Cephalopod intelligence

Cephalopod intelligence is a measure of the cognitive ability of the cephalopod class of molluscs.

Two-thirds of an octopus's neurons are in the nerve cords of its tentacles. These are capable of complex reflex actions without input from the brain.[1]

Intelligence is generally defined as the process of acquiring, storing, retrieving, combining, comparing, and recontextualizing information and conceptual skills.[2] Though these criteria are difficult to measure in nonhuman animals, cephalopods are the most intelligent invertebrates. The study of cephalopod intelligence also has an important comparative aspect in the broader understanding of animal cognition because it relies on a nervous system fundamentally different from that of vertebrates.[3] In particular, the Coleoidea subclass (cuttlefish, squid, and octopuses) is thought to be the most intelligent invertebrates and an important example of advanced cognitive evolution in animals, though nautilus intelligence is also a subject of growing interest among zoologists.[4]

The scope of cephalopod intelligence and learning capability is controversial within the biological community, complicated by the inherent complexity of quantifying non-vertebrate intelligence. In spite of this, the existence of impressive spatial learning capacity, navigational abilities, and predatory techniques in cephalopods is widely acknowledged.[5][6] Cephalopods have been compared to hypothetical intelligent extraterrestrials, due to their independently evolved mammal-like intelligence.[7]

Brain size and structure

Cephalopods have large, well-developed brains,[8][9][10] and their brain-to-body mass ratio is the largest among the invertebrates, falling between that of endothermic and ectothermic vertebrates.[11]

The nervous system of cephalopods is the most complex of all invertebrates.[10][12] The giant nerve fibers of the cephalopod mantle have been widely used for many years as experimental material in neurophysiology; their large diameter (due to lack of myelination) makes them relatively easy to study compared with other animals.[13]

Behavior

Predation
A veined octopus eating a crab.

Unlike most other molluscs, all cephalopods are active predators (with the possible exceptions of the bigfin squid and vampire squid). Their need to locate and capture their prey has likely been the driving evolutionary force behind the development of their intelligence.[14]

Crabs, the staple food source of most octopus species, present significant challenges with their powerful pincers and their potential to exhaust the cephalopod's respiration system from a prolonged pursuit. In the face of these challenges, octopuses will instead seek out lobster traps and steal the bait inside. They are also known to climb aboard fishing boats and hide in the containers that hold dead or dying crabs.[15][16]

Captive cephalopods have also been known to climb out of their tanks, maneuver a distance of the lab floor, enter another aquarium to feed on the crabs, and return to their own aquariums.[17][18][19]

Communication

Although believed to not be the most social of animals, many cephalopods are in fact highly social creatures; when isolated from their own kind, some species have been observed shoaling with fish.[20]

Cephalopods are able to communicate visually using a diverse range of signals. To produce these signals, cephalopods can vary four types of communication elements: chromatic (skin coloration), skin texture (e.g. rough or smooth), posture, and locomotion. Changes in body appearance such as these are sometimes called polyphenism.[21] Some cephalopods are capable of rapid changes in skin colour and pattern through nervous control of chromatophores.[22] This ability almost certainly evolved primarily for camouflage, but squid use color, patterns, and flashing to communicate with each other in various courtship rituals.[21] Caribbean reef squid can even discriminate between recipients, sending one message using color patterns to a squid on their right, while they send another message to a squid on their left.[23][24] Octopuses have been found to become more sociable when exposed to the psychoactive drug MDMA.[25]

The Humboldt squid shows extraordinary cooperation and communication in its hunting techniques. This is the first observation of cooperative hunting in invertebrates.[26]

It is believed that squids are slightly less intelligent than octopuses and cuttlefish; however, various species of squid are much more social and display greater social communications, etc., leading to some researchers concluding that squids are on par with dogs in terms of intelligence.[27]

Learning
A cuttlefish employing camouflage in its natural habitat.

In laboratory experiments, octopuses can be readily trained to distinguish between different shapes and patterns, and one study concluded that octopuses are capable of using observational learning;[28][29] however, this is disputed.[30][31]

Octopuses have also been observed in what has been described as play: repeatedly releasing bottles or toys into a circular current in their aquariums and then catching them.[32]

Cephalopods can demonstrably benefit from environmental enrichment[33] indicating behavioral and neuronal plasticity not exhibited by many other invertebrates.

In a study on social learning, common octopuses (observers) were allowed to watch other octopuses (demonstrators) select one of two objects that differed only in color. Subsequently, the observers consistently selected the same object as did the demonstrators.[34]

Both octopuses and nautiluses are capable of vertebrate-like spatial learning.[35]

Tool use
A small coconut octopus (4–5 cm in diameter) using a nut shell and clam shell as shelter.

