Mathaba News Agency

At the time of a 2002 report in The New York Times, Mathaba represented the closest thing to an online outlet for foreigners to engage the Libyan government, even inviting visitors to send an SMS message purportedly to Gaddafi himself.[7]

During the 2011 war on Libya, the Mathaba News Agency provided extensive coverage of the news of the Libyan Jamahiriya.

Mathaba's content is a mixture of original and republished articles along with various blog posts and videos, as well as excerpts from speeches. The site's official disclaimer states that the site's content "should be treated simply as a catalog of information of real significance" and that not all articles are necessarily endorsed by Mathaba itself.[8] The commentary of controversial figures such as David Duke and Louis Farrakhan have been among those selected for publication on the site.[9][10] Conspiracy theories are a common fixture of Mathaba's content, including claims that Osama bin Laden had been dead for years before he was reported killed;[11] that the AIDS virus was created by the World Health Organization to reduce the populations of nonwhite African countries;[12] and that Zionists control the media and were behind the Kennedy assassination,[13] the September 11 attacks,[14] and the wars in Iraq and Libya.[13] It accused Hillary Clinton of leading "banker jewish zionist-elite gangsters"[15] and called Google "a company owned by Zionist Jews".[16] The agency denies any accusations of anti-Semitism, saying, "we have regular Jewish contributors and analysts, we are not against ANY religion," but that it would report on statistical anomalies it deemed newsworthy such as "the fact that all 5 directors of the U.S. money supply (Federal Reserve Bank) are Jewish" and inviting readers to "draw their own conclusions".[17]

In the Libyan Civil War, Mathaba featured articles and republished blog posts[18] from a pro-Gaddafi perspective, including reporting on Hugo Chavez's support for the Gaddafi government,[19] while it also reported on Western opposition to the NATO military intervention, citing articles by Dennis Kucinich, among others.[20] Frontline reports were regularly published summarizing each day's events, with claims of many battlefield victories by Gaddafi loyalists.[15][21][22] On 16 August 2011, three months after rebels had defeated Gaddafi forces in Misrata, the news agency reported that "Misrata has been liberated by loyalist volunteers of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi and the Libyan Defence Forces."[23] It further reported on 25 August 2011, that news reports showing Tripoli in the hands of the rebels were "fake footage from Qatar" made using a "replica of Tripoli in Qatar ... used to spread fake media reports on Jazeera, CNN and the BBC world wide."[24][25] As late as 1 September 2011, with the opposition in control of most of the country, the agency claimed that Gaddafi still had "massive support among an estimated 95% of the population."[26]

On 13 October 2011, Mathaba reported that 80% of both Tripoli and Benghazi were controlled by Gaddafi loyalists, as well as 90-100% of the southern portion of the country.[27] When NATO declared after the announcement of Gaddafi's death on 20 October that it would soon cease its military operations in the country, Mathaba stated that NATO had "surrendered".[28] The agency also insisted that the video and images of Gaddafi's capture and body were faked and that he was "not captured and not killed" but "very much alive in more ways than one", and though he "does not need to speak... in the future if the time is right... he may choose to address us again". Readers were instructed to continue to spread the Green Charter in the meantime.[29]

• Mathaba News Agency website