Laura Maczka

In 2011, Gary Slagel, a 24-year veteran of the Richardson City Council, decided not to run for re-election, leaving his seat (Place 4) open. In the ensuing election, Laura Gibbs Maczka and Karl Voigtsberger both ran for the open seat. Maczka was endorsed by the Richardson Coalition, a political action group that had supported Slagel, and Voigtsberger was supported by the Richardson Citizens Alliance (RCA), a political action group that wanted to oust all incumbents.[11] Despite mudslinging and numerous false charges launched by the RCA against the Coalition's slate of candidates,[12] Maczka's and Voigtsberger's race was free of such controversy. She won the election to Place 4 with 5,772 (74.97%) votes to Voigtsberger's 1,927 (25.03%).[13] In 2013, Voigtsberger endorsed Maczka in her campaign for mayor.[14]

On November 27, 2012, Maczka announced her intention to run for mayor.[15] Because of the recent Richardson Charter change that set the mayor's place to be Place 7, Maczka left her current Place 4 open in the 2013 election. Her open place was eventually filled by fellow Councilmember Kendal Hartley (formerly Place 5) in an uncontested race.

On May 11, 2013, Maczka was elected by an overwhelming majority to become the first directly elected mayor in Richardson. Thanks to a Charter change in 2012, the mayor was no longer elected from the council, but was elected directly by the people. The Charter change set the mayor's place to be Place 7. Maczka won Place 7 by defeating fellow member of the Council Amir Omar by 10,167 to 4,172 (70.90% to 29.10%).[16]

The vote was canvassed (officially accepted) at the May 20, 2013 Council meeting, which marked the beginning of Maczka's term as mayor.

Mayor Maczka drew no opponents in the 2015 election and would have served two years as mayor. However, on April 2, 2015, she announced she would not serve that term as she posted on Facebook: 'There have been questions about my role as mayor for the City of Richardson for the next term. After much prayer and conversations with my family, I have made the decision that I will not serve as mayor for the 2015–2017 term and intend to submit a declination of such office at the city council meeting at which the election canvass will be conducted. My focus will be on my family, my health and professional career.'

While in office, Mayor Maczka had an affair with Mark Jordan, developer of a highly controversial project in Richardson. The details of the scandal were unclear prior to filing for reelection, which lead to Maczka running unopposed for reelection. However, as the scandal unfolded, many citizens demanded that she resign from office, which she did not do. However, Maczka was forced to not serve the additional term for which she had just been reelected. Moreover, it became public knowledge that she had taken a job with the development company that was in charge of the controversial project which she helped get approved through the city council.[17]

A special called City Council meeting was scheduled for April 28, 2015. The purpose of the meeting was to hear the report of the independent investigator into allegations that the mayor and/or members of the council violated either state law or the Richardson Code of Ethics or the city charter in terms of the Palisades rezoning development.

In addition, four specific complaints from Richardson citizens were submitted to the Independent Investigator who was chosen by the Richardson City Attorney (as allowed by the City Charter).

At the April 28, 2015 specially called council meeting, the independent investigator, George A. Staples, presented his report and conclusions on the initial investigation. His summary paragraphs states:

In conclusion, we have found no evidence of any ethical violation under state law, the City Charter, or the Code of Ethics by Mayor Maczka or any member of the City Council with respect to the referenced City Council votes or the Mayor's announced intention to decline another term of office.

Mr. Staples' report goes on to say:

However, the overriding interest of the Code of Ethics as stated in Section 2-I is to ensure, "that such officers of the City shall at all times strive to avoid even the appearance of impropriety." While the facts in this case do not reveal a cognizable violation of the Code of Ethics, it is certainly understandable that the sum of the Mayor's actions would be viewed by the public as offending the overriding interest of the Code of Ethics. Nevertheless, a failure to avoid the appearance of impropriety does not constitute a violation of the Code of Ethics, City Charter, or state law.

Mr. Staples did note that there was the possibility that the mayor withheld some emails that perhaps had public information that was required to be turned over per the Texas Public Information Act, but that these allegations, if genuine, needed to be followed up by the Public Integrity Unit of the Dallas District Attorney's Office.

Given his report, Mr. Staples said that no action should be taken by the council, and none was.[18]

Then Mr. Staples reported on his investigations of the four complaints lodged against the mayor and the council. He told the council:

After an initial review of the complaints, it was my opinion that they failed to allege a violation of the Code of Ethics and did not contain any evidence which would constitute a violation, were vague and lacked detail.

Mr. Staples asked the complainants for follow-up and evidence of wrongdoing, but none was provided. He therefore stated:

It is my opinion that the complaints are insufficient in detail and fail to allege a prima facie violation of the Code of Ethics.

Again, he recommended that no action be taken by the council, and none was.[19]

After the initial report, Ms. Maczka gave her side of the story. In essence, she divorced in December 2014, but that she and her ex-husband had worked out an agreement by which she and the children would be able to stay in the house, by having her parents cosign the loan. This support would also have allowed Ms. Maczka to continue to serve as mayor, so, urged by her family, she decided to file to run for re-election.

Ms. Maczka said that it was quite by surprise when several months after the loan process began, the loan company - Wells Fargo - told Ms. Maczka that despite the cosigners, that she herself would have to qualify for the loan based on her income, which at this point was virtually zero. This revelation came after it was too late to drop out of the race.

To complicate matters, Ms. Maczka, who had undergone treatment for melanoma eight years before. It also drove home the point that she had to have health insurance now. These two factors convinced her that she needed to give up the mayor's spot (hence, not take the oath of office, because it was too late to get off the ballot), and get a job with health benefits immediately. A position at JP Realty (the company doing the Palisades project for which vote she was criticized) came open, and she took it.[20]

On May 18, 2015, the Richardson City Council met to canvass the votes from the May 9th election. "Canvassing" the vote in Texas means that the elected body meets and formally accepts the election report from the local election department.

As previously indicated, Ms. Maczka submitted a letter to the City Secretary declining the office of mayor to which she had been elected. After the other council members had been sworn in, the council elected a new mayor pro tem, who was automatically, per charter changes made in 2012, made mayor. Paul Voelker is now the new mayor of Richardson. Subsequently, Mark Solomon was elected the new mayor pro tem.

On May 10, 2018, Maczka and husband Mark Jordan were indicted for various federal charges including bribery and honest services wire fraud. The indictment says that in exchange for her support of his project, she accepted monetary payments, payments to renovate her house, luxury hotel stays, flight upgrades, meals, a lucrative job, and intimate sexual contact from him.[21]

On March 7, 2019, Maczka and Mark Jordan were found guilty in federal court of four counts of bribery and honest services wire fraud. Maczka remained free on bond pending sentencing while Jordan was taken into custody due to fears he may flee.[22]

In 2020, a court of appeal threw out Maczka's conviction after it emerged that a bailiff had had a conversation with the judge that may have affected the outcome.[23] Prosecutors subsequently filed a new indictment against Maczka and Jordan on federal bribery and tax charges. The trial began on July 6, 2021.[24] After a three-week trial, both defendants were found guilty of bribery, tax fraud and conspiracy.[3][25] On August 4, 2022, she and Mark Jordan were each sentenced to six years in federal prison.[4] Candysdirt.com states that both Jordons began serving their terms Oct 24, 2022.