The octopus has repeatedly been shown to exhibit flexibility in the use of tools.

At least four individuals of the veined octopus (Amphioctopus marginatus) have been observed retrieving discarded coconut shells, manipulating them, transporting them some distance, and then reassembling them for use as shelter.[36] It is surmised that the octopuses used bivalves for the same purpose before humans made coconut shells widely available on the sea floor.[37][38] Other sea creatures construct homes in a similar manner; most hermit crabs use the discarded shells of other species for habitation, and some crabs place sea anemones on their carapaces to serve as camouflage. However, this behavior lacks the complexity of the octopus's fortress behavior, which involves picking up and carrying a tool for later use. (This argument remains contested by a number of biologists, who claim that the shells actually provide protection from bottom-dwelling predators in transport.[39]) Octopuses have also been known to deliberately place stones, shells, and even bits of broken bottles to form walls that constrict their den openings.[40]

In laboratory studies, Octopus mercatoris, a small pygmy species of octopus, has been observed to block its lair using plastic Lego bricks.[41]

Smaller individuals of the common blanket octopus (Tremoctopus violaceus) hold the tentacles of the Portuguese man o' war (whose venom they are immune to), both as means of protection and as a method of capturing prey.[42]

Problem-solving ability

The highly sensitive suction cups and prehensile arms of octopuses, squid, and cuttlefish allow them to hold and manipulate objects. However, unlike vertebrates, the motor skills of octopuses do not seem to depend upon mapping their body within their brains, as the ability to organize complex movements is not thought to be linked to particular arms.[43]

Cephalopods can solve complex puzzles requiring pushing or pulling actions, and can also unscrew the lids of containers and open the latches on acrylic boxes in order to obtain the food inside. They can also remember solutions to puzzles and learn to solve the same puzzle presented in different configurations.[44]

  • Octopus opening a container with a screw cap

Captive octopuses require stimulation or they will become lethargic; this typically takes the form of a variety of toys and puzzles.[45] At an aquarium in Coburg, Germany, an octopus named Otto was known to juggle his fellow tank-mates around, as well as throw rocks to smash the aquarium glass. On more than one occasion, Otto even caused short circuits by crawling out of his tank and shooting a jet of water at the overhead lamp.[46]

Additionally, cephalopods have been shown to have the capacity for future planning and reward processing after being tested with the Stanford marshmallow experiment.[47]

Protective legislation
An octopus in a zoo.

Due to their intelligence, cephalopods are commonly protected by animal testing regulations that do not usually apply to invertebrates.

In the UK from 1993 to 2012, the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) was the only invertebrate protected under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.[48] Since 2022, all vertebrates, cephalopods, and decapods have been recognised as sentient by the Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022.

Cephalopods are the only invertebrates protected under the 2010 European Union directive "on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes".[49]

In 2019, some scholars have argued for increased protections for cephalopods in the United States as well.[50]

