Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America

The SPP was neither a treaty nor a trade agreement.[1]

The initial SPP Working Groups were the Manufactured Goods and Sectoral and Regional Competitiveness Working Group, E-Commerce & ICT Working Group, Energy Working Group, Transportation Working Group, Food & Agriculture Working Group, Environment Working Group, Financial Services Working Group, Business Facilitation Working Group, Movement of Goods Working Group, and Health Working Group.[2] The Transportation Working Group was formed to analyze border trade and traffic flows.[1] The U.S. Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) led the SPP Health Working Group, in order to improve the ability of three countries to mutually assist each other during public health emergencies, to exchange information for policy planning, and to improve product safety.[3]

The stated goals of the SPP were cooperation and information sharing, improving productivity, reducing the costs of trade, enhancing the joint stewardship of the environment, facilitating agricultural trade while creating a safer and more reliable food supply, and protecting people from disease.[1]

On 26 February 2008, Canada's Minister of Finance Jim Flaherty, announced his government's 2008 budget, which included "$29 million over two years to meet priorities under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America".[4]

The North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) was an additional SPP working group. It was created later, at the second summit of the SPP in Cancún, Quintana Roo, Mexico, in March 2006. Composed of 30 corporate representatives from some of North America's largest companies, the North American Competitiveness Council was mandated to set priorities for the SPP and to act as a stable driver of policy implementation between the three countries.

The 2006 meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

As part of SPP, an annual trilateral summit was held between the leaders of the three countries. Following the cancellation of the SPP in 2009, meetings continued as the North American Leaders' Summit.

• March 23, 2005 - Baylor University, Waco, Texas, United States

A video of the Waco SPP Trilateral Summit News Conference is available online.[5]

• March 31, 2006 - Cancún, Quintana Roo, Mexico

Meeting between Mexican President Fox, Canadian Prime Minister Harper, and U.S. President Bush. A U.S. White House press release regarding the Cancun SPP Trilateral Summit is available online.[6]

• August 20–21, 2007 - Montebello, Quebec, Canada

The United States, Canada, and Mexico had a major trilateral summit meeting regarding SPP at the Château Montebello in Montebello, Quebec.[7] This conference was described as a public relations event with the purpose of promoting the SPP among investors and to reassure the public about the initiative.[8] The summit was also noteworthy because a short five minute video uploaded to YouTube led to the eventual police admission of the use of undercover officers disguised as protesters at the summit.[9] Critics charged that the undercover officers were agents provocateurs sent to disrupt the protest by inciting violence: "This circumstance is unique because it was among the very first occurrences in Canada where user-generated footage uploaded to video-sharing site YouTube elicited an official police response offered in defence of police tactics".[9]

• April 21–22, 2008 - New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

In his 2008 State of the Union address, President George W. Bush announced that a summit on the SPP would be held from April 21–22, 2008, in New Orleans, Louisiana. According to the White House, the summit focused on improving the SPP initiatives and on discussing "hemispheric and global issues of importance to North America".[10]

• August 9–10, 2009 - Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

In 2006, CNN anchor Lou Dobbs argued that the SPP was part of a plan to merge the United States, Canada, and Mexico into a North American Union similar to the European Union.[11] At the time, Dobbs claimed that U.S. President Bush, who left office on January 20, 2009, was to have bypassed Congress and ultimately create a union based on a Texas highway corridor.[12]

The Council of Canadians claimed that the SPP extended the controversial "no fly list" of the United States, made Canadian water a communal resource, and forced Canada and Mexico to adopt the United States' security policies—one of which would allow foreign military forces to neglect sovereignty in the case of a "civil emergency". It also touched on the issue of Albertan tar sands expansion to five times its current size.[13]

On May 10, 2007, Conservative MP Leon Benoit, chair of the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade, prevented University of Alberta professor Gordon Laxer from testifying that SPP would leave Canadians "to freeze in the dark" because "Canada itself—unlike most industrialized nations—has no national plan or reserves to protect its own supplies" by saying Laxer's testimony was irrelevant, defying a majority vote to overrule his motion, shutting down the committee meeting, and leaving with the other three out of four Conservative members; the meeting later continued, presided over by the Liberal vice-chair.[14] After these disruptions, the National Post reported on a Conservative party manual to, among other things, usurp Parliamentary committees and cause chaos in unfavourable committees.[15][16] The New Democratic Party (NDP) also criticized SPP for being undemocratic, not open to Parliament, and opaque.[17] NDP leader Jack Layton described the process as not simply unconstitutional, but "non-constitutional", held completely outside the usual mechanisms of oversight.[18]

Approximately thirty U.S.-based organizations also sent an open letter to Congress on April 21, 2008, criticizing the secrecy and lack of any sort of democratic oversight:

"What differentiates the SPP from other security and trade agreements is that it is not subject to Congressional oversight or approval. The SPP establishes a corporate/government bureaucracy for implementation that excludes civil society participation. ... Facing a worrisome pact pushed forward in secrecy, it is time for Congress to halt this undemocratic approach and establish a process based on openness, accountability, and the participation of civil society.[19]

In August 2009, the SPP website was updated to say: "The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) is no longer an active initiative. There will not be any updates to this site".[20] Subsequent to this the website link does not connect and the cache website links do not work.

The NDP called this a "victory" which is "the result of the active and sustained efforts across the country, and across North America, of Canadian, Mexican, and American activists from the labour movement, civil society, progressive legislators and all those concerned and committed to build a better quality of life in our Canada and throughout North America".[21]

On February 4, 2011, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama announced a new security and prosperity initiative with plans to "pursue a perimeter approach to security in ways that support economic competitiveness, job creation, and prosperity".[22]

On March 13, 2011, the Canadian government announced it was beginning a five-week consultation process "with all levels of government and with communities, non-governmental organizations and the private sector, as well as with our citizens on the implementation of the shared vision for perimeter security and economic competitiveness".[23]

• Canada–United States relations
• Canada–U.S. Civil Assistance Plan, signed February 14, 2008
• North American Free Trade Agreement
• North American Plant Protection Organization
• North American Union
• North American currency union (the currency of which is often called the "Amero")
• North American Competitiveness Council
• North American Aerospace Defense Command
• Partnership for Prosperity and Security in the Caribbean
• Alliance for Progress
• Defence Diplomacy
• Robert Pastor

Related infrastructure projects:

• North American SuperCorridor Coalition – Connecting Mexico City, central United States, and several Canadian provinces
• Trans-Texas Corridor – Superhighway connecting Northern Mexico and Texas
• East–West Economic Corridor – Superhighway connecting Southeast Asian countries
• Pan-European Corridor X – Superhighway connecting the European Union
• European route E73 – fifth segment of Pan-European Corridor with toll road listings

• Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America – Information by the United States government (no website any longer online at spp.gov)
• Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America – Information by the Canadian government
• (in Spanish) Alianza para la Seguridad y la Prosperidad en América del Norte – Information by the Mexican government
• US Government Agency SPP Documents obtained by Judicial Watch via FOIA
• From NAFTA to the SPP from Dollars & Sense magazine
• Building a North American Community – report detailing how to improve upon the SPP
• Governing the North American Free Trade Area: International Rule Making and Delegation in NAFTA, the SPP, and Beyond – Detailed analysis of SPP institutions