Majorization

In mathematics, majorization is a preorder on vectors of real numbers. Let denote the -th largest element of the vector . Given , we say that weakly majorizes (or dominates) from below (or equivalently, we say that is weakly majorized (or dominated) by from below) denoted as if for all . If in addition , we say that majorizes (or dominates) , written as , or equivalently, we say that is majorized (or dominated) by . The order of the entries of the vectors or does not affect the majorization, e.g., the statement is simply equivalent to . As a consequence, majorization is not a partial order, since and do not imply , it only implies that the components of each vector are equal, but not necessarily in the same order.

The majorization partial order on finite dimensional vectors, described here, can be generalized to the Lorenz ordering, a partial order on distribution functions. For example, a wealth distribution is Lorenz-greater than another if its Lorenz curve lies below the other. As such, a Lorenz-greater wealth distribution has a higher Gini coefficient, and has more income disparity. Various other generalizations of majorization are discussed in chapters 14 and 15 of.[1]

The majorization preorder can be naturally extended to density matrices in the context of quantum information.[2][3] In particular, exactly when (where denotes the state's spectrum).

Examples

(Strong) majorization: . For vectors with components

(Weak) majorization: . For vectors with components:

Geometry of majorization

Figure 1. 2D majorization example

For we have if and only if is in the convex hull of all vectors obtained by permuting the coordinates of . Figure 1 displays the convex hull in 2D for the vector . Notice that the center of the convex hull, which is an interval in this case, is the vector . This is the "smallest" vector satisfying for this given vector . Figure 2 shows the convex hull in 3D. The center of the convex hull, which is a 2D polygon in this case, is the "smallest" vector satisfying for this given vector .

Figure 2. 3D Majorization Example

Schur convexity

A function is said to be Schur convex when implies . Hence, Schur-convex functions translate the ordering of vectors to a standard ordering in . Similarly, is Schur concave when implies

An example of a Schur-convex function is the max function, . Schur convex functions are necessarily symmetric that the entries of it argument can be switched without modifying the value of the function. Therefore, linear functions, which are convex, are not Schur-convex unless they are symmetric. If a function is symmetric and convex, then it is Schur-convex.

Equivalent conditions

Each of the following statements is true if and only if :

  • for some doubly stochastic matrix .[4]:Thm. 2.1 This is equivalent to saying can be represented as a convex combination of the permutations of ; one can verify that there exists such a convex representation using at most permutations of .[5]
  • From we can produce by a finite sequence of "Robin Hood operations" where we replace two elements and with and , respectively, for some .[4]:11
  • For every convex function , .[4]:Thm. 2.9
    • In fact, a special case suffices: and, for every t, .[6]
  • .[2]:Exercise 12.17

In linear algebra: Majorization of operators


We say that a Hermitian operator, , majorizes another, , if the set of eigenvalues of majorizes that of .

In computability theory

Given , then is said to majorize if, for all , . If there is some so that for all , then is said to dominate (or eventually dominate) . Alternatively, the preceding terms are often defined requiring the strict inequality instead of in the foregoing definitions.

See also

Notes

  1. Marshall, Albert W. (2011). Inequalities : theory of majorization and its applications. Ingram Olkin, Barry C. Arnold (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. ISBN 978-0-387-68276-1. OCLC 694574026.
  2. Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-00217-3. OCLC 844974180.
  3. Wehrl, Alfred (1 April 1978). "General properties of entropy". Reviews of Modern Physics. 50 (2): 221–260. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.50.221.
  4. Barry C. Arnold. "Majorization and the Lorenz Order: A Brief Introduction". Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 43, 1987.
  5. Xingzhi, Zhan (2003). "The sharp Rado theorem for majorizations". The American Mathematical Monthly. 110 (2): 152–153. doi:10.2307/3647776. JSTOR 3647776.
  6. July 3, 2005 post by fleeting_guest on "The Karamata Inequality" thread, AoPS community forums. Archived 11 November 2020.

References

  • J. Karamata. "Sur une inegalite relative aux fonctions convexes." Publ. Math. Univ. Belgrade 1, 145158, 1932.
  • G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood and G. Pólya, Inequalities, 2nd edition, 1952, Cambridge University Press, London.
  • Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications Albert W. Marshall, Ingram Olkin, Barry Arnold, Second edition. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, 2011. ISBN 978-0-387-40087-7
  • A tribute to Marshall and Olkin's book "Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications"
  • Matrix Analysis (1996) Rajendra Bhatia, Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-94846-1
  • Topics in Matrix Analysis (1994) Roger A. Horn and Charles R. Johnson, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-46713-1
  • Majorization and Matrix Monotone Functions in Wireless Communications (2007) Eduard Jorswieck and Holger Boche, Now Publishers, ISBN 978-1-60198-040-3
  • The Cauchy Schwarz Master Class (2004) J. Michael Steele, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-54677-5

Software

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.