See also

References
  1. Yekutieli, Y.; Sagiv-Zohar, R.; Aharonov, R.; Engel, Y.; Hochner, B.; Flash, T. (2005). "Dynamic model of the octopus arm. I. Biomechanics of the octopus reaching movement". Journal of Neurophysiology. 94 (2): 1443–1458. doi:10.1152/jn.00684.2004. PMID 15829594. S2CID 14711055.
  2. Humphreys, Lloyd G. (April–June 1979). "The construct of general intelligence" (PDF). Intelligence (editorial). 3 (2): 105–120. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(79)90009-6. ISSN 0160-2896. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 August 2017. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  3. "Cephalopod intelligence" Archived 2020-03-21 at the Wayback Machine in The Encyclopedia of Astrobiology, Astronomy, and Spaceflight.
  4. Crook, Robyn & Basil, Jennifer (2008). "A biphasic memory curve in the chambered nautilus, Nautilus pompilius L. (Cephalopoda: Nautiloidea)" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology. 211 (12): 1992–1998. doi:10.1242/jeb.018531. PMID 18515730. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  5. Hunt, Elle (28 March 2017). "Alien intelligence: the extraordinary minds of octopuses and other cephalopods". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 April 2020.
  6. Bilefsky, Dan (April 13, 2016). "Inky the Octopus Escapes From a New Zealand Aquarium". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 16 April 2020. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
  7. Baer, Drake (20 December 2016). "Octopuses Are 'the Closest We Will Come to Meeting an Intelligent Alien'". Science of Us. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
  8. Tricarico, Elena; Amodio, Piero; Ponte, Giovanna; Fiorito, Graziano (2014). "Cognition and recognition in the cephalopod mollusc Octopus vulgaris: coordinating interaction with environment and conspecifics". In Witzany, Guenther (ed.). Biocommunication of Animals. Springer. pp. 337–349. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7414-8_19. ISBN 978-94-007-7413-1. LCCN 2019748877.
  9. Chung, Wen-Sung; Kurniawan, Nyoman D.; Marshall, N. Justin (2020). "Toward an MRI-Based Mesoscale Connectome of the Squid Brain". iScience. 23 (1): 100816. Bibcode:2020iSci...23j0816C. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2019.100816. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 6974791. PMID 31972515.
  10. Chung, Wen-Sung; Kurniawan, Nyoman D.; Marshall, N. Justin (2021-11-18). "Comparative brain structure and visual processing in octopus from different habitats". Current Biology. 32 (1): 97–110.e4. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.070. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 34798049. S2CID 244398601.
  11. Nixon, Marion; Young, John Z. (4 September 2003). The Brains and Lives of Cephalopods. Oxford University Press (published November 6, 2003). ISBN 978-0198527619. LCCN 2002041659.
  12. Budelmann, B. U. (1995). "The cephalopod nervous system: What evolution has made of the molluscan design". In Breidbach, O.; Kutsch, W. (eds.). The nervous systems of invertebrates: An evolutionary and comparative approach. Birkhäuser. ISBN 978-3-7643-5076-5. LCCN 94035125.
  13. Tasaki, I.; Takenaka, T. (October 1963). "Resting and action potential of squid giant axons intracellularly perfused with sodium-rich solutions" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 50 (4): 619–626. Bibcode:1963PNAS...50..619T. doi:10.1073/pnas.50.4.619. PMC 221236. PMID 14077488. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 August 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  14. Villanueva, Roger; Perricone, Valentina; Fiorito, Graziano (2017-08-17). "Cephalopods as Predators: A Short Journey among Behavioral Flexibilities, Adaptions, and Feeding Habits". Frontiers in Physiology. 8: 598. doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00598. ISSN 1664-042X. PMC 5563153. PMID 28861006.
  15. Cousteau, Jacques Yves (1978). Octopus and Squid: The Soft Intelligence
  16. "Giant Octopus – Mighty but Secretive Denizen of the Deep". Smithsonian National Zoological Park. 2 January 2008. Archived from the original on 25 August 2012. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
  17. Wood, J. B; Anderson, R. C (2004). "Interspecific Evaluation of Octopus Escape Behavior" (PDF). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 7 (2): 95–106. doi:10.1207/s15327604jaws0702_2. PMID 15234886. S2CID 16639444. Retrieved 11 September 2015.
  18. Lee, Henry (1875). "V: The octopus out of water". Aquarium Notes – The Octopus; or, the "devil-fish" of fiction and of fact. London: Chapman and Hall. pp. 38–39. OCLC 1544491. Retrieved 11 September 2015. The marauding rascal had occasionally issued from the water in his tank, and clambered up the rocks, and over the wall into the next one; there he had helped himself to a young lump-fish, and, having devoured it, returned demurely to his own quarters by the same route, with well-filled stomach and contented mind.
  19. Roy, Eleanor Ainge (14 April 2016). "The great escape: Inky the octopus legs it to freedom from aquarium". The Guardian (Australia).
  20. Packard, A. (1972). "Cephalopods and fish: The limits of convergence". Biological Reviews. 47 (2): 241–307. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1972.tb00975.x. S2CID 85088231.
  21. Brown, C.; Garwood, M. P.; Williamson, J.E. (2012). "It pays to cheat: Tactical deception in a cephalopod social signalling system". Biology Letters. 8 (5): 729–732. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0435. PMC 3440998. PMID 22764112.
