uses bunkered post-apocalyptic sci-fi/body horror to reconcile an imperfect, polarised world."[46] Alain Elliott of Nerdly said the dialogue driven performances are good and that "when you think post-apocalyptic zombie movie, this movie and its script isn’t what you expect."[14] Mitchell Brown at Slay Away said it is a "strange film that is at its best when it focuses on the dialogue and performances of the two leads."[47] Hugues Porquier from Battle Royale With Cheese called it "interesting writing" and "clean photography." They mentioned a possible reference to Leos Carax's Boy Meets Girl and said it reminded them of Videodrome and Existenz, swinging "between realism and surrealism."[48] Nils Gollersrud at Loud And Clear Reviews said "the film succeeds best in crafting an eerie paranoia and unpredictability that keeps it watchable."[49] Mark H. Harris of Black Horror Movies said "the articulate script is dialogue-heavy with a philosophical bent" and it "presents some thoughtful takes on identity, individualism and reconciling divergent worldviews."[10] S Dewhirst of Set The Tape said it has "themes of genetic engineering, world war, propaganda, paranoia and zombies" and that "fans of the off-beat, the weird, and the not-quite-mainstream will likely find plenty to enjoy in this strange, starkly-shot trip through the bunkers and cellars of a ruined world."[30] Kristy Strouse at Wonderfully Weird & Horrifying said that even though the film "sometimes meanders, the captivating performances, gnarly practical effects, and intelligent direction make the most of its limited screen time."[50]

When it comes down to it, the film’s twisted, mind-bending journey really leads viewers back to themselves, and to what they would do if they were in Diane’s bloody shoes.

— Karla Peterson, "San Diego filmmaker brings the apocalypse to the Oceanside International Film Festival", The San Diego Union Tribune (8/14/2020)[51]

Corey Bulloch of UK Film Review claims it has "world-building that leaves more confusion than intrigue" and "constant ambiguity that it’s hard for the audience to maintain invested interest."[5] Keri O'Shea at Warped Perspective said that it "needed to commit to something – oddness, aesthetics, or plot."[52] Rebecca Cherry at Film Carnage gave it 2 out of 5 and said "There’s the classic theme of survival as with any apocalypse film but the threat isn’t sufficient enough to add the right amount of tension or suspense to keep you gripped or invested in the characters’ fate."[26] MontiLee Stormer at Movie Reelist scored it 2 out of 5 and said to "save this one as a palette cleanser between a Waters film and a Lynch film."[53] Lindsey Ungerman at Horror Buzz said it had "Tarantino vibes", was "attention-grabbing and engaging but loses steam quickly due to story ambiguity and spasmodic dialogue." They rated it 3 out of 10 concluding that the film was "definitely beautiful" but "too chaotic."[16] Marie Asner of The Phantom Tollbooth scored it 1 out of 5 and came to the conclusion that it "would have made a better radio drama than a film."[31] Josh Taylor at Nightmarish Conjurings said that "it’s a clever film that never feels clever enough for its own premise."[54]

Characters and storylines were buried under the rubble of the apocalypse this film finds itself in.

— Lindsey Ungerman, "Friend of the World was Attractive but Jumbled", Horror Buzz (9/14/2020)[16]

Friend of the World ranks on Bored Panda's 50 Best Horror Comedies That Will Have You Confused Whether To Laugh Or Scream list[55] and is one of Video Librarian's Top 15 Best Narrative Films of 2022.[56]