Like Water, Like Fire

The book's title comes from Janka Kupała's poem In the Night Pasture (Belarusian: На папасе, romanized: Na papasie):

by forces unknown / New-created, like water, like fire![1]^: 21[3]

The book consists of 221 poems and poetry fragments by 41 authors[4] — 37 men, four women — across 347 pages.

It begins with the only known poem by Paŭliuk Bahrym, ‘Play Then, Play’, which was taught in the schools of Soviet Belarus as the earliest example of peasants’ liberation literature. It continues with works by Francišak Bahuševič and Janka Łučyna from the mid-19th century and ends with the Soviet Belarusian authors Maksim Tank and Arkadź Kulašoŭ.

The book begins with acknowledgements and a 10-page introduction, in which the translator discusses the historical context of the published works and of Belarusian literature as a whole. The translator also explains the pronunciation of the names and transliterated words of Belarusian origin, for which she uses a Belarusian Latin alphabet.

The anthology is divided into seven chronological parts. Each part begins with a short introduction to the corresponding literary period and ends with the translator's detailed commentaries to the published works.

Vera Rich reading from Like Water, Like Fire during the Kupalle (Belarusian Midsummer Night) celebration in London, 2009

The Belarusian diaspora and specialists in Belarusian studies welcomed the anthology and recommended it to their readers. They also criticized its shortcomings.

Janka Zaprudnik, a Belarusian scholar based in the United States, wrote that the Soviet co-funder insisted on populating the anthology with a significant number of authors who "though were not of a great talent, had the impeccable party reputation".[3]

Alexander Nadson, head of the Belarusian Catholic community in London, who knew Rich for many years and assisted her with translations, recalled that the translator kept the exact content of the anthology secret, alluding this was due to a possible influence of one of the book's funders.[5] He noted that Rich was most productive under pressure which might explain the varied quality of translations.[6] In a short critical article he quoted Nił Hilevič's A Wonder Came (Belarusian: Цуд тварыўся) as an example of a successul translation. He also regretted that a significant number of works selected for the anthology were of poor quality. He predicted the next chance for such a publication wouldn't happen soon.[7]

Vera Rich, the author and translator of the Like Water, Like Fire anthology, 2009

Arnold McMillin welcomed Like Water, Like Fire as "an outstanding piece of work which will serve many English readers as an introduction to an unjustly neglected corner of European literature".[8] He was critical, however, of a misrepresentative – to a certain degree – selection of works: poor representation of the 19th century poetry[8] and emphasis on poetry of the last 30 years (that is, 1940s-60s) which — he speculated — might have been the result of the sponsors' influence.[9] In his opinion, the translator was most successful with the works of the beginning of the 20th century and the Naša Niva period of Belarusian literature, particularly poems by Bujła, Kupała, Kołas and Bahdanovič.[9]

Anton Adamovič of the Belarusan Institute of Arts and Sciences, New York, corroborated McMillin's criticism. He noted that contemporary (that is, post-World War II) Soviet Belarusian poetry was represented most extensively: 29 out of 41 authors of the anthology were living at the time of the publication; 165 out of 221 poems were composed and published in Soviet Belarus. Most of those works were also translated well, "particularly the poems by Tank, Kulašoŭ, Pančanka, Pysin, Baradulin, and Hilevič".[4] However, the 1920s - one of the most fruitful periods for the Belarusian literature and culture - was represented by only one poem. The whole of pre-Soviet Belarusian poetry was represented by 56 poems of nine authors.[4] None of the poets of the post-Second World War Belarusian diaspora were included. Adamovič admitted that the book had "many apt observations and comments in the introduction and in the numerous notes",[4] however it contained "just as many misunderstandings and factual errors".[4] This led him to suggest that while the book would be useful and enjoyable for general readers, "journalists and scholars [...] should be cautious when using the anthology for quotations and comments."[4]

Thirty years after the anthology's appearance, a US-based scholar, Lavon Jurevič, wrote that the anthology "is a unique edition even today; it is indeed the only one of its kind in a positive sense, because of its quality and coverage, but also in a negative sense, it being the only one".[10]

In 2012, Svetlana Skomorokhova produced a detailed analysis of the anthology as part of her doctoral thesis on the English translation of Belarusian literature.[11]^{: 245–255} She noted that 'the founding fathers' of the new Belarusian literature - Bahdanovich, Kolas and Kupala - were the most translated poets of the anthology; and the well-established poets of the 20th century were well represented too, which "makes the book a seminal work in Belarusian literary translations into English".[11]^: 247 Its "scope and diachronic method make it as yet unrivalled",[11]^: 254 while "the coverage and the encyclopaedic character of the data presented in the book are extensive".[11]^: 254 Skomorokhova noted that for translating and explaining Belarusian poetry, Vera Rich used masterfully her knowledge of classical English literature, and employed comparisons with English, Irish and Welsh literary traditions extensively.[11]^: 247 Skomorokhova doubted, however, that Rich's style would appeal to a modern reader; she suggested that Rich's translations "may be in line for further revisions as well due to her disregard of contemporary literary aesthetics in her translations".[11]^: 255