  22. Cloney, R.A.; Florey, E. (1968). "Ultrastructure of cephalopod chromatophore organs". Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 89 (2): 250–280. doi:10.1007/BF00347297. PMID 5700268. S2CID 26566732.
  23. "Sepioteuthis sepioidea, Caribbean Reef squid". The Cephalopod Page. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
  24. Byrne, R.A.; Griebel, U.; Wood, J.B.; Mather, J.A. (2003). "Squids say it with skin: A graphic model for skin displays in Caribbean Reef Squid". Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen. 3: 29–35.
  25. Nuwer, Rachel. "Rolling under the Sea: Scientists Gave Octopuses Ecstasy to Study Social Behavior". Scientific American.
  26. Zimmermann, Tim (July 2006). "Behold the Humboldt squid". Outside Magazine.
  27. "Are squids as smart as dogs?". www.medicalnewstoday.com. 2020-02-10. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
  28. Fiorito, Graziano; Scotto, Pietro (24 April 1992). "Observational Learning in Octopus vulgaris". Science. 256 (5056): 545–547. Bibcode:1992Sci...256..545F. doi:10.1126/science.256.5056.545. PMID 17787951. S2CID 29444311. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  29. "Octopus intelligence: Jar opening". BBC News. 25 February 2003. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
  30. Hamilton, Garry (7 June 1997). "What is this octopus thinking?". New Scientist. No. 2085. pp. 30–35. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  31. Stewart, Doug (1997). "Armed but not dangerous: Is the octopus really the invertebrate intellect of the sea". National Wildlife. 35 (2).
  32. Mather, J. A.; Anderson, R. C. (1998). Wood, J. B. (ed.). "What behavior can we expect of octopuses?". The Cephalopod Page.
  33. Mather, J.A., Anderson, R.C. and Wood, J.B. (2010). Octopus: The Ocean's Intelligent Invertebrate. Timber Press.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. Fiorito, G. & Scotto, P. (1992). "Observational learning in Octopus vulgaris". Science. 256 (5056): 545–547. Bibcode:1992Sci...256..545F. doi:10.1126/science.256.5056.545. PMID 17787951. S2CID 29444311.
  35. Crook, R.J. & Walters, E.T. (2011). "Nociceptive behavior and physiology of molluscs: animal welfare implications". ILAR Journal. 52 (2): 185–195. doi:10.1093/ilar.52.2.185. PMID 21709311.
  36. Finn, Julian K.; Tregenza, Tom; Norman, Mark D. (15 December 2009). "Defensive tool use in a coconut-carrying octopus" (PDF). Current Biology. 19 (23): R1069–R1070. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.052. PMID 20064403. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 August 2017 – via Occidental College.
  37. Morelle, Rebecca (14 December 2009). "Octopus snatches coconut and runs". BBC News. Archived from the original on 31 May 2020. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
  38. "Coconut shelter: evidence of tool use by octopuses | EduTube Educational Videos". Edutube.org. 2009-12-14. Archived from the original on 2013-10-24. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
  39. Octopus tool use on YouTube published January 26, 2010 New Scientist
  40. "Simple tool use in owls and cephalopods". Map Of Life. 2010. Retrieved July 23, 2013.
  41. Oinuma, Colleen, (14 April 2008). "Octopus mercatoris response behavior to novel objects in a laboratory setting: Evidence of play and tool use behavior?" In Octopus Tool Use and Play Behavior
  42. Jones, Everet C. (22 February 1963). "Tremoctopus violaceus uses Physalia tentacles as weapons". Science. 139 (3556): 764–766. Bibcode:1963Sci...139..764J. doi:10.1126/science.139.3556.764. JSTOR 1710225. PMID 17829125. S2CID 40186769.
  43. Zullo, Letizia; Sumbre, German; Agnisola, Claudio; Flash, Tamar; Hochner, Binyamin (17 September 2009). "Nonsomatotopic organization of the higher motor centers in octopus" (PDF). Current Biology. 19 (19): 1632–6. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.067. PMID 19765993. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 July 2020. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
  44. Richter, Jonas N.; Hochner, Binyamin; Kuba, Michael J. (2016-03-22). "Pull or Push? Octopuses Solve a Puzzle Problem". PLOS ONE. 11 (3): e0152048. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1152048R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152048. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4803207. PMID 27003439.
  45. "Captive Octopuses Need Intellectual Stimulation Or Else They Get Bored". curiosity.com. Retrieved 2018-11-19.
  46. "Otto the octopus wreaks havoc". The Telegraph. 31 October 2008. Archived from the original on 24 June 2011.
  47. Starr, Michelle (3 March 2021). "A Cephalopod Has Passed a Cognitive Test Designed For Human Children". ScienceAlert. Retrieved 2021-03-03.
  48. "The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (Amendment) Order 1993". The National Archives. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  49. "DIRECTIVE 2010/63/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL". Official Journal of the European Union. Article 1, 3(b). Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  50. Zabel, Joseph (Spring 2019). "Legislators Need to Develop a Backbone for Animals that Lack One: Including Cephalopods in the Animal Welfare Act". Journal of Animal and Environmental Law. University of Louisville School of Law. 10 (2): 1.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.