National Law School of India Review
The National Law School of India Review is a student-run, peer-reviewed, bi-annual law review published by the Student Advocate Committee of the National Law School of India University.[1]
Discipline | Law |
---|---|
Language | English |
Edited by | Kopal Mital |
Publication details | |
Former name(s) | Student Bar Review |
History | 1988 - present |
Publisher | |
Frequency | Annually |
Yes | |
Standard abbreviations | |
ISO 4 | Natl. Law Sch. India Rev. |
Links | |
History
The journal was established in 1988 as the Student Bar Review. It obtained its current name in 2007. Notable authors include Justice B.N. Srikrishna (former Judge, Supreme Court of India), Rajeev Dhawan, Fali Nariman, and P.P. Rao (senior advocates).
Citations
The journal has been cited in various publications and the only student-run journal to be cited by the Supreme Court of India in cases of Action Committee, Un-Aided Pvt. Schools & Ors.Vs. Director of Education, Delhi, the Right to Privacy verdict and Union of India v. M/s Mohit Minerals.[2][3][4]
See also
References
- "Home | National Law School of India Review". NLSIR. Retrieved 2023-01-07.
- "Action Committee, Un-Aided Pvt. Schools & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Director of Education, Delhi & Ors. ...Respondents" (PDF). Supreme Court of India: 22.
It is also of some interest to note that opinions in the academic field are being expressed that res extra commercium is an expression wrongly used in the last sixty years by this Court and other High Courts. No activity can be called "res extra commercium". It is either permitted or not. Having regard to its conceptual roots to Roman law, it would mean only those things which are not incapable of being ownership and, thus, any matter which is res extra commercium were things incapable of ownership be vests in res in commercio. [See Arvind Datar, "Privilege, Police Power and Res Extra Commercium – Glaring Conceptual Errors" 21(1) National Law School of India Review 133 (2009)]
- "Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs Union Of India & Ors. (2017)" (PDF). Supreme Court of India: 53.
- Union of India & Anr. v. M/s Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Through Director. Supreme Court of India. 2022. p. 75.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.