Modifiable temporal unit problem

The Modified Temporal Unit Problem (MTUP) is a source of statistical bias that occurs in time series and spatial analysis when using temporal data that has been aggregated into temporal units.[1][2] In such cases, choosing a temporal unit (e.g., days, months, years) can affect the analysis results and lead to inconsistencies or errors in statistical hypothesis testing.[3]

Flowchart illustrating selected units of time. The graphic also shows the three celestial objects that are related to the units of time.

Background
Table showing quantitative relationships between common units of time

The MTUP is closely related to the modifiable areal unit problem or MAUP, in that they both relate to the scale of analysis and the issue of choosing an appropriate analysis.[2][4] While the MAUP refers to the choice of spatial enumeration units, the MTUP arises because different temporal units have different properties and characteristics, such as the number of periods they contain or the amount of detail they provide.[2][4][5] For example, daily sales data for a product can be aggregated into weekly, monthly, or yearly sales data. In this case, using monthly data instead of daily data can result in losing important information about the timing of events, and using yearly data can obscure short-term trends and patterns.[3] However, the daily data in the example may have too much noise, temporal autocorrelation, or be inconsistent with other datasets.[1] With only daily data, conducting an analysis accurately at the hourly rate would not be possible. In addition, the Modifiable Temporal Unit Problem can also arise when the time units are irregular or when the data is missing for some periods. In such cases, the choice of the time unit can affect the amount of missing data, which can impact the accuracy of the analysis and forecasting.

Overall, the Modifiable Temporal Unit Problem highlights the importance of carefully considering the time unit when analyzing and forecasting time series data.[1] It is often necessary to try different time units and evaluate the results to determine the most appropriate choice.[1]

Implications

Crime

The impact of MTUP on crime analysis can be significant, as it can affect the accuracy and reliability of crime data and its conclusions about crime patterns and trends.[3] For example, suppose the temporal unit of analysis is changed from days to weeks. In that case, the number of reported crimes may decrease or increase, even if the underlying pattern remains constant. This can lead to incorrect conclusions about the effectiveness of crime prevention strategies or the overall level of crime in a given area.[3]

Food accessibility

The MTUP can also have an impact on food accessibility.[4] This issue arises when the temporal unit of analysis is changed, leading to changes in the patterns and trends observed in food accessibility data. For example, if food accessibility data is analyzed from different years or aggregated differently, then the results of a study are likely to be impacted.[4] This can affect our understanding of the availability of food in different areas over time, and can result in incorrect or incomplete conclusions about food accessibility.[4]

Epidemiology

The MTUP can affect our understanding of the incidence and prevalence of diseases or health outcomes in different populations over time, resulting in incorrect or incomplete conclusions about the public health situation.[6][7] The timeframe chosen for collecting and analyzing public health data is something that needs to be considered by researchers.[6]

Suggested solutions

To address the MTUP, it is important to consider the temporal resolution of the data and choose the most appropriate temporal unit based on the research question and the goals of the analysis.[1] In some cases, it may be necessary to aggregate or interpolate the data to a consistent temporal unit. Additionally, it may be helpful to use multiple temporal units or to present results for different temporal units to demonstrate the sensitivity of the results to the choice of temporal unit.[1]

See also

References
  1. Cheng, Tao; Adepeju, Monsuru; Preis, Tobias (27 June 2014). "Modifiable Temporal Unit Problem (MTUP) and Its Effect on Space-Time Cluster Detection". PLoS ONE. 9 (6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100465. PMC 4074055.
  2. Jong, R. de; Bruin, S. de (5 January 2012). "Linear trends in seasonal vegetation time series and the modifiable temporal unit problem". Biogeosciences. 9: 71–77. doi:10.5194/bg-9-71-2012.
  3. Deckard, Mica; Schnell, Cory (22 October 2022). "The Temporal (In)Stability of Violent Crime Hot Spots Between Months and The Modifiable Temporal Unit Problem". Crime & Delinquency. doi:10.1177/00111287221128483.
  4. Chen, Xiang; Ye, Xinyue; Widener, Michael J.; Delmelle, Eric; Kwan, Mei-Po; Shannon, Jerry; Racine, Racine F.; Adams, Aaron; Liang, Lu; Peng, Jia (27 December 2022). "A systematic review of the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) in community food environmental research". Urban Informatics. 1. doi:10.1007/s44212-022-00021-1. S2CID 255206315. Retrieved 27 December 2022.
  5. Openshaw, Stan (1983). The Modifiable Aerial Unit Problem (PDF). GeoBooks. ISBN 0-86094-134-5.
  6. Park, Yoo Min; Kearney, Gregory D.; Wall, Bennett; Jones, Katherine; Howard, Robert J.; Hylock, Ray H. (26 August 2021). "COVID-19 Deaths in the United States: Shifts in Hot Spots over the Three Phases of the Pandemic and the Spatiotemporally Varying Impact of Pandemic Vulnerability". Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 18 (17). doi:10.3390/ijerph18178987. hdl:10342/11106.
  7. Tuson, M.; Yap, M.; Kok, M. R.; Murray, K.; Turlach, B.; Whyatt, D. (27 March 2019). "Incorporating geography into a new generalized theoretical and statistical framework addressing the modifiable areal unit problem". International Journal of Health Geographics. 18. doi:10.1186/s12942-019-0170-3. PMC 6437958.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.